Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts-bucs predictions


Two_pound
 Share

Recommended Posts

Regarding the Bills game. I think the Bills defense is overrated because they've beaten up on a lot of bad teams making them look better than they are. The Bills defense is a lot like the Colts defense was last year - we beat up on bad teams early, making us look good, but were mediocre against contenders.

That said, we also benefitted a great deal from the bad weather. The Bills missed on a lot of opportunities because their receivers couldn't hold on to the ball making our defense look better than it is.

 

The Bucs have pretty consistently shut down the run. The Saints beat them by sticking to the run and I think the only way for us to win is to do the same. Keep feeding JT and don't panic if we fall behind. Also, it would be fantastic is we could start off like we did against the Jags and the Bills - get a turnover early and get a TD from it.

 

I really want us to win against the Bucs, but I think this game will be the toughest the Colts will face all season and I'm not confident we can win it.

 

34-27 Bucs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we have good balance, and both JT and Pittman have good days, we're in it till the end.

I think we'll need some help from the D (either stout play, or at least a well timed turnover) or someone else stepping up on O, like one of the TEs, Hines, or another WR. 

 

I'm gonna bet TY wants this game pretty bad. He's never beaten Brady. No player on our roster has ever beaten Brady, but he's the oldest continuous Colt and probably has a well developed disgust for losing to Tom... 

 

Wonder if Irsay gave them a good speech about the significance of 2009.... And luck was 0-for... uh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have TB and NE as our two losses the rest of the year. Brady is experienced (and still good) enough to move the ball with ease on us, even if our secondary is healthy now. Add to the fact that they have the no1 run defense and the best run-stuffing NT in Vita Vea and our chances are low to win IMO. This is probably the worst matchup the rest of the year for us IMO, but I think we can make up for it the rest of the year.

 

Bucs 31

Colts 17

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tsarquise said:

I hope the Colts win, but, if I'm being rational, I can't think that they're going to win.  But maybe. The WFT and Saints beat them. 

I won't be an overly bias Colts fan so I will say this is a 50/50 game. It can go either way. Brady is the GOAT IMO, I have Peyton and Joe right there but that is another topic. Having said that, Brady for some reason in Regular Season games does tend to struggle at times on the road against good teams. They did last year and if you remember they were only 7-5 through 12 before he and his team turned it on. Brady tends to play his best in the playoffs and IMO we need this game more. Bucs are going to win their division even if they lose today. Another thing we have going for us is, we are real healthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Key today is not allowing Brady to step up in the pocket. Middle of our dline needs to come up big. I am kind of sad the Colt players don’t understand the rivalry. Hopefully Reich pulled out some tricks this week to show them how much Colt fans hate Brady and help them understand the history.

 

Seems to me we need to use a lot of misdirection in the run game. Pairing Hines and Taylor together will be big.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Wentzszn said:

Key today is not allowing Brady to step up in the pocket. Middle of our dline needs to come up big. I am kind of sad the Colt players don’t understand the rivalry. Hopefully Reich pulled out some tricks this week to show them how much Colt fans hate Brady and help them understand the history.

 

Seems to me we need to use a lot of misdirection in the run game. Pairing Hines and Taylor together will be big.

Why do you think the current players don't understand? You think Irsay, Frank, TY, or Doyle haven't said anything over the years?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

Why do you think the current players don't understand? You think Irsay, Frank, TY, or Doyle haven't said anything over the years?

Because non of them were around for the Peyton years and understand it.  I am sure they have brought it up. This is a lot like Buffalo was for Reich. This is going to mean a lot to Arians to win this game. Bucs have Brady that can help his team mates understand it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Wentzszn said:

Because non of them were around for the Peyton years and understand it.  I am sure they have brought it up. This is a lot like Buffalo was for Reich. This is going to mean a lot to Arians to win this game. Bucs have Brady that can help his team mates understand it.

The guys on the roster now would have to be pretty thick not to understand the history. They didn't have to be on the team 15-20 years ago to know the team's history. 

 

This is not like Frank/Buf for Arians. Arians had 2 stops here for a total of 4 years. Three with Peyton, 1 with Luck. He had as many, or more years in KC, AZ, and PItt. Frank played for Buffalo in their best years. I'm sure it means some to Arians, but it's very different. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

The guys on the roster now would have to be pretty thick not to understand the history. They didn't have to be on the team 15-20 years ago to know the team's history. 

 

This is not like Frank/Buf for Arians. Arians had 2 stops here for a total of 4 years. Three with Peyton, 1 with Luck. He had as many, or more years in KC, AZ, and PItt. Frank played for Buffalo in their best years. I'm sure it means some to Arians, but it's very different. 

A lot of these guys were barely teenagers at that time. I am not saying they won’t completly understand it I just wish they were part of the rivalry because that always helps. Maybe Reich played that ballard clip of him saying the rivalry is back on. Some these guys were around went mc cheat backed out which I forgot about. So I imagine that will serve as motivation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Wentzszn said:

A lot of these guys were barely teenagers at that time. I am not saying they won’t completly understand it I just wish they were part of the rivalry because that always helps. Maybe Reich played that ballard clip of him saying the rivalry is back on. Some these guys were around went mc cheat backed out which I forgot about. So I imagine that will serve as motivation.

God I am so stupid. Why do I think Wr are playing NE. Lmao

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am so po'd at myself for changing my pick. I've noticed not too many people make predictions, especially our resident experts, I wonder why. Another giveaway and some very questionable play calls and strategy that, in reality, played into the strengths of Tampa. Oh well, at least the media jacks get to spend all day talking up Tommy, it's what they love to do any way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ballard put high pay in the wrong places, another failure for him
    • He actually does have legit sources and has a track record of being the first person to leak something hours or even a day ahead of everyone else and he was spot on. He's 100% legit and I believe him whenever he tells everyone that one of his sources confirmed what happened in the meeting between Irsay, Ballard, and Reich.
    • our high dollar o-line is a huge disappointment in pass blocking
    • I'm not going to rank my 10s, but I'll comment on yours    Hard to argue this. I was either great scouting or great luck. Or both. Undersized a bit, that totally upped his game on the NFL level. And he was smart enough to realize his injury limited him in areas, and he needed to concentrate on technique and turnovers. Tough S O B that still was one of the best in the league against the run this year despite a less than great ankle. More than anything, love his attitude and personality.  I think Mack was considered gone when the pick was made, but loved the move. Taylor was a great prospect, and the only risk was scheme translation IMO. Great pick regardless. Will be interesting to see how he's treated when his contract is up.  I love Kenny when he's limited to slot coverage. Picking NE's cast off DBs though is something a lot of GMs do. We need to do a better job of scheme at CB so Kenny can stay and focus on slot where he's one of the best.  I don't think he was picked to be a T at all. Maybe picked with some flex ability, but he was picked for G. You have to credit DeGuglielmo as the architect, who tried several combos in 2018 before settling on our beastly front 5. After week 5 or 6, we were set.   Q is a beast, and I love ND players. Probably my favorite Colt. Only debatable area is if it's smart to build your OL around a G with at top 10 pick.    And back to 2018, and DeGuglielmo, if we didn't have AC playing well at the time, Q could have ended up at T. Folks forget Q was considered one of the better T prospects going into college, and was a G only because of the T that was already starting at ND, and the T that committed to ND after Q was already killing it at G.    Bold move overall to take a G at 6. I don't hate it, but understand the questions around it.  He a crazy great talent. Wasted a bit in our scheme. His stats would be much better playing for other teams with different schemes.  A Seattle cast off, he's another you have to credit DeGuglielmo for some of his success. He's been our weak link for a few years, and fans like to diminish him, but he's one of the best weak links in the league, and has been very consistent in run blocking. And just had a career year.  I don't think you could really go wrong with him (or Claypool) at the draft spot, but glad we grabbed him. We were X-less for way too long, and Pittman is a stud.  Great get. Injuries aside this year, very solid FA pick up on the cheap.  Kudos to RS, but kickers never excite me. lol.   I'd say some that should get consideration are RYS, who played a great second half rook year (top 10 CB), and had a very good year this season. Also Rodgers who was a later pick but has been a stud STer and great depth CB.  Hard to argue with this. Came from a scheme that discounted technique and a lot of things, and was a plain stretch regardless of what position.  While I agree he was a bust, most scouts got suckered into the one year Florida wonder.  Disagree here. It has been all injury issues. There was not a lot injury risk in CFB.  Not overly expensive for a LT, but I think familiarity played too big of a part with a bad decision not to go with a much safer selection (Leno) who was even cheaper. But yes, bad decision, and I'd rank this higher than Wilson, and a lot higher than Campbell.  Sure, held on too long. But he was a great.... I'd rank other things higher.  Hooker was a good pick for C1 and C3. Not a good pick for C2, which we played mostly in his year two. Blame the scheme change and injury, not really the pick.   I'd actually rank letting him go higher than drafting him... lol. He graded 10ish points higher in Dallas this year, than our FS (Blackmon). And he was crazy cheap. We cheaped out. He went on to have a career year playing a  3-4 tweener roll, and out-stat'd our highly paid 3T and all our DEs. Another injury situation, that I just have a hard time ranking...  I think it was too much $, but they were trying to solve for X, which we didn't have for years.  There's so many more decisions I'd rank before this. Houston, Walker, being let go etc.. His whole DE draft history.... Musical chairs at QB for 4, maybe 5 years.  This will be debated for a long time, but you can't diminish the poor OL play, and weak WR group. Only time will tell.    One thing I'd add to the top 5 is the Josh McDaniel's fiasco. Ballard owns it one way or another. Then they hire someone that wasn't even in their first round interviews, and was likely 3rd at most on their 2nd round interviews. What went down was a cluster. Folks like to forget....  
  • Members

    • EastStreet

      EastStreet 17,003

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Btown_Colt

      Btown_Colt 840

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dark Superman

      Dark Superman 1,302

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtsGermany

      ColtsGermany 369

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Moosejawcolt

      Moosejawcolt 2,100

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DEFENSE

      DEFENSE 386

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Arby0359

      Arby0359 7

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • zibby43

      zibby43 1,504

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Narcosys

      Narcosys 582

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nesjan3

      Nesjan3 1,360

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...