Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

What Should be Done With the First Overall Pick [Merge]


The Peytonator

Colts  

66 members have voted

  1. 1. Are they a Top 10 Team in the NFL



Recommended Posts

  • Replies 314
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

For Peyton, Luck and The Colts C needs to be the way to go. Let Peyton find the best chance of winning another superbowl. I will keep following Peyton and cheering for him to continue his legacy as one of the best QB's of all time. This is also the opportunity for the Colts to truly rebuild into a team that is ready to dominate for another 10+ years with Luck and the new coaching philosophy and management style. It will be a tough couple years of rebuilding but it's best for the franchise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's completely eliminating an option most think is best. Even if there was an option D that would just split the Luck camp, but still only represent 1/4 of the vote.

You wanted a 50/50 option regarding Luck. I provided it.

It does not eliminate anything concerning Luck. You either draft him, or you don't. Easy. This has nothing to do with PM. People will vote if they think Luck is worth the pick or not. Simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You wanted a 50/50 option regarding Luck. I provided it.

It does not eliminate anything concerning Luck. You either draft him, or you don't. Easy. This has nothing to do with PM. People will vote if they think Luck is worth the pick or not. Simple.

"How do you want the Colts to handle the Peyton Manning situation?"

Really now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So do you see no way in which we can have both?

We can have both but it would not be a good move long term. I just can't see it working. Manning is going to want to continue to play and Luck isn't going to be content on the bench. If Manning plays like the GOAT then the fan base will be upset that a #1 pick was wasted on a backup QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given Peyton is back to form, he's a keeper for 2012. He would be the best QB at the position for the Colts regardless whom they would get in a draft or trade. According to FJC/UF, paying the 28 mil would represent 17mil or 14% of the 2012 cap. Freeney hits the cap in 2012 for 19mil so PM is worth the 17.

Per UF, new rookie #1 can be had for 4mil. That's around 3% of the 2012 cap. A total of 17% of the cap and only 2mil more in total than Freeney. That gives the colts the best QB in football to win a championship now and the best backup available for the money should something happen to the GOAT. After last year does anyone only want one good QB? Seriously?

Challenge this great new coaching staff with the job of developing a middle of the pack(15/16th) ranked defense and running game.

Peyton Manning + 15th ranked def/run game = Super Bowl Contender.

Deal with 2013 when it gets here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given Peyton is back to form, he's a keeper for 2012. He would be the best QB at the position for the Colts regardless whom they would get in a draft or trade. According to FJC/UF, paying the 28 mil would represent 17mil or 14% of the 2012 cap. Freeney hits the cap in 2012 for 19mil so PM is worth the 17.

Per UF, new rookie #1 can be had for 4mil. That's around 3% of the 2012 cap. A total of 17% of the cap and only 2mil more in total than Freeney. That gives the colts the best QB in football to win a championship now and the best backup available for the money should something happen to the GOAT. After last year does anyone only want one good QB? Seriously?

Challenge this great new coaching staff with the job of developing a middle of the pack(15/16th) ranked defense and running game.

Peyton Manning + 15th ranked def/run game = Super Bowl Contender.

Deal with 2013 when it gets here.

PM (under current contract terms)+ Luck(at 5% increase over Newton's contract) + QB3(at league minimum) will represent 18-20% of total team cap for every year between 2012-2015. IMO, this will severely hamper the team's ability to pay for FAs, including our own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Asked and answered.

Your options can be seen as biased. It eliminates a whole group of voters in the situation. You also suggested the Pro Manning camp is only larger because of more poll options. This poll is the most balanced because it provides options to the Pro Manning and Luck camp, the Pro Manning/Anti Luck, and the Anti Manning/Pro Luck camp. The reality is 75% rather Manning as the starter compared to the 25% who believe Luck should be our starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your options can be seen as biased. It eliminates a whole group of voters in the situation. You also suggested the Pro Manning camp is only larger because of more poll options. This poll is the most balanced because it provides options to the Pro Manning and Luck camp, the Pro Manning/Anti Luck, and the Anti Manning/Pro Luck camp. The reality is 75% rather Manning as the starter compared to the 25% who believe Luck should be our starter.

Correct. The only option not available is to release Manning and not draft Luck. But who the f would do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PM (under current contract terms)+ Luck(at 5% increase over Newton's contract) + QB3(at league minimum) will represent 18-20% of total team cap for every year between 2012-2015. IMO, this will severely hamper the team's ability to pay for FAs, including our own.

I don't buy into the estimate of 5% over Newtons contract because of the new CBA limits. No need for QB #3. But, even accepting your estimates then I definitely believe that 20-21% of the cap would be money well spent for the locking in great QB's for the next decade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't buy into the estimate of 5% over Newtons contract because of the new CBA limits. No need for QB #3. But, even accepting your estimates then I definitely believe that 20-21% of the cap would be money well spent for the locking in great QB's for the next decade.

The new CBA limits applied to Newton's contract too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Correct. The only option not available is to release Manning and not draft Luck. But who the f would do that.

Well certainly no one fans of the Colts would choose that option. You could say some fans of other teams, maybe the Texans perhaps, see that as the "best" option for the Colts. ;)

Thanks for the acknowledgement. :thmup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The new CBA limits applied to Newton's contract too.

Yes, but in an article I read yesterday there were some allowances for the first year. Sorry can't quote and don't remember where. So suffice it to say estimates are estimates. Yours probably not that far off.

Still, 20% of the cap now doesn't hamper the Colts as much as you think. Cap greatly expands in the future also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its been said before but since we need 2 QBs anyway...(assuming Curtis Painter or Danny Orlovsky will not be back)

Re-sign Peyton and draft Luck...

It covers us from any of the 2 biggest problems.

If Luck isnt ready...we have Manning, a proven winner

...if Manning isnt healthy, we have Luck..the premier prospect

I couldnt be less concerned what was fair to either of them...it isnt about them

They will both work together because they know each other (and the families do) and we will be secure at the QB position for the future AND for 2012...

Irsay wont blow this....because he suggests that this is what he's wanted anyway...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I say we draft the next Peyton manning next year....his name? Tyler Bray.

Look him up the kid special, he's only a sophomore and could stay for his senior season, I imagine him and Peyton have talked a couple times.

Mark it down now, if not next year, his junior year, they will be comparing him to Peyton by his senior year. They will be talking about how he is just had good as luck was coming out. Except he's the real deal having played in the best conference in college.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re-sign Peyton and draft Luck...

OK, well how long do you re-sign Peyton for? 3 years? So 3 years of "the best NFL ready prospect since Elway" sitting on the bench?

Don't think Peyton would agree to just a 1 year deal. And 2 years is still pretty long for a guy like Luck to be on the sidelines.

Honestly. This town isn't big enough for both of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Laiatu Latu's new tattoo....sounds like the title of a Dr. Seuss book lol       Laiatu Latu got a tattoo The tattoo is new It's of the Shoe It is not blue the new tattoo
    • I kinda liked the job Sermon And Goodson did (sans drop) when called upon. 
    • After getting one in my younger days, I'm glad to see someone else with one lol.
    • Ballard's draft strategy is sound, IMO. It's his unwillingness to be more aggressive in other areas that I think holds him back. To build the kind of team he wants with as little outside help as he acquires, he'd have to be seriously outperforming everyone in the draft every year for several years in a row, and that's not going to happen.     Yeah it would be director of scouting or something similar, where he can work from a home base but still do his thing. It's really remarkable that he can compile this information without being on the road all year, but that probably means he has a network feeding him info, which is basically what a director would be doing. I have no idea about the compensation though.     Solak is not my cup of tea. I agree with his opinions often enough, but his presentation is grating. And he comes across as overly opinionated and downright contemptuous of anyone who disagrees with his strong opinions.   An example is last year, how he mocked the idea that any team would like Levis as a top level QB. For him, it had to be because NFL teams just like the guy who looks and talks like a franchise QB, no one could actually like Levis for his traits and his game. So the Colts were the team that was definitely going to fall in love with him, because he looks and talks the way Jim Irsay prefers, and therefore the Colts were going to stupidly draft him at #4. Again, not because they like his game. Anyone who disagreed with his analysis of Levis had to have a flawed and prejudiced process from top to bottom. He was loud and somewhat abrasive about it... and he was very wrong.    I think he does the work. I think he also gets ahead of himself in certain ways, and presents things as if he's absolutely certain, even when he's off on the details. In some ways, he seems more suited for sports debate shows than player analysis, and I don't like sports debate shows.
  • Members

    • GoColts8818

      GoColts8818 17,314

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Archer

      Archer 1,781

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • cjwhiskers

      cjwhiskers 847

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • 1959Colts

      1959Colts 3,768

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 21,251

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Blueblood23

      Blueblood23 1,004

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndyD4U

      IndyD4U 1,434

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ProblChld32

      ProblChld32 699

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Patrick Miller

      Patrick Miller 2,029

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • KB

      KB 1,142

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...