Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

CR91

Goat Of The Year Award Goes To.....

  

27 members have voted

  1. 1. goat of the year

    • cundiff shanking the fg
      7
    • evans game winning td drop
      8
    • williams two muffed punt returns
      7
    • welker game icing drop
      5


Recommended Posts

the award goes to....................

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pats WRs in the Super Bowl dropped passes when they were needed to be count on the most.

You could say the same for the Packers...just take out the Super Bowl part

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Evans...

When you're a receiver (I play as a receiver), you're suppose to hold onto the ball (squeeze it) when you're in the endzone so that hard hits or swiping doesnt knock the ball out. Evans caught it, turned, and relaxed, and when Moore knocked it out very easily. He's a veteran receiver, so that was just stupid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cundiff. There's no excuse to shank a 32-yd FG.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YRHlX_d1baw

^ It wasn't even close! He literally shanked it! If he was a rookie, I could understand, but he was a Pro Bowl kicker a year ago! Confidence is what separates the greatest kickers from the scrubs. I know he said he was feeling the pressure for rushing out onto the field, but when a FG is short in a crucial situation, you have to make it, period. During practice, kickers prepare for hurry-up situations, like this. No excuse for the miss whatsoever. The expressions on his teammates faces says it all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Evans...

When you're a receiver (I play as a receiver), you're suppose to hold onto the ball (squeeze it) when you're in the endzone so that hard hits or swiping doesnt knock the ball out. Evans caught it, turned, and relaxed, and when Moore knocked it out very easily. He's a veteran receiver, so that was just stupid.

I'd go with Evans too. Although I'm not sure if the back peddling motion had anything to do with it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd go with Evans too. Although I'm not sure if the back peddling motion had anything to do with it?

The back pedalling shouldn't really affect him. The only thing about back pedalling is that it requires you to pay more attention to the back pedalling. If you lose focus when you're back pedalling, you'll fall. He was also turning just before the ball got knocked out, so maybe he was thinking about that too. He wasn't 100% focused on squeezing onto the ball. If he wasn't back pedalling, I'm pretty sure he would have hung on to the ball.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cundiff missed the easiest play. Chip shot FG

Evans was catchable but he was defended.

Welker had to go after an off-target pass, the 49ers guy was part bad luck on one, and good technique by the giant.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Evans drop.....

It's the only single play that would've had a solid, game winning result. The Cundiff FG would've just tied the game, not guaranteeing a win. The Welker drop was on 2nd down, and in no way whatsoever guaranteed a win. The Williams muffs were a close second, but still did not guarantee a win or loss either way.

The Evans drop, if he catches it, they win.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not voting for any of them.

Weren't there problems with the snap/hold for Cundiff? I'm not sure that he chocked. One little thing can throw a kickers timing way off.

How was Welkers a drop? I don't like the guy, but that was not an easy catch by any stretch of the imagination.

Evans was the victim of a bang-bang defensive play, I didn't see a mistake on his part.

The closest was the 49ers returner, but mostly for the first play. He was a last second replacement who stupidly stayed too close to a bouncing ball that he was never going to catch on the first play, and that went to his head so he was trying too hard on the second play (and the defense did a great job).

I hate to see one player victimized in a team game. If you are going to go that route, how about Brady's stupid penalty and bad interception. We are talking about someone who suppossedly has ice water in his veins (as oppossed to a rookie kick returner trying to make his mark). If he had just had the presence of mind to legally throw away either one of those passes the Patriots probably win.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not voting for any of them.

Weren't there problems with the snap/hold for Cundiff? I'm not sure that he chocked. One little thing can throw a kickers timing way off

The snap came at the last second because it took too long for the Ravens special teams to take the field. I think Cundiff was distracted by the dwindling play-clock.....and should have either been granted a timeout, or called one himself. The key element was that it was a great decision by Belichick to not "ice" Cundiff as he realized the dwindling play-clock was far more of a distraction tool.

How was Welkers a drop? I don't like the guy, but that was not an easy catch by any stretch of the imagination.

It was as a drop simply by the fact that it hit both his hands. Anytime this occurs, it's considered a drop by statisticians. The fact that the throw was off by several degrees is inconsequential to the actual statistic of a drop. As well, there was no guarantee that the Pats would've scored at all. Plus, given Eli's awesomeness in the last 2:00, I would've bet he'd have scored a TD regardless of being down by 5 (if NE had scored a FG after the 'would be' Welker catch).

However, the drop by Branch on the Pats final drive was far more critical, as he was streaking uncovered across the middle and it may well have resulted in a win. That drop was more on Brady, as Tom should've held it for one more beat to allow Branch to clear the safety that impeded the receivers view.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I gotta go with Evans. Perfect pass, both hands touched the ball. They would have been in the Superbowl.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Brady's unnecessary back shoulder throw to Welker.

I think Brady was just looking out for Welker on that throw. You can tell he was trying to put it where welker wouldn't get laid out by the safety coming over the middle. I love Peyton, but that's one thing he was never good at doing (protecting his receivers.) How many times have we seen him lead Collie or Clark over the middle right into a bone crushing hit?

You can't fault Brady for that throw. He was just protecting his safety net receiver.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Brady was just looking out for Welker on that throw. You can tell he was trying to put it where welker wouldn't get laid out by the safety coming over the middle. I love Peyton, but that's one thing he was never good at doing (protecting his receivers.) How many times have we seen him lead Collie or Clark over the middle right into a bone crushing hit?

You can't fault Brady for that throw. He was just protecting his safety net receiver.

So he protects his receiver by throwing him a ball high and outside, exposing his ribs? I'm not buying it. I give QB's passes on a lot of things, but that was just a bad throw.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I voted for the muffed punts (horrible) but on second thought this is a tough vote. The field goal miss was really bad. On the Evans pass the defender did get his hand in there - but...

I call it a 3 way tie.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cundiff going lefty Vanderjagt on the Ravens was not a pretty sight. oops.

and you've come back alive? referring to your sig

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To make it short. My point and question is this. Who is Peyton Manning, and why does he have 1 ring in Indy. From the onset, if someone told you that by drafting PM you would be guaranteed to win 1 ring, is that good or bad. BTW Eli has 2 with same team. We we all know that Eli is good but he ain't the fk Sheriff (ask Jon Gruden).   If someone told you that PM won 1 ring in 10+ years with Indy, "most" would question why only 1 with Indy. And may even say that that's a fail.  
    • Since the 2000 season we are tied for the 3rd most wins in the NFL with the Packers (2000-2019/20 seasons). Only the Pats and Steelers have more wins in that time frame. Regarding SB championships you make it sound like a team winning 2 SB's is miles better than winning 1. 2-1 is a slight margin. Only the Patriots who have won 6 have a huge margin over all teams. Ravens and Giants have won 2 SB's since 2000 but we have more wins. Steelers have 2 as well and more wins so they deserve being ranked the 2nd best franchise since the 2000's. Colts along with the Packers have only won 1 and have the same amount of wins. Like I said 2-1 is a slight margin in championships won. 6-1 is a big margin like the Pats have but the Pats have the upper hand on every team since the 2000's. It really doesn't bother me. Had we recovered a simple onsides kick vs the Saints, we would've had 2 but we didn't, it would've never came down to Peyton's INT trying to rally us again putting everything on him again, crap happens.     Since 2000 (20 seasons) the best franchises have been IMO: 1. Patriots (*belongs here though because of the cheating they have done)   2. Steelers   3. Packers - same amount of wins as the Colts and a SB win like the Colts.   Tied for 3rd. Colts - I put us over the Ravens and Giants who did win 2 SB's simply because we have many more wins and have made the playoffs a lot more than the Giants did. Winning the 1 SB combined with that puts us tied for 3rd. The Seahawks and Broncos have won 1 SB too but we have more wins than those teams since 2000 as well. Without Regular Season wins you don't even make the playoffs, the Regular Season is very important. If someone wants to say we underachieved regarding winning SB's, I can buy that but It is what it is.  JMO
    • You said nothing wrong at all. There's always going to be people who don't agree with you then try to attack instead of communicate. 
    • No worries here. That was actually how I interpreted what you said...but I can understand how others might have interpreted it differently.
    • Maybe the pass attempts will still be high, but we won't be seeing the Marino, Fouts, Big Ben , Arians/Coryell type of bombs away attacks, IMO.  Its going to be more underneath stuff, which requires DBs having certain skills that are more pronounced than the skills needed to defend the offenses of the past.   Maybe it was an anomaly,  but Watson's ball velocity was like 50 mph at his combine.  Hardly even NFL caliber.  So while he may be able to chuck it with accuracy down field a few times, he doesn't have the arm to run a deep out or bombing attack style of offense, and he has to open up passing game with the threat of his legs and escapability.  Even that also requires DBs with tackling skills. 
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...