-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
-
Popular Now
-
-
Thread of the Week
-
-
Topics
-
-
Posts
-
By ChuggaBeer · Posted
I think he wants out of Baltimore. And will deal a better contract to another team IF it is a straight up trade. If its under the current tag then Baltimore would have to see the contract to be able to match it. Anyway I am doing my due diligence on these ideas and looking at all options. And I suspect the Colts are doing the same. My 1st preference has always been Anderson or Tyree at 4 and trade up if needed for Hooker. 2nd would be Richardson. If those players are gone then push hard on trade -
Have you ever bumped one of your threads where you were wrong about everything? -
By 2006Coltsbestever · Posted
This, I roughly said the same thing above. -
By ChuggaBeer · Posted
What if the QB they want isn't there?? They really won't know until "2 minutes before they pick" Quoting Streichen -
By 2006Coltsbestever · Posted
In my case it isn't, I am/was all for it and still would be ok with it. I would love to have Young or Stroud. Like many though, nobody thought Lamar would be an option before last season ended. Just because someone might want Lamar doesn't mean they would not be ok with a rookie QB either. Lamar is only 26 as well so it is not like he is farting dust. He isn't in his late 30's/early 40's for example.
-
-
Members
-
Recommended Posts