Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

ColtsSouljah

When are we wearing the throwbacks?

20 posts in this topic

I think teams have to apply to wear a throwback before the season starts, and I could be wrong but I think the Colts didn't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Has that been confirmed?

Just an assumption.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think teams have to apply to wear a throwback before the season starts, and I could be wrong but I think the Colts didn't.

I'm sure you are right. I have tried searching for who did and did not apply, but I haven't been able to find anything yet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

$135 for a jersey with iron on on numbers? No thanks.

Zoom in all the way. Appears to be stitching around them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd actually like to see the Colts bring back the blue pants from the 90's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

$135 for a jersey with iron on on numbers? No thanks.

The Game jerseys are iron on numbers, but the Limited jerseys are not.

Here's the description:

TAILORED FIT

This jersey has a tailored fit designed for movement.

FLYWIRE STRENGTH

Flywire strength resists stretch around the neck, so it holds its shape.

BREATHABILITY

Strategic ventilation over major heat zones helps keep you cool.

Additional Details

  • Team and Alternate Colors: 100% recycled polyester
  • White: 100% polyester
  • Flexible premium twill numbers for an authentic feel
  • Hand crafted inside and out for lasting comfort
  • No-tag neck label offers clean comfort
  • Woven jock tag at front lower left

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We won't.

that's good news..MTC..

....did you see Pittsburgh's 'jailbird' throwbacks...I could not watch

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If we do, it will be a home game.

why the last two times we've done it for a regular season game it was on the road @ Philly in 2010 and @ the lions 2007.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Zoom in all the way. Appears to be stitching around them.

It's still too much money. I get my 100% sewn on jerseys for $40 and the quality is excellent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm curious....

What is the thrill of wearing the same jersey your team wore during the Korean War??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We don't need a throwback or alt. best uniforms in pro sports!!!!

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm curious....

What is the thrill of wearing the same jersey your team wore during the Korean War??

Jersey sales... One could argue there is some sentiment about honoring a specific team, but for the most part it is $ that drives it. Just like it will be in the next couple of years when Nike introduces the pro-combat line to the NFL.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol stats are the facts not an opinion which you offer and nothing else, you say he holds onto the ball to long and ribbles a lot...I showed you proof he does not. You said he Is a bad defender....Clearly he is not as the stats show. How about if I got to the previous year and pick up stats from those same categories? Are they cherry picked to? Not likely because some of them were not good so it supports your narrative that he is bad player.   Calling me stupid is pretty childish by the way...I thought you were better then that. Maybe I'm wrong?   Yes he has skills like Lebron, He can pass well, He can rebound well, He is hard to stop when attacking the basket. He has good basketball instincts on the court. Now the reason he don't put up those numbers is because he isn't as aggressive as those guys . You also forget when he put up those numbers for the Pacers it was in his second year starting. You also disregard that while his points were low with the Clippers he still shot 49.4% and 40% from 3 http://espn.go.com/nba/player/stats/_/id/4244/lance-stephenson He did not fit what the Clippers already had on offense. They to many guys dominating the ball...Crawford. Paul as should. Rivers.   And then when he got traded to the Grizzlies because Rivers wrongly thought he could not play defense he still shot 47.4% and 35% from 3 and had 14.2 points a game for them in 26.6 minutes and only 26 starts plus a double double   You even hear Buckner saying Lance found the right man on a pass and most of these passes are simple passes, Particularly for him. They also help players around him who cant create there own shot help get them an open shot (Scola, West multiple times). Now where Lance was awful at was in catch an shoot situations where he was only 35.1% in 2015 but he averaged less than 1 of those a game in 2015
    • that may be a low estimate         
    • I think the jury is still out on the O-line, though I like that additions (player and coaching) that we saw in the offseason.   The bigest concern IMO is the Pass Rush.  Ideally, Mathis and Cole can have a good year and Maggitt can learn quickly.  
    • Fair enough. My point really was it's much harder to win League MVP than it is SB MVP IMO. To win League MVP you have to be Great for a whole season, to win SB MVP you only have to be Great for 1 day and sometimes only Good. When Tom won SB MVP in 2001 he didn't even play Good. If I included SB MVP's, Tom would still only be up 9-8 for that 3rd criteria. I would much rather win League MVP and a SB compared to winning a SB MVP and a SB. As long as my team won the SB it wouldn't bother me at all if I didn't win SB MVP. Ben never has and nobody ever brings it up, they just talk about his 2 wins. I do think it's important to have at least 1 though just to say you won 1, hence my signature at the bottom. I noted Peyton winning 1 here.
    • http://www.todayspigskin.com/nfl-draft/pre-season-2017-nfl-mock-draft/   We picked Derek Barnett at 21, although I would've switched him with Charles Harris (at the moment) as I think he's a better scheme fit. Still and all, good player at a position of need. Interesting to see how high the running backs were projected to go!
  • Welcome New Members

  • Members

    • myic90

      myic90 51

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • csmopar

      csmopar 1,517

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • 2006Coltsbestever

      2006Coltsbestever 2,953

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • wig

      wig 707

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • SilentHill

      SilentHill 1,987

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Bluefire4

      Bluefire4 960

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ÅÐØNϧ 1

      ÅÐØNϧ 1 933

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • GwinnettColt

      GwinnettColt 303

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Lawrence Owen

      Lawrence Owen 318

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • pfcurry

      pfcurry 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.