Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

2017-2018 Indiana Pacers and Everything NBA Thread


Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, oldunclemark said:

3 games in 4 nights..all losses..

 

..we miss Sabonis against team like the Pistons..Oladipo 7-of-20.......we seem to flame out offensively late in games

 

Yeah I feel like the Pacers have a brutal schedule so far with multiple back to backs.  Yeah they have to find their mojo again and get a win, very soon!  Sabonis being out and Turner doesn't seem to really be in game shape.  We'll see how they fair in the next few games.  I thought their record would be around 35-40 wins.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Malakai432 said:

 

Yeah I feel like the Pacers have a brutal schedule so far with multiple back to backs.  Yeah they have to find their mojo again and get a win, very soon!  Sabonis being out and Turner doesn't seem to really be in game shape.  We'll see how they fair in the next few games.  I thought their record would be around 35-40 wins.  

I still think they win 32 games maximum like I did at the start of the season. This schedule has to be the most grueling in the league to start off the season, but it will cool down soon. I think we have a full week and a half of home games the first week of December.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎11‎/‎8‎/‎2017 at 8:04 PM, Bluefire4 said:

Another lead lost in this one. This time it was just early in the game. It all comes down to shot selection for me. We've taken a lot of mid-range jumpers while the Pistons are getting into the paint.

Not to mention the total lack of defense. Good defense is almost a thing of the past in the NBA in general.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎11‎/‎8‎/‎2017 at 8:46 PM, Malakai432 said:

 

Yeah I feel like the Pacers have a brutal schedule so far with multiple back to backs.  Yeah they have to find their mojo again and get a win, very soon!  Sabonis being out and Turner doesn't seem to really be in game shape.  We'll see how they fair in the next few games.  I thought their record would be around 35-40 wins.  

That projection is still valid..

We're missing those 10 rebounds a game Sabonis was giving us......

 

..but there are signs of life from Lance..Im still encouraged...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, oldunclemark said:

That projection is still valid..

We're missing those 10 rebounds a game Sabonis was giving us......

 

..but there are signs of life from Lance..Im still encouraged...

 

Yeah I agree, I think they will still win 35-40 games.  Just gotta get back, get Myles back into the swing of it and Sabonis back.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

7 minutes ago, Malakai432 said:

OUCH!

 

You got to have a strong stomach to watch the Celtics this year with blood gushing from faces and ankles being snapped in half.

 

No Horford or Irving. Brad Stevens in desperation mode going "Hack-a-Howard".

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Jules said:

 

 

You got to have a strong stomach to watch the Celtics this year with blood gushing from faces and ankles being snapped in half.

 

No Horford or Irving. Brad Stevens in desperation mode going "Hack-a-Howard".

 

Yeah it's like a horror movie!  But they keep going and going!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

That is my look at Lonzo Ball everytime he shoots!

 

Poor kid, really he is having so many issues shooting and stuff. I almost feel sorry for him since I know so many are making jokes about it.

 

I know before he was drafted some scouts said his shooting form was seriously off. But they also were afraid to fix it too.

 

Someone needs to work with him maybe on the side, hopefully Kobe can give him some help.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jules said:

 

Poor kid, really he is having so many issues shooting and stuff. I almost feel sorry for him since I know so many are making jokes about it.

 

I know before he was drafted some scouts said his shooting form was seriously off. But they also were afraid to fix it too.

 

Someone needs to work with him maybe on the side, hopefully Kobe can give him some help.

He does everything else well, he is a Great passer and a Good Rebounder but he cant shoot. Jason Kidd only shot 38% as a rookie so we will see. Kidd also was awful from the 3 point land but got Good as he got older.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 2006Coltsbestever said:

He does everything else well, he is a Great passer and a Good Rebounder but he cant shoot. Jason Kidd only shot 38% as a rookie so we will see. Kidd also was awful from the 3 point land but got Good as he got older.

 

I thought a few times the other night I saw Lonzo play some decent defense vs. the Celtics too. The thing is, I think LaVar didn't want anyone to change his shooting since it worked in college. Me thinks LaVar might change his mind soon.......

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jules said:

 

I thought a few times the other night I saw Lonzo play some decent defense vs. the Celtics too. The thing is, I think LaVar didn't want anyone to change his shooting since it worked in college. Me thinks LaVar might change his mind soon.......

Yeah Lonzo is a Great Passer, Good Rebounder, and I would say an Above Average Defender because he has decent length. He just needs to improve his shot.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Damn, Celtics must be the best defensive team in the league (they are). They should be down 40 in this game since without the Kyrie/Horford combo they can't get much going on offense at all. Being down only 12 at the end of the third is a shocker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jules said:

Damn, Celtics must be the best defensive team in the league (they are). They should be down 40 in this game since without the Kyrie/Horford combo they can't get much going on offense at all. Being down only 12 at the end of the third is a shocker.

Not looking good for Boston tonight, they are under manned though. Stevens needs a miracle tonight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm lets see if Brad Stevens can do it. Celtics making a comeback without Kyrie. Now down by 3.

 

Even if they lose they are showing the sort of effort the Cavaliers SHOULD be showing but their lazy entitled over paid bums won't do it because defense and rebounding is too much work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I cannot believe Boston just won this game. Holy crap. Brad Stevens is God. I thought they were doomed without Kyrie and Horford tonight.

 

Just wow........

 

Hornets should have put them away easily in the third but Boston plays some serious defense......

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jules said:

I cannot believe Boston just won this game. Holy crap. Brad Stevens is God. I thought they were doomed without Kyrie and Horford tonight.

 

Just wow........

 

Hornets should have put them away easily in the third but Boston plays some serious defense......

Look who is on their team Dwight 'Spineless' Howard, most overrated player of all-time. Nevertheless I agree still a miracle win considering Kyrie and Horford were out.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is how I feel...   From a roster building standpoint, it seems to make most sense. Especially given the talent at skill positions in the draft. This is assuming we are tagging/resigning Pittman, which I believe we do. But a depth piece in free agency there and a day 2 pick might not be a bad thing. It's certainly more of Ballard's way of doing things. I can't imagine we don't pick up Paye's 5th year. Assuming as much, and drafting someone like Verse would time out well with not relying on him too much from the get-go. He would be a good rotational piece early while we evaluate and give Paye another 2 seasons to earn a bigger paycheck. Dayo, to me, is the odd duck in the picture, with him going into the final year of his contract. You are probably correct in the thought that DT is more pressing. If we don't sign/replace Grover, I'm not sure what the plan is. But the clock is ticking on he and Buckner, no matter which way you look at it.  Also, Ballard has repeatedly stated that he and Steichen see eye-to-eye on the concept of building the trenches. So I think there will be continued investment there. 
    • I read something that said the leaked scores were only partial. And now that I'm thinking about it more, I think they were saying the low score that was published was from his first attempt, and he might have retaken the test and done better. It's kind of fuzzy, but that might be the case.    Either way, my point was that I remember notable pushback against the leaked scores, and their importance. So if certain people are now saying that they didn't care about the S2 scores a year ago, that doesn't sound like revisionist history to me. One of those unnamed execs could be Ballard, who was very vocal about not liking how Stroud was talked about. And we know the Colts subscribe to S2...     Some suggestions... basically unsubstantiated rumors that get repeated enough that they begin to be accepted as fact. Who knows what the Panthers were doing last year, but if they let the S2 test decide which QB to draft, they deserve all the dysfunction they've experienced. I don't think even the Panthers are that lost. More likely, Bryce Young was the guy they decided on, and maybe the higher S2 was in his favor, but would have just been one of several factors that they used.      The way it's described, there's potentially value in the S2 testing. But using Stroud as the example, if you watch him play, and then look at a low S2 score, and can't figure out how to reconcile the disparity between the tape and the test score, then you don't know how to evaluate. Overall, I think way too much is being made of the S2 thing, similar to how way too much was made of Wonderlic scores. It's just one piece of info, and probably carries a small amount of importance overall.    But if a team wants to use S2 testing to prepare a development plan, especially for a QB, there's no real reason they can't have him take the test after the draft. If that's really part of the value, and the player declines the test before the draft because he doesn't want to be scrutinized over it, then ask him to take it once you've drafted him.
    • Ask Philip Rivers to give him advice on parenthood, AR should stick around in the NFL for a while then. 😉
    • Yes, I think so too.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...