Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

LucasOilStadium

Colts @ Bills Game Day Thread

Recommended Posts

Pats game, everyone said our WRs couldn't get any separation, and that's why we lost. So we draft Dorsett and bring in Andre. Our receivers still couldn't get any separation this game

What point are you trying to make here?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It doesn't matter who we draft when our top 2 coaches are Pagano and Manusky...it just doesn't matter

manusky did good. Pagano and pep need to go

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What point are you trying to make here?

I think it's pretty evident.

 

Let's not overreact here, though.  It's almost a certainty that every team will lose at least 1 game this year.  It was a terrible performance, but the season is young

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pats game, everyone said our WRs couldn't get any separation, and that's why we lost. So we draft Dorsett and bring in Andre. Our receivers still couldn't get any separation this game

Teams know all we have is the pass game. It's a well known thing we're one demensional. So they sit back and stay attached to our WRs. Scarry part is, now we gotta go play the Jets D with a very formidable secondary. That really concerns me, especially after today.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

jets corners gonna smother us if buffalo could

Yeah that's what's really scarry right now. Passing the ball against the Jets will be no easy task.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lets wit till week 4 with judging the team, but the start of this season is very unsettling. 

 

Not the loss is the problem, the way we lost is a problem. Big problem. Everyone seemed to be out of sync, what must be fixed!

 

Good night folks! A disappointing evening it has been. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

didn't use them right they spoke on having the two burners on the field together yet didn't make it happen huge contradiction

I really don't understand that either.  That defeats the whole point of drafting Dorsett if you don't play him with T.Y.  Our coaching staff makes some baffling decisions. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Throw.  Throw. Throw. Throw.  Throw.  Throw.  Throw.

This is what happens when there's no running game.

Throw more.  Throw.  Throw more.  Maybe a Throw.  

Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some of us underestimated Buffalo.  Fact is this is a pretty tough team. Keep in mind they beat the Pats in the season opener last year and New England still went on to win the Super Bowl. 

 

I knew this was going to be a dangerous opener for us.  Can't understand how anyone was thinking that we would just go into Buffalo and blow this team out.  Reality got served today. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it's pretty evident.

Let's not overreact here, though. It's almost a certainty that every team will lose at least 1 game this year. It was a terrible performance, but the season is young

You're saying we lose if our WRs don't get open? Profound statement

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lets wit till week 4 with judging the team, but the start of this season is very unsettling.

Not the loss is the problem, the way we lost is a problem. Big problem. Everyone seemed to be out of sync, what must be fixed!

Good night folks! A disappointing evening it has been.

Oh when we lose we lose in an awful way!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really don't understand that either. That defeats the whole point of drafting Dorsett if you don't play him with T.Y. Our coaching staff makes some baffling decisions.

they need to go

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know teams play extra hype when a new likable coach takes over for the first game. Wish it wasn't us that took the punishment. Played horrible and that receiver depth looked bad today.

Forgot how much Moncreif relies on his body and loses so much to DBs on contested passes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Our Colts will have plenty of time to evaluate and regroup, to prepare for their next game with the. New York Jets next Monday Night on the Colts home opener at LOS. Jets beat the Browns today in New Jersey 34-10. Enjoy your week, see you back here next Monday Night hopefully with better results. Stay Colts Strong and thank you everyone for participating here in the Game Day Thread, and GO COLTS!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. Up until that neck injury I don’t think manning missed a snap his entire career here.
    • Andrew has had 3 maybe 4 injuries since the beginning of his career, manning only missed one season here. So no worries the bad luck was all Bob's. 
    • that guy is too short, has no wheels, and has to take a time out after every 6 attempts. will never make it.. nice jugs though
    • The facts.. a hung jury (twice) mistrial with most voters having sided for the alleged accuser/victim... both times.     She (prosecution) didn't drop the charges, the school (judge/jury) did.  She wanted round 3.  She wanted a full yes or no vote (4-1 or 5-0) either way, not we're split 3-2 so we'll just call it against the majority vote and designate as "Not Responsible" because it isn't 4 or more votes either way. - 'Case closed'.     There were questions (and other items) from the accuser that were never allowed in or asked in follow up questioning.  I think one of the changes to the Stanford Title IX hearing rules is to also allow an attorney to be not only in attendance but to also perform all duties of representation.  And an outside group determines what is admissible as questions/evidence, follow questions, etc...     At some level, it did, and many things at Stanford were changed after. At the  minimum, it was a mistrial x2, with no conclusive verdict either way. Then school (not prosecution) drops the case.   So she really needed to report this to both the school, and also the Police.  But with what evidence does she have to convince the LEO?  Guess the gals need some hidden body cam w/audio these days, like many folks do with dash cams (like me and my wife's cars...) and be their own TMZ...   Video, apparently the only way things get rectified anymore...     No worries, at least we know each others positions.  All is good.     Except to have (at some level) differing story from a another high achieving Stanford student about another high achieving Stanford student-   https://www.collegesimply.com/colleges/california/stanford-university/admission/     We don't even know for certain they ever got the FULL story, but articles I've read suggest that the Stanford Panel repressed/disallowed many/most of her interrogating questions and supplemental follow up inquiries to be asked of the accused.  Unless someone directly asks her directly, how could you answer as to whether her whole story was even heard or not?   If you are not truly interested to fully know those answers, then you don't ask.  At least, that's my perspective.  
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...