Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts Vs. Jaguars Game Day Thread


LucasOilStadium

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 755
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

who thought that the colts would be in a defensive battle against the jaguars

Yeah...it looks like the team has a gigantic hangover from the New England game...and Pagano SHOULD have been able to get them prepped to play this game and blow out the Jags...but instead nothing from Chuck but a little clapping here and cheerleading there on the sidelines...it looks like he doesn't know what to do as HC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted · Hidden by 21isSuperman, November 23, 2014 - personal shot
Hidden by 21isSuperman, November 23, 2014 - personal shot

You can get off my case I can post in this forum the same as anyone else.

I never said you couldn't. You're being irrational and irritating.

Link to comment

Yeah...it looks like the team has a gigantic hangover from the New England game...and Pagano SHOULD have been able to get them prepped to play this game and blow out the Jags...but instead nothing from Chuck but a little clapping here and cheerleading there on the sidelines...it looks like he doesn't know what to do as HC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So we ended up with 3 more shots, that may provide value if they get on the field and perform well. Yeah! Old news.
    • Back to the original post about this, seems like they got something backwards with their Johnson/Hill numbers. Johnson has decimals, Hill has whole numbers. But chart shows Hill will decimals and Johnson with whole numbers.    Johnson - 19 Hill - 6.03     Jimmy Johnson has early 6th round value   + 16.4pts - pick 183-184 range   https://www.drafttek.com/NFL-Trade-Value-Chart.asp?RequestTeam=Ind   Rich Hill has late 5th round value #35 - 170pts   #44 - 135pts #110 - 30pts #158 - 10pts #211 - 3pts   +8pts - pick 167-172   https://www.drafttek.com/NFL-Trade-Value-Chart-Rich-Hill.asp?RequestTeam=Ind   Inconsequential, but a little flaw in that data entry.   Only thing I don't like about Rich Hill's is the value he places on those top 3 picks, where I think Jimmy Johnson's has the advantage in my eyes.   Although I like the value gained on Rich Hill's better. Lol.
    • In essense we got Julius Brents, Adetomiwa Adebawore, Daniel Scott and Titus Leo for #35... I really believe that you have to have a great reason not to trade back when that's the value you are getting. To a huge degree the draft is a crapshoot and the difference in expected value between 35 and 44 is probably negligible. And for the price you get 3 more shots at players, some of them with really high upside too.    Of course, there might be some exceptions to the rule(QBs as always break that rule... maybe some exceptional talent at another high value position), but in general if you can get that type of a deal, you should almost always do the trade back. And I think this is one area where Ballard has actually been great as a GM. 
    • I will say, me personally though, I find more value than an early 6th(compilation of trades).   We got 4 players for the 1 pick(#35), once the dust settled, and got the guy we would of probably taken at #35 in the first place.   So adding (3) guys for "free" essentially, is a big win.   So I would say I lean a little more towards value charts than trade charts for that reason. Maybe somewhere in the middle, late 3rd early 4th "value", and that's mainly because I think we would of took Brents at #35 either way.   Seems teams are closer to the trade chart when making deals, but claim the value charts after deal, if it shows a big win.    
    • I see it now. When I first read it, thought you were saying 1st trade down got 6th round value and 2nd trade got 2nd round value.     Then was blinded by just waking up and already looking for a flaw.   Clearly teams aren't using the value charts as you stated in post above.     Thanks for helping me read out the chart. Should just read the picks we kept and sent out. No need to have them cancel each other out.     EDIT: ahh who am I to tell the guy how to do his charts(have to account for the picks). It was my reading comprehension that caused the problem.
  • Members

    • Dr. T

      Dr. T 362

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Chucklez

      Chucklez 802

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DZS13

      DZS13 12

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ChuggaBeer

      ChuggaBeer 1,525

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 7,602

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • richard pallo

      richard pallo 6,901

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtsGermany

      ColtsGermany 658

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • superrep1967

      superrep1967 858

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PureLuck

      PureLuck 269

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • lincolndefan

      lincolndefan 89

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...