Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Conversations are moderated for civility. We ask that you please stay on topic. For more info, see our Community Guidelines ×
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum
Enter To Win 2 Tickets to Steelers @ Colts Sun 09/29 | 1:00 PM EDT

Danny O Played Like Peyton Ohhh

DILLIGAFER

By DILLIGAFER
in Colts Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

DILLIGAFER Walk On

DILLIGAFER

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Yeah Dan! He put up those numbers in garbage time vs the worst pass defense in the NFL! WTG!

Now back to reality.... Start Painter that game was way to close.

Omg.. really? Your sarcam just sounds *ic. Starting the worst back up qb in the leauge over a guy that only had a week to prepare go on the road and play in new england and put up those numbers? Absolutely stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SilentHill Walk On

SilentHill

Posted
Posted

Omg.. really? Your sarcam just sounds *ic. Starting the worst back up qb in the leauge over a guy that only had a week to prepare go on the road and play in new england and put up those numbers? Absolutely stupid.

Yes, We need to lose. After we've locked up the #1 pick we can win all you want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Blackhawk4 Walk On

Blackhawk4

Posted
Posted

Dan did alot better in the 2nd half compared to his play in the 2nd quarter, but he did get his best plays in garbage time when the pats had already won and showed they were taking it easier on us. He performed better than I thought he would, but it wasn't really amazing. His play in the 2nd quarter was still atrocious and besides that 1st drive, there was inconsistency at times which led to three and outs. Not all on him of course, but a combination of bad play calling did not put him in the best situation at times

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Coltsman1788 Team Captain

Coltsman1788

Posted
Posted

Yeah Dan! He put up those numbers in garbage time vs the worst pass defense in the NFL! WTG!

Now back to reality.... Start Painter that game was way to close.

Yeah...but that is exactly what Peyton did against them last year minus the interception thrown at the end. Pats are notorious for playing that soft prevent D at the end of games which often allows the Colts to catch up during cosmetic time. So that's not exactly a knock against Orlovsky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Turftoe Practice Squad

Turftoe

Posted
Posted

Regardless of being "garbage time" (which IMO is baloney), Orlovsky's passes were crisp, tight, and on target - something Painter is incapable of. Even the interception was a strong, tight spiral and an absolute great play by the defender (I don't think anyone on our defense could have grabbed and held onto that ball).

Is he our next starter? NO, but he can provide decent backup QB play. Painter will not be on an NFL roster after this season for good reason.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Coltsman1788 Team Captain

Coltsman1788

Posted
Posted

He's gonna beat 2 out of the 3 teams we have in the South. He's obviously better than Painter.

Not if our secondary doesn't stop giving up those large cushions. If we played more aggressively defensively and actually challenged the Pats receivers a bit more then this game might have turned out differently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SilentHill Walk On

SilentHill

Posted
Posted

We have NO chance at Baltimore, very little chance with Houston. We're still gonna get the #1 pick. But lets preserve some dignity, people!

As I already said. I'm all for that. AFTER that pick is locked up.

Minnesota and STL both only have 2 wins.

Minnesota's schedule: @DET, NO, @WAS, CHI

STL Schedule: @SEA, CIN, @PIT, SF

I can see both of those teams going 0-4 in there final 4... If we win 2 games we're out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Andy Walk On

Andy

Posted
Posted

As I already said. I'm all for that. AFTER that pick is locked up.

Minnesota and STL both only have 2 wins.

Minnesota's schedule: @DET, NO, @WAS, CHI

STL Schedule: @SEA, CIN, @PIT, SF

I can see both of those teams going 0-4 in there final 4... If we win 2 games we're out.

I think Minne wins either against WAS or CHI. If STL loses next week, they'll go 0-4. With Orlovsky under center, there's a possibility we win at least 2 games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mightisright Walk On

mightisright

Posted
Posted

I think Minne wins either against WAS or CHI. If STL loses next week, they'll go 0-4. With Orlovsky under center, there's a possibility we win at least 2 games.

Good! I'm fine if we get the number 2 pick. I'd LOVE to get the number 1 pick and trade it for a king's ransom but since the Polians never trade, I'm fine with avoiding the Luck controversy alltogether! I just want us to win a few times. I still think that we'll probably get the first round pick even if we win 2 games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Andy Walk On

Andy

Posted
Posted

Good! I'm fine if we get the number 2 pick. I'd LOVE to get the number 1 pick and trade it for a king's ransom but since the Polians never trade, I'm fine with avoiding the Luck controversy alltogether! I just want us to win a few times. I still think that we'll probably get the first round pick even if we win 2 games.

Well if the Rams get the first overall pick, they won't pick Luck. Why would they? They have Bradford. Luck is ours...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jason_ Hall of Famer

Jason_

Posted
Posted

Dan did have a great game but I'm not gonna get too excited just yet. Like others have said, let's see if he can sustain it and against teams that don't have the worst pass defense. That said though, yes the pats have given up a lot of yards but not a lot of points and Dan did lead us to 24 points...though granted that's only 4 points above what NE is averaging giving up per game but considering how bad the Colts offense has been so far this year that's still pretty good. So I'm cautiously optimistic :).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jason_ Hall of Famer

Jason_

Posted
Posted

Well if the Rams get the first overall pick, they won't pick Luck. Why would they? They have Bradford. Luck is ours...

If the Rams get the #1 pick I don't think there's any way they wouldn't trade the pick. The majority opinion is that Luck will be the #1 pick...it's just a matter of who is there to pick him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Andy Walk On

Andy

Posted
Posted

Dan did have a great game but I'm not gonna get too excited just yet. Like others have said, let's see if he can sustain it and against teams that don't have the worst pass defense. That said though, yes the pats have given up a lot of yards but not a lot of points and Dan did lead us to 24 points...though granted that's only 4 points above what NE is averaging giving up per game but considering how bad the Colts offense has been so far this year that's still pretty good. So I'm cautiously optimistic :).

True, next week will be the week where we see his true colors

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Andy Walk On

Andy

Posted
Posted

Of course they will...That's like saying we have Peyton Manning we won't pick Luck.....

Well Sam Bradford is the future of that franchise and is 23. Manning is not the future of the franchise and is 35, going to be 36.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
everybodysgotone Walk On

everybodysgotone

Posted
Posted

Orlovsky showed some poise and touch we haven't seen out of QB all year. On the long TD throw to Garcon, he had to wait while PG put a triple move on the CB to get open downfield, then hit him in perfect stride with defenders in his face. Nice throw under pressure. At least he has a vertical game. The Painter experiment was worthwhile in this lost season....we found out he's not a capable backup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CantBeStopped Practice Squad

CantBeStopped

Posted
Posted

Did anyone see the look peyton gave clyde on the sideline. It was during the second half im pretty sure and it was just like peyton was like wth are you doing dude. As far as dan. The man played great for not starting since 08. People need to give him credit for that. The game was over and it was just in garbage time? Tell that to Tom brady who had to come back in to kneel the ball so nothing bad happened like a fumbled snap. They were nervous at the end of the game. And who made them nervous? Dan did! He made our offense respectable again. Sure he didnt play great during the second

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ProblChld32
      Taking Taylor off the field

      By ProblChld32 · Posted

      I get the logic behind it , but imo the WRONG player was in the field it shouldn’t have been Sermon, he isn’t that good of a pass catcher. It should have been Goodson. I do agree that having you BEST weapon on the field during times like that. But JT had been making some bad plays, the bad drop (more so on AR than JT but you gotta catch those) and the fumble. I just don’t under understand why Goodson wasn’t in if we are in a clear passing situation. Goodson is the better receiver out of the two.
    • ProblChld32
      It will never happen, but...

      By ProblChld32 · Posted

      Genuinely speaking did you actually think before typing this out? This was a terrible take ….NEXT!
    • bluebombers87
      It will never happen, but...

      By bluebombers87 · Posted

      The idea that project QBs work out on anything other than a rare occasion is something to consider.   We’ve gone through a revolving door of QBs since Luck retired (with a few that were project QBs). Can’t blame fans for wanting to see something other than mediocre to poor play.
    • Hoose
      Taking Taylor off the field

      By Hoose · Posted

      It’s also possible that Shane is sending a message to JT: I’m not playing you in crucial situations if you don’t block. That’s a tough lesson to teach, especially in a game like last Sunday. But benching Taylor when he did makes more sense if there’s a message being sent than just wanting to give the backups a chance. 
    • Defjamz26
      Colts vs Packers post game thread

      By Defjamz26 · Posted

      The 33rd team just posted that Malik Willis was 3rd behind only Kyler Murray and Derek Carr for EPA per drop back. Again, the score abd box score do not tell the full story of this game. Willis moved the ball effortlessly though the air when he needed to. If they had really needed him to throw more, there’s no doubt in my mind he would’ve found success. The run defense is covering up just how awful this secondary is.

  • Members

    • BeanDiasucci

      BeanDiasucci 850

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Introspect

      Introspect 351

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • #12.

      #12. 3,359

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • cdgacoltsfan

      cdgacoltsfan 4,540

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • superrep1967

      superrep1967 965

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...