Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Walden out


Recommended Posts

You cant argue with the rule book.  Walden deserved to be tossed (if you take the rule literally).  However, what happens if a player merely taps the ref on the back and says great job?  EJECTED?  Of course he wouldn't get tossed!!  Refs touching Walden was the primary factor of Walden touching the ref, so to be fair suspend the referee.  That would be justice!  Furthermore Gresham dancing like a clown and ridiculing Walden didn't deserve a penalty?  I don't care if the referee or the rulebook states it, call everything fairly.  Which never happens.  Every game refs have "make up calls" for blowing it on previous plays...  That's also injust.  I realize they're only human too, but don't make petty calls because you're butt hurt that Walden stood up to you.  The ref had no business putting his hand on Walden, therefore he should not have been thrown out. 

 

The referee is the police on the field.  It is his job to separate participants in an altercation to prevent any further escalation. if a player brushes off the ref doing that job, the NFL wants said player to sit out the rest of the game. And the commissioner will determine if more punishment is needed; depending upon what happened. No matter how heated you are, or innocent the gesture. No player has any right to stand up to an official.  Let the coaches make an argument/appeal. And then take it up with the League office later. No standing up to the Refs calls on the field.  The league can't, and won't stand for it.  That's why the Refs can, without question disqualify, a player. that tries and the (real) Police will personally escort that player off if he refuses to go.

 

The NFL rulebook is lengthy and specific.  If payers don't want to abide by them, they can go play in CFL or the Arena League.  But, ahem... , they also have lengthy rulebooks too.  ;-)

 

Gresham can act like Bo Bo the Clown jumping around like a giddy little school girl, as long as his antics and verbal output is not directed directly at the opponent, or the official. But I wish he did get a flag.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 157
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Precedent-

 

 

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap1000000077882/article/vikings-harrison-smith-ejected-for-pushing-referee

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPX7qleLtzc

 

You don't even have to touch or graze an official, you can do it this way too!

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6VFW2V_xv18

 

Even players on player hitting!  Player 1 gets 15 yard for illegal hit out of bounds, retaliating players hits back with fists, gets disqualified!

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yKuKfLhIYSQ

 

 

The saying, the anti-Nike.  Just Don't. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was probably more verbal than touching the official.

 

That's what I think too. Walden probably claimed that a zebra call was a nonsense or are you bleeping blind zebra & his tongue got him ejected. Just because we didn't hear anything, it doesn't mean he didn't curse quietly under his breath. I myself have been busted for that. LOL! I know of what I speak personally here. 

What people are missing here is the context. What Walden was saying may have had an effect. 

Precisely, what was said & the tone or eye contact in which disgust was conveyed probably led to Walden's banishment from the game ruksak. 

 

The refs are authority figures. They are effectively 'police' on the field. You don't touch a cop, ever, or you get ejected from society. 

Right again man. Always know who is in charge & whose feet not to step on or royally tick off. When elite players say that "this game is won from the neck up" they are referring to more than just formations, playbook mastery, & field execution. Never allow another presence on the grass get under your skin. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Precedent-

 

 

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap1000000077882/article/vikings-harrison-smith-ejected-for-pushing-referee

 

 

You don't even have to touch or graze an official, you can do it this way too!

 

 

Even players on player hitting!  Player 1 gets 15 yard for illegal hit out of bounds, retaliating players hits back with fists, gets disqualified!

 

 

 

The saying, the anti-Nike.  Just Don't.

Oh who cares. There is precedent for cops giving speeding tickets for going 58 in a 55... doesn't make it right. In both the Kuechly and Walden case the refs overreacted. The refs should understand their role and the situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted · Hidden by Superman, October 21, 2014 - inappropriate, inflammatory
Hidden by Superman, October 21, 2014 - inappropriate, inflammatory

Precedent-

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap1000000077882/article/vikings-harrison-smith-ejected-for-pushing-referee

You don't even have to touch or graze an official, you can do it this way too!

Even players on player hitting! Player 1 gets 15 yard for illegal hit out of bounds, retaliating players hits back with fists, gets disqualified!

The saying, the anti-Nike. Just Don't.

Very submissive, cowardly attitude... I'm sure if they told you to kill yourself that you would do it.

Link to comment

Oh who cares. There is precedent for cops giving speeding tickets for going 58 in a 55... doesn't make it right. In both the Kuechly and Walden case the refs overreacted. The refs should understand their role and the situation.

With Keuchly, the ref screwed up. He's lucky he didn't get a broken nose for being dumb enough to grab a player from behind like that. Ejecting Luke was insulting to me as a fan. You don't grab people like that from behind. If you get hit, it's on you.

 

Now Walden......no sir, dude has had that coming for a LONG time. The ref did him a favor. Hopefully, Walden being ejected will prevent him from further committing PF penalties, especially in the postseason. Walden has a history, if we want to talk precedent. He's ripped players helmets off after the whistle, taunted, and shoved players down after the play on numerous occasions. 

 

I fully support his ejection. The Keuchly incident, I wish the ref had been knocked out cold for being so foolish. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh who cares. There is precedent for cops giving speeding tickets for going 58 in a 55... doesn't make it right. In both the Kuechly and Walden case the refs overreacted. The refs should understand their role and the situation.

Yeah it's like saying a person deserved a traffic ticket for going over the speed limit by one for like two seconds because it's the law!

Whoever thinks Walden should be ejected is a major pedant. Common sense should prevail. Walden's intent wasn't to touch the official. It seemed as though he was pushing the player off of him and his arm brushed the official.

Lots of submissive, pedantic sentiments being expressed in this thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With Keuchly, the ref screwed up. He's lucky he didn't get a broken nose for being dumb enough to grab a player from behind like that. Ejecting Luke was insulting to me as a fan. You don't grab people like that from behind. If you get hit, it's on you.

 

Now Walden......no sir, dude has had that coming for a LONG time. The ref did him a favor. Hopefully, Walden being ejected will prevent him from further committing PF penalties, especially in the postseason. Walden has a history, if we want to talk precedent. He's ripped players helmets off after the whistle, taunted, and shoved players down after the play on numerous occasions. 

 

I fully support his ejection. The Keuchly incident, I wish the ref had been knocked out cold for being for foolish.

Oh no, he accidentally grazed the arm of an old fat ref. And frankly, I I don't mind Walden's extra curricular activities....a football team can't be full of Boy Scouts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That ref is a fan of Boy George, wondering why Walden wants to hurt him and make him cry.

Bonus points for incorporating a zebra exile call with a Boy George song Joker. Very original actually.  :thmup:

 

It would have been funny if the TV network cut to a commercial break playing "Do you really want to hurt me? or "The Crying Game" in a snippet chorus refrain. I'm weird that way. Enough said. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh no, he accidentally grazed the arm of an old fat ref. And frankly, I I don't mind Walden's extra curricular activities....a football team can't be full of Boy Scouts.

Watching my team march backward 15 yards doesn't bring to me one small amount of pleasure. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With Keuchly, the ref screwed up. He's lucky he didn't get a broken nose for being dumb enough to grab a player from behind like that. Ejecting Luke was insulting to me as a fan. You don't grab people like that from behind. If you get hit, it's on you.

 

Now Walden......no sir, dude has had that coming for a LONG time. The ref did him a favor. Hopefully, Walden being ejected will prevent him from further committing PF penalties, especially in the postseason. Walden has a history, if we want to talk precedent. He's ripped players helmets off after the whistle, taunted, and shoved players down after the play on numerous occasions. 

 

I fully support his ejection. The Keuchly incident, I wish the ref had been knocked out cold for being for foolish. 

 

I agree.  Walden was face up with ref, and the Cincy opponent ref wanted Walden to stay away from.  But maybe after the report, the League will look into just when a Flag only is sufficient.  Because of Walden's past, that might swing the call anyway.  And it was was surprising to see the league come out in favor of Kuechly, because they have / had? (according to Mike Pereira) a no tolerance policy on contact with officials.  So while rulebook is B/W, maybe league will allow some wiggle room for un-intentional contact that seems defensive and not offensive. 

 

OTOH, the league will protect their Officials, much like they're protecting defenseless players from kill shots.  I't will be interesting to see what Goodell says after the reports are filed.  If Walden gets a fine or more, we know where the line is drawn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh no, he accidentally grazed the arm of an old fat ref. And frankly, I I don't mind Walden's extra curricular activities....a football team can't be full of Boy Scouts.

 

While walking, I accidentally slip off sidewalk curb into your car door and push a dent in on it.  I don't have to responsible to fix it then right? Got it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh who cares. There is precedent for cops giving speeding tickets for going 58 in a 55... doesn't make it right. In both the Kuechly and Walden case the refs overreacted. The refs should understand their role and the situation.

 

Just because you don't feel it's right doesn't make it so either.  Challenge it in court and tell them it isn't right and throw it out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And you think that is a good analogy? Lol.

And you know for sure Walden didn't "Say" something abusive or vulgar  to the official?  That is what more than a few of us thinks happened. Who says it was the 'so called accidental' brushing off the arm of the ref?  Or Walden might have been using the racial slurs outlawed this year... toward Gresham or maybe the official.    There could have been more to it.  Any of that will get you tossed. You cannot proclaim to know the whole story.  The ref will have to report it to Goodell. We'll see what he says then.  And other have been ejected for less before.  See Stokley video.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just because you don't feel it's right doesn't make it so either. Challenge it in court and tell them it isn't right and throw it out.

 

If I cut down a cactus in Arizona, I can get 25 years in prison.  

 

This is obviously the right ruling, because it is the rules. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While walking, I accidentally slip off sidewalk curb into your car door and push a dent in on it.  I don't have to responsible to fix it then right? Got it.

You should be responsible and issue an apology to anyone that read that failed attempt at an analogy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And you know for sure Walden didn't "Say" something abusive or vulgar  to the official?  That is what more than a few of us thinks happened. Who says it was the 'so called accidental' brushing off the arm of the ref?  Or Walden might have been using the racial slurs outlawed this year... toward Gresham or maybe the official.    There could have been more to it.  Any of that will get you tossed. You cannot proclaim to know the whole story.  The ref will have to report it to Goodell. We'll see what he says then.  And other have been ejected for less before.  See Stokley video.

Or maybe the ref hates black people.

And what stokley did was worse than walden

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And you know for sure Walden didn't "Say" something abusive or vulgar  to the official?  That is what more than a few of us thinks happened. Who says it was the 'so called accidental' brushing off the arm of the ref?  Or Walden might have been using the racial slurs outlawed this year... toward Gresham or maybe the official.    There could have been more to it.  Any of that will get you tossed. You cannot proclaim to know the whole story.  The ref will have to report it to Goodell. We'll see what he says then.  And other have been ejected for less before.  See Stokley video.

Exactly what racial slur was he using towards a white official? I've been white for 28 years now and I'm still waiting for an offensive slur directed towards my race.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So if you accidentally break a rule, you should get a pass, but if you accidently break something tangible, you don't.  If so, the I apologize.

? <--- Question Mark, they are quite useful. Also do you read what you type, or do you just mash a bunch of keys and hit post?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly what racial slur was he using towards a white official? I've been white for 28 years now and I'm still waiting for an offensive slur directed towards my race.

Racial slurs could be directed to Gresham, to the official (or Gresham as well), it only has to be  "abusive, threatening, or insulting language" as has been pointed out in at least two prior posts that appears you have completely skipped over. And i think things were said, but not exactly what.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah it's like saying a person deserved a traffic ticket for going over the speed limit by one for like two seconds because it's the law!

Whoever thinks Walden should be ejected is a major pedant. Common sense should prevail. Walden's intent wasn't to touch the official. It seemed as though he was pushing the player off of him and his arm brushed the official.

Lots of submissive, pedantic sentiments being expressed in this thread.

I don't think that word means what you think it means.

Walden deserved to get the flag, whether he deserved to get ejected no one besides the players around there really know because, like other's have stated it's not just the push but also the words being said at the time.  

 

Anyone that claims, definitively, that he should not have been ejected is really basing that opinion on ignorance of the situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My last post. Ref has both arms out in between Walden and Gresham to keep them separated and from things escalating.  Walden has right arm cocked and aimed toward Refs chest. Walden looking right into Refs face, not Gresham.

 

push_zps78ed0d11.png

 

Walden pushes off the ref, not accidentally, it would appear. Looking right at him still.

 

push1_zpsa5c82c58.png

 

Slow motion loop.  It takes awhile before ref clumsily tries to throw the flag.  He wasn't trigger happy until a certain point.  Then appears he can't get to that flag fast enough.  Many posts ago, I'm on record stating I thought the ref was going to let things slide, but then something changed his mind.  I understand other don't feel that way, but it is the way it looks to me right now.  when the story comes out we'll know more.

 

nmotouchref.0_zpsugqg7fvh.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly what racial slur was he using towards a white official? I've been white for 28 years now and I'm still waiting for an offensive slur directed towards my race.

Cracker?  That one was pretty famous here recently down in Florida.  White bread, honky, gringo, bule?  Never heard of any of those?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My last post. Ref has both arms out in between Walden and Gresham to keep them separated and from things escalating. Walden has right arm cocked and aimed toward Refs chest. Walden looking right into Refs face, not Gresham.

push_zps78ed0d11.png

Walden pushes off the ref, not accidentally, it would appear. Looking right at him still.

push1_zpsa5c82c58.png

Slow motion loop. It takes awhile before ref clumsily tries to throw the flag. He wasn't trigger happy until a certain point. Then appears he can't get to that flag fast enough. Many posts ago, I'm on record stating I thought the ref was going to let things slide, but then something changed his mind. I understand other don't feel that way, but it is the way it looks to me right now. when the story comes out we'll know more.

nmotouchref.0_zpsugqg7fvh.gif

I presonally agree with this. After reading the rule.

You can clearly see him slapping his arm away. It was not un intentional. You can tell by his body language he's slapping the refs arm away in a disrespectful manner. And what football player doesn't have a mouth full of nonsense smack talk? Of any on our team does, it's Walden.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Consensus?  Huh?   I have no idea what that means?   I offered MY opinion.  That’s all.      But I can’t keep up with you.  You just wrote a very long post about how 32 teams have very similar looking Big Boards.   If I had $1 for every time in 13 years I’ve posted that there are 32 teams and 32 completely different looking big boards, I’d be filthy RICH!!     In any given year 32 teams may all agree on the top player, but that the further you get away from the first pick the big boards look very very different.   The exact opposite of what you speculated.  I didn’t agree with one sentence of what you posted here.  You’re entitled to whatever opinion you want but it’s not supported by anything.      I’ve pretty much disagreed with everything you’ve written since the draft started.  But that works to your advantage.  I couldn’t possibly point out all the flaws, so I’ll try to be selective.      Here’s one argument you’ve repeated the last two years.   That Ballard lucked into getting both Woods and Raimann and that he wasn’t even smart enough to realize that Raimann was the better player.  What gets me is that I’ve explained the reasoning to you multiple times and I’ve read other posters explain it to you multiple times.   And we all say the same thing:  That Ballard calculated correctly that because Raimann was 24 and would turn 25 during the season, he stood a better chance of lasting to pick 77 while Woods was taken at 73.   But you keep posting the negative Ballard viewpoint as if NO ONE has explained it to you.  I think it’s both insulting and rude.   It’s what you do when you can’t handle an argument, you just avoid it.  Ballard was smart and right and not only do you not acknowledge it, you try to belittle him every time.    There is sooo much more I could discuss with you but this post is enough.  I’ll be curious if you’ll even respond. 
    • Great episode!  Gotta couple notes here I took:   - confirms we were indeed looking to trade up.  My gut tells me it was definitely for one of the big 3 WRs or bowers based off Ballard remark “Let’s try and if it doesn’t happen, we’ll let the draft play itself out.” (Paraphrased).     - they were interested in Latu but didn’t think he’d be there.  I don’t think anyone thought he’d be there at 15 lol.  Don’t know where Latu was at on our board but he was obviously toward the top.  Also can tell he was toward the top based on Ballard reaction “we got the best pass rusher in the entire draft”   - I’m guessing WR was definitely on the top of our board.  Ballard mentioned wanting speed at the position.  AD falling into his lap couldn’t have played out any better.  Also, good to see Reggie happy about his new toys in AD and Gould.     - No side remarks or mentions of any corners.  I’m going to stick with what I said before the draft and that corner was never on our radar.  What also makes me believe that more than ever is that we had the option to choose between the top 2 corners and even in later rounds other corners and we chose not to.  I’ve said it before, Ballard is straightforward.  If he says “I like what we have” he’s not drafting it unless there’s a player that you can’t miss on.  If he says “this draft is deep in ___” you can bet that’s what he has his eyes on and will most likely double dip.  He said he likes our corners, didn’t draft one.  He said this draft was deep in receivers and OL, we drafted 2 of each.
    • That is a very good point, and if I am not mistaken, Turner profiled more as a 3/4 OLB by many scouts.
    • I’d say yes.  Would have to see what would be fair what he provides, but id say yes.  
  • Members

    • iuswingman

      iuswingman 253

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Moe

      Moe 604

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Scott Pennock

      Scott Pennock 4,418

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Kc77

      Kc77 3

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TheNewGuy

      TheNewGuy 8

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NFLfan

      NFLfan 17,441

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 14,196

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Fluke_33

      Fluke_33 5,081

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 21,262

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Goatface Killah

      Goatface Killah 2,030

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...