Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Offensive Strategy


Flash7

Recommended Posts

At the beginning of last season, we saw a lot of the "Power Run" formation. It was successful, however, the power run formation was a dead giveaway that we were going to run the ball, which made it easy for the opposing defenses. It only worked with the right lineman.

 

Later, as the season progressed, (after injuries along the O-line), it became evident that the Power Run game did not work with our remaining linemen. We switched to a fast-paced air it out offense. This worked well until we got to the playoffs.

 

What do you think we will see this year? More Power Running or more of a spread attack? Both?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Spread offense worked. But once the playoffs hit the inexperience showed & injuries caught up with us. Injuries were the downfall of the :colts: last season imo

 

But much respect to Pep for swallowing his pride and accepting that the offense needed to be changed. Pride will always lead to FAILURE. Thankfully he swallowed his. 

 

I look for a mixture of Spread & Power. We have too many weapons across this field to be one dimensional imo 

 

:rantoff:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that balance is the key. We should be an effective team passing the ball, when needed and an effective team running the ball, when needed. This is more of the Patriots style of offense, as apposed to the Broncos style--which is mostly on the shoulders of Manning.

 

I like the Patriots ability to place the game in Brady's hands when needed, or rely on their run game, all depending on their opponent's weakness. The Patriots seemed to change from week-to-week. We need to see more of that flexibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As unpopular with the bloggers as it was, the philosophy "run the ball and stop the run" is really the way to win.  The Seahawks proved it.  The Patriots at least proved it against us.  Doesn't mean we aren't a passing team, it just means we can make defenses be concerned about the run which opens up the passing game even more.

 

Like Rick said, it all comes down to gameplanning.  You're going to take advantage of your advantages.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO that was the biggest difference between us and say teams like Seattle/Denver. Skill position players on ir. Mainly offense. I know Denver lost their LT and Seattle had some oline guys nicked up. But I think they kept all their wr's, te's and rb's intact. Could be wrong ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we'll see more of the return to try and power run,  and I think this for several reasons.

 

One.....   I believe our defense is not that good -- yet.    So, one of the things teams with an OK defense do is try and shorten the game.   That is done by running the ball and trying to let the clock run.   Keep the defense off the field.   A shorter game means less plays for both sides.

 

Two....   I believe we'll see more running because our interior blocking is poor which means Andrew Luck is at risk.   We run to slow up the pass rush.   A good running game means the DL and LB's can't pin their ears back and go after Luck.    We run to protect Andrew by making our offense multi-dimensional.    If we're passing the ball 40-50 times a game, we're easier to defend.   Defenses know what's coming.

 

Put those two issues together -- protecting Luck and protecting our defense -- and this makes committing to a power based running attack paramount!    We simply have to.

 

I know this view will not be popular.    It'll be extremely unpopular.   But it explains why we do what we do.  

 

Just some food for thought..... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont ever recall the power running formation being successful or effecient at all, we ran the ball most effectively out of the singleback, Spread, and Shotgun formations. With Allen and Thomas coming back we should be able to run effectively out of power run formations atleast i hope we can. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have read numerous scouts and they had him ranked as the  #3 WR in the draft based on talent. I loved the pick but let's not fool ourselves, there is something that made him drop to the 2nd. I am not going to say it is character and/or lack of production. Ballard can go on his rant all he wants, but there was a reason. If he succeeds and becomes a legit #1, then we will wont care. My guess is if he fails to live up the hype, then we  it will leak out why he never reached his full potential. At this point, I couldn't care a less, as I loved the pick at the time and it was the Colts taking a chance with some questions about Mitchell. The one thing I did not like was Ballard going on his rant is he should have just kept quiet and said we like he player. Him going on a rant leaves him open to criticism if for example Mitchell does not work out and say it comes out that he has a poor attitude, work ethic etc.
    • Actually,  I don't think you can really say who is the #2. I think, they actually want Pittman to be relegated to that role as they are hoping that Mitchell or Pierce can finally assume that take the top of the defense  #1 wr.  I don't put to much stock in Mitchell unseating Downs as they play to different positions. Downs is the slot and Mitchell is hopefully that legit #1 that the Colts have never had. So in saying, Mitchell will not be unseating Downs, as they will be asked to do different things. I think the Colts are just hoping to have that legit #1 guy and then everyone else can play the role they were drafted for. If Mitchell or Pierce break out, you will see the ball spread out to the remainder of the WR's and TE's. 
    • Keep in mind, with drops, it has always been very subjective to whether it was a “drop” or not. Which is why the rates vary so much
    • That is about how much I heard he might get. I am glad it is over and we are not waiting for the other shoe to drop (leave in FA or choose not to play).   Now, all the pressure is on him to perform
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...