Smonroe Posted September 7 Share Posted September 7 I know, I know…so sue me for looking ahead. I would never wish an injury on any player, and I would rather see us face a team at full strength. But, this is the NFL, injuries happen, next man up, etc. I’m curious if they stay with Willis or pick up someone like Tannehill or Winston. If it bugs you to talk about it before the Texans game, no one is forcing you to comment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CR91 Posted September 7 Share Posted September 7 Most likely Love won't play, but the ACL is in tact so my guess is it's a sprained knee and will probably miss 2-3 games Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cdgacoltsfan Posted September 7 Share Posted September 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AwesomeAustin Posted September 7 Share Posted September 7 If Love doesn’t play, we need to jump on the opportunity to steal a win from a really good team. This could turn into a really close race at the end of the year to make the playoffs. Colts will need all the help they can get. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JediXMan Posted September 7 Share Posted September 7 We could the return of Ryan Tannehill because Willis is beyond awful lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Restinpeacesweetchloe Posted September 7 Share Posted September 7 He sprained his MCL and is expected to miss some time. We will see if they stick with Willis or go get a vet. Talk about a lucky break for the colts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CR91 Posted September 7 Share Posted September 7 8 minutes ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said: He sprained his MCL and is expected to miss some time. We will see if they stick with Willis or go get a vet. Talk about a lucky break for the colts. Sprained MCLs are usually a month to 6 weeks. Probably going to IR 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smonroe Posted September 7 Author Share Posted September 7 6 minutes ago, CR91 said: Sprained MCLs are usually a month to 6 weeks. Probably going to IR That's a shame. He was just coming into his own as a franchise QB late last season. I hope he has a full recovery. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adubb84 Posted September 7 Share Posted September 7 No way they stick with Willis lol 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smonroe Posted September 7 Author Share Posted September 7 7 minutes ago, adubb84 said: No way they stick with Willis lol Maybe, but it's not easy to bring in a guy off the street and have him learn the playbook in less than a week. A vet like Tannehill could be their best bet, with some packages for Willis. So glad we got Flaaacoo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richard pallo Posted September 7 Share Posted September 7 We trade them Flacco after the game. The pick might be high enough. We still have Sam. lol. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adubb84 Posted September 7 Share Posted September 7 59 minutes ago, Smonroe said: Maybe, but it's not easy to bring in a guy off the street and have him learn the playbook in less than a week. A vet like Tannehill could be their best bet, with some packages for Willis. So glad we got Flaaacoo. Glad we got Flacco too! I saw something somewhere saying there are 7 or more teams out there that have a disastrous backup QB situation and If the QB1 gets severely injured the whole season goes up in smoke. Point and example the Jets. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twfish Posted September 7 Share Posted September 7 They could bring back Jacob Eason Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NFLfan Posted September 7 Share Posted September 7 1 hour ago, adubb84 said: No way they stick with Willis lol I wonder why they traded for him. Willis is not a starting NFL QB. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NFLfan Posted September 7 Share Posted September 7 1 hour ago, Smonroe said: Maybe, but it's not easy to bring in a guy off the street and have him learn the playbook in less than a week. A vet like Tannehill could be their best bet, with some packages for Willis. So glad we got Flaaacoo. Willis has not been there more than a week or so. They have to sign someone else. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Restinpeacesweetchloe Posted September 7 Share Posted September 7 The good news is if they sign tannehilll Colts know him well. I can’t believe they didn’t go out and make the backup QB position better. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jvan1973 Posted September 7 Share Posted September 7 1 hour ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said: The good news is if they sign tannehilll Colts know him well. I can’t believe they didn’t go out and make the backup QB position better. You mean like us when Kerry Collins came in? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luv_pony_express Posted September 8 Share Posted September 8 5 hours ago, NFLfan said: I wonder why they traded for him. Willis is not a starting NFL QB. They didn’t acquire him to be a starting QB. If he’s not good enough to step in for 3 or 4 games, then I agree they shouldn’t have traded for him and should’ve signed somebody like Tannehill or Siemian. I’d be surprised if they don’t do that now. The Packers have a shot at a very good season. And it’s critical for them to try to limit the losses during Love’s absence. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NFLfan Posted September 8 Share Posted September 8 1 hour ago, luv_pony_express said: They didn’t acquire him to be a starting QB. Oh. I know. But he has to step in to be a starter now. 1 hour ago, luv_pony_express said: If he’s not good enough to step in for 3 or 4 games, then I agree they shouldn’t have traded for him and should’ve signed somebody like Tannehill or Siemian. I think I would prefer Willis over Siemian. Siemian is not good. I believe Tannehill, Ridder, and maybe Winston are better. 1 hour ago, luv_pony_express said: The Packers have a shot at a very good season. And it’s critical for them to try to limit the losses during Love’s absence. I agree. It will not be easy. The NFC North teams have brutal schedules. Green Bay has the Colts, Tennessee and then the Vikings. Not too difficult. The Vikings have the 49ers, Texans, then GB the next three weeks after tomorrow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now