Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

New turf installed


Recommended Posts

The Colts installed this same turf at the practice facility in April, including the indoor and outdoor fields. And apparently the infill they're using is organic, and needs to be watered?? There's no drainage at LOS, so I wonder how they worked that out. Maybe the amount of water used doesn't require significant drainage... I can't find a direct answer on that.

 

http://www.hellasconstruction.com/2024/april/indianapolis-colts-choose-hellas-matrix-helix-turf-geo-coolfill-and-cushdrain-for-safety-and-performance-enhancement/

 

Also this article includes a reference to a study that appears to indicate there's no major injury difference between the monofilament turf being installed at LOS and natural grass. In fact, the Titans recently switched from natural grass to the same Matrix Helix with the same fill and cushion being used at LOS. 

 

https://www.indystar.com/story/sports/nfl/colts/2023/10/04/why-the-indianapolis-colts-wont-switch-to-grass-at-lucas-oil-stadium/71007554007/

Quote

 

Zach Binney, an assistant professor of quantitative theory and methods at Emory University, found through research conducted with analyst Aaron Schatz between 2018-21 that the slit-film turf surface at Lucas Oil Stadium is associated with about a 7% increase of lower-body injuries that led to missing at least one game. His research found there was no major difference to injuries between monofilament-style turf and natural grass.  

 

The NFLPA has an issue with the slit-film turf Indianapolis uses, which is a thicker style of turf blade that can be pulled apart into smaller blades, according to ATX Turf. The slit-film turf blades will fray over the years and contribute to a flatter surface and faster ball movement. Monofilament turf has thinner, singular blades that will not pull apart. These blades will stand up straighter than slit-film turf and have a slower ball movement. The NFLPA said in November 2022 that, at the very least, it is demanding teams change from slit-film to monofilament turf to decrease the chance of injuries.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

That’s what I thought. I have never seen a close up of the old turf like this but pretty sure it didn’t look like this. It looked like cement underneath.

I’ve been on the field before. The old turf was not like that at all. It honestly felt like being on a track. No give and very hard.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Superman said:

The Colts installed this same turf at the practice facility in April, including the indoor and outdoor fields. And apparently the infill they're using is organic, and needs to be watered?? There's no drainage at LOS, so I wonder how they worked that out. Maybe the amount of water used doesn't require significant drainage... I can't find a direct answer on that.

 

http://www.hellasconstruction.com/2024/april/indianapolis-colts-choose-hellas-matrix-helix-turf-geo-coolfill-and-cushdrain-for-safety-and-performance-enhancement/

 

Also this article includes a reference to a study that appears to indicate there's no major injury difference between the monofilament turf being installed at LOS and natural grass. In fact, the Titans recently switched from natural grass to the same Matrix Helix with the same fill and cushion being used at LOS. 

 

https://www.indystar.com/story/sports/nfl/colts/2023/10/04/why-the-indianapolis-colts-wont-switch-to-grass-at-lucas-oil-stadium/71007554007/

 

No but the old style turf was linked to an increase in non contact injuries

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Watching on Tv, you don't always get to see that someone is beating coverage, but it was pointed out by some on here that attend games, that Alec was repeatedly open deep. Minshew  finally hit em a few times. Glad we have Qbs this year that can take advantage of his speed.   Pitt still makes tough catches, Downs being open most of the time might be why he's not getting the targets he used to.
    • I knew it was bad when Danny Pinter had tears on his face and was visibly upset. 
    • My understanding is that it is what the NFLPA recommended 
    • That loss is totally and unforgivably on the defense. Yes they are banged up, but that was beyond pathetic. The tackling was ABYSMAL, coverage was awful and Trevor had all day back there. The offense did what they had to, even if it wasnt pretty at times, with no Richardson or JT... Gus needs to be fired, immediately, I know that wont solve our defense for this year, but Gus should not be anywhere near our facility any more. Consistently awful defenses for the past few years tells you all you need to know about him and removes the excuse of "but the defense is banged up right now".  On to the next one, but this team has no hope until they get this defense fixed. Attrocious.
    • I saw him open last year as well like some other's mentioned. Made anxious for AR to get on the field to get him the ball.  Same could be said for Cross, always shown flashes, but was waiting for consistency.  Jones is another, that's why I trusted Ballard on the secondary. He was hesitant on Blackmon it seemed.  Glad he's a Colt but Pitt is looking for like part of a peice and not the piece like Franklin. 
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...