Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

8/27/22 Preseason Game 3: Bucs @ Colts, 7:30 PM ET


NFLfan

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, GoColts8818 said:

Yeah Rodgers and Hines can return kicks and punts and both have TDs in real games so I expect them to be the return guys if healthy and I just don’t see a roster spot for Flowers.

Dont see Hines on st this season,too risky because they plan to use him a ton on offense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, holeymoley99 said:

Dont see Hines on st this season,too risky because they plan to use him a ton on offense

Had him do it in 2020 when they did the samething with him on offense so I expect he will do that again this year.  I don’t think he returns kicks but I do think he’s the punt returner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, GoColts8818 said:

Had him do it in 2020 when they did the samething with him on offense so I expect he will do that again this year.  I don’t think he returns kicks but I do think he’s the punt returner.

Think club has a much bigger role in mind this season, dont see any clubs with important players in either pr or kr roles so.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, holeymoley99 said:

Think club has a much bigger role in mind this season, dont see any clubs with important players in either pr or kr roles so.....

Wes Welker returned kicks for years.  Cobb returned kicks for years for the Packers and was a starting WR.  It does happen.  Heck Hilton returned punts his first couple of years here too.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mick12Maher said:

Foles being the backup over Sam is laughable at this point. Even with Foles’ veteran presense, I would rather go with Sam’s upside. 

Foles has played well too so no it’s not.  I’ll say all three is going to make the final roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, John Waylon said:


I do like him. But this has just been a rambling mess. We’re hashing the Wentz ordeal all over again. Why?

He didn’t really say anything about Wentz. They made a change because of a seasons work. Chemistry didn’t feel right back in preseason. I watched and saw the same thing. He even said it doesn’t fall on one person. He expects better. He tempered expectations with Matt. Very logical and spot on.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Boss7894 said:

What do you mean?  I don’t have the game

It’s Irsay long rambling answers that don’t really say much.  He was asked right out of the gate about the meeting last year and the “he’s picking on Wentz” crowd will be happy he didn’t say Wentz’s name once.  He basically said he felt the chemistry was off from day one last year.  It’s pretty easy to see based on how things turned out he clearly blamed Wentz for that.  I think when it comes down to it they just don’t think he was the leader they needed him to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, John Waylon said:


I do like him. But this has just been a rambling mess. We’re hashing the Wentz ordeal all over again. Why?

To be fair, Rick asked him what was said in the meeting after the Jacksonville game. He said it’s not about one player but the mental part (4” between the ears) part of the game was important. If you want to infer he was talking about Wentz, so be it.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, John Waylon said:


I do like him. But this has just been a rambling mess. We’re hashing the Wentz ordeal all over again. Why?

He didn’t say Wentz name one time.  He talked about what they talked about in the meeting at the end of the year because he was asked about it so that’s why.  He’s not going out of his way to bring it up he’s responding to what he’s being asked.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, GoColts8818 said:

He didn’t say Wentz name one time.  He talked about what they talked about in the meeting at the end of the year because he was asked about it so that’s why.  He’s not going out of his way to bring it up he’s responding to what he’s being asked.

He also had a great take on Matt. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, John Waylon said:

He’s basically dumping on Wentz again. Not directly, but they’re covering that whole subject again. It’s been interesting to say the least. 

He didn’t say Wentz name one time.  He responded to what he was asked and you are inferring based on what happened after the meeting that he was talking about Wentz.  I agree he probably was but again he was asked about it.  It’s not like they went hey tell me about Jonathan Taylor and he went you know what Wentz sucks.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When I seen Roster Moves as the title, you scared me. I thought maybe we were bringing back Charlie Whitehurst since the AR news. (joking)
    • Well 30 I doubt the Vikings called themselves or maybe they did…
    • Actually, I kind of disagree that it would have been a contender. Most contenders are tight up against the cap and adding a receiver who was going to get north of $30,000,000 would have been very difficult. Plus contenders 1st round picks tend be very low in the 1st round. For example if Buffalo was interested , you would probably want multiple 1st and those are like say at 25 (basically 2nd round talent). I just dont see it happening and thats not appealing to the Vikings. The Colts are appealing because their pick was at  say #15 and they may have had the cap room to fit him under. Thats why I don't believe a lot of what is out there. 1st you have to look at each teams cap and say "who can fit a receiver for $30,000,000.00 under our cap. I bet it would have been few teams. The rumor was that the Vikings tried to trade him to say the Chargers. If i was the Chargers why would i take that deal? At number 5, I could have taken Nabers for a lot less money and many were saying he was the best receiver. Sure, he could be bust out, but I would have taken the chance. I bet if the Vikings would have offered Jefferson to the Cardinals, they would say no. Why would I give up Harrison for a guy, who is proven i must say, but is wanting $35,000,000.00 a year? I will take my chance with Harrison. Ballard has said they tried to move in the draft.  Like I said, maybe the move was for Jefferson. I always had a hard time he was trying to move below. I think that would have taken so much draft capital for a position he does not have in high regard. Jefferson would have been a safer move as maybe you give up a lot less draft capital but a lot more money. Offer their #15  and a 2nd rounder. People will say  a #15 and a 2nd rounder for an all pro wr? I think the wr market is totally out of control. Ballard could offer that because he then says to the Vikings now I have to turn around and give  him $35,000,00.00 a year. The Chiefs moved Hill because of economics and they won 2 super bowls without him. You build around the qb and not a wr. I do think the wr market will some day crater like the rb market. I think a lot of these guys will come up for their 2nd contract and teams will  try to move them. That is why I was not big on moving up to say 4 or 6 to get one of the elite wr. You would have to spend tons of draft capital and then come four years later what are you paying Harrison and/or Nabors if they play out? Like $40,000,00? No thanks. I will continue to look for diamonds in the rough. Here is an example of positional value. Do i think the Cardinals would have traded for Jefferson and then the Vikings say take Harrison at #4? No  I do not. Now if say the Cardinals need a pass rusher and the best one was there are #4 and he was considered elite   and Cowboys said we will trade Parsons for your pick. Do I think Cardinals take that trade? I bet they do without hesitation even if Parsons was in line for a monster contract. That is just the way I see it and always will when it comes to certain positions.
    • Signing confirmed.  Colts just announced.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...