Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Second Round, Coby Fleener


Recommended Posts

I like Coby Fleener for two resones. He played with Luck. Wich would be great to have for our rookie qb. And he is dangrous in the red zone. If he is availbule i think we should take him. How about your thoughts on this. Or getting a WR that Lucks used to

I like Fleener, but i personally think that we need a shut-down cornerback rather than a tightend at #34. that's my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the Colts will face a wonderful dilemma in the second round. Looking at player rankings and mock drafts from various sites, there is a real chance that several of the following players will still be on the board at pick 34:

SS: Mark Barron

CB: Janoris Jenkins / Stephon Gilmore

DT: Devon Still / Jerel Worthy

TE: Coby Fleener

WR: Rueben Randle / Stephen Hill

OG: Cordy Glenn / Kevin Zeitler

ILB: Dont'a Hightower

OLB: Zach Brown

Any of these prospects would be a solid pick at 34, but I also like the idea of trading down into the middle of the 2nd round and acquiring an extra 3rd rounder. Brandon Thompson or Alameda Ta'amu would be decent value in the 45-55 range. The Colts could wait until pick 65 to get a NT, but these two big boys might not get past Pittsburgh and Houston later in the 2nd round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fleener just Ran a 4.51 average. (drop that to 4.59 for pro day bias) and I say, draft him if he's there. Just wanted to make sure he was athletic enough.

I felt he wouldn't make it to the 2nd round before the pro day... That 40 time just cemented it: that guy's not making it out of the 1st round. He may even be a mid 1st rounder at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I felt he wouldn't make it to the 2nd round before the pro day... That 40 time just cemented it: that guy's not making it out of the 1st round. He may even be a mid 1st rounder at this point.

Agreed. If by some crazy act of insanity on draft day he falls to us at 34, we HAVE to take him. But he in all likelyhood will get scooped up by the Broncos or Giants at this rate, maybe even earlier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed. If by some crazy act of insanity on draft day he falls to us at 34, we HAVE to take him. But he in all likelyhood will get scooped up by the Broncos or Giants at this rate, maybe even earlier.

broncos have signed two tight ends in free agency and the giants have signed one also...plus the giants tend to like old school tight ends. i wouldn't be stunned if fleener fell to the second, but it would suprise me to see him taken by the bears @19 either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

broncos have signed two tight ends in free agency and the giants have signed one also...plus the giants tend to like old school tight ends. i wouldn't be stunned if fleener fell to the second, but it would suprise me to see him taken by the bears @19 either.

Yeah I made that post before the Broncos signed the two tight ends.. feel like 19 is too early for the Bears. They need line help before they get a TE. If the Giants don't take him I could see us getting him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suppose anything is possible, but with his size and running a 4.45 forty at his pro-day, unlikely he falls past TE needy teams (e.g. Giants).

That 4.45 was with the wind. While I do see the Giants taking him at 32, it won't be the end of the world if we don't get him. Even if he is around at 34 depending who's around we could easily pass on him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That 4.45 was with the wind. While I do see the Giants taking him at 32, it won't be the end of the world if we don't get him. Even if he is around at 34 depending who's around we could easily pass on him.

I actually agree completely. I honestly think looking at all the holes on our team, particularly on defense, taking a TE at the #34 overall pick would be unwise. There will still be some very good corners there at that pick, as well as NT and LB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That 4.45 was with the wind. While I do see the Giants taking him at 32, it won't be the end of the world if we don't get him. Even if he is around at 34 depending who's around we could easily pass on him.

don't see the giants taking fleener. the cowboys signed martellus bennet from the cowboys and he fits what the giants traditionally look for in a tight end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The issue some may have is the kind of journalism where Bob McGinn created an article that affected a young man's career based solely upon anonymous sources.   I'm confident you will reply back referring to your experience as a journalist with some version of 'without anonymous sources, there would be no journalism'. I value reading your insight about how sports are covered and I don't disagree that anonymous sources can be important. Its fair for anonymous sources to give background about things they are not comfortable saying out loud.   However, I'll add that perhaps its also fair for Bob McGinn to use his anonymous sources to help him find the story and craft the story, but if nobody will put their name on it then Bob McGinn needs to dig deeper before he launches infotainment into the world. He can't take back the damage he did to AD Mitchell.    
    • So damn classy as always. I still rewatch their pandemic golf game from 2020. They just have awesome chemistry together. Hopefully they can get Tom on the Manningcast again for more hilarity.  
    • Uuuugh.     I think it would’ve been better if I had preached a healthy dose of patience and NOT patients.        
    • Feel the need to clarify something.   The writer of the article, Bob McGinn, is one of the top-10 football writers there is.  (Milwaukee Journal Sentinel) McGinn does NOT have an opinion on Mitchell.  It’s the unnamed scouts who have the negative opinions.  McGinn is quoting them which is his job.  He is supposed to do that.     Ballard even acknowledged that in his own way.  He literally said “put your name on it!”   Well, McGinn’s name IS on it.  it’s his column.   But it’s the scouts who are saying things anonymously.   If there’s an issue, (if) it’s with them, not McGinn.     
    • And when/if a team signs one of those safeties they’ll be made to look like a genius while Ballard is called a fool.    I think what’s more likely is that an injury will inevitably happen and a team will bring in an available free agent. That could be training camp. That could early in the season. You just never know. 
  • Members

    • newb767

      newb767 0

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Coltsfan1953

      Coltsfan1953 201

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PureLuck

      PureLuck 274

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 21,511

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • lester

      lester 302

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • bellevuecolt

      bellevuecolt 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 8,435

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Defjamz26

      Defjamz26 4,737

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PeterBowman

      PeterBowman 1,764

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nadine

      Nadine 8,162

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...