Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Safeties


compuls1v3

Recommended Posts

Geathers has been excellent the last 2 games after a rocky first game against the Bengals. He has had 22 tackles in his last 2 games with 13 of them solo. He is a good strong safety.

 

Hooker is a little rusty but he will get there. The Redskins game was a complete right off as Smith was never going to test him. Hooker made a good pass break up when tested yesterday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hooker may take a bit of time.

 

I don't see the tremendous closing speed that made him a star at Ohio State

and his few games here......  he may be healing as he goes

 

We need him to get there

 

Geathers had some good tackles yesterday, but he seems like a step or two slow this year

 

This defense needs BOTH of these safeties to play at a high level

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Happy2BeHere said:

Some of our downfield coverage is quite suspect...we have given up more plays than we should and Hooker seems to be a little scattered out there and unsure of himself. It's improving and that's good but the secondary has got to do a better job in coverage for sure.

After watching the highlights I agree, I feel Hooker seemed a little scattered or not confident.  That TD saving pass break up and tackling angles were encouraging at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both playing really well.

 

That low shoulder roll cut tackle Hooker seems to do has me worried sometimes when he’s the last man to beat. Sooner or later people are going to expect it and vault him. I’d rather he wrapped up and lost another yard or 2 on forward progress than gave up touchdowns by making a poor cut tackle he can’t recover from.

 

Just my 2 cents.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, PeterBowman said:

Seems to me that team are avoiding Hooker. Maybe that's why his name doesn't get called often.

teams will probably always avoid him somewhat, especially after he gets more ints.  he needs to get his speed back and make great reads to be a factor 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Steamboat_Shaun said:

 

I must be missing what the rest of you guys are watching, all I see is a freak athlete.

 

That's one play, a HIGHLIGHT play, and I acknowledged it already.  It might have been because it was wet, but there was just some plays he looked hesitant on.  Trust me, I'm on the Hooker bandwagon. And I'm no analyst.  That's just what I saw when I watched the game highlights.  My eyes may have failed me :D.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • But you haven't learned the narrative this forum has been trying to tell you.   Frank Reich pounded his fists for Wentz, Ryan, Pryor, and all of the WRs that busted.   OTOH, Pagano never pounded his fist for TJ Green, or Bjoern Werner, or Trent Richardson, or that little small school cornerback that got canned before the season even started.     You see, the GM is only responsible for the bad players when it helps support the previous statements that the GM is bad, and the HC is responsible for the bad players when it helps support previous statement's that the GM is a genius.   You should know this by now and be falling in line accordingly.
    • TJ Green was a a Grigson pick. I know it’s been pointed out but if you’re going to be so arrogantly biased but not remember a player drafted before the GM your bashing them, the substance of your message is incredibly vacated of credibility.   His drafts have consisted of incredibly high upside, toolsy and traitsy prospects. If anything his knock has been that he hasn’t taken safer players with high floors and lower upside.   My take on Banogu is that his demise is from his greed. He was drafted to play, and played in college as a linebacker. His role was to be the same as a Dontae Hightower. Someone mainly utilized for blitzes, and a run stuffer. However he came in and wanted to be a pass rusher because they get paid a heck of a lot more than a line backer on average. They shouldn’t have let him take that on and kept him at line backer and he might still be on a roster.    As far as block buster moves how can you discredit the Buckner trade? Trading for Carson Wentz? Trading for Matt Ryan? You can’t say he hasn’t taken chances. I blame Frank Reich more than anything still. I mean who the hell has Andrew Luck coming back in his first game after a huge shoulder surgery and throwing 53 times? I think that was the first moment that made me question Reich.   Your Richardson take is so disgusting and troll inducing it makes me think you don’t watch football or have watched any tape. You would think he played like Lamar Jackson where as he always has his eyes down the field when he breaks from the pocket.   Reich was the bigger failure and the reason we kept a revolving door at QB IMHO. A GM has to take the QB his head coach wants and Reich was wrong 4 times with the likes of Rivers (ultimately set us back another year by playing one season and dipping after taking us deep enough in the draft we couldn’t trade up without it costing us a fortune) Wentz, Foles and Ryan. You can’t win without a QB and he impeded us from getting a QB his entire tenure.
    • I appreciate your frustration…. But you and I have had this exact same conversation before.      What can I tell you?   The world changed.  Information used to come in your morning newspaper or the 10 or 11p news.  Info moved slowly.      Now information moves at the speed of a tweet.  The pressure to keep up has exploded.   Most people don’t get their news from the paper,  they get it from their phone.   Everyone is doing the best they can under extremely difficult circumstances.   Well…. Most everyone.    And what may be crap to some is fine for others.   In this thread here, @Superman noted that for some people the news is good or bad simply if they agree with it or not.  We, all of us,  are far, far more tribal than we ever used to be when we were younger.      The world has changed for better and worse.   Who was the former Indy Star writer who left to join The Athletic? He wrote about how,  for the first time in his life, having to worry about selling subscriptions.  And if he didn’t hit quotas he was going to get fired.  I was horrified for him.  My heart broke for him.  Why The Athletic thinks that’s a good business model is beyond me, but they do.   That kind of excruciating pressure will inevitably lead to bad editorial decisions.  A real shame.      I don’t know what kind of response you were expecting from me….  But these are my thoughts.   Hope it clarified.  
    • It's a valid concern. We had a powerhouse post on this from one of our members after the Colts made the pick. You should check it out.      
  • Members

    • Dobbinblitz

      Dobbinblitz 1,388

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • lester

      lester 302

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndyD4U

      IndyD4U 1,450

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Rhodelesstraveled

      Rhodelesstraveled 713

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NFLfan

      NFLfan 17,533

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • 1959Colts

      1959Colts 3,790

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dingus McGirt

      Dingus McGirt 3,687

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DougDew

      DougDew 9,074

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • twfish

      twfish 1,965

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Introspect

      Introspect 346

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...