Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Future of Colts Cornerback position


chad72

Recommended Posts

Do you guys think Ballard might bring in Dominique Rodgers Cromartie or a Jeremy Lane for help with the Cornerback position for a short term deal? Or do you think he will restrict himself to exclusively the ones he has on the roster plus UDFAs?

 

He did claim Pierre Desir off the waivers after being released by the Seahawks, later in the season in September last year, didn't he? Hence wondering.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we are looking at all of this the wrong way 

 

What is the purpose/job of a CB? The same as a LB.

 

Limit the yards allowed. It's as simple as that.

 

Traditionally, LBs have done so against the run and the CBs have done so against the pass.

 

But we live in untraditional times and thus, given the talent on the draft, we will likely use untraditional methods to do so.

 

I envision us using our Mike and Wills to take away the middle, the underneath, and the flats with CBs and Safeties taking away the posts and the deep field.

 

Given the talent and skillset of LBs we just drafted, they all have one thing in common: they have speed and above average agility, who bodes well for the jobs that will be asked of them.

 

The goal is to limit yards and points.

 

You can do it either using All Pro CBs or using the team/scheme approach.

 

Given our talent at CB, I suspect it will be the latter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I was putting money on it I would say that the Colts make some wavier claims but don't sign proven veterans like DRC or Jeremy Lane.

 

If the Colts did sign a veteran CB I don't think it would be DRC. He is 32 years old and I don't think the Colts are going to sign a CB that old. I could potentially see them signing Lane if they do decide to bring a more proven veteran in.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We brought in Aker and DJ White both from KC and both starting experience. We have Q Desir Hairston Moore and Milton from last season when Ballard overhauled the secondary. He will be on the look out as always but he may want to see the development of the guys he's already brought in 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that with a faster defense, we may get to the quarterback more. This will help out our secondary a lot. 

 

I would also like to note our defense will most likely not be very good. If it is, it will be, at best, 15th in total defense, which ironically would be so good we’d probably make the playoffs. It all depends on how our players develop. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, akcolt said:

We brought in Aker and DJ White both from KC and both starting experience. We have Q Desir Hairston Moore and Milton from last season when Ballard overhauled the secondary. He will be on the look out as always but he may want to see the development of the guys he's already brought in 

White played in the loss to Denver he was awful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, jameszeigler834 said:

White played in the loss to Denver he was awful.

New coaches new system you never know what a new year may bring. If he continues to be awful he'll be gone. Moore is the guy I want to see this year He was a camp star in NE last year. I think we can expect Q and Hairston to be improved hopefully Desir's development continues. Ballard will have an eye out Desir and Moore were both snagged off PS's last year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, krunk said:

He will probably grab a few guys off waivers when cuts start happening. We are up near the top of the pecking order this year.

Good point.  As long as Dorsey and Gettleman dont beat us to the punch.  Cleveland still has cash to spend too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

Here's a vote for Breeland....

 

 

Yeah. We have the cap space, and the price right now could probably be pretty low with his injury, and the fact that it’s caused issues with him landing anywhere else. Even Washington said they don’t want him back. 

 

Which is also a reason for concern. It’s kind of a risk signing him. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We’re definitely going to add someone, but as other have stated, I don’t think it will happen before teams are to trim their roster down to 53. We will then either get a decent vet or - more likely - snag a nice prospect that someone tries to hide on the practice squad.

 

The only concern is that this was a weak CB class draft, so there wont be as much CB shuffling around as we would have liked. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He's not signed, there is nothing else to talk about and I am bored.  
    • Yes, I know. The Stanford teams  when Hogan was the starting QB were full of top recruits on offense and defense. It was so much fun being a fan then. I'm not as big a fan of Stanford as you are. Being on the East Coast makes it hard to follow them as much as I used to.   Overall, I am becoming less and less interested in sports. For over 20 years, I used to listen to sports radio whenever I had free time.  I used to follow tennis, golf, baseball, college basketball, a little NBA and NHL as well as NFL and college football. I once went to 20+ baseball games in a year.  The only sport I still follow religiously now is NFL football. I try to follow my favorite baseball team, the Mets, but not enough. I attribute my loss of interest to there being too much change and movement of players, coaches, teams, conferences, etc. Stanford is now part of the ACC! My goodness! (Shaking my head) I don't like all these changes in conferences.   I was a big fan of Ted Leyland, Stanford's former athletic director many years ago. It saddened me when Leyland left Stanford to go to the University of Pacific which was his alma mater. I see he retired. He hired Buddy Teevens who died last year. Back in those days, I followed Stanford football a lot more closely. They were not great years but I loved rooting for players who also excelled in the classroom.   TL;DR 😉
    • Oh I think they are ready. They are right in the thick of it. Well educated and smart women. They are more in tune with the Indianapolis Colts than all of the new ownership in the league is with their respective franchises. I'm not concerned in the least with these ladies taking over moving forward. I think it's a great thing and speaks to the stability that the organization is preaching and looking to build. 
    • I'm out this year. I'm going to be focusing on my bestballs and daily fantasy. I already have $400 invested and am making a concentrated effort this year to win some money.
    • I got the email but I’ll put it here too, I’m in.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...