Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

S. Smith to the Raven's


ColtsBlueFL

Recommended Posts

Steve Smith is overrated. Past his prime.

He is past his prime, but I'm not sure you're correct when saying he's overrated. As a player, he's quite talented. But because he's such a jerk, I would not want him on my favorite team. I don't think his talent is strong enough to excuse his jerk side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great signing.

 

I prefer "tough" and "physical" receivers over finesse anyday.

 

Steve Smith, Golden Tate, Anquan Boldin, Hines Ward - just love these guys.

 

Seattle are going to miss Tate big time.

 

Toughness is really under rated.

Seattle won't miss Tate a bit. If anything, he's going to miss Seattle. If they thought he was so critical they would have kept him there. Tate made some great plays from time to time, but he's not a game changing threat in any way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seattle won't miss Tate a bit. If anything, he's going to miss Seattle. If they thought he was so critical they would have kept him there. Tate made some great plays from time to time, but he's not a game changing threat in any way.

What has Seattle done at WR this year? I have not followed them much. They can't go into the season with just the often injured Harvin. Tate was a good receiver for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be better for the economy if he were retired and a young player had the opportunity.

Sure, but you forgot about the Ravens signing an old Matt Birk at center, and how effective he was. How about the Orioles signing an old Frank Robinson from the Reds? The Ravens won a Super Bowl, and the Orioles won 2 World Series with these " old" guys. I guess it depends who the old guys are !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does not matter whatsoever. Flacco is overrated as hell and look at their defense. Defense wasn't even impressive when they lucked into that Super Bowl a few years ago.

We will take the so-called lucky Super Bowl every time , over the unlucky drop and missed field goal the year before on 2011, when we were probably the best team in the league. Unlike New England, who has trouble matching up with the Giants, the Ravens are a good match up , and generally beat them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Problem was they overpaid Flacco, while lots of key role players were let go or retired.

 

e.g. Ray Lewis, Ed Reed, Bernard Pollard, Dannell Ellerbe, Arthur Jones, Paul Kruger, Anquan Boldin, Matt Birk, Bryant McKinnie.

Flacco's cap number is quite low now. Lewis retired, Reed should have retired, Kruger, Ellerbe , and Jones overpaid, Birk retired , McKinnie traded due to be overweight. Boldin was a mistake, and Pollard replaced. Most had nothing to do with Flacco.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does not matter whatsoever. Flacco is overrated as hell and look at their defense. Defense wasn't even impressive when they lucked into that Super Bowl a few years ago.

 

It was impressive enough to hold Peyton to 21 and Brady to 13 points in their own house. If not for the power mishap in the SB, I doubt the 49ers even make it that close. I strongly feel so.

 

No SB winner is a lucky one, and they have all had to endure enough obstacles on their way, IMO. Everyone will have their SB called "lucky" or belittled in some form or fashion. I expect nothing less in this negativity filled world.

 

Patriots won because of the tuck rule in 2001 or because they played McNabb in 2004, Steelers won because of the refs in 2005, Peyton won because of Grossman in 2006, Eli won because of a "fluky" Tyree catch in 2007, Saints won because of the bounties and the refs' swallowing whistles vs Favre in 2009 etc. based on which side you are (you all can figure out who said who and when :)).

 

I'll take the SB win for my franchise any day and let the whiners whine away. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was impressive enough to hold Peyton to 21 and Brady to 13 points in their own house. If not for the power mishap in the SB, I doubt the 49ers even make it that close. I strongly feel so.

 

No SB winner is a lucky one, and they have all had to endure enough obstacles on their way, IMO. Everyone will have their SB called "lucky" or belittled in some form or fashion. I expect nothing less in this negativity filled world.

 

Patriots won because of the tuck rule in 2001 or because they played McNabb in 2004, Steelers won because of the refs in 2005, Peyton won because of Grossman in 2006, Eli won because of a "fluky" Tyree catch in 2007, Saints won because of the bounties and the refs' swallowing whistles vs Favre in 2009 etc. based on which side you are (you all can figure out who said who and when :)).

 

I'll take the SB win for my franchise any day and let the whiners whine away. :)

No doubt, they are hard to get, and you take them whenever you can. The 2006 Colts technically wasn't their best team record wise of the Manning era , but they got hot and went on a run. No one is ever going to apologize for a Super Bowl win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • As it stands the Eagles are pretty loaded with CBs at the moment after picking up Rodgers then drafting both Quinyon and Cooper in the draft. There have been rumblings of them potentially preparing to move Bradberry. They are currently in need of another WR, so the question I pose is would you be ok with trading Alec to Philly in exchange for Bradberry? Or do you think they should let the current CBs on the roster battle it out? Keep in mind Bradberry is approaching 31 years of age.
    • Exactly. I wanted the Vikes to trade Jefferson. I think being careful not to overpay is important in football. I guess that is why I like Ballard. He does not jump and pay the shiniest free agent all this money. He believes in rewarding his own players.   The only reason I would pay Jefferson is because he has been in our organization and we know him. I prefer paying players who have been with the team and have been good players and good citizens (stays out of trouble, are team players, etc.)
    • It is but as the guys reporting this said Pierce was the only one of the top four WRs working with special teams and not something he’s done in the past.  Like I said it’s early indication,  it can clearly change.
    • Yeah it was a wild game. Cubs are in a funk that is for sure lol.
    • Tatum is a great player but Doncic is better. Both teams basically will have a week off and should come in healthy so there really can't be any excuses for the losing team. Unless a key player gets injured during the series. I still like Dallas in 6. If I am wrong I will be here and tip my cap to you, and say I was wrong.   Regarding football, if you look my top 5 QBs of all-time, I have Brady #1 and I am a diehard Colts fan. I have Brady 1, Montana 2, Peyton 3, Mahomes 4, Unitas 5. The League MVP is the 2nd best thing a QB can win, only winning the Championship is better. So I put a lot of weight on League MVPs. Peyton is top 5 at worse just because of that alone combined with winning 2 Championships. At the end of the year, if a QB doesn't win the Championship, but wins League MVP, most say, he still at least won MVP and was the best player the whole regular season.
  • Members

    No members to show

×
×
  • Create New...