Stoney Posted March 3, 2014 Share Posted March 3, 2014 What good is a proven safety if he's in coverage for 6-8 seconds EVERY pass play cause the pass rush can't there?Everything starts up front! There is no argument. Having an great secondary means NOTHING with no pass rush. Why would you want your DB's in coverage for decades? Or another example, crossing routes. Teams KILLED us with those. How would a safety change that?Sry for that blank comment, my phone is confusing. But you didn't answer my question. What players are available this year besides Arthur Jones that we just have to get that would immediately make our front 7 worlds better. I'm all in for Orakpo too but he probly cost too much $ for you right? There is a play making Safety available staring us right in the eyes why not get him and make our dbacks an elite group for years to come. If we had Byrd maybe he gets that INT that Bethea dropped late in the game against the Patriots playoffs. And don't get me wrong, I'm all with ya that it starts up front. But I'm also not afraid to want to spend a little more money on a guy that I know will make a difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TKnight24 Posted March 3, 2014 Author Share Posted March 3, 2014 OOOOOOO you're in trouble now Mister!!!Speaking the truth vis-a-vis the secondary and the pass rush is a big no-no.*Puts dunce cone hat on & sits in timeout chair*Guess I'll be over here until the mods tell me I can come out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TKnight24 Posted March 3, 2014 Author Share Posted March 3, 2014 I wish more fans understood this.You can lead a horse to water, but can't make it drink Balzer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stoney Posted March 3, 2014 Share Posted March 3, 2014 Those crossing routes are on the ILB's to read AND Safeties, A good example of this is the Broncos second posession of the SB.....there 2nd play of that drive, Thomas came across Peytons vision on a crossing route and Cam Chancellor came up and layed a huge hit on Thomas for just 3 yards^this guy gets it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TKnight24 Posted March 3, 2014 Author Share Posted March 3, 2014 Sry for that blank comment, my phone is confusing. But you didn't answer my question. What players are available this year besides Arthur Jones that we just have to get that would immediately make our front 7 worlds better. I'm all in for Orakpo too but he probly cost too much $ for you right? There is a play making Safety available staring us right in the eyes why not get him and make our dbacks an elite group for years to come. If we had Byrd maybe he gets that INT that Bethea dropped late in the game against the Patriots playoffs. And don't get me wrong, I'm all with ya that it starts up front. But I'm also not afraid to want to spend a little more money on a guy that I know will make a difference.Honestly i don't know the FA class like that so I couldn't tell you. Orakpo would help but Walden did all year what he was paid to do, set the edge. But Orakpo is probably a better force in the pass rushDansby would be good, if he's available. I'd even make the trade for Dion Jordan if the price is right. Convert him to OLB cause he's too small for DE. And he's very athletic so OLB would be good. You can never have too many pass rushers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thewholefnshow28 Posted March 3, 2014 Share Posted March 3, 2014 That is a risky move. At least with the franchise tag you can always negotiate a long term deal up till a certain deal and you are sure you are keeping the guy no matter what for at least another season. This leaves a team who is willing to throw money at him open to come in a steal him. I am all for keeping him, but not above a certain price tag. If someone wants to pay him top 5 CB money then you let him walk. Hopefully we can get him closer to Grimes's deal and call it a day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colts_Fan12 Posted March 3, 2014 Share Posted March 3, 2014 Honestly i don't know the FA class like that so I couldn't tell you. Orakpo would help but Walden did all year what he was paid to do, set the edge. But Orakpo is probably a better force in the pass rushDansby would be good, if he's available. I'd even make the trade for Dion Jordan if the price is right. Convert him to OLB cause he's too small for DE. And he's very athletic so OLB would be good. You can never have too many pass rushersI'd look into Jordan also depending on what they are asking. He was playing the wrong position last year and didn't get to play much Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason_ Posted March 3, 2014 Share Posted March 3, 2014 What good is a proven safety if he's in coverage for 6-8 seconds EVERY pass play cause the pass rush can't there?Everything starts up front! There is no argument. Having an great secondary means NOTHING with no pass rush. Why would you want your DB's in coverage for decades?Or another example, crossing routes. Teams KILLED us with those. How would a safety change that? wow, hyperbole much? Our pass rush wasn't even close to as bad as you're making it out to be. You realize the Colts were 11th in the league last year with 42 sacks right? Pressures also figure into the equation of course. For a full PFF breakdown, check here: https://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2013/11/27/pass-rushing-productivity-team-defenses/ You'll find that: DL ranked 7 out of 15 in total pass rush productivity (only including 3-4 teams...Houston was #1 which isn't really fair because they are a 1-gap team)LB ranked 6 out of 15 (only including the 3-4 teams)DB ranked 32 out of 32 (ouch)Total, colts ranked 17th out of 32 teams. Not great, definitely can be improved, but not NEARLY as bad as you're trying to make it out to be. Also, for people that keep complaining that we don't get enough pass rush from our DL, compare to Baltimore's numbers. Overall they are ranked 6th in total Pass rush productivity but their DL was ranked 12 out of 15, which was 5 places lower than the Colts and there were only 3 teams that run a 3-4 that were lower. Our DL actually did pretty well last year considering 2 of the 3 starters were new to the team (Franklin and RJF). I do expect some moves to be made to improve the DL but not the drastic moves some are calling for. I actually wouldn't be surprised if there was no big name DL brought in during FA but rather another player or 2 in the draft to groom. What we need most is someone to take over for Redding but that may very well be Hughes. I expect Chapman to take over as starter in 2014 and after that we need better quality depth. IF a free agent is brought in it will likely be someone to start ahead of Redding moving Redding to a rotational role and as a situational interior pass rusher. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TKnight24 Posted March 3, 2014 Author Share Posted March 3, 2014 I'd look into Jordan also depending on what they are asking. He was playing the wrong position last year and didn't get to play muchYep, only if the price is right. Don't want to get robbed out of a draft pick. But I believe Jordan would be good here at OLB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colts_Fan12 Posted March 3, 2014 Share Posted March 3, 2014 Yep, only if the price is right. Don't want to get robbed out of a draft pick. But I believe Jordan would be good here at OLBI think he will be good anywhere as an OLB lol he got screwed in Miami Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TKnight24 Posted March 3, 2014 Author Share Posted March 3, 2014 I think he will be good anywhere as an OLB lol he got screwed in MiamiIndeed. Player's Jordan size coming out as DE's usually go to 3-4 teams to play OLB. Not sure what made Miami take him in their 4-3 defense. There were plenty of 4-3 players & offensive line available when they picked Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colts_Fan12 Posted March 3, 2014 Share Posted March 3, 2014 Indeed. Player's Jordan size coming out as DE's usually go to 3-4 teams to play OLB. Not sure what made Miami take him in their 4-3 defense. There were plenty of 4-3 players & offensive line available when they pickedCause Miami is stupid they don't use there heads they got robbed last year by ellerbe and Wallace and just got robbed by grimes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TKnight24 Posted March 3, 2014 Author Share Posted March 3, 2014 Cause Miami is stupid they don't use there heads they got robbed last year by ellerbe and Wallace and just got robbed by grimesYeah I just saw that. What was it $16 million guaranteed I think someone posted here? Isn't he like 30+ years old? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colts_Fan12 Posted March 3, 2014 Share Posted March 3, 2014 Yeah I just saw that. What was it $16 million guaranteed I think someone posted here? Isn't he like 30+ years old?Yeah he is lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TKnight24 Posted March 3, 2014 Author Share Posted March 3, 2014 Yeah he is lolMiami just dishes out money like it's nothing I suppose Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TKnight24 Posted March 3, 2014 Author Share Posted March 3, 2014 wow, hyperbole much? Our pass rush wasn't even close to as bad as you're making it out to be. You realize the Colts were 11th in the league last year with 42 sacks right? Pressures also figure into the equation of course. For a full PFF breakdown, check here: https://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2013/11/27/pass-rushing-productivity-team-defenses/You'll find that:DL ranked 7 out of 15 in total pass rush productivity (only including 3-4 teams...Houston was #1 which isn't really fair because they are a 1-gap team)LB ranked 6 out of 15 (only including the 3-4 teams)DB ranked 32 out of 32 (ouch)Total, colts ranked 17th out of 32 teams. Not great, definitely can be improved, but not NEARLY as bad as you're trying to make it out to be. Also, for people that keep complaining that we don't get enough pass rush from our DL, compare to Baltimore's numbers. Overall they are ranked 6th in total Pass rush productivity but their DL was ranked 12 out of 15, which was 5 places lower than the Colts and there were only 3 teams that run a 3-4 that were lower. Our DL actually did pretty well last year considering 2 of the 3 starters were new to the team (Franklin and RJF).I do expect some moves to be made to improve the DL but not the drastic moves some are calling for. I actually wouldn't be surprised if there was no big name DL brought in during FA but rather another player or 2 in the draft to groom. What we need most is someone to take over for Redding but that may very well be Hughes. I expect Chapman to take over as starter in 2014 and after that we need better quality depth. IF a free agent is brought in it will likely be someone to start ahead of Redding moving Redding to a rotational role and as a situational interior pass rusher.I'm not saying our pass rush is the worst in the world but it could use much improvement. When Robert comes off the field, you can see the significant drop off in pressure generated by our front. It's gotta be more options to help that is all I'm saying. Mathis despite how good he is and despite the season he just had, he's not getting younger and we gotta find him some help Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colts_100nascar17fan Posted March 3, 2014 Share Posted March 3, 2014 I wouldn't of tagged davis, he aint worth 11million a year,not even half that. Played terrible last year most games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bestQBever Posted March 4, 2014 Share Posted March 4, 2014 So let's say we re-sign Vontae then sign Byrd. Then what? That's probably 85% of our money gone cause Byrd is gonna cost. We're STILL in bad shape cause we have NO PASS RUSHEverything starts up front. If we get a better pass rush, we won't have to worry about pur secondary getting gashed for huge playsWe could address pass rush in the draft. With our 2nd round pick. This all relies on Henoc Muamba becoming the next Jerrell Freeman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted March 4, 2014 Share Posted March 4, 2014 So, Grimes get 8 mio per year at the age 30. That means we will have to pay Davis at least that since that. 8+ mio a year for a corner is too much. I'd rather let Davis walk and use the 2nd round pick on a corner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iancolts Posted March 4, 2014 Share Posted March 4, 2014 I agree with James 8 mill a year is a lot for a 30 year old DB. Vontae is 25 I think that alone he will use as leverage and and easily 2-3 mill more then Grimes yearly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gavin Posted March 4, 2014 Share Posted March 4, 2014 So, Grimes get 8 mio per year at the age 30. That means we will have to pay Davis at least that since that. 8+ mio a year for a corner is too much. I'd rather let Davis walk and use the 2nd round pick on a corner. That still dont solve anything, we wouldn't likely end up with a #1 Corner at our slot in the 2nd round and even if we did somehow that Corner is still a rookie and will take some time to develop...On top of not currently having a reliable #2 Corner now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iancolts Posted March 4, 2014 Share Posted March 4, 2014 Grimes contract puts us in a bind now if Davis uses that as leverage/asking price etc... Only if we had signed Davis earlier we probably wouldn't have to overpay now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted March 4, 2014 Share Posted March 4, 2014 That still dont solve anything, we wouldn't likely end up with a #1 Corner at our slot in the 2nd round and even if we did somehow that Corner is still a rookie and will take some time to develop...On top of not currently having a reliable #2 Corner now Could find a stop gap type player (like Tillman) and sign him for 1-2 seasons while our 2nd round CB could develop. I see plenty of CBs in this draft who has potential to start after a year or two. EJ Gaines, Macgill, Fuller, Hampton, Jean-Baptiste. Then maybe get Colvin in the later round and sit him like Chapman. They we have two youngsters ready to start come 2015.Paying big bucks for Davis 8 mil a year will not end well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted March 4, 2014 Share Posted March 4, 2014 Grimes contract puts us in a bind now if Davis uses that as leverage/asking price etc... Only if we had signed Davis earlier we probably wouldn't have to overpay now This. It's a huge headache now. We must not overpay for Davis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLUEx40 Posted March 4, 2014 Share Posted March 4, 2014 I love Davis and there is probably no one who wants him back more than me but for some reason I think he tests free agency and gets an offer he cant refuse Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BProland85 Posted March 4, 2014 Share Posted March 4, 2014 If we can't get Davis signed back with the team, we may have to trade up to get a #1 CB like Darqueze Dennard. We would have been best served to sign him long term a few months back so we wouldn't be up against a corner 1 week from free agency. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IndyScribe Posted March 4, 2014 Share Posted March 4, 2014 If we can't get Davis signed back with the team, we may have to trade up to get a #1 CB like Darqueze Dennard. We would have been best served to sign him long term a few months back so we wouldn't be up against a corner 1 week from free agency.That's going to cost us way too much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BProland85 Posted March 4, 2014 Share Posted March 4, 2014 That's going to cost us way too much.Which is why if we don't resign Davis, this offseason is off to a horrible start for the Colts. They have had plenty of time to get a deal done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IndyScribe Posted March 4, 2014 Share Posted March 4, 2014 Which is why if we don't resign Davis, this offseason is off to a horrible start for the Colts. They have had plenty of time to get a deal done.Yep. If Davis walks, then there is something seriously wrong with Grigson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jvan1973 Posted March 4, 2014 Share Posted March 4, 2014 Yep. If Davis walks, then there is something seriously wrong with Grigson.? If he wants more money than grigson is willing to give, how does that make something wrong with grigson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IndyScribe Posted March 4, 2014 Share Posted March 4, 2014 ? If he wants more money than grigson is willing to give, how does that make something wrong with grigsonI don't think he asks for $10 million. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jvan1973 Posted March 4, 2014 Share Posted March 4, 2014 I don't think he asks for $10 million.Based on? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IndyScribe Posted March 4, 2014 Share Posted March 4, 2014 Based on?A couple of things. Grimes' contract will probably be where he asks around. Also, he knows that Grigson won't pay him $11 million because of not franchise tagging him. He's also stated he wants to stay in Indy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gavin Posted March 4, 2014 Share Posted March 4, 2014 For all we know both sides agreed on an amount but the length of years is what the problem is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IndyScribe Posted March 4, 2014 Share Posted March 4, 2014 For all we know both sides agreed on an amount but the length of years is what the problem isThat's true. It wouldn't be that hard to negotiate the length of years though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iancolts Posted March 4, 2014 Share Posted March 4, 2014 If Davis can agree to a grimes contract then I'll we will be okay but any higher would kill us cap wise to and any other free agents we need desperately like guards, ILB, Dline, and safety Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jvan1973 Posted March 4, 2014 Share Posted March 4, 2014 If Davis can agree to a grimes contract then I'll we will be okay but any higher would kill us cap wise to and any other free agents we need desperately like guards, ILB, Dline, and safetyWhy would he agree to Grimes contract? He is five years younger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BProland85 Posted March 4, 2014 Share Posted March 4, 2014 Davis should be getting right around what Grimes received. Remember that Davis didn't make the pro bowl this year or last year, so the Colts have a little leverage there based on Grimes making the pro bowl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BProland85 Posted March 4, 2014 Share Posted March 4, 2014 Why would he agree to Grimes contract? He is five years youngerI agree youth does play into the contract, but so does stats and Grimes has the stats and pro bowl appearances that Davis does not have. That's why he should be getting around the deal Grimes received. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason_ Posted March 4, 2014 Share Posted March 4, 2014 Whether Davis gets re-signed or not, there's going to be a meltdown on this forum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now