Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

0-16 For Colts And Dolphins Scenario


Grav

Recommended Posts

strength of schedule, then divisional & conference records and if still tied coin flip

As far as both go 0-16 the divisional and conference records should not make any difference.

About strength of schedule, does it mean the W-L record of the opponents this year, or sth. else?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay at this point who has had the easiest schedule?

I'd say the Dolphins based on a quick look. I was already thinking about the Colts strength of schedule because it's occurred to me that some of the "easy" games they've had turned out to be against decent teams. The Browns are 3-4, the Chiefs 3-3, everyone else has a winning record. Such a strange year.

Of course that's only considering teams played to this point. The Jaguars and Panthers are on the horizon. Hopefully we'll beat them and avoid this absurd situation altogether.

Edited by MAC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't forget we're in the AFC south and they're in the east. It's possible that 3 teams could have winning records in their division. Not so likely in this division. We just need to cross our fingers and hope we can manage to lose to the Jags twice. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't forget we're in the AFC south and they're in the east. It's possible that 3 teams could have winning records in their division. Not so likely in this division. We just need to cross our fingers and hope we can manage to lose to the Jags twice. :lol:

oh trust me mjd is gonna have a big smile on his face when he gets to play us

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As of right now we aren't even tied with them. Or I should say they aren't even tied with us due to us having the worst record. Even if they were 0-8 too, we would have an easier schedule based on our opponents records for all 16 games. The #'s will have a slight change after MNF.

1) Indy 0-8 .536 sos .483 remaining schedule

2) Mia 0-7 .558 sos .565 RS

3) Ari 1-6 .495 sos .476 RS

4) STL 1-6 .561 sos .500 RS

5) Car 2-6 .504 sos .533 RS

6) JAX 2-6 .508 sos .414 RS

7) Min 2-6 .574 sos .603 RS

8) Sea 2-5 .504 sos .429 RS

9) Den 2-5 .582 sos .557 RS

On paper Miami only has two games that they should even be able to win: KC & Wash,

While our best chances at win will be the two Jacksonville games, a slim chance vs. Carolina and another slim chance vs. Tennessee.

Arizona & Seattle & St. Louis will all play each other a # of times so they could each get a win or two.

Edited by firejimcaldwell
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they are wrong. Indy, by far has the easier schedule. Not only that, but "as of now" the Colts have a worse record.

If you count only opponents played we have played opponents that are 35-23 to the Dolphins 28-21 so up till now they have played a weaker schedule, but when you go ahead and add in the records of all the teams on each schedule ours is the weaker of the two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you count only opponents played we have played opponents that are 35-23 to the Dolphins 28-21 so up till now they have played a weaker schedule, but when you go ahead and add in the records of all the teams on each schedule ours is the weaker of the two.

Yeah, thats what I was going by. Miami's remaining schedule is much stronger than ours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd say the Dolphins based on a quick look. I was already thinking about the Colts strength of schedule because it's occurred to me that some of the "easy" games they've had turned out to be against decent teams. The Browns are 3-4, the Chiefs 3-3, everyone else has a winning record. Such a strange year.

Of course that's only considering teams played to this point. The Jaguars and Panthers are on the horizon. Hopefully we'll beat them and avoid this absurd situation altogether.

Isn't it strength of schedule based on 2010's results? The Colts are playing a division winner schedule (two first place teams round out our opponents), while the Dolphins are playing a third place schedule (two third place teams round out their schedule). I always assumed that's how they break the tie there, but haven't done anything to figure out if that's accurate or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't it strength of schedule based on 2010's results? The Colts are playing a division winner schedule (two first place teams round out our opponents), while the Dolphins are playing a third place schedule (two third place teams round out their schedule). I always assumed that's how they break the tie there, but haven't done anything to figure out if that's accurate or not.

It's based on the current year.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't it strength of schedule based on 2010's results? The Colts are playing a division winner schedule (two first place teams round out our opponents), while the Dolphins are playing a third place schedule (two third place teams round out their schedule). I always assumed that's how they break the tie there, but haven't done anything to figure out if that's accurate or not.

Wel....It depends on how you define this qoute from the link I posted awhile back on this;

Strength of schedule for the previous season is the first tie-breaker for teams with the same winning percentage. The team with the lowest strength of schedule percentage wins the tiebreaker and picks ahead of all other teams with the same record.

http://football.abou...tdraftorder.htm

I understand that as meaning from the year that has just ended, as it was the "previous season".

Edited by ruksak
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The team with the weaker schedule goes first, in that case the Fins go first I think. Then the Colts get the first pick in the 2nd round, and the FIns in the 3rd, Colts in 4th, Fins in 5th, Colts in 6th, Fins in 7th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The team with the weaker schedule goes first, in that case the Fins go first I think. Then the Colts get the first pick in the 2nd round, and the FIns in the 3rd, Colts in 4th, Fins in 5th, Colts in 6th, Fins in 7th.

Correct.

Rounds 2-7

• In subsequent rounds, teams with the same record rotate draft positions regardless of whether or not they made the playoffs. The only exception is the Super Bowl teams, who always pick last.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wel....It depends on how you define this qoute from the link I posted awhile back on this;

http://football.abou...tdraftorder.htm

I understand that as meaning from the year that has just ended, as it was the "previous season".

I'm sure this will either be clarified or nullified as time goes on. I guess all we can do is root against the teams that beat us, which is hard when so many of them play each other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wel....It depends on how you define this qoute from the link I posted awhile back on this;

http://football.abou...tdraftorder.htm

I understand that as meaning from the year that has just ended, as it was the "previous season".

Ruksak, thanks for the link, but it is not from the NFL site, so i am a tad skepical . . . the NFL tends to be consistent in its rulings, and as such, I would think it would simply be the opposite of a playoff tied breaker . . .

so it would be . . . lowest SOS for this year . . . i could be wrong but logic would dictate that it would be the one with the weakest schedule, and unlike your link, for the current season . . .my two cents . . .

if it was for last year, then we would know who is in the lead and it would not change unless they win a game, my sense would be that had it has already been decided . . . we would be hearing something like "Miami is in the lead and it is there draft pick to loss (or win as they say)" . . . but if it is base on SOS for this year, that fact will not be know till Jan. 1

Edited by Yehoodi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't it strength of schedule based on 2010's results? The Colts are playing a division winner schedule (two first place teams round out our opponents), while the Dolphins are playing a third place schedule (two third place teams round out their schedule). I always assumed that's how they break the tie there, but haven't done anything to figure out if that's accurate or not.

I honestly have no idea. I assumed they meant this year since that would be more fair, but I haven't read the rules myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you look at Miami's upcoming schedule it looks much more difficult than ours. When all is said and done their better AFC East division would help our chances at having the easier schedule. The Jags and Titans will certainly help our case, whereas if the Jets continue to do better, then we will have the lock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ruksak, thanks for the link, but it is not from the NFL site, so i am a tad skepical . . . the NFL tends to be consistent in its rulings, and as such, I would think it would simply be the opposite of a playoff tied breaker . . .

so it would be . . . lowest SOS for this year . . . i could be wrong but logic would dictate that it would be the one with the weakest schedule, and unlike your link, for the current season . . .my two cents . . .

if it was for last year, then we would know who is in the lead and it would not change unless they win a game, my sense would be that had it has already been decided . . . we would be hearing something like "Miami is in the lead and it is there draft pick to loss (or win as they say)" . . . but if it is base on SOS for this year, that fact will not be know till Jan. 1

I've dug deep and was unable to find a different source to verify.

It's delving into the realm of semantics, and they should have written it more clearly, however isn't the season declared over at the conclusion of the SB? If so, than the "previous season" would be the season that just occurred. As well, it makes more sense than reverting back essentially two seasons.

As I understand it, again, in the link I provided they stipulate the team with the weakest SOS wins the tie-breaker, garnering the first overall selection in the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's delving into the realm of semantics, and they should have written it more clearly, however isn't the season declared over at the conclusion of the SB? If so, than the "previous season" would be the season that just occurred. As well, it makes more sense than reverting back essentially two seasons.

This is perhaps the most sublime logic ever written by a person wearing a bag over his head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.nfl.com/standings/tiebreakingprocedures

TIE-BREAKING PROCEDURE FOR SELECTION MEETING

  • Clubs not participating in the playoffs shall select in the first through 20th positions in reverse standings order.
  • The Super Bowl winner is last and Super Bowl loser is next-to-last.
  • The losers of the Conference Championship games shall select 29th and 30th based on won-lost-tied percentage.
  • The losers of the Divisional playoff games shall select 25th through 28th based on won-lost-tied percentage.
  • The losers of the Wild Card games shall select 21st through 24th based on won-lost-tied percentage.

If ties exist in any grouping except (2) above, such ties shall be broken by strength-of-schedule. If any ties cannot be broken by strength-of-schedule, the divisional or conference tie-breakers, if applicable, shall be applied. Any ties that still exist shall be broken by a coin flip.

When you total the strength of schedule for the teams that each have played:

0-8 Colts 35-23 .603

0-7 Dolphins 28-21 .571

But when you add in the complete schedule at this point:

1) Indy 0-8 .536 sos .483 remaining schedule

2) Mia 0-7 .558 sos .565 RS

3) Ari 1-6 .495 sos .476 RS

4) STL 1-6 .561 sos .500 RS

5) Car 2-6 .504 sos .533 RS

6) JAX 2-6 .508 sos .414 RS

7) Min 2-6 .574 sos .603 RS

8) Sea 2-5 .504 sos .429 RS

9) Den 2-5 .582 sos .557 RS

All this was posted above.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.nfl.com/s...akingprocedures

When you total the strength of schedule for the teams that each have played:

0-8 Colts 35-23 .603

0-7 Dolphins 28-21 .571

But when you add in the complete schedule at this point:

1) Indy 0-8 .536 sos .483 remaining schedule

2) Mia 0-7 .558 sos .565 RS

3) Ari 1-6 .495 sos .476 RS

4) STL 1-6 .561 sos .500 RS

5) Car 2-6 .504 sos .533 RS

6) JAX 2-6 .508 sos .414 RS

7) Min 2-6 .574 sos .603 RS

8) Sea 2-5 .504 sos .429 RS

9) Den 2-5 .582 sos .557 RS

All this was posted above.

Good job digging up the link from an official source. Me and Google don't always get along, and I couldn't find it.

Of course the remaining schedule and any predictions are a complete mathematical rats nest as of now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good job digging up the link from an official source. Me and Google don't always get along, and I couldn't find it.

Of course the remaining schedule and any predictions are a complete mathematical rats nest as of now.

Obviously the KC/SD game will alter it some, as will every other game, but right now, that's how it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The diference is that the Dolphins are not a horrible team. They have been in every game and have even led several late only to lose them in crazy ways. The Colts have hardly been in any games and have been blown clear out of the stadium several times.

The Dolphins are going to win some ball games while the Colts will be lucky to steal one vs the Jags.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was never sure on this either so did some searching:

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d81d6b708/article/complete-order-of-first-round-of-2011-nfl-draft-determined

If ties exist in any grouping except (A) above, they will be broken by strength of schedule (i.e., figuring the aggregate won-lost-tied percentage of each involved club's regular-season opponents and awarding preferential selection order to the club which faced the schedule of teams with the lowest aggregate won-lost-tied percentage).

Based on that it sounds like this current season, so the strength of schedule would likely be determined at the time of the draft if it needed to be applied.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The diference is that the Dolphins are not a horrible team. They have been in every game and have even led several late only to lose them in crazy ways. The Colts have hardly been in any games and have been blown clear out of the stadium several times.

The Dolphins are going to win some ball games while the Colts will be lucky to steal one vs the Jags.

Miami is REALLY Bad..

They folded against Tim Tebow....'nuff said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've dug deep and was unable to find a different source to verify.

It's delving into the realm of semantics, and they should have written it more clearly, however isn't the season declared over at the conclusion of the SB? If so, than the "previous season" would be the season that just occurred. As well, it makes more sense than reverting back essentially two seasons.

As I understand it, again, in the link I provided they stipulate the team with the weakest SOS wins the tie-breaker, garnering the first overall selection in the draft.

Yes I see it now, it makes sense to me . . . as the normal tiebreakers were are dealing with the playoffs and the season is still going on . . . and would thus be the 'present' season . . . and after the season is over when the draft order is set up, we are dealing with the previous season . . . okay . . . thxs . . .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if peyton comes back in december then maybe we will be 2-14. so we dont have to worry about going winless. its not like we are going to pick up Luck anyway.

The best thing we CAN do is trade for more picks. The last thing we need is to give our 2nd or 3rd pick a $100 million contract. The lower the pick, the more we have to pay him!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The team with the weaker schedule goes first, in that case the Fins go first I think. Then the Colts get the first pick in the 2nd round, and the FIns in the 3rd, Colts in 4th, Fins in 5th, Colts in 6th, Fins in 7th.

Very informative thread. I knew strength of schedule favored the weaker one in regards to draft positon but was unaware that they measured by the previous season or that who picked first in subsequent rounds alternated between the two teams. Thanks guys. :thmup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very informative thread. I knew strength of schedule favored the weaker one in regards to draft positon but was unaware that they measured by the previous season or that who picked first in subsequent rounds alternated between the two teams. Thanks guys. :thmup:

I'm not so sure that last part is accurate. The only time I remember the NFL flipping picks like that was when Jacksonville & Carolina both entered the league at the same time.

If teams A & B tie at 0-16, or 1-15, or whatever, then the team with the weakest schedule strength would pick 1st in each round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I get the Addison comparisons a bit with body type but maybe Steve Smith feels coaching can teach someone to run routes even as a burner. I compare Troy Franklin to a taller DJax that folks had to give a cushion due to speed thus allowing comeback routes and the occasional double move or if it’s single safety high, a possible post move based on where the safety is.   Legette, he has only 1 year of production vs Metcalf in college, that’s the comparison that I don’t agree with. But Franklin is definitely worth the upside at No.46, no doubt    I see Adonai Mitchell catching style like MVS. If it hits you in the numbers, you are a body catcher and will bring it down but if your catch radius is tested a bit more and it’s not a perfect ball in stride like Mahomes threw sometimes, you’re not going to come down with it.    
    • Perhaps I should’ve been more clear.     When I say there was no negative reaction back then, I’m not talking about the fan base.  I’m talking about the media that covers the NFL — people in the know.     Rare is the time I care about what fans think.   I just don’t.   Fans are not informed enough.  But media-wise, I don’t recall any media reaction expressing shock or surprise that Chicago took Trubisky over the other two.     NOTE:  please see my post to 2006CBE about my view of Trubisky.  I was not a big fan of his, but I also wasn’t a hater.   So I’m not defending him. 
    • To be clear….   I was NOT a Trubisky fan.  He only started one season for North Carolina.  I think he only started 13 games (like AR).   His one year was very good, but still he had so little experience.      But I don’t remember any outrage over Chicago taking Trubisky over Watson or Mahomes.    Maybe there was and I’m misremembering.     FWIW:  There are video’s on YouTube about how much KC LOVED Mahomes.  But they didn’t want to trade up to 2.  So they hoped he’d fall to 10, which he did, and KC traded two 1’s and a 3 to move up and take him.     KC thought Mahomes was not only the best QB in that class, they thought he was one of the best QB prospects they’d ever seen.  Their view was Texas Tech had a terrible defense and so Mahomes played every game knowing he had to score a minimum OF 35 points to win, and in some cases 45-50 points.  KC thought he was brilliant.   Props to them, they got it right.     Now, I should look for videos about the Bears drafting Trubisky.  Try to gage reaction back in 2017 and see what the reaction was in real time.  Interesting stuff on YouTube. 
    • I didn't either. Thanks for having my back and Watson was very good with Houston. He won the Division a few times and was in the MVP running 1 year.
    • There were many who did not believe he would succeed. I know that many of the fans that post on the Vikings site that I follow did not think he would do well. Most thought Watson may be best. One guy was very high on Mahomes. He thought Mahomes would be the best. I don't recall any fan who thought Trubisky would be the best of the three.
  • Members

    • Gigc

      Gigc 564

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • GoColts8818

      GoColts8818 16,400

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Restinpeacesweetchloe

      Restinpeacesweetchloe 41,442

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • newb767

      newb767 0

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • KB

      KB 1,000

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtStrong2013

      ColtStrong2013 2,915

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Kc77

      Kc77 3

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Pigskin

      Pigskin 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • holeymoley99

      holeymoley99 2,588

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • chad72

      chad72 17,766

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...