Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts @ Steelers Preseason Game Night Thread


LucasOilStadium

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 284
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Well, it's nearly 3am here, I'll catch the 2nd half in the morning. That was just a terrific performance all round. It's not a reg season game, but those Steelers were right up for that.

I'm upping my prediction from 8-8 to 8.5-7.5 after that.

Luck really is the real deal.

'night folks...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

good first half. i think we did good on both sides of the ball considering where we are "expected" to be. some observations...

Fleener seems to be one of those catch and gets tackled in one hit type of players not a bad thing... but would like to see him break a tackle and get up field.

Ballard and brown will probably be our combo.

Brazill looks really good.

Sure we will hear about Lucks 2 ints but the way we bounced back is what should be the focal point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the Collie play, I can't believe nobody hasn't brought up that it should have a roughing personal foul for illegal shot to the head on a defenseless receiver. Yet another dirty illegal headshot on Collie. The guy should be fined, plain and simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the Collie play, I can't believe nobody hasn't brought up that it should have a roughing personal foul for illegal shot to the head on a defenseless receiver. Yet another dirty illegal headshot on Collie. The guy should be fined, plain and simple.

Yeah it looked like a rough play for sure. Unfortunately people probably will be gunning for him in that aspect for the rest of his career. Definitely sucks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm far behind in player Evaluations, but I'd say a couple of things.   While the testing and drills at the Combine are very important, and let the fans see what would otherwise be available to only teams up close, I'd be wary of not taking Combine, senior Bowl, etc., over the college tape. Combine measurements should supplement in player Evaluations and should not be taken at the forefront.   The way some players got moved up multiple rounds after their performance in senior Bowl and subsequent player rankings and mock drafts are cautionary tales, but it would continue to happen after Combine too.   It's very important to make sure the player checks all the boxes or as much as possible but essentially play on the field, and what we get from Combine does surely factor into some of the boxes.   That's one of the reasons I don't speak much in praise of Ballard (not against either, but just holding back judgement) due to his propensity to have players check boxes essentially on player measurements, metrics, size, arm lengths, athleticism and RAS scores.    As long as better Combine performance moves up players few spots on same round or day, I'd be okay with it.   When a player shoots up multiple rounds up or down the board or too much to get close to Day 1/2 all of a sudden, based on Combine measurements, I'd be wary of those evaluations. 
    • A large part of vocal Vikings fans in the popular forum are homers, and if we get another Christian Ponder, they'd spend two or more years hyping him up as better than Kirk Cousins.. in fact, they spent more than half a decade saying Kirk will take next step and be a force in playoffs or important games. Funnily, he started playing more freely only in last two years as he has achieved enough financial freedom and he ended up injured, which is why Kirk has been very careful to not get injured for most of his career at the expense of making plays outside the structure. Kirk is pretty smart taking care of his career and earnings and subsequent contracts heavily favored on his terms, and fans didn't realize, some even now.    The reason I'm saying all that is respectability is very subjective. I don't know what's worse for the respectability than not even sniffing play-off success for decades save for a year or two here and there and having won no SBs in 6 decades but just being a Middling team year after year, not picking even close to either top 5 or bottom 5 in the draft.    It's better to lose QB and WR, if it helps find a franchise QB for Vikings. Like Bears, Vikings franchise QB history is only good for homers. There's nothing worse than being perennial average team, and trying to find FUN in the season. Vikings don't have an RB and run game too, after discarding Dalvin Cook needlessly.   I'd say respectability be damned, be absolute worst if you've to, and only focus Vikings should have is finding their franchise QB. If this GM is not looking seriously at that, I'm not sure what their plan will be. This GM has looked like running headless chicken so far, but he's got good HC and DC for now. Let's see what they do, but they don't need to sell the farm to find franchise QB, they just need to have sole focus in finding one in next few years and grab the opportunity with both hands when it is presented or do make necessary moves to get that opportunity present itself.    Having said that, we talk about trading JJ only because he's made some statements and has been visibly upset or get lonely during losses or when the team is gonna miss playoffs. If Diggs does the same, they'd call him absolute Diva but JJ has made more scathing remarks publicly so we're thinking it may not be good idea to have an elite WR get disgruntled every year and Rather help him get to a contender (Like Texans as you said) and utilize the return in finding a franchise QB. 
    • I do want to follow this up with, If I see someone that really wow's me, I would consider taking them over Bowers. You have to be open minded in this thing and study different area's. I just see Bowers as a can't miss. If Bowers and Odunze both are there at #15, I would be 50/50 on who to take. I doubt both will be there though.
    • I just seen this and normally I would agree with you about the Pacers, but I think they will be a very tough out in these playoffs. This team looks different than the one's that have recently had a decent record, but we knew would be 1 and done. They are #1 in offense is why. They can outscore almost every team in the league most nights. They would have a better record, but Haliburton missed 2 weeks earlier in the season. Boston is the only team in the East that looks dominant, but they tend to choke every year, so I am not even sold on them. I think the Pacers at worse end up with a #6, stay out of that playin and will win a series if not 2 this year.    Regarding Clark, she is the best College Basketball player I have ever seen with the exception of Cheryl Miller, Reggie's sister. That says a lot because players Diana Taurasi, Maya Moore, Brittney Griner, and Candice Parker who were no slouch in college.
  • Members

    • Nadine

      Nadine 8,088

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DoubleE Colt

      DoubleE Colt 288

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dingus McGirt

      Dingus McGirt 3,489

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 18,257

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Yoshinator

      Yoshinator 8,666

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PRnum1

      PRnum1 2,874

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • csmopar

      csmopar 15,672

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • AwesomeAustin

      AwesomeAustin 2,308

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Tsarquise

      Tsarquise 1,211

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Crunked

      Crunked 244

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...