Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

BR Darius Leonard Contract Projection


Recommended Posts

49 minutes ago, Nickster said:

I edited it.  That’s not what I meant.  He’s worth way more than 2nd round money.  I’m talking about the 5/95 money being discussed.

He ain't making that.   Who knows what CB does when the time comes

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 138
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Anyone thinking Leonard doesn’t deserve a big contract or that we won’t be giving him one has lost their mind. 

He’s not worth that.

So he’s good at his job leading the league in tackles and you turn it into a negative!   Now it’s a wear and tear issue.    You’ve created a scenario where there’s no reason to keep h

3 hours ago, J@son said:

 

 You can absolutely find linebackers for this defense in later rounds of the draft.....if you're OK with them being the caliber of Gilbert Gardner rather than Darius Leonard and you're OK with the defense being infinitely worse lol

Gary Brackett...

Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Moosejawcolt said:

Gary Brackett...

 

For some reason, you refuse to let this go....

 

You seem to think there's one 4-3 defense and that every team that's playing it is playing the exact same defense.   They're not.   

 

When Ballard was hired, he said the key to his 4-3 defense was the 3-tech.   That spot was the engine that made it go.  It's not that way for every 4-3 team.    For some,  it's the RDE that drives it.    Ballard also said the 2nd key spot was the WILL.   It was the most important linebacker spot,  and the 2nd most important spot on the defense.    That roughly translates into....   not every WILL will fit his defense.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

From time to time, I often wonder if those who work on Colts.com watch what is posted here.    And the latest example of that came yesterday.    I know that's a LONG time ago for some here.

 

Because yesterday, on the front of this website,  was this story about....    Darius Leonard.

 

And for the "Darius Leonard is overrated" crowd,  you have to deal with this....

 

https://www.colts.com/news/darius-leonard-lavonte-david-brian-urlacher-ray-lewis-fun-fact-friday

  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

For some reason, you refuse to let this go....

 

You seem to think there's one 4-3 defense and that every team that's playing it is playing the exact same defense.   They're not.   

 

When Ballard was hired, he said the key to his 4-3 defense was the 3-tech.   That spot was the engine that made it go.  It's not that way for every 4-3 team.    For some,  it's the RDE that drives it.    Ballard also said the 2nd key spot was the WILL.   It was the most important linebacker spot,  and the 2nd most important spot on the defense.    That roughly translates into....   not every WILL will fit his defense.  

Wooton...slow down. 

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

From time to time, I often wonder if those who work on Colts.com watch what is posted here.    And the latest example of that came yesterday.    I know that's a LONG time ago for some here.

 

Because yesterday, on the front of this website,  was this story about....    Darius Leonard.

 

And for the "Darius Leonard is overrated" crowd,  you have to deal with this....

 

https://www.colts.com/news/darius-leonard-lavonte-david-brian-urlacher-ray-lewis-fun-fact-friday


The numbers don’t lie... 

 

A few all pro’s to back the stat sheet that he fills is nice... He has a hall of fame start to his career. Lock him down and continue supporting him so we can have the privilege of watching the rest of his career with the shoe. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

From time to time, I often wonder if those who work on Colts.com watch what is posted here.    And the latest example of that came yesterday.    I know that's a LONG time ago for some here.

 

Because yesterday, on the front of this website,  was this story about....    Darius Leonard.

 

And for the "Darius Leonard is overrated" crowd,  you have to deal with this....

 

https://www.colts.com/news/darius-leonard-lavonte-david-brian-urlacher-ray-lewis-fun-fact-friday

There is a reason teams don’t make personal decisions based on fans opinions.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have mixed thoughts on this topic.

 

  • I love Leonard as a tackler and fumbler forcer. 
  • Coverage he's just OK. 2020 was his worst by far year in coverage IMO. No INTs and 109 passer rating allowed.
  • Yes, his combined stats for his first three years are outstanding, but:
    • His stats year 1 are clearly better than years two and three. If you take away his year 1 sacks and FFs, his averages and totals are far less intimidating. Scheme tweaks or opponents adjusting after year one, or just freak outlier in year 1, I don't know.
    • It's hard to compare guys today, with guys like 10-20+ years ago like Bickett or Urlacher. Ds, and LB position are just really really different right now. 
    • The fact that our 4-3 only uses 3LBs a third or less of the time, the WILL in our system naturally is in position to get a lot of Ts. Even Walker at MIKE has been a T machine who's averaged over 100 Ts a year the last 3.
  • Overall, I think Leonard is easily a top 10 LBer, but not sure he's top 3 or 4. Do I want to set the market on his contract? Nope. Will I be mad if he gets Bobby Wagner (currently the #1 paid LB) level pay at 18M/year. Nope. Overall, I'm sure he'll get 17-20. Hopefully closer to 17 than 20.

 

However you want to look at it, Leonard is a stud vs the run. And LBs in a 4-3 are devalued. Both are true. Given his shortcomings vs the pass, should he get top pay? I don't know. Would we ever give him his walking papers, doubt it. I wouldn't doubt if Ballard made him an offer and told him to explore the market though. Not that many teams are in a position, or willing, to spend 20/year on a LB.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, EastStreet said:

I have mixed thoughts on this topic.

 

  • I love Leonard as a tackler and fumbler forcer. 
  • Coverage he's just OK. 2020 was his worst by far year in coverage IMO. No INTs and 109 passer rating allowed.
  • Yes, his combined stats for his first three years are outstanding, but:
    • His stats year 1 are clearly better than years two and three. If you take away his year 1 sacks and FFs, his averages and totals are far less intimidating. Scheme tweaks or opponents adjusting after year one, or just freak outlier in year 1, I don't know.
    • It's hard to compare guys today, with guys like 10-20+ years ago like Bickett or Urlacher. Ds, and LB position are just really really different right now. 
    • The fact that our 4-3 only uses 3LBs a third or less of the time, the WILL in our system naturally is in position to get a lot of Ts. Even Walker at MIKE has been a T machine who's averaged over 100 Ts a year the last 3.
  • Overall, I think Leonard is easily a top 10 LBer, but not sure he's top 3 or 4. Do I want to set the market on his contract? Nope. Will I be mad if he gets Bobby Wagner (currently the #1 paid LB) level pay at 18M/year. Nope. Overall, I'm sure he'll get 17-20. Hopefully closer to 17 than 20.

 

However you want to look at it, Leonard is a stud vs the run. And LBs in a 4-3 are devalued. Both are true. Given his shortcomings vs the pass, should he get top pay? I don't know. Would we ever give him his walking papers, doubt it. I wouldn't doubt if Ballard made him an offer and told him to explore the market though. Not that many teams are in a position, or willing, to spend 20/year on a LB.

U said it better than I ever could lol.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

From time to time, I often wonder if those who work on Colts.com watch what is posted here.    And the latest example of that came yesterday.    I know that's a LONG time ago for some here.

 

Because yesterday, on the front of this website,  was this story about....    Darius Leonard.

 

And for the "Darius Leonard is overrated" crowd,  you have to deal with this....

 

https://www.colts.com/news/darius-leonard-lavonte-david-brian-urlacher-ray-lewis-fun-fact-friday

When I say overrated I mean he’s not the best Lb in the league and is not worth 5/95.

 

I think he’s a good player, a really good linebacker.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Nickster said:

When I say overrated I mean he’s not the best Lb in the league and is not worth 5/95.

 

I think he’s a good player, a really good linebacker.  

I understand.   

Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, EastStreet said:

I have mixed thoughts on this topic.

 

  • I love Leonard as a tackler and fumbler forcer. 
  • Coverage he's just OK. 2020 was his worst by far year in coverage IMO. No INTs and 109 passer rating allowed.
  • Yes, his combined stats for his first three years are outstanding, but:
    • His stats year 1 are clearly better than years two and three. If you take away his year 1 sacks and FFs, his averages and totals are far less intimidating. Scheme tweaks or opponents adjusting after year one, or just freak outlier in year 1, I don't know.
    • It's hard to compare guys today, with guys like 10-20+ years ago like Bickett or Urlacher. Ds, and LB position are just really really different right now. 
    • The fact that our 4-3 only uses 3LBs a third or less of the time, the WILL in our system naturally is in position to get a lot of Ts. Even Walker at MIKE has been a T machine who's averaged over 100 Ts a year the last 3.
  • Overall, I think Leonard is easily a top 10 LBer, but not sure he's top 3 or 4. Do I want to set the market on his contract? Nope. Will I be mad if he gets Bobby Wagner (currently the #1 paid LB) level pay at 18M/year. Nope. Overall, I'm sure he'll get 17-20. Hopefully closer to 17 than 20.

 

However you want to look at it, Leonard is a stud vs the run. And LBs in a 4-3 are devalued. Both are true. Given his shortcomings vs the pass, should he get top pay? I don't know. Would we ever give him his walking papers, doubt it. I wouldn't doubt if Ballard made him an offer and told him to explore the market though. Not that many teams are in a position, or willing, to spend 20/year on a LB.

You hit that one onto Waveland.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/24/2021 at 11:47 PM, EastStreet said:

I have mixed thoughts on this topic.

 

  • I love Leonard as a tackler and fumbler forcer. 
  • Coverage he's just OK. 2020 was his worst by far year in coverage IMO. No INTs and 109 passer rating allowed.
  • Yes, his combined stats for his first three years are outstanding, but:
    • His stats year 1 are clearly better than years two and three. If you take away his year 1 sacks and FFs, his averages and totals are far less intimidating. Scheme tweaks or opponents adjusting after year one, or just freak outlier in year 1, I don't know.
    • It's hard to compare guys today, with guys like 10-20+ years ago like Bickett or Urlacher. Ds, and LB position are just really really different right now. 
    • The fact that our 4-3 only uses 3LBs a third or less of the time, the WILL in our system naturally is in position to get a lot of Ts. Even Walker at MIKE has been a T machine who's averaged over 100 Ts a year the last 3.
  • Overall, I think Leonard is easily a top 10 LBer, but not sure he's top 3 or 4. Do I want to set the market on his contract? Nope. Will I be mad if he gets Bobby Wagner (currently the #1 paid LB) level pay at 18M/year. Nope. Overall, I'm sure he'll get 17-20. Hopefully closer to 17 than 20.

 

However you want to look at it, Leonard is a stud vs the run. And LBs in a 4-3 are devalued. Both are true. Given his shortcomings vs the pass, should he get top pay? I don't know. Would we ever give him his walking papers, doubt it. I wouldn't doubt if Ballard made him an offer and told him to explore the market though. Not that many teams are in a position, or willing, to spend 20/year on a LB.

I agree with everything. However; I would be flabbergasted if Ballard let Leonard even come close to testing the market. 

 

Not only is he a stud, he is the unquestioned leader on this team. That is worth more than people realize. 
 

I think he'll get 5/85-90 million with record in guarantees. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Colts1324 said:

I agree with everything. However; I would be flabbergasted if Ballard let Leonard even come close to testing the market. 

 

Not only is he a stud, he is the unquestioned leader on this team. That is worth more than people realize. 
 

I think he'll get 5/85-90 million with record in guarantees. 

I'd be good with 5/85.

I love Leonard. Just not the player, the personality too.

I think his agent will be pushing for more though, and I won't be shocked if Ballard let's him test the market.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, EastStreet said:

I'd be good with 5/85.

I love Leonard. Just not the player, the personality too.

I think his agent will be pushing for more though, and I won't be shocked if Ballard let's him test the market.

If by test the market you mean non exclusive Franchise Tag maybe, but he isn't just letting him test the market with the chance of losing him for nothing.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, w87r said:

If by test the market you mean non exclusive Franchise Tag maybe, but he isn't just letting him test the market with the chance of losing him for nothing.

Yes, the NEFT.

I expect them to try and work through an extension first though.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, stitches said:

 

Hope that guy never plays for another team.

 

 

This is why we just set back and let Ballard work. Total faith in his vision.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Because I’ve been a Colts fan for a long time and Jim Irsay has never had an issue spending money.  Ballard has also said over and over again he was saving his money to pay his own.  This isn’t breaking news.  So rather buy into some idea that he was fine with spending money under Tobin, Polian, and Grigson but is no longer fine with spending money under Ballard just doesn’t add up when you look at his history and what Ballard said.  It’s much more logical to assume that’s he’s spending what Ballard wants like he has with his previous GMs especially when the GM tells you he doesn’t believe in splash free agents and is saving his money to sign his own.   Irsay doesn’t negotiate the contracts.  Ballard does so contract structuring is done by Ballard and Ballard has done it in away to give him cap flexibility that is going to allow him to keep guys like Nelson, Leonard, Smith and others over the next couple of years.    Also Jim Irsay is worth 3 billion dollars he’s not hurting for money.   You want to see an organization that doesn’t want to spend money look across town where Simon won’t even let the Pacers look at the luxury tax.  That’s an owner who doesn’t want to spend.
    • I’m not sure why you find it hard to accept that the Colts may have cash flow problems?  Not that they can’t manage them, but still….   Irsay is one of the few owners who doesn’t have any other source of big income.   No high tech company.  No real estate development.   No oil and gas.   His wealth is owning the Colts.   That’s it.    Sure he may he may spend money, but these last five years he now uses a pay-go system that lends itself to managing money.  We used to give bigger SB’s under Grigson.   Now,  we give either small or no signing bonuses.   Very few teams do that.  And we’re a very small market franchise.   You weren’t the least bit surprised to see DeForest Buckner accept a ZERO signing bonus?   I sure was.     Point of clarification:  none of what I’ve written is proof of anything.   But I think it’s at least worth considering, and you seem completely unwilling to even do that.  I confess find that surprising. 
    • Just because they had money left over doesn’t mean Irsay had a problem spending it had Ballard wanted too.  It doesn’t take that hard of a look back at Irsay’s history of owner to see he has zero problem spending what his GM wants to spend.  
    • That's not exactly true if you consider cap space left over. IIRC, we had the most unspent or near most unspent over a 3-4 year period just recently (IIRC, 16, 17, 18, 19). Pretty sure we had 40+M unspent two years in a row.   IIRC, we carried over the most in the league again this year at around 30M.   It was also speculated that we 1) didn't ask Luck for money back, AND 2) gave JB such a big raise, was because we would have been too far under the 89% rule had we not done both 1 and 2.     
    • Regardless Irsay has never been shy about spending to make the Colts better.  So either way the first point that started all this is irrelevant.  
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...