Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Why Spence respects Luck


CR91

Recommended Posts

Thought this was a very interesting quote by Sean Spence about luck

 

“I remember when I was back in Pittsburgh and we played (the Colts),” Spence begins. “We beat (the Colts) pretty bad and jumped out to an early lead. We were hitting Luck a lot and sacking him and knocking him down. When we turned on film the next day, that Monday, he never flinched. He never backed out of a throw. He never curled up before he threw the ball. He stood strong in the pocket. I respected him. I respected him even much more.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, TKnight24 said:

Emphasis on "beat the Colts bad"

 

It'd really be nice to stop getting owned by Pitt & NE sometime soon here 

It looks as though we are trending in the right direction.  I will say that I'm confident that the Colts will be more competitive against those teams.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Albaby said:

It looks as though we are trending in the right direction.  I will say that I'm confident that the Colts will be more competitive against those teams.  

We'll find out very soon, Pittsburgh is on the schedule again this season. 

 

New England we won't see unless we make the playoffs 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

after so many embarrassing beat downs i feel like we will never get over the Steeler, Patriot hump till their current star players retire, but i am optimistic Ballard just might be able to turn it around, heres to hoping.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Stephen said:

Nothing would be better than knocking off ne and steelers in route to super bowl victory

Yep that run in 06 was pretty special though since we took out Baltimore....but yeah...Pittsburgh, Baltimore, NE....and finish it off over say the Cowboys.....that would be the most epic SB run ever!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Steamboat_Shaun said:

 

Even then we probably won't play them unless win a wild card game. They'll have a 1st round bye, it's pretty much automatic at this point.

I'd love it to meet in the afc championship game.... wishful thinking but man I'd love for a Jan 07 repeat

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • 84th percentile against man, 83d percentile against press... 
    • I think you're working from some assumptions that I don't agree with. First, it seems like you believe "the system" produces 32 relatively equal draft boards, and it's pretty obvious that's not the case. Second, it seems like you believe that if a team picks a player in the 4th round, that means they must have had a 4th round grade on him, otherwise they would have drafted him earlier.   It's possible that a team feels more strongly about a player than other teams. They could have Player X as their 30th player, and Player Y as their 35th player. The team is on the clock at #40, both players are still on the board, the team takes Player X. A few picks go by, Player Y is still on the board, they start trying to move up from wherever they sit in the next round, but a trade isn't coming together. They wind up staying put, and are able to draft Player Y -- their 35th ranked prospect -- at #75 or whatever. They had a high 2nd round grade on him, and got him in the middle of the third. Maybe they'd felt like they got lucky because things went their way. But drafting him in the third round doesn't mean they only viewed him as a third round prospect; what would make that scenario possible is the fact that every team works from their own board, and there are major variances from team to team. 
    • I doubt that. The reason is because not a single WR was selected the rest of the 2nd round, as borne out by how that 2nd round went. So any other GM still chose not to draft a single WR after the AD pick (either felt they didn't need one or had already gotten one), so your statement is not supported by how things played out. Whether it was Ballard at 52 or Ballard at 56 that he traded down to, he would have still found AD as value and pulled the trigger, is my contention.
    • For what it’s worth: there are videos of a younger Chris Ballard ranting and cursing about college players getting anonymous negative reports. He really gets heated on that subject. 
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...