Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Are the Patriots the Spurs of the NFL?


amfootball

Recommended Posts

There certainly are many important similarities between the two franchises given their successes.

However, the Spurs are a bunch of likable, standout citizens. Pops is not paranoid and narcissistic. Win or lose, he has no problem shaking the opposing coaches hand. Duncan is not smug and arrogant. The Spurs, to my knowledge, have never been the subject of a scandal, running up the score, or thumbing their nose at the rulebook and integrity of the game (I know, integrity and the NBA do not go together).

The Spurs and the Patriots have built similar organizations, with different ideas about the definitions of character and sportsmanship. Both are, for the last 15 years, the class of their respective leagues. It's just that one of the teams could stand to learn something about class from it's counterpart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think what is interesting is both teams won a lot of championships early on then a drought but during the drought they were still making deep playoff runs.

 

I think Duncan and Brady are a lot a like in terms of personality and leadership although I would say Brady is more vocal and emotional. Also, Duncan was more of a role player last year for the Spurs whereas Brady led the team to the 4th ring.

 

Still both have great ownership, great coach and great franchise player.

 

I agree about Spurs being liked more. Not sure there is a more hated franchise than the Pats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say that it's much easier to win multiple titles in the NBA once you get a franchise player like Duncan. The success of a football team requires a high level of play from many many more people than a basketball team requires. Put Tim Duncan or LeBron or Kobe or Jordan on almost any team with a bunch of decent/average surrounding players and you'll win a lot. It's much harder to do in football, as Colts fans are seeing...you've got the franchise player. If this were the NBA you'd be much closer to a championship than you are in the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say that it's much easier to win multiple titles in the NBA once you get a franchise player like Duncan. The success of a football team requires a high level of play from many many more people than a basketball team requires. Put Tim Duncan or LeBron or Kobe or Jordan on almost any team with a bunch of decent/average surrounding players and you'll win a lot. It's much harder to do in football, as Colts fans are seeing...you've got the franchise player. If this were the NBA you'd be much closer to a championship than you are in the NFL.

Actually it's harder now. Every team have their own players/leverage(even the freaking bucks are good) and the new CBA contract prevents teams like the Lakers, Heat, and Celtics stack their own teams to win multiple titles.

Now teams in the nba must create their own leverage and a lot of team work is reguired. The days of the relying on superstars winning is over. Evidence is last year. Check the standings. The Spurs are the 7th seed. The Hawks (who was the 8th seed last year) is the 1st seed of the eastern conference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think what is interesting is both teams won a lot of championships early on then a drought but during the drought they were still making deep playoff runs.

 

I think Duncan and Brady are a lot a like in terms of personality and leadership although I would say Brady is more vocal and emotional. Also, Duncan was more of a role player last year for the Spurs whereas Brady led the team to the 4th ring.

 

Still both have great ownership, great coach and great franchise player.

 

I agree about Spurs being liked more. Not sure there is a more hated franchise than the Pats.

1252.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://espn.go.com/boston/nfl/story/_/id/12255920/patriots-spurs-nfl

 

Read this article yesterday before the game and now that the Pats did win their 4th ring, I think this comparison is valid. The similarities in their runs the last 15 years is remarkable.

 

Thoughts?

http://espn.go.com/boston/nfl/story/_/id/12255920/patriots-spurs-nfl

 

Read this article yesterday before the game and now that the Pats did win their 4th ring, I think this comparison is valid. The similarities in their runs the last 15 years is remarkable.

 

Thoughts?

http://espn.go.com/boston/nfl/story/_/id/12255920/patriots-spurs-nfl

 

Read this article yesterday before the game and now that the Pats did win their 4th ring, I think this comparison is valid. The similarities in their runs the last 15 years is remarkable.

 

Thoughts?

[/quote

No....its kind of an insult to both

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There certainly are many important similarities between the two franchises given their successes.

However, the Spurs are a bunch of likable, standout citizens. Pops is not paranoid and narcissistic. Win or lose, he has no problem shaking the opposing coaches hand. Duncan is not smug and arrogant. The Spurs, to my knowledge, have never been the subject of a scandal, running up the score, or thumbing their nose at the rulebook and integrity of the game (I know, integrity and the NBA do not go together).

The Spurs and the Patriots have built similar organizations, with different ideas about the definitions of character and sportsmanship. Both are, for the last 15 years, the class of their respective leagues. It's just that one of the teams could stand to learn something about class from it's counterpart.

This ^ ......could not of said it any better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/rams-tried-to-trade-up-for-brock-bowers-then-byron-murphy   You seem to be right.
    • Read this this morning. Thought it was interesting    https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nfl/indianapolis-colts/news/colts-rams-nfl-draft-trade-offer-revealed-rejected/be019bcd2ee81b6ffeb4656e     "This was the rejected trade offer from the Rams to the Colts in the first round:     Rams get: Nos. 15, 191   Colts get: Nos. 19, 99, 154   While that's the kind of deal Chris Ballard would be expected to take in the past, the Colts clearly had an eye for edge rusher Laiatu Latu.   It's clear that it would have taken much more in the offer for the Colts to move off the chance of selecting the prospect they believe was the best defender in the entire draft.   There were a few viable prospects available at the time so it would have made sense for the Colts to trade back.   But this only proves how convicted they were in draft Latu."     Not too surprised we turnt that down as it has us losing on the draft chart by a little bit, but does show the conviction they had in Latu.
    • Offense wins in the league now and to take it a step further the QB is by far the lost important piece on any team.    So, on offense you need the best possible QB with the best possible supporting cast and on defense you need players who can affect the play of the opposing QBs directly. 
    • This is definitely an issue. So, either Ballard is A.) Cheap and he doesn't want to spend money on FAs (even with injuries happening) or B.) He can't build a competitive enough team to attract any worthwhile FA's after 7 going on 8 years now.    If AR and the current team can't attract FAs that could theoretically get a starting job at the S position for a year, then we are in big trouble according to the opinions of the players of the NFL. Personally, I think Ballard just avoids FA so much that he doesn't want to bring outside help in. He wants to be known as the GM who builds his team from the draft.   Wish the local media would call him out on this.
    • I think the Colts have the money to be competitive for a good free agent safety.  I think bringing in one of them may depend on whether a player like Simmons wants to play for the Colts.  They may be hoping to sign for a team with a better chance of making the playoffs.   So I don’t know if Ballard is making a statement or not?     Hope my answer makes sense to you….    
  • Members

    • Hoose

      Hoose 1,982

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • holeymoley99

      holeymoley99 2,693

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Kc77

      Kc77 11

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TheNewGuy

      TheNewGuy 87

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Mr. Irrelevant

      Mr. Irrelevant 962

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • chad72

      chad72 18,397

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • twfish

      twfish 1,964

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 19,968

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndyEV

      IndyEV 97

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ClaytonC

      ClaytonC 69

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...