Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Ndamukong Suh: Agent will decide.


Recommended Posts

I think we've danced this dance before, but Jones and RJF play a 5-technique in the base 3-4. That's the base spot in a 3-4.

Just as the 3-technique is the base spot in a 4-3.

I'm not saying Jones or RJF never play the 3-tech, but in the base? It's the 5, not the 3.

You'll find several articles specifically detailing the colts and ravens defense that would disagree. I know that in a standard, 2 gap 34 defense, both defensive linemen on each side of the NT line up at 5 tech.

However the colts and ravens run a hybrid front where the strong side DE (Redding, Kerr) lines up at 5 tech, the NT at 0 or 1 tech, and the weakside DT (jones, RJF) lines up at 3 tech.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You just know that he's gonna pull some stunt like that right after a big 3rd down or 4th down stop in a very important game.

 

Imagine. . . we're up by 2, 4th quarter, 4th down on defense at midfield.  All we have to do is make the stop, take a knee and we're AFC champs.  Tom Brady goes to the line, takes the snap, Suh makes a great swim move plows straight into the Brady for a sack.  Then Suh decides he needs to give Brady a good swift kick to the head. . . cause he's Ndamukong Suh.  So Suh kicks Brady in the head with the ref right there.  Ref throws the flag, Suh's ejected. . . 15 yard penalty - first down.  Brady hands the ball off once to run the clock down, Belicheck takes his last timeout with 2 second left.  Gostkowski walks on the field, kicks the field goal and the Colts lose by 1.  Pats back in the SB, Colts go home.  

 

This or something similar is going to happen if we sign Suh.  I want no part of it.

Meh, I would love to have a guy that stomps on opposing players. The guy was wearing a helmet....he was fine. Plus, Suh has cut down on his personal fouls this season. Colts fans always seem to want a locker room filled with choir boys.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a fan of Suh but I think we need a dominant force at the NT position. Wouldn't mind drafting a DT/NT with our first pick next year. It would help the Defense agains the run and the pass by freeing up other players. And i really like the way we are compensating the loss of Mathis with the whole Defense unit. Blitzing and pass rush with different players...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meh, I would love to have a guy that stomps on opposing players. The guy was wearing a helmet....he was fine. Plus, Suh has cut down on his personal fouls this season. Colts fans always seem to want a locker room filled with choir boys.....

 

I don't want a choir boy, I just want a guy that doesn't commit stupid 15 yard personal foul penalties.  JJ Watt is better then Suh and doesn't have a habit of committing stupid 15 yard personal foul penalties.  Playing well as a D-lineman doesn't have to include stomping and kicking players while they are down.   

 

And yes I realize that kicking someone in the head when they are wearing a helmet probably is going to hurt you more then it hurts them.  But that doesn't mean the refs aren't gonna throw a flag when they see it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't want a choir boy, I just want a guy that doesn't commit stupid 15 yard personal foul penalties.  JJ Watt is better then Suh and doesn't have a habit of committing stupid 15 yard personal foul penalties.  Playing well as a D-lineman doesn't have to include stomping and kicking players while they are down.   

 

And yes I realize that kicking someone in the head when they are wearing a helmet probably is going to hurt you more then it hurts them.  But that doesn't mean the refs aren't gonna throw a flag when they see it.

Suh has cut down on those penalties since he now has a real coach that holds him accountable. I think Watt has at least double the amount of roughing penalties as Suh this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't want a choir boy, I just want a guy that doesn't commit stupid 15 yard personal foul penalties.  JJ Watt is better then Suh and doesn't have a habit of committing stupid 15 yard personal foul penalties.  Playing well as a D-lineman doesn't have to include stomping and kicking players while they are down.   

 

And yes I realize that kicking someone in the head when they are wearing a helmet probably is going to hurt you more then it hurts them.  But that doesn't mean the refs aren't gonna throw a flag when they see it.

 

Suh has a few high-profile penalties, but he really doesn't get flagged more than you're average dlineman. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meh, I would love to have a guy that stomps on opposing players. The guy was wearing a helmet....he was fine. Plus, Suh has cut down on his personal fouls this season. Colts fans always seem to want a locker room filled with choir boys.....

Would love to have him liked Suh since he came into the league but he is way to good to come here with what we will spend in FA
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The kind of money he  and his agent are going to demand is simply not worth the emotional on-field wreck. your talking signing a large contract for someone who regularly gets penalized for roughing the passer due to his lack of tackling discipline.  Better off finding a different free agent or draft pick thats just as fast and knows how to tackle a QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too much team distraction, doesn't fit scheme 100%, and also too costly to pay.

On the other hand, Watt for $15 million a year, i would halfway entertain it.

 

I think I would too.  Watt makes the whole defense a lot better.  Crap you need to put 2 guys on him just to have a hope of containing him and 3 if you want to stop him.  And he can play TE too.

 

Normally I'm not for spending QB money on non QB's but Watt is one of the few cases where it's worth it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Things NFL players would never say:

 

Suh - "I would like to go to a 3-4 team, so I can play a 2-gap role and set the edge & contain. Additionally, I will do so for only $5 million dollars; money isn't everything. After that is done, I will Americanize my name into Michael Smith."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the cap continuing to rise we can sign a couple big name players this offseason, and I actually think Grigs will go after one or two studs. I would love to see Sue in a Colts uniform.

Grigson's history shows he won't go after "studs"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Things NFL players would never say:

 

Suh - "I would like to go to a 3-4 team, so I can play a 2-gap role and set the edge & contain. Additionally, I will do so for only $5 million dollars; money isn't everything. After that is done, I will Americanize my name into Michael Smith."

 

LOL, You remember Cam Newton calling him Donkey Kong Suh? lmao.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If I had to guess Unitas, Berry, Lenny Moore, Buddy Young, Jim Parker, Gino, Art Donovan, and Mackey. Maybe Bert Jones.
    • The site created their own way of trying to compare the value of a any player, regardless of position.  Over time, they call it the "weighted average value" or "wAV".  I don't know how well it works out, but at least they tried!   If you want to read through their exhaustive methodology, here's the link for it. https://www.sports-reference.com/blog/approximate-value-methodology/  
    • How many players from the Baltimore Colts are in the Ring of Honor?
    • To continue kicking the dead horse of sacks/pressures...   I decided to compile some numbers from PFR, to investigate whether the Colts sack/pressure ratio on defense in 2023 is an outlier, and unsustainable. The Colts were 5th in total sacks, but 24th in pressures. I think that's an anomaly, so let me share the numbers that support my case.   In 2023, the Colts defense had 51 sacks on 127 pressures, converting 40% of their pressures into sacks. (From this point forward, I'll use the term "sack rate" in reference to this ratio.) This is the second highest sack rate in 2023, and the fourth highest sack rate of any team in the last five years (42% twice, 45% once). It's my opinion that this high sack rate is an unsustainable outlier.   From 2019 to 2023, the league-wide sack rate was 27% (6,362 sacks, on 23,204 pressures). In 2019, 28% (1,276 sacks, 4,585 pressures). 2020, 24% (1,135 sacks, 4,739 pressures). (Lowest sack rate and number of sacks) 2021, 25% (1,244 sacks, 5,056 pressures). (Highest total pressures) 2022, 30% (1,297 sacks, 4,325 pressures). (Lowest total pressures) 2023, 31% (1,410 sacks, 4,449 pressures). (Highest sack rate and number of sacks) It's only a five year sample, so I wouldn't say for sure that there's a trend in either direction. It's interesting that the two highest sack total and sack rate years were 2022 and 2023, so maybe there's a trend forming; but I think understanding how many QBs have been injured lately would help to explain the recent increase. In 2019, the lowest sack rate was 20% (Bears), and the highest was 34% (Panthers). 2020, the lowest was 14% (Raiders; this is also the lowest sack rate for all five years), highest was 36% (Rams). 2021, the lowest was 17% (Falcons), highest was 39% (Bears). 2022, the lowest was 21% (Jaguars), highest was 45% (Saints; this is also the highest sack rate for all five years). 2023, the lowest was 22% (Lions), and the highest was 42% (Ravens; Colts were second, at 40%).  And for comparison: The Colts sack rate for the last five years: 31.6% (209 sacks, 661 pressures) 2019, 31% (3 points above league average) 2020, 27% (3 points above league average) 2021, 28% (3 points above league average) 2022, 33% (3 points above league average) 2023, 40% (9 points above league average) So that’s a lot of info. It’s not comprehensive, it’s actually a really small sample. I’m also not analyzing the quality of the defenses, because pass rush is just one element of a successful defense.   The questions I set out to answer were 1) Whether the Colts 40% pressure to sack rate is an outlier, and I think it’s obvious that it is an outlier. Out of 160 results (32 teams x five seasons), it’s the fourth highest sack rate of any team defense since 2019, and it’s 13 points higher than the average sack rate during those five years. Compared to the Colts own performance, the 2023 sack rate is 7 points higher than 2022 (Bradley’s first year), and it’s more than 8 points higher than their five year average. So I think it’s clearly an outlier result.   And 2) Whether that sack rate is sustainable, I think this is less conclusive, but the sample indicates that it’s not sustainable. From 2019 to 2022, the Colts have a history of outperforming the league average sack rate, by 3 points each year. But in 2023, that tripled to 9 points above league average. And it’s by far the highest sack rate the Colts posted in the five year sample. So I think calling it unsustainable is accurate. (It's more likely that the Colts will be closer to 3 points above league average in 2024; with a similar number of total pressures, that would cost the defense about 10 total sacks.)   Just to further support the idea that it’s not sustainable, I looked at the Ravens sack rate over the last five years, simply because they led the league in sack rate in 2023. They went 42%, 38%, 22%, 22%, 26%, and over the five years, they averaged a 29% sack rate. So they've been well above the league average the last two seasons, but below league average the previous three seasons, and only 2 points higher than league average overall.    That’s a lot, so what’s my point? To be clear, I'm not saying that having a high sack rate is a bad thing, or that pressures are more important than sacks.    What I'm saying is a team converting 40% of their pressures into sacks is a statistical outlier, and it would be a mistake for the Colts to rely on converting pressures to sacks at such a high rate moving forward. That's not reliable output, based on recent history and trends. Even converting 30% of pressures to sacks is above typical league average, but at least that seems reasonable for the Colts' defense.   So if the Colts want to reach that 50+ sack threshold again in 2024, 127 total pressures (7.5/game) won't get it done. We need to count on having a sack rate closer to 30% than 40%, and that means we need to be closer to pressuring the QB 170 times total (10/game) next season. 
    • Good. I want to see this offense and Richardson shut up the naysayers. 
  • Members

    • Samu-Rye

      Samu-Rye 75

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Blueblood23

      Blueblood23 1,010

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CR91

      CR91 12,955

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Superman

      Superman 21,157

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Myles

      Myles 7,113

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IinD

      IinD 4,527

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Narcosys

      Narcosys 631

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jskinnz

      jskinnz 2,680

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • bellevuecolt

      bellevuecolt 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • indyagent17

      indyagent17 1,885

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...