Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Gavins Final Mock


Recommended Posts

With release of Mayocks final mock I thought it only appropriate to release my final mock so with that said....here it goes:

 

1.Chiefs-Luke Joeckel-Tackle

2.Jaguars-Barkevious Mingo-DE

3.Raiders-Star Lotulelei-DT

4.Eagles-Dion Jordan-DE

5.Lions-Ziggy Ansah-DE

6.Browns-Tavon Austin-WR

7.Cardinals-Eric Fisher-OT

8.Bills-Ryan Nassib-QB

9.Jets-Cordarelle Patterson-WR

10.Titans-Xavier Rhodes-CB

11.Chargers-Lane Johnson-Tackle

12.Dolphins-D.J. Fluker-Tackle

13.Jets.Dee Milliner-CB

14.Panthers-Shareef Floyd-DT

15.Saints-Jarvis Jones-DE

16.Rams-Kenny Vaccaro-Safety

17.Steelers-Keenan Allen-WR

18.Cowboys-John Cyprien-Safety

19.Giants-Jonathan Cooper-G

20.Bears-Manti Teo-ILB

21.Bengals-Eric Reid-Safety

22.Rams-Sheldon Richardson-DT

23.Vikings-Deandre Hopkins-WR

24.Colts-Cornellius Carradine-DE

25.Vikings-Sylvester Williams-DT

26.Packers-Barrett Jones-C (yes I still think he has a shot to go in the bottom of the 1st, prior to injury he was talked about as a 1st round pick, there is a reason for that)

27.Texans-Justin Hunter-WR

28.Broncos-Bjoern Werner-DE

29.Patriots-Datone Jones-DE

30.Falcons-Alex Okafor-DE

31.49ers-Jesse Williams-NT/DE

32.Ravens-Matt Elam-Safety

 

Colts 3rd round pick Brian Winters

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh.....    just shoot me now.

 

Someone with a gun....    please just shoot me.    Do it right, and don't make a mess of things,  but put a bullet in my head and put me out of my misery....     Please!

 

 

:facepalm:         :bored:         :facepalm:         :loco:         :facepalm:          :wall:            :facepalm: 

 

 

 

Is it Thursday night yet?    Please, the draft can't get here soon enough!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh.....    just shoot me now.

 

Someone with a gun....    please just shoot me.    Do it right, and don't make a mess of things,  but put a bullet in my head and put me out of my misery....     Please!

 

 

:facepalm:         :bored:         :facepalm:         :loco:         :facepalm:          :wall:            :facepalm: 

 

 

 

Is it Thursday night yet?    Please, the draft can't get here soon enough!

Thats your contribution to this thread? your opinion......Seriously? Flare for the dramatic eh?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gavin......

 

You know I live you like a Colts brother....   Remember, I was the guy who encouraged you to do one more Mock when you announced last week that was your last mock.    I said,  'no, do another!'     And then you had to go and do this....

 

So when you lead with your chin and practically beg someone to hit it,  you can't be surprised or angered when somebody does...

 

-- No Warmack --- Ooops!

 

-- Jones in the first?!

 

-- Okafor in the first?!

 

 

Hey, one of them might happen.    All of them might happen.    And I might win the next power ball lottery.    Technically, it's possible.    But I think the odds are pretty small.

 

Guess you should've quit last week......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like this for 1 reason according to this warmack is there when we pick haha and also IMO if cooper fell that far he won't go to the giants so then he could fall to us too :P

I forgot about Warmack, i was flipping between pages (Mayocks mock and NFL.com draft Grades and Predict The Pick on NFL.com so I forgot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Gavin winds up reading this thread again,  I'm posting a story just put out a day or so ago by ESPN.com....

 

And it's all about........   Barrett Jones.....     It's mostly a very flattering story.....   except for the part about the player evaluation....

 

 

http://espn.go.com/nfl/draft2013/story/_/id/9197435/2013-nfl-draft-alabama-barrett-jones-espn-magazine

 

 

Here are the three key paragraphs about his playing ability.....

 

 

Why, then, is the NFL so lukewarm on Jones as an NFL prospect?  Scouts have questions about his feet and strength, and doubts about his athleticism.  He's projected, at best, as a second- or third-round pick.  Good character, says Lions coach Jim Schwartz, can make a scout or a GM more comfortable, but only so much.  "The one thing you want to try to avoid having is a reason other than athletic ability for why the guy doesn't succeed,"  Schwartz says.  "I think good character makes you feel stronger about your evaluation because it will cushion a little bit of the volatility that comes with drafting anybody.  When you're in a people business, you don't know everything."

 

But ultimately it comes down to what teams see on tape.  One longtime NFL scout believes Jones was one of the most overrated linemen in college football last season.

 

"He's just an average player," the scout says.  "He's probably a fifth-round talent.  But if you throw in all the intangibles -- work ethic, intelligence, toughness, competitiveness, instincts -- then it's a feel-good pick, something that will make the owner and the media happy.   But it shows you what a joke those college awards are.   He's never going to embarrass you off the field, but he'll probably be a backup forever.   He could succeed in the right system, but he's just not very good."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Gavin winds up reading this thread again,  I'm posting a story just put out a day or so ago by ESPN.com....

 

And it's all about........   Barrett Jones.....     It's mostly a very flattering story.....   except for the part about the player evaluation....

 

 

http://espn.go.com/nfl/draft2013/story/_/id/9197435/2013-nfl-draft-alabama-barrett-jones-espn-magazine

 

 

Here are the three key paragraphs about his playing ability.....

 

 

Why, then, is the NFL so lukewarm on Jones as an NFL prospect?  Scouts have questions about his feet and strength, and doubts about his athleticism.  He's projected, at best, as a second- or third-round pick.  Good character, says Lions coach Jim Schwartz, can make a scout or a GM more comfortable, but only so much.  "The one thing you want to try to avoid having is a reason other than athletic ability for why the guy doesn't succeed,"  Schwartz says.  "I think good character makes you feel stronger about your evaluation because it will cushion a little bit of the volatility that comes with drafting anybody.  When you're in a people business, you don't know everything."

 

But ultimately it comes down to what teams see on tape.  One longtime NFL scout believes Jones was one of the most overrated linemen in college football last season.

 

"He's just an average player," the scout says.  "He's probably a fifth-round talent.  But if you throw in all the intangibles -- work ethic, intelligence, toughness, competitiveness, instincts -- then it's a feel-good pick, something that will make the owner and the media happy.   But it shows you what a joke those college awards are.   He's never going to embarrass you off the field, but he'll probably be a backup forever.   He could succeed in the right system, but he's just not very good."

 I'll admit my bias....I by the hype on B. Jones.  I just don't see how all these limitations are anything but overstated.  He's big enough, he has good enough feet to play LT against SEC edge rushers and win awards doing it, and he's versatile enough to play every position.  Seems like over analysis when he can obviously block NFL defensive linemen and has been for 4 years.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Gavin winds up reading this thread again,  I'm posting a story just put out a day or so ago by ESPN.com....

 

And it's all about........   Barrett Jones.....     It's mostly a very flattering story.....   except for the part about the player evaluation....

 

 

http://espn.go.com/nfl/draft2013/story/_/id/9197435/2013-nfl-draft-alabama-barrett-jones-espn-magazine

 

 

Here are the three key paragraphs about his playing ability.....

 

 

Why, then, is the NFL so lukewarm on Jones as an NFL prospect?  Scouts have questions about his feet and strength, and doubts about his athleticism.  He's projected, at best, as a second- or third-round pick.  Good character, says Lions coach Jim Schwartz, can make a scout or a GM more comfortable, but only so much.  "The one thing you want to try to avoid having is a reason other than athletic ability for why the guy doesn't succeed,"  Schwartz says.  "I think good character makes you feel stronger about your evaluation because it will cushion a little bit of the volatility that comes with drafting anybody.  When you're in a people business, you don't know everything."

 

But ultimately it comes down to what teams see on tape.  One longtime NFL scout believes Jones was one of the most overrated linemen in college football last season.

 

"He's just an average player," the scout says.  "He's probably a fifth-round talent.  But if you throw in all the intangibles -- work ethic, intelligence, toughness, competitiveness, instincts -- then it's a feel-good pick, something that will make the owner and the media happy.   But it shows you what a joke those college awards are.   He's never going to embarrass you off the field, but he'll probably be a backup forever.   He could succeed in the right system, but he's just not very good."

He likely will be average. I get the reasons he is looked at as a mid round talent, I agree he probably will go in the mid rounds but I think the Packers could reach do to a seriosu need at Center. I see mistakes in his game (watching D Linemen sometimes after making a play on them for instance). Also Okafor is certainly one of them fringe 1st round picks, more likely to fall but he has the strength, the size, the production and the quick get off at the snap and good tackling ability 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Correct, the weak side, so we agree.  Paye is better suited for the strong side.  Now Dayo, talk about a swiss army knife!  Can play both ends, 3 tech, and NT on obvious passing downs, love the kid :).  
    • When you write...Only you have these views...that is singling out me from some group you have in mind.  The word Only does that.  Including the word VIEWS, it suggests that you are singling out my views from a group.  That would be the consensus.  It appears that you don't remember what you wrote.   I said that teams have their TOP 250 ranked Prospects pretty much the same, because the evaluation process uses the same inputs and metrics, give or take some weighting, and based upon if its the top 30 prospects or the last 220 to 250 prospects.  I said their draft boards could be different, and gave an example of having their #12 ranked prospect, JJ McCarthy, ahead of their #3 ranked prospect MHJ on their draft boards.  So what you said about draft boards...like anybody pays attention to you over 13 years...probably doesn't disagree with what I said either...so relax.   This comment seems full of itself.  It doesn't read like a 50/50 disagreement of opinions.  Approaching someone who has a different opinion by TELLING them its has gobs of flaws looks more like an 85/15.  Sorry, but neither I nor many on this board are going to treat you like the 85/15 knowledgeable guy you want to be treated like (and some others here).  You just haven't earned the chops.   Hmm.  You "explained to me"...and so did others?  There goes that 85/15 relationship you...and others...sort of demand.  And you...and others...haven't earned.  And BTW, you didn't even get my opinion right.   This thread should not be talking about opinions you think I've had the past two years...not sure why they are relevant.  But you are not representing them correctly so they need to be corrected (I'm sure everybody cares to read it. LOL)   As far as Woods:  I never said Ballard got lucky with Woods at 73.  I said Ballard overvalued Woods relative to other teams at 53.  Ballard's own words in his own draft day video showed him debating who to take at 53...AP or JW...and he finally says "lets go with the wide-out".  And then Woods fell to 73, where Ballard stopped him from falling who knows how far by picking him.  So him debating closely to take JW at 53 shows he strongly considered taking him at 53 when he did not have to strongly consider it.   As far as Raimann.  I did not ignore the age thing that you..(and others?)...explained to me.  I discarded it for being bad.  Every GM E.V.E.R.Y one of them would have been glad to spend a first round pick on a 25 year old LT who is playing like a top 10 LT and have that player under a rookie contract for 5 years (except the GMs who already had an All-Pro at LT).  EVERY GM who's team needed an LT as badly as the Colts probably would have traded up from 53 to get him...if they knew what he would be this early.  Being 25 is completely irrelevant.  LTs have longevity, and they still have to deal with a second contract.  They'll gladly take the top 10 play for the next 5 years (lets see) over the risk of what he will be like 5 years from now.  The same player evaluation process that prevails throughout the NFL failed Raimann.  And Ballard got lucky that such a good player was able to be picked with his third pick of the draft.     Hmmm, as if NO ONE explained to me?  Who would that be?  Just another guy on the forum?   Or the ones with 5 figure post counts that feel that their role is to explain stuff to others?     Saying Ballard got lucky is not negative nor is it belittling.  Especially when I also say that ALL GMs get lucky, which I exampled by mentioning Polian/Mathis, Polian/Saturday, NE/Brady, and Lynch/Purdy...etc.   They all get lucky.  I'm sorry that you feel putting Ballard in the same Commoner bucket as all other GMs belittles his Majesty.   Which is what Ballard tended to support by his own words that said "nobody knows how this stuff (the draft day activities...rankings, draft board, and draft pick trades) will play out".     Sorry, but for what...7 years...you have been trying to sell this notion of Ballard being Smart and right...like there is a bright line separation between those GMs who are, what, dumb and wrong?  Ballard has sort of deflated the idea that there is a bright line between GMs.  BTW, the great John Lynch sure did mess up that Trey Lance trade up didn't he? Good thing he got lucky with Purdy pick to sort of bail him out of the important QB position issue. 
    • Latu will occupy the side where he is rushing the passer. That is his job. To get to the qb!!  I am not sure who will go where. I expect Paye to play LDE and I am not sure where Sam and Dayo will line up. I really wouldn't be shocked if Paye isnt even a starter to open the season on the left side. I think what will be clear is Latu will be starting and those other 3 will be doing a lot of switching around but I do think Dayo will become a starter soon into the season
    • I do think the entire dline will take a step forward with an experienced dline coach this year. It’s very exciting to have someone with so much experience. 
    • People act like he had one or two sacks all season.  He had almost ten. 
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...