Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

AC better Left or Right Tackle?


CardiacColts

Recommended Posts

With all of the possibilities available to solidify our offensive line, I just wanted to gauge our fan forum interest in which direction to go. For instance, I wouldn't mind seeing Castonzo stay at left and sign a true RT like Volmer or Loadhold; however, the possibility of signing a true LT like Clady or Long and sliding AC to RT intrigues me. So the question is twofold: 1.) Where do you think AC is a more natural fit, left or right tackle? and 2.) What would your IDEAL offensive tackle situation look like? Personally, the easy answer is sign Clady at left and play Anthony Castonzo at right but get creative...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't expect Clady to be available...   either re-signed or franchise tagged...

 

I don't know about Long...  it appears he had a poor season...   but even if he becomes available, I think he's going to want more money than we want to spend...

 

As to Castonzo,  he played left tackle at BC for 3-4 years...  if we move him, it's possible he'll leave when his rookie contract is up.  Left tackles are paid better than right tackles.   So, by moving him,  we're hurting his earning power.   Unless,  we're willing to pay him as a left tackle while he plays the right side.   And then it gets expensive paying two left tackles.

 

His run blocking is better than his pass blocking.   But considering how bad our OL was,  I think it's hard to know just how poor his pass blocking is.    So, I'll trust Grigson on this one.   As a former tackle,  the man knows his talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like AC as a left tackle and would prefer a right tackle to be played at right tackle. If we move AC to right tackle I feel he might move on when his rookie contract is up for a LT spot, meaning we have to start again.

Elite linemen cost too much in my opinion I'd rather have Evan Mathis type linemen who are very good but don't demand the money, that way you have a chance of keeping the line together for a number of years and rarely lose your best lineman to free agency.

Something like Castonzo Slauson Shipley Vasquez Cherilus would be what I'd aim for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AC should stay right where he's at and honestly this question needs to be squashed. AC is going into his 3rd season which is when many O-lineman start to hit their stride. He has done pretty good at LT and there is no doubt he can still improve, but moving him to RT would be a huge mistake. He hasn't played there since his freshman yr. in college(I believe). Moving him now would do nothing but set him back in his progress.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AC should stay right where he's at and honestly this question needs to be squashed. AC is going into his 3rd season which is when many O-lineman start to hit their stride. He has done pretty good at LT and there is no doubt he can still improve, but moving him to RT would be a huge mistake. He hasn't played there since his freshman yr. in college(I believe). Moving him now would do nothing but set him back in his progress.

Agree. With your statement, not your avatar. It's disturbing. Hypnotic, but disturbing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AC should stay right where he's at and honestly this question needs to be squashed. AC is going into his 3rd season which is when many O-lineman start to hit their stride. He has done pretty good at LT and there is no doubt he can still improve, but moving him to RT would be a huge mistake. He hasn't played there since his freshman yr. in college(I believe). Moving him now would do nothing but set him back in his progress.

 I am totally on board with you; however, given that I have heard myriad different opinions on the topic I thought it would be interesting to see what people think. I personally would like to see AC stay at left where he has shown progress in his development and go after a load of man for RT. I do really agree with you about the pivotal year 3. The general consensus seems to be that offensive lineman really take off after year 3, so we would be doing ourselves a disservice to not at least see what we have these next couple years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 I am totally on board with you; however, given that I have heard myriad different opinions on the topic I thought it would be interesting to see what people think. I personally would like to see AC stay at left where he has shown progress in his development and go after a load of man for RT. I do really agree with you about the pivotal year 3. The general consensus seems to be that offensive lineman really take off after year 3, so we would be doing ourselves a disservice to not at least see what we have these next couple years. 

 

 

I agree, If we go after a tackle either in free agency or the draft, I'm sure it will be a RT and I also agree on Loadholt, He's my 1st choice if we go the free agent route for a Tackle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree, If we go after a tackle either in free agency or the draft, I'm sure it will be a RT and I also agree on Loadholt, He's my 1st choice if we go the free agent route for a Tackle.

That's what I'm saying. He can be an absolute beast and in the right setting could be a probowler. Yes he has had some issues with penalties, but I'll take a few penalties over a lack of talent when it comes to protecting Luck. Also, penalties can be cleaned up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Castonzo pass blocked much worse in year two. 11 sacks! He got left standing still a number of times.

That was pretty shocking to see. If it was because of physical issues and he heals up Great!

Only he and Hopefully our Coaches know. Don`t believe AT ALL he was even near an upper half OT this season.

He looks a little long legged to me, and his footwork doesn`t impress.

Year three should answer the question.

A good probability they can find a RT as late as rd 4.

And I would target the Guard position very seriously.

Of course if Satelle is your man, rots of ruck!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's one of the better run blocking LTs in the league. He really seemed to be at his best as the year went on especially in pass pro. Next year I feel he'll be a top 7 LT, and moving him to RT would just take him out of his element. Sign a real RT (Vollmer/Cherilus/Smith), a couple good Guards (Vasquez/Schwartz/Moore), and have Shipley start at Center....best Oline ever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Halfway home fellas. 59-47 at Half. We just need 24 great minutes, and we advance. 
    • Some of us gave our opinions on that already.  Ballard probably had a group of players in mind.  He can't control what offers come in.  The deal is for pick 52 and he feels safe making the trade because he thinks he's going to get a good player at 52.  After all, he doesn't know for sure what teams will pick whom, or what team will trade up to snipe a player, despite his thoughts of teams had needs for another WR.   I think if he was actually targeting AD, he probably would have just picked him at 46.  I see Ballard's comments as truly thinking he got lucky with having  player with the prospects of AD (I too think he could be our long desired #1...huge catch radius to go with the metrics), with no other team wanting to draft him before there.   Ballard finally discarded ADs issues enough at that point.   As far as personality, don't all of the #1 NFL WRs have a bit of that diva persona about them?  Not all of them, but its kinda seems like it comes with the territory and has to be sort of expected a bit.     BTW, do you think Ballard got lucky with Latu on the board at 15?  That seems to be the prevailing thought if you read pundit comments about ATL and Penix...how that pick #8 influenced lower teams, for the good and bad (took him away from LVR, who's GM still "has no QB").  Some here will read that as a slam on Ballard, but I think it just shows how much the randomness of a card game impacts how good a GMs draft is or is not.  And I think Ballard would acknowledge the same, based on his comments.
    • I saw it but I didn’t know it was real. It looked photoshopped in the picture I saw.  
    • I dunno if it’s been posted yet but has anyone seen latu’s horseshoe tattoo?  I think it’s pretty cool and I really like the show of loyalty and how all in he is for the colts.   Pretty cool in my opinion. 
  • Members

    • 2006Coltsbestever

      2006Coltsbestever 41,559

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 21,276

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TheNewGuy

      TheNewGuy 16

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Iron Colt

      Iron Colt 133

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jumpman

      Jumpman 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 14,229

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • legend300

      legend300 139

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Goatface Killah

      Goatface Killah 2,030

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Flash7

      Flash7 1,910

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MFT5

      MFT5 326

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...