Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

CB Darius Butler - Roster Move


grmasterb

Recommended Posts

do you think coaches are right all the time and fans are wrong all the time just because we are fans?

No but I think the coaches are right a lot more of the time than the fans are and no offense no matter how much of an expert one claims to be on a message board I am going to side with the people who get paid to do this for a living.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 132
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

No but I think the coaches are right a lot more of the time than the fans are and no offense no matter how much of an expert one claims to be on a message board I am going to side with the people who get paid to do this for a living.

who is claiming to be an expert? not be confrontational, just a question
Link to comment
Share on other sites

who is claiming to be an expert?

People who say things like "well I haven't gotten to go back and look at the tape" comes across like they are trying to speak coach speak and asks questions like do you think the coaching staff is always right comes across as thinking they know a lot about the game. Nothing wrong with that and I am not saying they don't. I am just saying I am going to side with the people who do this for a living. Like I said you are more than welcome to your opinion I am just saying I am going to trust the coaches on this one and figure they have a method to what they are doing.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That opinion has nothing to do with Essex being released but more about how awful Olsen has played its not hard to see at all to even a common fan, Im sure the coaches have there reasons and it was mentioned Essex may have or did not clean ou this locker so who knows, but I know what I have seen from Olsen

Gavin - my guess is that keeping Olsen over Essex (who could easily be right back in a procedural roster move) is a reflection of a couple of things: performance delta (or lack there of) and development potential. At this stage of the season, Olsen is an established part of the team - part of the core 7 O linemen - and it takes a significant performance difference to unseat him by a newcomer that hasn't been thru camp. Secondly, Olsen is a young player that is still just now getting a chance to play and develop. The coaches have some investment in his development and may feel strongly that he has the tools to be a solid guard in the league once experience is coupled with ability. Just because he has some performance struggles now doesn't mean he can't be a starting caliber player in a year or two. That kind of progression happens all the time in this league and it it he responsibility of coaches and GM's to invest in the right players. Essex is a know commodity, he can play at a serviceable level, but he isn't going to get any better. You offer him a job when you need what he is today but you don't invest much in him for the future. He and Olsen are completely different players on the roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welcome Butler. In regards to Essex over Olsen, and Link :facepalm: . I'm starting to think Link has the force.

Pagano- "Could you come into by office please Jeff."

Link- "Sure Coach"

Pagano-" Jeff, you've been on the team for a while now, and we appreciate your contributions. However, we are going to have to release you."

Link- *Waves Hand* "You aren't going to release me."

Pagano- "We aren't releasing you."

Link-"You are releasing Essex."

Pagano-"We are releasing Essex."

Link-"I can go about my business."

Pagano-"You can go about your business."

Link- "Move along."

Pagano- "Move along."

Link-"I'm not the O-Lineman your looking for"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

do you think coaches are right all the time and fans are wrong all the time just because we are fans?

no one is right all the time. however, the biggest difference between any of us rewatching the game and the coaches rewatching it and grading it accordingly is huge. they know EXACTLY what each players reponsibilities are on every play. they know what pass coverage was called, what pass blocking scheme was called etc. a lineman can have a pancake block but if it wasn't his guy he gets a failing grade. my brother has been an assistant coach at a lower college level for 8 years. he says grading film is done the same everywhere. first and foremost a player is graded on did they execute the proper assignment and secondly the quality of said execution. a good block on the wrong guy is a failing grade. freelancing in team sports is a recipe for disaster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • There is still a few decent players that we could pick in the secondary or linebackers. We have quite a few picks coming up to add good depth and camp competition.
    • I agree with this and well said. It’s not too much to ask that he appear interested and engaged in the interview process. He turned teams off and it cost him. Regarding Ballard, I am clearly in the minority but I think it’s a bad look and unprofessional for an NFL executive, the man representing the franchise, to drop curse words and then half-way apologize and then keep swearing as if he just couldn’t control it. Also, Ballard doesn’t really know Mitchell, he hasn’t spent enough time with him over any lengthy period to where he can know he’s a “good kid.” I am really excited for the pick and we were fired up at my house when Mitchell’s name was called. I just think the Ballard stuff was embarrassing and nothing but theater. 
    • It's clear and obvious. He said it plainly. The way the fans/media perceive the need at corner is very different from the way the Colts perceive the need at corner. 
    • I had Goncalves in my mock, in the 4th round. Basically in range. I like the pick, I assume his foot is fine, he said as much, and he worked out at his pro day. Big dude, nice feet, good technique in pass pro, can get stronger to improve in the run game, technically sound for the most part.    I wanted two things on offense this offseason: 1) A dynamic pass catcher, and 2) Depth/competition on the OL, specifically a swing tackle/guard. I was hoping for a veteran OL in addition to a draft pick, but we re-signed Pinter, so I guess we can count that. And as a bonus, Drew Ogletree is back on the roster, after I thought he was for sure going to be gone.   IMO, the offense is ready to roll. I was worried that Plan A at WR -- get a guy in the second round -- was shot after the way Thursday night went. Plan A wound up working out nicely.   The secondary could still use some work. I would have liked to see an athletic boost with a boundary corner, but this wasn't really the draft for that. And while I'm not sure what will happen after the draft, there are a ton of veteran corners and safeties still available. Including Justin Simmons and Quandre Diggs, whom everyone wanted on Day 1 on free agency. So maybe we still add some veteran help.   We also have one 4th round pick, and then three 5th rounders all bunched up from #142 to #155. Ballard already traded out of the 6th, and I wouldn't be surprised to see him either trade out of the 7th, or trade down in a swap that also moves him up higher from one of the 4th/5th round picks. He might want to keep a pick in the 7th just to grab their favorite UDFA target...
  • Members

    • IndyJoe

      IndyJoe 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Arby0359

      Arby0359 7

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Mikemccoy84

      Mikemccoy84 87

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Hammer

      Hammer 327

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Superman

      Superman 20,853

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • colts89

      colts89 1,044

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ShuteAt168

      ShuteAt168 972

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TheNextGM

      TheNextGM 655

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Architects08

      Architects08 284

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • HOZER

      HOZER 4,639

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...