Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

New turf installed


Recommended Posts

The Colts installed this same turf at the practice facility in April, including the indoor and outdoor fields. And apparently the infill they're using is organic, and needs to be watered?? There's no drainage at LOS, so I wonder how they worked that out. Maybe the amount of water used doesn't require significant drainage... I can't find a direct answer on that.

 

http://www.hellasconstruction.com/2024/april/indianapolis-colts-choose-hellas-matrix-helix-turf-geo-coolfill-and-cushdrain-for-safety-and-performance-enhancement/

 

Also this article includes a reference to a study that appears to indicate there's no major injury difference between the monofilament turf being installed at LOS and natural grass. In fact, the Titans recently switched from natural grass to the same Matrix Helix with the same fill and cushion being used at LOS. 

 

https://www.indystar.com/story/sports/nfl/colts/2023/10/04/why-the-indianapolis-colts-wont-switch-to-grass-at-lucas-oil-stadium/71007554007/

Quote

 

Zach Binney, an assistant professor of quantitative theory and methods at Emory University, found through research conducted with analyst Aaron Schatz between 2018-21 that the slit-film turf surface at Lucas Oil Stadium is associated with about a 7% increase of lower-body injuries that led to missing at least one game. His research found there was no major difference to injuries between monofilament-style turf and natural grass.  

 

The NFLPA has an issue with the slit-film turf Indianapolis uses, which is a thicker style of turf blade that can be pulled apart into smaller blades, according to ATX Turf. The slit-film turf blades will fray over the years and contribute to a flatter surface and faster ball movement. Monofilament turf has thinner, singular blades that will not pull apart. These blades will stand up straighter than slit-film turf and have a slower ball movement. The NFLPA said in November 2022 that, at the very least, it is demanding teams change from slit-film to monofilament turf to decrease the chance of injuries.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

That’s what I thought. I have never seen a close up of the old turf like this but pretty sure it didn’t look like this. It looked like cement underneath.

I’ve been on the field before. The old turf was not like that at all. It honestly felt like being on a track. No give and very hard.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Superman said:

The Colts installed this same turf at the practice facility in April, including the indoor and outdoor fields. And apparently the infill they're using is organic, and needs to be watered?? There's no drainage at LOS, so I wonder how they worked that out. Maybe the amount of water used doesn't require significant drainage... I can't find a direct answer on that.

 

http://www.hellasconstruction.com/2024/april/indianapolis-colts-choose-hellas-matrix-helix-turf-geo-coolfill-and-cushdrain-for-safety-and-performance-enhancement/

 

Also this article includes a reference to a study that appears to indicate there's no major injury difference between the monofilament turf being installed at LOS and natural grass. In fact, the Titans recently switched from natural grass to the same Matrix Helix with the same fill and cushion being used at LOS. 

 

https://www.indystar.com/story/sports/nfl/colts/2023/10/04/why-the-indianapolis-colts-wont-switch-to-grass-at-lucas-oil-stadium/71007554007/

 

No but the old style turf was linked to an increase in non contact injuries

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This time last year people were calling Freeland Smith’s replacement.  The result?  Smith was one of the best RT tackles in football while pushing through what probably should have been a season ending injury and some fans have moved on from Freeland to another rookie to replace Smith because he looked like a rookie tackle and struggled a lot.     just a useful reminder.  I get the excitement over the new players and always wanting to replace a high price player with a younger player.  Let’s just remember there is a reason Smith is highly paid.  Also his knee should be fixed now and while he could have another injury that’s football.  
    • Craziness, IMO. I saw that the other day and it makes me think the Colts are definitely going to sign someone at FS. 
    • It wouldn't surprise me to see Kelly and Smith gone next season. Going to be interesting.
    • Read my words again.   I didn’t say Goncalves over Fries this year.  I said in the years to come.  The future.  Not this season.  
    • Plenty if teams use first round picks on a right tackle.   Smith himself was puck 37, just 5 picks out if the first round.   If you look at this last draft plenty of RT’s were picked in the first.  I think it’s a premium position worthy of a premium pick.   Chicago took a RT at 9 in 23.     Most “experts” that you always hate have us right in the range of 8-9 and 9-8.   Which expert has the Colts with a worse record and landing a high pick?   I’d be curious.    Added Note:   In Smiths last year of college,  he made Bruce Feldman’s annual list of freakiest athletes in college.   A combination of speed quickness,  strength.  All at 315 pounds.  I think that’s how Smith has been able to be a good RT even with very short arms. 
  • Members

    • GoColts8818

      GoColts8818 17,406

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Knuckles79

      Knuckles79 244

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ShuteAt168

      ShuteAt168 974

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • newb767

      newb767 0

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Painterman

      Painterman 101

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Superman

      Superman 21,220

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • lukec1995

      lukec1995 18

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CR91

      CR91 13,006

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JlynRN

      JlynRN 1,002

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • bellevuecolt

      bellevuecolt 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...