Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Week 17: Colts @ Giants, Sunday, Jan. 1, 2023, 1:00 PM ET


NFLfan

Recommended Posts

There’s my guy Campbell again. Like I said before, Pittman is only WR1 because he gets the targets. Campbell is criminally underused. Could be our WR1 with better production if given Pitt’s targets. But I’d be happy if got consistent WR2 targets. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Solid84 said:

Please score Colts! No wait, please stop them Giants!… I’m so conflicted. 

Same… I honestly would rather lose out at this point to move up in the draft. I’ve got a bad feeling at least one team will jump us and trade up, leaving us with basically nothing. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Smoke317 said:

There’s my guy Campbell again. Like I said before, Pittman is only WR1 because he gets the targets. Campbell is criminally underused. Could be our WR1 with better production if given Pitt’s targets. But I’d be happy if got consistent WR2 targets. 

I agree but all of our receivers are under used.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Smoke317 said:

There’s my guy Campbell again. Like I said before, Pittman is only WR1 because he gets the targets. Campbell is criminally underused. Could be our WR1 with better production if given Pitt’s targets. 

That was a great catch but he is not very reliable hands-wise 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Smoke317 said:

There’s my guy Campbell again. Like I said before, Pittman is only WR1 because he gets the targets. Campbell is criminally underused. Could be our WR1 with better production if given Pitt’s targets. But I’d be happy if got consistent WR2 targets. 

Pitts not a number #1 too inconsistent. Parris has been underused a bit under Frank but thats probably a lil due to previous injuries. I look for Alec to be #1 sooner then later. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Nelson56 said:

Team was unorganized and unprepared for that 4th down play.  Jeff was unsure of what to call, thus the timeout.

 

 

I think they wanted to see waht kind of look they got to go for it.  Who ever uses all the first half time outs anyways

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, strt182 said:

Pitts not a number #1 too inconsistent. Parris has been underused a bit under Frank but thats probably a lil due to previous injuries. I look for Alec to be #1 sooner then later. 

I don’t know if Pierce will ever be able to get open consistently enough to be our #1. I do think he’s gonna be our big play guy though.  Which will eventually open up the underneath stuff for him.  Regardless, he’s gonna have those explosive moments.  Big Play Pierce is no joke at high pointing that ball.  Yet we give him no red zone chances. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Once again, Latu just pops on the screen.  I know it’s just a drill, but compared to Ebukam…his movements and techniques are more fluid and crisp, and hes quicker.   https://youtube.com/shorts/k5W6CFq5ReQ?si=7DLSO-G0Gqt-5R6a
    • He's not signed, there is nothing else to talk about and I am bored.  
    • Yes, I know. The Stanford teams  when Hogan was the starting QB were full of top recruits on offense and defense. It was so much fun being a fan then. I'm not as big a fan of Stanford as you are. Being on the East Coast makes it hard to follow them as much as I used to.   Overall, I am becoming less and less interested in sports. For over 20 years, I used to listen to sports radio whenever I had free time.  I used to follow tennis, golf, baseball, college basketball, a little NBA and NHL as well as NFL and college football. I once went to 20+ baseball games in a year.  The only sport I still follow religiously now is NFL football. I try to follow my favorite baseball team, the Mets, but not enough. I attribute my loss of interest to there being too much change and movement of players, coaches, teams, conferences, etc. Stanford is now part of the ACC! My goodness! (Shaking my head) I don't like all these changes in conferences.   I was a big fan of Ted Leyland, Stanford's former athletic director many years ago. It saddened me when Leyland left Stanford to go to the University of Pacific which was his alma mater. I see he retired. He hired Buddy Teevens who died last year. Back in those days, I followed Stanford football a lot more closely. They were not great years but I loved rooting for players who also excelled in the classroom.   TL;DR 😉
    • Oh I think they are ready. They are right in the thick of it. Well educated and smart women. They are more in tune with the Indianapolis Colts than all of the new ownership in the league is with their respective franchises. I'm not concerned in the least with these ladies taking over moving forward. I think it's a great thing and speaks to the stability that the organization is preaching and looking to build. 
    • I'm out this year. I'm going to be focusing on my bestballs and daily fantasy. I already have $400 invested and am making a concentrated effort this year to win some money.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...