Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Update: Foles signing with Colts 5/23


CR91

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Superman said:

 

If your sample only includes SB winning teams, your results are flawed.

 

It doesn't matter how you get your franchise QB. It only matters THAT you get your QB. Not winning a SB doesn't mean your method of acquiring a QB was wrong.

Yes and no. I think it was wrong to trade for Buckner and not move up in the draft to have our pick between Herbert and Tua. I see your logic but they do keep score for a reason.
 

I do believe the goal is to win championships, Irsay said that himself. If the Colts don’t win I will still enjoy it either way.  Matt Ryan is a fine QB that probably gives us a two year window to go for it.  Herbert would give us a decade or longer.  Ryan wasn’t the wrong move, I just believe drafting would be the better choice. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 291
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Think about it folks, think about it. In the last 3 years, the Colts have had a future HOF QB in Rivers who got us to the playoffs and almost farther, a former 2nd pick overall...who although didn't succeed at the level most of us hoped but still led the team to a winning season despite covid, and now a SB QB who laid 28 on the Patriots before their defense took a nap, and have added a former SB MVP QB as a backup. Listen to this presser. Listen to his attitude, intelligence, and honesty. This was a home run signing. 

 

https://www.colts.com/news/nick-foles-frank-reich-matt-ryan-backup-quarterback-sam-ehlinger

 

To point fingers at Ballard for not addressing the QB position, is categorically false. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Four2itus said:

Think about it folks, think about it. In the last 3 years, the Colts have had a future HOF QB in Rivers who got us to the playoffs and almost farther, a former 2nd pick overall...who although didn't succeed at the level most of us hoped but still led the team to a winning season despite covid, and now a SB QB who laid 28 on the Patriots before their defense took a nap, and have added a former SB MVP QB as a backup. Listen to this presser. Listen to his attitude, intelligence, and honesty. This was a home run signing. 

 

https://www.colts.com/news/nick-foles-frank-reich-matt-ryan-backup-quarterback-sam-ehlinger

 

To point fingers at Ballard for not addressing the QB position, is categorically false. 

I was very impressed by this yesterday. It’s so refreshing to have both QB be smart and all about team. You didn’t hear one thing from Foles about himself. It was all about helping Ryan succeed and the team winning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/20/2022 at 5:46 PM, Jared Cisneros said:

Agreed. If Foles hypothetically started the season and played all year, I think we win 5-6 games. He's nothing but a backup who would fill in well if Matt Ryan missed a game or a quarter or two. Anything more and our season is probably in jeopardy.

That's true of any backup. That's why they're a backup. They aren't intended as a long-term plan.

 

Good move IMO. I'll take Foles over most if not all backups in the NFL. The only thing is he's inconsistent. If he's on, well we all know what he can do. But if he's not......

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/23/2022 at 11:04 PM, throwing BBZ said:

 

  Chuckle.  The 22 Colts will NOT be a "running team".We will have a Strong passing game.

Snort. We have the best RB in the league and exactly one proven receiver. I hope we find a balance, but yeah, I think the edge goes to being a more run-based team, if only slightly. We have no clue how strong our passing game will or won't be. On paper it looks at least solid, but there are so many new faces and variables.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/25/2022 at 12:55 PM, AwesomeAustin said:

Pretty much. I understand why the Colts, Denver and Cleveland have made the moves they did.  All three have good rosters that are a QB and some luck from winning it all. I’m guessing none of the three will win a SB. The Bucs and Rams are the exception and I find it even more surprising it happened in back to back years. 
 

In the last 20yrs one team has traded outside the draft for a QB and won a championship. 4 teams won with free agent QBs. Three of those were Brees, Manning and Brady.  Teams need to draft their QBs.  


Setting aside how one feels about the guy, CLE got a soon-to-be 27 year-old franchise QB. So even if they don’t win this year, they should have their QB locked  up for a long time.

 

Somewhat similarly with DEN, Wilson should give them a fairly decent window to win a SB.

 

My point was more that if a team is not able or willing to make that type of move (where they give up considerable draft capital for a proven vet), then drafting is the way to go for long-term success.

 

I don’t think plug and playing vet QBs heading into their late 30s is a viable SB strategy, outside of a few exceptions. And I think the poster was saying that it was now a viable strategy.

 

But if a team doesn’t have a QB, it’s certainly not the wrong move, because they have to fill the position.
 

But IMO, it’s still delaying true long-term success and contention, which has been the stated goal.

 

At some point, the Colts will draft a QB though. Maybe even next year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, shasta519 said:


Setting aside how one feels about the guy, CLE got a soon-to-be 27 year-old franchise QB. So even if they don’t win this year, they should have their QB locked  up for a long time.

 

Somewhat similarly with DEN, Wilson should give them a fairly decent window to win a SB.

 

My point was more that if a team is not able or willing to make that type of move (where they give up considerable draft capital for a proven vet), then drafting is the way to go for long-term success.

 

I don’t think plug and playing vet QBs heading into their late 30s is a viable SB strategy, outside of a few exceptions. And I think the poster was saying that it was now a viable strategy.

 

But if a team doesn’t have a QB, it’s certainly not the wrong move, because they have to fill the position.
 

But IMO, it’s still delaying true long-term success and contention, which has been the stated goal.

 

At some point, the Colts will draft a QB though. Maybe even next year. 

I think Cleveland is putting themselves in cap hell without any resources to replace their good players. That team has a history of being a train wreck and the roster will probably be in shambles in a few years unless they draft exceptionally well in the later rounds. 
 

Denver, and the age of Russel Wilson makes sense bc they can throw everything at their roster for the next 4 years and go for a title. By the time he is 37 they will be ready to start thinking rebuild or maybe 1-2 years of absolutely going all in but knowing the team will be bad for a few years after. 
 

The Colts bargain shopper the same situation by going with a QB at the end of his career. Maybe we catch lightning in a bottle but honestly, I’m hoping we are just competitive so we have a punchers chance and we get our next guy in the building to learn. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/26/2022 at 1:22 PM, Four2itus said:

Think about it folks, think about it. In the last 3 years, the Colts have had a future HOF QB in Rivers who got us to the playoffs and almost farther, a former 2nd pick overall...who although didn't succeed at the level most of us hoped but still led the team to a winning season despite covid, and now a SB QB who laid 28 on the Patriots before their defense took a nap, and have added a former SB MVP QB as a backup. Listen to this presser. Listen to his attitude, intelligence, and honesty. This was a home run signing. 

 

https://www.colts.com/news/nick-foles-frank-reich-matt-ryan-backup-quarterback-sam-ehlinger

 

To point fingers at Ballard for not addressing the QB position, is categorically false. 

Agreed.  There is a difference in not addressing something and not addressing something the way people want (a draft pick).   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don't know how close Ryan is to tailing off talent wise, but it seems reasonable to expect at least one or two good years out of him. And the Colts know it...I will be very surprised if they don't look seriously at using a #1 on a QB next year or the year after. 

 

Damn. It still just grates on me that Luck retired. Not slamming him per se, but think of this team the last few years if we had him yet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm curious if a lot of these NFL players that are gambling and getting caught (and will get caught with the second wave of investigations) are gambling addicts. There are a lot of them that have probably never revealed this addiction in the past, and with gambling being made legal in the U.S. and easier than ever to access on sites like Fanduel and Draftkings, it's so much easier to gamble and become addicted to the point (in Rodgers case) where you make 100s of bets because you are a millionaire.    There's also possible inside information and the possible desperation among rookies and lesser players to make money because they aren't getting paid yet or they aren't good enough to get a payday, that they could easily use info that no one has access to to not only win games, but to possibly rig games slightly in schemes like point shaving. Point shaving happened in college basketball with Stevin Smith at Arizona State when he had to pay back a debt for gambling and wanted to live the high life.    There's just so many things that can be opened up with gambling these days in sports, and if you are addicted, that makes things worse. I'm curious if Rodgers is a gambling addict. If he's making 100s of bets, there's certainly a possibility. 
    • Dear Isiah Rodgers,  You knew what you were doing when your family and team needed you. So with the most sincerity, I have one thing to say….
    • If he bet on the Colts to lose IMO he will never play again.    If he bet on spreads of Colts games IMO he will never play again either.   If he bet on the Colts to win, he might get a chance to play but still I'm not sure.   If he only bet on other games or other  sports he probably will be reinstated at some point(probably next year).   He knew what he was doing. He knew it was against the rules and that's why he used another person's account to place those bets and not his own. He thought he won't get caught. I guess the positive is he's taking responsibility for what he's done, but there will be ton more steps before he convinces the league and an NFL team to give him another shot.    Such a shame for a talented player to waste his career like that  
    • How did this guy come up with Pittman? It is Rodgers who isn't even close to Pittman . Not good but not a huge blow either. He had promise but only played 9 games last season. Ballard will probably roll with the Rooks and go get a vet. If Rodgers bet on us to lose, he may get a lifetime ban. Disturbing.
    • I'm astounded at the number of people here passing harsh judgements and talking about worst cases without having full idea about what exactly he's done.    We could wait until we get enough information to see if he bet on Colts games, whether he used the inside information he'd have known in betting, and how innocent or guilty he was in committing what he did.    I'm sure Colts organization would look at it objectively with complete data than fans would ever know, and they'd take a prudent decision.
  • Members

    • MarquisJ

      MarquisJ 467

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • John Waylon

      John Waylon 4,426

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jared Cisneros

      Jared Cisneros 7,162

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • That Guy

      That Guy 248

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 16,215

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Colts_Fan12

      Colts_Fan12 1,843

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jmac_48

      jmac_48 517

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nancy

      Nancy 327

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...