Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

How would things have been different if Andrew Luck entered the draft last year?


Recommended Posts

I remember last year when they announced that Andrew Luck was going to return for another year for Stanford.

Panthers would have chosen Andrew Luck (because he was the top prospect last year still)

and Titans would have had Cam Newton. or other way around.

Which would mean that we would most definitely chose RG3. That would be so weird...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank Peyton Manning for it!!! He was one of those that Andrew Luck consulted and it was reported that Peyton let Luck know that Peyton had enjoyed one more year with his teammates and QBs that have been in college 4 years normally do better than their counterparts. I am sure Jerry Richardson hated it but I dont think he regrets picking Cam Newton now.

Titans however, on the other hand, hmm....no comment.

Little did Peyton know that Luck would take his advice and supplant him after a year of inactivity from the NFL. :)

Such is life!!! :) :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank Peyton Manning for it!!! He was one of those that Andrew Luck consulted and it was reported that Peyton let Luck know that Peyton had enjoyed one more year with his teammates and QBs that have been in college 4 years normally do better than their counterparts. I am sure Jerry Richardson hated it but I dont think he regrets picking Cam Newton now.

Titans however, on the other hand, hmm....no comment.

Little did Peyton know that Luck would take his advice and supplant him after a year of inactivity from the NFL. :)

Such is life!!! :) :)

I was just gonna say the same thing. Peyton advised Luck to return based on his own experiences. I guess it's bittersweet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suspect the Skins would have tried to trade up for Cam or stood pat and taken Locker at 10 had that happened. The Colts would probably be drafting Griffin this year but there'd probably be a lot of poor, misguided Barkley fans fouling things up.

I think we would have taken the best pocket passer. Judging by these stats I think I know who that is: http://www.extremesk...47&d=1334097611

Show some class, ya troll.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suspect the Skins would have tried to trade up for Cam or stood pat and taken Locker at 10 had that happened. The Colts would probably be drafting Griffin this year but there'd probably be a lot of poor, misguided Barkley fans fouling things up.

Show some class, ya troll.

Just trying to get the truth out there my good man

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this.

i think we would have kept peyton and traded our #1 for a ton of picks

I agree. I think Peyton would still be here if Luck had come out last year. I really don't think RG3 was ever "seriously" considered by Irsay and who knows what effect Luck coming out last year would have had on Barkley's decision. He may very well have still stayed at USC. I also disagree with the notion that RG3 is better than Barkley, especially "in every possible way." :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Correct. Guess I got confused MIN (McCarthy and Turner) with ATL.    Ballard did get lucky with Latu being there, regardless. No defensive players went off the board until pick #15. Doubt that has ever happened
    • I bet when Ballard and the Colts looked at their board, they had Murphy and Latua coming off the board. The Bears, ATL, Raiders and the Saints were the teams that I thought may go D with their first pick. The best rush end and DT do not usually last till 15 and 16. It was just an odd year with 6 qbs taken. Then you factor in the 2 Oline and 3 wrs and possibly generational te. It really was the 6 qbs drafted that made this possible.
    • Its not stacked when you consider  that their Oline is not good. They went skill and ignored the trenches for the last few years
    • Vikings got Dallas Turner.    Both Love and Rodgers went in the mid to late 20s, so GB could maximize their first rounder value, move back into the first round for the QB that is dropping. So to me, it is not the same.   The downside of using No.8 is if Cousins plays well for 3 years (say), and they haven't made the SB but have made an NFCCG and divisional round (say), they have put Penix in a bad situation and still have nothing to show for such a high value No.8 pick. Penix could get disgruntled like Jordan Love did with Rodgers around asking for a trade and the Falcons have nothing to show for but a stubbornness to not trade Penix Jr. at that point. If Penix Jr. plays after 3 years and is average, they have the same dilemma again 2 years later. So what value did that No.8 pick truly give them?    From what I am hearing, Falcons were the only team that highly interested in Penix Jr., and by picking him at No.8 with players like Odunze, Bowers, best pass rushers like Latu and Turner available, they have put both Cousins and Penix Jr. on a collision course with a potential bad situation 3 years down the road. Raheem Morris' twisted logic was "we might not pick that high next year", and if that were the case, moving back into Round 1 around the 20s giving up a future 1st rounder would put money where his mouth is, trusting their first rounder would be a playoff team type 1st rounder, like the Texans with their Will Anderson trade deal.   Plus, knowing their situation they got themselves into, even if they try to get Cousins traded 2 years later after JUST making a wild card playoff game or divisional round game, other teams will say "fat chance, we ain't bailing you out of a situation you created yourself".
    • I think we can give Stafford a little bit of credit. He's a fantastic QB. I think the QB-WR relationship is far more complex than many give credit. They both need each other to do the job well in order for the other to succeed.    Johnson, Kupp, Nacua. All 1,000 yard receivers. All played with Stafford. He knows how to get his star receivers the ball and put them into a position to succeed (YAC). It's why I was really wanting him to come to Indy years ago. 
  • Members

    • w87r

      w87r 14,249

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 8,354

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • richard pallo

      richard pallo 9,080

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • RollerColt

      RollerColt 12,304

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • HoosierHero

      HoosierHero 198

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jvan1973

      jvan1973 10,893

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dobbinblitz

      Dobbinblitz 1,374

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Believe blue1306

      Believe blue1306 90

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Shaolin06

      Shaolin06 30

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • cjwhiskers

      cjwhiskers 854

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...