Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Andrew Luck the 'Lebron James of the nfl'


RockThatBlue

Recommended Posts

You honestly do not think him saying he is the greatest player in sports is a "me" thing?

 

I'm going to amend my comment about "the best player" comment....

 

What he said is that he's the best basketball player in the world.......    not the best athlete in the world.

 

In my view,  what he was doing, given the context of the question he was asked,  is that he was publicly reminding his teammates that though they're down 3-2,  the series is going back to Cleveland,  and though Golden State may have a better 12-man roster,  Cleveland has the best player in the world -- him.

 

I don't think he's saying something like that for sake of saying it, or because he's got an ego.   LeBron is super smart, like all the great ones are.    He said what he said for a reason -- to send a positive message to his team -- they've got a fighting chance,  even down 3-2.

 

Just my view of it......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to amend my comment about "the best player" comment....

 

What he said is that he's the best basketball player in the world.......    not the best athlete in the world.

 

In my view,  what he was doing, given the context of the question he was asked,  is that he was publicly reminding his teammates that though they're down 3-2,  the series is going back to Cleveland,  and though Golden State may have a better 12-man roster,  Cleveland has the best player in the world -- him.

 

I don't think he's saying something like that for sake of saying it, or because he's got an ego.   LeBron is super smart, like all the great ones are.    He said what he said for a reason -- to send a positive message to his team -- they've got a fighting chance,  even down 3-2.

 

Just my view of it......

That last game....dude gave more than he had to give....had to just lay down after the buzzer. This new world view of the best in any sport is sickening. It started with Shaq. All he could ever accomplish was our given expectations. He could never exceed them because our lovely media and frothy fan spin put him at the top of all future accomplishments before he had ever touched an NBA basketball in season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well Lebron is now 2 for 6 in the finals. Tough. Tough.

The next Jordan right? lol.  I think the media can finally be done with that garbage.  Great player, future HOFer, played amazing in the finals despite some questionable fourth quarters and low shooting percentage but he is no MJ.  With that being said, I am sure the Cavs will be even better next year.  They will be able to learn from this and will have a good shot to finally win one next year.  I also believe the Warriors, Spurs and Thunder will be extremely tough, the East is a joke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't get all the hate on Lebron. Not too many players would have returned home to a below average team and wanted to do something for his hometown. Yes Jordan was the best player in his era and maybe of all time but he also played on a very good team. Did Jordan win a championship without Pippen? Did Bryant win one without another super star on the roster? Comparing the NFL to the NBA does not tell a whole story. The NBA teams have 5 starters while the NFL have 22. Coaching in the NBA calls for a lot less personnel involvement than the NFL. It is easier to coach 10 players rather than 53.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just as long as Andrew and a few other guys on our team never act like this.......

 

I still can't get over this crap. Some of the dumbest crap I ever saw. Might as well been an intro to Magic Mike.

 

Truer words have never been more accurate. Wow, was that cheesy with a capital C Jules. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't get all the hate on Lebron. Not too many players would have returned home to a below average team and wanted to do something for his hometown. Yes Jordan was the best player in his era and maybe of all time but he also played on a very good team. Did Jordan win a championship without Pippen? Did Bryant win one without another super star on the roster? Comparing the NFL to the NBA does not tell a whole story. The NBA teams have 5 starters while the NFL have 22. Coaching in the NBA calls for a lot less personnel involvement than the NFL. It is easier to coach 10 players rather than 53.

Jordan played mostly with players that were drafted by the Bulls. That's the difference. Also Jordan RARELY ever disappeared in the 4th quarters like Lebron has had a bad habit of. How much talent does the so-called "greatest player in the world" need? He had two 7 footers that GS struggled to stop yet he kept taking shot after shot then proceeds to say he has no talent. The easiest way to beat Lebron is let him try to do everything. He'll shoot his team right out of the game. GS and San Antonio did it to damn near perfection

He never would have made it in the 80's-early 90's NBA. His patented lowered shoulder bull rush through people would have had him beaten all to hell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I agree here. There were legit football reasons for teams to not be in love with Mitchell based on his play and some of his indicators that a lot of people seem to value were not great.  I don't know how to parse what Destin is selling here. I'm not sure you can be certain those reports changed anything in team's evaluation of Mitchell. He's presenting anecdotal evidence that teams starting asking more about his diabetes after those reports. Again... not sure if this is factual or it just was more noticeable after those reports? Who knows...      Let me summarize my view in short -  I don't think the reports are made up. Someone told McGinn those things. There might be some truth to it. To me it looks very one sided. Just go and read the whole thing again,,, the diabetes part, the uncoachable, immaturity part, the combine part(this one we can actually see with our own eyes and I can absolutely tell you the characterization of what happened is preposterous). If a scout under me really had those opinions about what transpired in those drills, I personally would question every single thing he's telling me.     On the other examples of rumors/reports about other players(Caleb, Levis, Stroud) - absolutely, if you are going to disparage the character of any of those players the very least you must do is ask them for a comment. The fact that this practice of just throwing rocks and hiding hands and not even giving the opportunity of the target to respond, is prevalent in today's draft media, doesn't make it right.       
    • I understand where you're coming from. It's not my intention to call out everyone who doesn't like how the AD stuff was handled. It just seems like typical draft season stuff to me, which everyone peddles in every year, but now that it's a highly drafted Colts pick, we're raising the standard.    Wasn't it 'unnamed sources' who claimed Caleb Williams didn't want to play for the Bears, or wanted ownership equity, etc.? Weren't 'unnamed sources' repeated when questions about Levis' personality started to float around? To me, some stuff is either factual, or it's not -- it's a fact that AD has diabetes. Other stuff is opinion/projection -- rude, abrasive, immature, uncoachable -- and should be treated as such.    The AD stuff was a mix of both. He has diabetes, the claim is that it has affected his ability to practice. Either that's true or it's not. I don't find it hard to believe, since AD definitely has diabetes, and that kind of stuff is typical of a young person with that condition. Someone else might view it differently, but we're never going to get anyone to corroborate that stuff on the record. One of the scouts said he has bad character reports from Georgia and Texas, which isn't going to be validated by anyone in the know, but it's hard to imagine someone just making that up. And that scout -- who I think was the harshest -- also said that when AD's blood sugar is right, he's great. So to me, he offered a reasonable explanation, and I don't think he came across as someone who dislikes AD or would have him as a character red flag. I think there was nuance that doesn't get fully considered when this stuff gets repeated.   Even maturity is a spectrum, not a black and white consideration. A person -- especially at a young age -- might be incredibly responsible in one area of their life, while still figuring things out in another area. One person might see something as immature, and another has no problem with it. So a source gave an opinion, and I think it should be treated like one person's opinion, and not a rubber-stamped designation that the monolithic scouting community has agreed upon.   And I don't think that Bob McGinn's collection of quotes from unnamed sources impacts how teams handle their draft board. I think McGinn is getting this stuff from people who work for teams; the teams already have the info. So I don't see the quotes as affecting AD's draft stock. It would have been balanced to offer some counter quotes, if those were available, but I don't think the quotes are as negative as they seem from the headlines.    My only reservations about Ballard's presser is that it seemed like an "outburst," but knowing that he kind of did the same thing last year, I think it was sincere, and he did it for the right reasons. Without that background, he might have come across as being petty and unprofessional, but context is important.   Short version: I don't think the reports are made up, I think there's probably some truth to them. And I assume the Colts did their homework, because that's how they operate. So if they're comfortable with AD Mitchell and have a plan to help him succeed, I have no concerns about it. 
    • Ability to cover one on one which is what happened... We haven't seen any cornerback play yet this year, so I'll reserve judgment until so. Otherwise we are predicting what is going to happen based on two rookies playing last season. I am more concerned about the depth, as I can't imagine they aren't as well. I was hopeful for Scott bringing serious competition and elevating the secondary. I hope Flowers does that at cornerback. Can always improve though, and there is still plenty of time. I hope Cross becomes our permanent guy and elevates. We have a lot of youth on the backend of this roster. It's obvious the plan is for them to grow. Hopefully we see it out of the gate and consistent growth throughout the season.  I don't see any way the pass rush is not more effective. I don't see the secondary getting worse, far from it. That will help to begin. We added the best pass rusher in the draft. We now have a deep d-line that is going to be rotated heavily, which will lead to fresh bodies bringing pressure, all the way up until the big gal sings her final tune each game.    I may be crazy, but I'm not concerned as much as other's are about the defense. I'm concerned about #5, 11, and 28's health, as I think they drive the offense, which is going to be the difference in the W/L column. If they can stay healthy, and our defense can grow throughout the year, I think we'll be positioned well. Our depth in the trenches is going to be a major advantage over the course of a long season. I believe in Shane Steichen, more than anyone.
    • I saw the media tried to make it out that the Celtics had an easy path to the finals. They went 64-18 during the season and 16-3 in the postseason. That is absolute domination from start to finish. Awesome to see Indiana native Brad Stevens get his first ring!!  I hope the Pacers close the gap and look forward to battling the Celtics the next few years. 
    • I do agree about the great OL and play caller.    The DL will come down whether Latu is a legit stud pass rusher right away. JT has been a great RB, but not the past two years. The receivers are solid, but seems like most teams have good-great WR groups anymore.    This feels like a "if everything goes right" kind of thing. But it's the offseason.  
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...