Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Should Patriots trade Brady after 2014 season?


Sports Central1

Recommended Posts

I just don't understand...Tom Brady is perhaps the best leader in football....and maybe the best QB in the league...why would you EVER let him go. He is cap friendly, does nothing but win games, and is a great leader on the team and in the community. You would have to be crazy to let him go. Unless he suffers a catastrophic injury why let him go? He hasn't slowed down any...if anything he gets better with age. While I think Jimmy was a great pick he still years away from being able to do what Tom can do. If anything let Jimmy play behind him ala Aaron Rodgers and when Tom's contract is up or in the last year THEN you can consider it. Not sure when that is but the Patriots would never live down letting Tom Brady go....not at his current form. He could go to basically 29-30 of the NFL teams and instantly make them a playoff team if not a title contender. The Patriots don't understand how lucky they are that Bledsoe got hurt....without Brady they don't win a single SB, without that defense they don't win a SB, and without Belichek they probably don't win any of those SBs. Well we have seen that take away 1 of those things and they haven't won a SB....you are telling me take away the defense AND Tom Brady and they are going to suddenly be better?? Even if Garoppolo is really good that is still not nearly as good as 85% of Tom Brady. Last year he carried that team ala Peyton Manning style into the playoffs....nobody else could win their division and make it to the title game with that roster outside Manning and Brady....the talent was dismall. You have something special you don't let it walk away....and if you do you better have a hall of famer backing him up. I'm thinking Joe Montana to Steve Young, Brett Favre to Aaron Rodgers, and Peyton to Luck.....anything less and you've done yourself a disservice and your fans. There will come a time to let Tom go....father time comes for them all....but it isn't now or even the next couple years...and you will still have your back up by then...no reason to rush into the great unknown! Give Tom another stout defense (like you seem to be building) and your going to have several more Lombardi trophy opportunities....mark my word they are the team to beat in the AFC if that defense stays healthy....no matter who Tom is throwing to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brady just said in and interview and hour ago " I like to win. When I suck I'll quit". Right now he's still arguably the best QB in the NFL and only being paid 9 million over the next three seasons. The best bargain in football by a wide margin.

 

 

Is "9 million over the next 3 seasons" some kind of typo ? Cause that's just plain ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

after what happened to Peyton. Its

 

 

but we probably would have gotten a first, 2nd, and 3rd rounder every year til this year. lol. That means:

 

2 first, second, and 3rd round picks in 2012

2 first, second, and 3rd round picks in 2013

2 frist, second, and 3rd round picks in 2014.

 

jk..

 

 

Considering the contract Manning had signed in 2011 , it was virtually impossible to trade him. That "noise" was coming from ESPN *s who were also saying the Colts could keep Manning and draft Luck. Both were almost impossible ti implement. The only way Irsay could have traded PM was pretty much to burn the old contract and sign a new one that would make a trade feasible and possible. Manning would have never agreed to any deal that would mean his new team would give the Colts compensation and thus weaken the team he went to. Just a reminder .... when the Colts had to either cut Manning or keep him , he was due a 27 mill signing bonus . No way any team could even think of paying that when at that time no one even knew if Manning would play that year. If the Colts had decided to keep PM , he would have revised that deal . But... he would never get suckered in to signing a new deal that enabled to the Colts to trade him. Nor would Irsay try to "sucker" him into something like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just don't understand...Tom Brady is perhaps the best leader in football....and maybe the best QB in the league...why would you EVER let him go. He is cap friendly, does nothing but win games, and is a great leader on the team and in the community. You would have to be crazy to let him go. Unless he suffers a catastrophic injury why let him go? He hasn't slowed down any...if anything he gets better with age. While I think Jimmy was a great pick he still years away from being able to do what Tom can do. If anything let Jimmy play behind him ala Aaron Rodgers and when Tom's contract is up or in the last year THEN you can consider it. Not sure when that is but the Patriots would never live down letting Tom Brady go....not at his current form. He could go to basically 29-30 of the NFL teams and instantly make them a playoff team if not a title contender. The Patriots don't understand how lucky they are that Bledsoe got hurt....without Brady they don't win a single SB, without that defense they don't win a SB, and without Belichek they probably don't win any of those SBs. Well we have seen that take away 1 of those things and they haven't won a SB....you are telling me take away the defense AND Tom Brady and they are going to suddenly be better?? Even if Garoppolo is really good that is still not nearly as good as 85% of Tom Brady. Last year he carried that team ala Peyton Manning style into the playoffs....nobody else could win their division and make it to the title game with that roster outside Manning and Brady....the talent was dismall. You have something special you don't let it walk away....and if you do you better have a hall of famer backing him up. I'm thinking Joe Montana to Steve Young, Brett Favre to Aaron Rodgers, and Peyton to Luck.....anything less and you've done yourself a disservice and your fans. There will come a time to let Tom go....father time comes for them all....but it isn't now or even the next couple years...and you will still have your back up by then...no reason to rush into the great unknown! Give Tom another stout defense (like you seem to be building) and your going to have several more Lombardi trophy opportunities....mark my word they are the team to beat in the AFC if that defense stays healthy....no matter who Tom is throwing to.

 

This.

 

Jimmy is good, but he needs at least 2-3 years sitting behind Brady before he is ready to go. He needs to learn how to read defenses, he hasn't done a great job at it yet, but of course as a rookie I don't expect him to be perfect in his first year. He could be the next Aaron Rodgers if he sits behind Brady for the next few years. The kid has potentials, he has a strong arm, he is mobile, and he is very smart.

 

What I see happening here is the Patriots will keep Brady starting for at least the next 2 years, maybe a 3rd year, then he will be moved to backup if he still able to play the game at a high level, if not he will retire as a patriot, I highly doubt Rober/BB will ever consider trading him to any teams. I am sure once Brady retires he will have some type of role with the New England Patriots at some point, just like Elway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just don't understand...Tom Brady is perhaps the best leader in football....and maybe the best QB in the league...why would you EVER let him go. He is cap friendly, does nothing but win games, and is a great leader on the team and in the community. You would have to be crazy to let him go. Unless he suffers a catastrophic injury why let him go? He hasn't slowed down any...if anything he gets better with age. While I think Jimmy was a great pick he still years away from being able to do what Tom can do. If anything let Jimmy play behind him ala Aaron Rodgers and when Tom's contract is up or in the last year THEN you can consider it. Not sure when that is but the Patriots would never live down letting Tom Brady go....not at his current form. He could go to basically 29-30 of the NFL teams and instantly make them a playoff team if not a title contender. The Patriots don't understand how lucky they are that Bledsoe got hurt....without Brady they don't win a single SB, without that defense they don't win a SB, and without Belichek they probably don't win any of those SBs. Well we have seen that take away 1 of those things and they haven't won a SB....you are telling me take away the defense AND Tom Brady and they are going to suddenly be better?? Even if Garoppolo is really good that is still not nearly as good as 85% of Tom Brady. Last year he carried that team ala Peyton Manning style into the playoffs....nobody else could win their division and make it to the title game with that roster outside Manning and Brady....the talent was dismall. You have something special you don't let it walk away....and if you do you better have a hall of famer backing him up. I'm thinking Joe Montana to Steve Young, Brett Favre to Aaron Rodgers, and Peyton to Luck.....anything less and you've done yourself a disservice and your fans. There will come a time to let Tom go....father time comes for them all....but it isn't now or even the next couple years...and you will still have your back up by then...no reason to rush into the great unknown! Give Tom another stout defense (like you seem to be building) and your going to have several more Lombardi trophy opportunities....mark my word they are the team to beat in the AFC if that defense stays healthy....no matter who Tom is throwing to.

 

Nice post, thanks.

 

Read somewhere recently that the Patriots could go 0-16 in 2014 and Brady would still lead all QBs in NFL history (can't recall the number of games that was the qualifier) by a wide margin in winning percentage. That, to me, is what makes him special. The numbers are nice, the awards are nice, but in the end, this guy has been winning games in the NFL for 14 years like no other. Yes, wins are a team accomplishment, but he and Belichick are the constants throughout all these years. And no player on the field impacts a team's ability to win or lose games as much as the QB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Is that how it went down? It was a curious move because they just paid Cousins a bag. But this approach worked pretty well for GB.   ATL's offense is pretty stacked and putting in a proven QB like Cousins will allow them to maximize and evaluate those pieces immediately. Meanwhile, Penix develops in the background. And they bought themselves 3 years to find out.     Plus, they did get Turner as well, who I think was their #1 target. 
    • I have to say, I do agree that a lot of GMs are on a similar level as far as skill and talent. That's how they got to where they are.    Some will be more inexperienced than others, some are more aggressive while others are passive. I think there are a lot of varying philosophies on running an NFL team compared to running a normal business.    I don't think everyone's board is the same. I'm sure there are some overlap especially at the top. But in the middle I would imagine it's far more varied. There's only so many scouts, so many days and hours, and thousands of players to evaluate. They aren't going to catch them all.    But, I will say there is always going to be some luck and chance probability involved when it comes to the draft. That's just a truth in life itself. 
    • I meant whether or not he's the pick.  Going into the draft they probably have scenarios of how to pursue the existing roster based upon if a player falls.  Example, if DeFo is near contract time, the falling of Murphy begins a thought about not resigning DeFO more strongly than what you'd think if you thought he would have been gone by pick 15.   I'm not saying specific here about the Colts and Defo.  What I'm saying is that these are the types of things that happen with all 32 teams, and Ballard can't tell you that another team is going to execute a strategic roster plan...and not snipe or will snipe based upon a player falling.  Instead of not knowing how this plays out,  Ballard telling us what other teams will do would be described as knowing how this stuff will play out.
    • Do you mean meddling?  Sure, I mean its reported that Arthur Blank screwed his GM by wanting Penix.  Tough break for the new GM, and it makes it harder for Blanc to evaluate him I'd think.  I hope the new guy doesn't get blamed for stuff that was out of his control.
    • They aren't adjusting anything with the 15th pick. The board is the board and they've agonized over every scenario for months
  • Members

    • CheezyColt

      CheezyColt 897

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • shasta519

      shasta519 5,260

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 19,760

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Believe blue1306

      Believe blue1306 90

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • teganslaw

      teganslaw 1,125

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DougDew

      DougDew 9,033

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • wig

      wig 259

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dobbinblitz

      Dobbinblitz 1,374

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Breeze

      Breeze 326

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DynaMike

      DynaMike 162

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...