vacolt16 Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 There have been couple of articles about the Colts spending wisely this year on free agents with an eye toward resigning key players 2015 and 2016 despite having over $35 million in cap room. My question is, does the CBA set a minimum amount of money (a percent) of the overall cap amount that teams must spend on salaries to insure that teams are being competitive? I thought I remember it being around 85 to 90 percent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 Yes you do have to spend a certain amount. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derakynn Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 It is an average of 90 percent over a five year span. Or three. Don't remember which. You can be severely under one year and the cap rolls over, but you get penalized if you don't get to that 90 percent average. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vacolt16 Posted February 25, 2014 Author Share Posted February 25, 2014 It is an average of 90 percent over a five year span. Or three. Don't remember which. You can be severely under one year and the cap rolls over, but you get penalized if you don't get to that 90 percent average.A three or five-year span makes sense and would explain the strategy of spending more judiciously this year.Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Superman Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 Which we will match after the 2015 season... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ztboiler Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 It is also a cash basis average if I remember correctly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gabriel Alexander Morillo Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 Please don't be afraid to move on from Bethea... and other such riff-raff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Peytonator Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 Please don't be afraid to move on from Bethea... and other such riff-raff. Little harsh to call him riff-raff. I mean, I'm all for moving on from him as he's seemed to regress in recent years and he's getting a little older, but the guy has given our team a lot for the last 8 years. He helped win us a Super Bowl and has been the one guy in the secondary that you could count on to always be there and contribute. I got nothing but respect for the guy, even though I am okay with moving on without him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gavin Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 Little harsh to call him riff-raff. I mean, I'm all for moving on from him as he's seemed to regress in recent years and he's getting a little older, but the guy has given our team a lot for the last 8 years. He helped win us a Super Bowl and has been the one guy in the secondary that you could count on to always be there and contribute. I got nothing but respect for the guy, even though I am okay with moving on without him.I think some fail to take into account he was a 6th round pick, He came from Howard University....A college at the time that played Cover 2 specifically and he was good at Howard U in that scheme so Polian drafted him to do just that....We switched schemes now so in affect he has been having to learn a new scheme the last two years and a new position, Now he had 2 really great years...2009....2007......He is going to be well into 30 years old by the time the season starts, I think the questiona are for Grigson, Is it worth bringing him back to continue to learn the new position and scheme(which I really expect he learned pretty well by now) at what will be 31? How much is he worth? If Im Grigson Im moving on or seeking a sign and trade with the Chicago Bears(Im asking a 4th round pick for Bethea...But this Safety class is a bit deep so I would settle for less. Im also not sure his production says 4th round pick), They need another Safety Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southwest1 Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 Little harsh to call him riff-raff. I mean, I'm all for moving on from him as he's seemed to regress in recent years and he's getting a little older, but the guy has given our team a lot for the last 8 years. He helped win us a Super Bowl and has been the one guy in the secondary that you could count on to always be there and contribute. I got nothing but respect for the guy, even though I am okay with moving on without him.Well said Peytonator. I do appreciate his contributions to the Colts organization, believe it is time to move in another direction, but I have nothing harsh to say against Mr. Bethea personally. Honestly, I just think that age catches up to every athlete making them more of a liability vs asset right now & that's where Bethea is at at the moment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Peytonator Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 I think some fail to take into account he was a 6th round pick, He came from Howard University....A college at the time that played Cover 2 specifically and he was good at Howard U in that scheme so Polian drafted him to do just that....We switched schemes now so in affect he has been having to learn a new scheme the last two years and a new position, Now he had 2 really great years...2009....2007......He is going to be well into 30 years old by the time the season starts, I think the questiona are for Grigson, Is it worth bringing him back to continue to learn the new position and scheme(which I really expect he learned pretty well by now) at what will be 31? How much is he worth? If Im Grigson Im moving on or seeking a sign and trade with the Chicago Bears(Im asking a 4th round pick for Bethea...But this Safety class is a bit deep so I would settle for less. Im also not sure his production says 4th round pick), They need another Safety A sign and trade does seem like a good idea. A 4th rounder seems kinda ambitious but I don't really know what we could get for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patagonia Chris Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 If Im Grigson Im moving on or seeking a sign and trade with the Chicago Bears(Im asking a 4th round pick for Bethea...But this Safety class is a bit deep so I would settle for less. Im also not sure his production says 4th round pick), They need another Safety The closest you can get to a sign and trade in the NFL is franchise tagging Bethea then trading him, so the Bears would have to pay $10 Mil and a 4th round pick for a 31 year old safety? Not a chance. Plus he's an URFA so if he signed for any guaranteed money with the Colts, the Colts would have to eat it as soon as they traded him. If he didn't have any guaranteed money in the deal he'd likely have to work out another deal as soon as he got with Chicago. There's absolutely no chance a sign and trade could or would happen. He'd just sign with the Bears outright as opposed to throwing the Colts a bone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southwest1 Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 There have been couple of articles about the Colts spending wisely this year on free agents with an eye toward resigning key players 2015 and 2016 despite having over $35 million in cap room. My question is, does the CBA set a minimum amount of money (a percent) of the overall cap amount that teams must spend on salaries to insure that teams are being competitive? I thought I remember it being around 85 to 90 percent.To quote Clint Eastwood, "A man's got to know his limitations" & SW1 sucks at comprehending or deciphering the mathematics of spending millions of dollars properly. A GM I am not. I leave that stuff to other forum experts more skilled than me. I just judge who we get & how well they play on the field. Besides, I'm a chemistry locker room guy anyway analyzing how the 52 man roster ebbs & flows all season long. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gavin Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 The closest you can get to a sign and trade in the NFL is franchise tagging Bethea then trading him, so the Bears would have to pay $10 Mil and a 4th round pick for a 31 year old safety? Not a chance. Plus he's an URFA so if he signed for any guaranteed money with the Colts, the Colts would have to eat it as soon as they traded him. If he didn't have any guaranteed money in the deal he'd likely have to work out another deal as soon as he got with Chicago. There's absolutely no chance a sign and trade could or would happen. He'd just sign with the Bears outright as opposed to throwing the Colts a bone.If thats the case then no harm no foul, just draft a better Safety in he 3rd, 4th(In a trade down), 5th Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gabriel Alexander Morillo Posted February 25, 2014 Share Posted February 25, 2014 Little harsh to call him riff-raff. I mean, I'm all for moving on from him as he's seemed to regress in recent years and he's getting a little older, but the guy has given our team a lot for the last 8 years. He helped win us a Super Bowl and has been the one guy in the secondary that you could count on to always be there and contribute. I got nothing but respect for the guy, even though I am okay with moving on without him.I am thankful for what he has DONE for us. But this is a new generation of players, Luck&company are trying to make their own suberbowl run. We need an upgrade at his position. He played pretty bad this year and honestly shouldn't be resigned. This isn't disrespectful in the least. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmac_48 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 I am thankful for what he has DONE for us. But this is a new generation of players, Luck&company are trying to make their own suberbowl run. We need an upgrade at his position. He played pretty bad this year and honestly shouldn't be resigned. This isn't disrespectful in the least.Unfortunately, young man, referring to a player who has served Colts Nation admirably for the past 8 years as riff-raff IS disrespectful! As you age and mature you will come to understand respect better.No Biggie, you will learn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gabriel Alexander Morillo Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Unfortunately, young man, referring to a player who has served Colts Nation admirably for the past 8 years as riff-raff IS disrespectful! As you age and mature you will come to understand respect better.No Biggie, you will learn.No it's not disrespectful. When he plays like garbage it is what it is. He as a human being isn't riff-raff. But as a player at this stage in his career his performances=bleh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmac_48 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 No it's not disrespectful. When he plays like garbage it is what it is. He as a human being isn't riff-raff. But as a player at this stage in his career his performances=bleh.Hey, I want the Colts to move on from him, because he hasn't delivered for the team recently but to call him riff-raff and garbage is uncalled for... I try to hold my esteem and respect for a player even when they have passed their prime and are fading stars.Even though he isn't the player he once was he is still rated well on FA charts and unless the Colts are lucky about his replacement, if he is not resigned the team may regret letting him go. For perspective, I would never call John Unitas garbage or riff-raff although in his later years his worth and performance dropped off greatly, he tried to extend his career too long but I never lost respect for him. I guess I come from an era when respect is attained over time, not just from year to year, game to game performance.We live in a throw away world today, I was just brought up different. Anyway this is off topic... I just want the interior oline fixed, after that I don't really care what else the Colts do.I'm sick of seeing our runners stuffed, and Luck getting pressured and sacked! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gabriel Alexander Morillo Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Hey, I want the Colts to move on from him, because he hasn't delivered for the team recently but to call him riff-raff and garbage is uncalled for...I try to hold my esteem and respect for a player even when they have passed their prime and are fading stars.Even though he isn't the player he once was he is still rated well on FA charts and unless the Colts are lucky about his replacement, if he is not resigned the team may regret letting him go.For perspective, I would never call John Unitas garbage or riff-raff although in his later years his worth and performance dropped off greatly, he tried to extend his career too long but I never lost respect for him.I guess I come from an era when respect is attained over time, not just from year to year, game to game performance.We live in a throw away world today, I was just brought up different.Anyway this is off topic...I just want the interior oline fixed, after that I don't really care what else the Colts do.I'm sick of seeing our runners stuffed, and Luck getting pressured and sacked!The second we start making Superbowl noise is the second we'll have fixed our trenches decently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Defjamz26 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Depends on whats out there in FA. I'd sign whatever Safety is out there to take over for 2 years while we groom a young guy we draft, to take over eventually. Would have to be someone who can be more effective than Bethea, but doesn't cost too much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iancolts Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 So say we have example 36 mill to spend and we spend say only 15 mill do we get punished for saving for the future? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now