Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

surprise star of next year


CR91

Recommended Posts

I don't think Landry will be back

It would cost $500,000 more to cut him than to keep, so he will be back!

 

My guess is that someone who is not even on the roster now will be the biggest story next year.

My hope is a Center who achieves all-pro status and leads a line that provides holes for two 1000 yrd. rushers.

:goodluck:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

now let me clarify, surprise star is someone not expected to shine and doesnt have expectations to shine so richardson doesnt count. im referring to small names that can make an impact on the team next year. mine is daniel adongo. the guy has natural talent, but obviously was behind the 8 ball when it came to football knowledge, but I like the potential this kid has and I think with a full off-season to learn the game, he can make a huge impact on not only STs, but also a rotation guy at OLB. 

Delano Howell. I like what I saw of him in the limited amount of time he was on the field. I think he could really be a key component to the secondary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

now let me clarify, surprise star is someone not expected to shine and doesnt have expectations to shine 

One can't predict who the unexpected star will be, because no one will expect him to become a star.  If you can accurately predict who this surprise star is, it's not a surprise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chapman. Over a year removed from his knee surgery plus a decent amount of NFL experience... I expect him to be a force up the middle next year.

Having had the same injury and same surgery, I agree. Yeah, your OK after a year, but for me, I didn't get full strength back till almost 2 years later, granted I wasn't a pro athlete but I still say Chapman gets better over the next season or two, provided he doesnt re-injury anything 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having had the same injury and same surgery, I agree. Yeah, your OK after a year, but for me, I didn't get full strength back till almost 2 years later, granted I wasn't a pro athlete but I still say Chapman gets better over the next season or two, provided he doesnt re-injury anything 

I also had a ACL replaced and i agree for me i was at like 75-80 percent after the first year but took at least 2 years before I was back to full strength.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Richard….    JVan and I aren’t agreeing on much recently, but on this issue I believe he’s right.   But there’s more….      I believe as the story goes Ballard shared that Morocco Brown and other scouts were confident that Smith could play RT effectively.  Ballard was worried because Smiths arms are very short at 32 1/4 when Ballard wants at least 33 1/2 if not more.  So Brown and the scouts convinced Ballard Smith was athletic enough to do the job.    And they been right.  
    • maybe not a starter but I think dulin will be a pleasant surprise this season
    • All of the following is my opinion…. I think 2024 is the last year for Ryan Kelly and then Bortolini takes over in 25.      I think Smiths last year is 2025, and I think the Colts will draft a RT to replace Smith in 25 and the kid will start for the Colts in 26.      I think Goncalves might take over at RG for Fries, but almost no one realize Fries graded in the top 40 percent of all guards, so there will be good competition at the spot.     I think the Colts are using the next few years to rebuild the Colts offensive line for the near future… 
    • Once again showing your ignorance .  Just like in your Peyton vs Brady arguments.   Russell and his fellow Celtics were clearly the best basketball team of the 50s/60s.   if that’s the case (and try following the logic), that would stand to mean that if they had the same advantages as those 80’s teams had in terms of training, true professional training facilities, etc, then they would have just been just as good as any 80’s team.   It’s the same when young people today say that Magic/Larry, etc, would have no shot against kids who have played AAU and been groomed since 10 years old.  Of course they would have, given the same opportunities.
    • Two players make a championship team?  Two small forwards, in fact? again, you’re showing your basketball ignorance.  
  • Members

    • Hammer

      Hammer 327

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ClaytonColt

      ClaytonColt 427

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 21,435

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Kirie89

      Kirie89 6

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...