Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Thoughts of the coaching staff thus far?


bluephantom87

Recommended Posts

I will start off by saying I know it's early but a valid question because most feel like this is a more TALENTED team on paper than last years 11-5 pieced together squad. Now most are starting to feel like this is a 7-9 or 8-8 team after 2 games what gives? Coming into this season expectations were HIGH. A playoff win or maybe a division crown considering that the Colts also have the 3rd easiest schedule. (I know that's "flawed" because it's based on records from the previous year and all the subpar teams seem to be better. KC is 2-0 already) The Colts started 1-2 last year and could've easily been 0-3 (if not for the Vikings game) then went on a remarkable run after Chuck was lost with the oc (Bruce A) subbing as hc (earning COY honors), a rookie qb and skill players, a terrible o-line, and a bad defense that lacked the players to pull off the 3-4 scheme. Jaws (former SB qb now working for espn) pointed out last year how Luck put a lot of pressure on opposing defenses using that wr core with numerous "explosive" plays downfield and with a dominate o-line being the focus in the offseason their run game would get better but it would allow Luck (with a clean pocket) to shred defenses like Peyton, Brees, and Rogers because he has more upside than any of the young qbs. Pep has been debated enough but why did it take an injury for Thorton to get on the field as bad as the o-line has played? Bradshaw should be in on critical downs REGARDLESS of the 50-50 split with Brown. Everyone knows that the Colts weren't an 11-5 team on paper last year but the coaching staff catered to the talent at hand and utilized their strengths to produce WINS. Mac received a pass last year with the defense because he didn't have the personnel to run the 3-4 scheme but 2 wks in a row the opposing qbs have looked like world beaters. Some say the Colts are lucky to be 1-1 instead of 0-2 and they haven't even begun to play the superior teams yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not thrilled 1 bit. Our offensive and defensive philosophies don't seem to adjust to what's going on in the game, we always seem to play like we have a big lead, on offense and defense. Where's the urgency on offense? Where's the aggressiveness on D?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think we basically have to rookies on the main 3 staff, but they we should be 2-0 right now the ref stole this game illegal shifting on a man in motion that is #@$@% but ole we i know how green bay feel after the ref constantly cheat them, we have a stretch  of games coming up that if we are lucky i mean very lucky we will be heading tot he bye week   3-4  with the texans next but ...the good news is that even if we come out the bye week 3-4 we have alot of winnable games down the stretch 9 games that i feel like we have a shot to win in each game so if we handle business we looking at another 11-5 or 10-6 yr wildcard berth  :goodluck:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not thrilled 1 bit. Our offensive and defensive philosophies don't seem to adjust to what's going on in the game, we always seem to play like we have a big lead, on offense and defense. Where's the urgency on offense? Where's the aggressiveness on D?

man i know what u mean its like we play %^$ backward on off we play like we up 30 and on def we play like we down 30 instead of off playing like thier down and def understanding the situation playing to stop big play when it is time 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will start off by saying I know it's early but a valid question because most feel like this is a more TALENTED team on paper than last years 11-5 pieced together squad. Now most are starting to feel like this is a 7-9 or 8-8 team after 2 games what gives? Coming into this season expectations were HIGH. A playoff win or maybe a division crown considering that the Colts also have the 3rd easiest schedule. (I know that's "flawed" because it's based on records from the previous year and all the subpar teams seem to be better. KC is 2-0 already) The Colts started 1-2 last year and could've easily been 0-3 (if not for the Vikings game) then went on a remarkable run after Chuck was lost with the oc (Bruce A) subbing as hc (earning COY honors), a rookie qb and skill players, a terrible o-line, and a bad defense that lacked the players to pull off the 3-4 scheme. Jaws (former SB qb now working for espn) pointed out last year how Luck put a lot of pressure on opposing defenses using that wr core with numerous "explosive" plays downfield and with a dominate o-line being the focus in the offseason their run game would get better but it would allow Luck (with a clean pocket) to shred defenses like Peyton, Brees, and Rogers because he has more upside than any of the young qbs. Pep has been debated enough but why did it take an injury for Thorton to get on the field as bad as the o-line has played? Bradshaw should be in on critical downs REGARDLESS of the 50-50 split with Brown. Everyone knows that the Colts weren't an 11-5 team on paper last year but the coaching staff catered to the talent at hand and utilized their strengths to produce WINS. Mac received a pass last year with the defense because he didn't have the personnel to run the 3-4 scheme but 2 wks in a row the opposing qbs have looked like world beaters. Some say the Colts are lucky to be 1-1 instead of 0-2 and they haven't even begun to play the superior teams yet.

 

It's definitely a more talented team on paper, it's hard to argue against that. However, I think a lot of people under-estimated how much the team over-achieved last year.

 

How many games were won on the last drive last season? How many of those wins could easily have been losses? At least 3 or 4. 

 

Like it or not, the Colts were VERY lucky to end up with an 11-5 record last season and they certainly weren't an 11-5 team on paper.

 

I'd say we were an 8-8 team on paper last season and I still maintain we're a 10-6 team this season, despite a bit of a rough start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1.Defense is a puzzle since all the starters are experienced.Can Manusky coach defense?

2.Satele and McGlynn still hurt the offense.Not sure if the OL coach is the problem.

3.Loss of Ballard for the season, and early injuries affected the Miami game.

4.I like the new offense but it stunted the growth of the team because instead of fine tuning (little things like blitz pickups) the team has to learn a new offense.

5.Did having a lot of project players on defense (Adongo, Werner, McNary,Hughes) stunt the growth of the defense or is Manusky at fault? I am not sure.

6.Thought Chapman would make a difference by now but not sure if its coaching or he is overweight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this isn't Madden. More "talent" doesn't always mean better production immeadiately. It takes time to gel. There are a lot of new faces and a whole new offensive scheme. Everyone needs to pump the brakes and relax.

 

Couldn't agree more. We'll be ok, lighten up doom & gloom thinkers. The only complaint I have is I see we are ranked 5th in the league in average yards per rush at 5.0 yds.per play. Might not be the greatest run stopping opponents we'll play, but it's the NFL & 5 yds. per play is not shabby. I hope we can run the ball more throughout the season & give Luck more time in the passing game via play action passes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, quality of competition does matter and a coach like Arians who goes for it a bit more does matter. Bills, Chiefs, Browns, Jags twice, and a less talented than this year Titans squad twice, lets face it, our schedule did work in our favor last year. Then, on all those critical 3rd downs in last year's Dolphins game, how many of those did Luck convert using 3 WR formations with pretty much slightly lesser talent on the OL front?

 

Just like blaming playcalling for everything is too sweeping a generalization and is short sighted, not giving a portion of the blame to playcalling would also be not calling it like it is, IMO. The odds of us winning close game after close game had to catch up to us and it did in the Dolphins game.  But if we keep any game close, we will stand a chance, IMO, and that is all you can ask for every Sunday, a chance to win it at the end and it is a W no matter how it is obtained.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not thrilled 1 bit. Our offensive and defensive philosophies don't seem to adjust to what's going on in the game, we always seem to play like we have a big lead, on offense and defense. Where's the urgency on offense? Where's the aggressiveness on D?

Agree 100%!! Early or not I see a problem with this staff. Didn't like the Manusky hire in the 1st place but he got a free pass last year (understandable) because he didn't have the personnel for the scheme. His biggest knock was that his 3-4 was too vanilla and generated little pressure unless down but with Chuck as hc I figured that wouldn't be a problem. All I heard was how much bigger, more physical and aggressive they would be. Not seeing it or the fear factor. Even though they had 5 sacks Sunday (in spurts) the Colts in general have lacked pressure (against 1 subpar and 1 ok team) Tanny seemed to have all day compared to Luck. Before taking the hc job in Arizona Bruce was talking about the Colts going more no huddle this year keeping the defense on their heels and off balance because Luck and the offense could handle it. I think Bruce coached the team with a sense of urgency and got the MOST out of what he had. That defense last year was bad yet you never felt the Colts were out of a game except for a few times. Still don't like Pep's offense. Yes they need to rush the ball and their avg is up but our run game seems to have no flow within the game. The few times they throw the deep ball it seems like only 1 wr is downfield. I have a feeling Chuck will be conservative as hc because I remember the first 3 games last year with him at the helm they lost to the Jags and barely beat the Vikings after having leads and choosing to sit on the ball in the 2nd half. From what I'm seeing he will be content with close games and trying long field goals with a suspect kicker whose age is starting to catch up with his leg.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this isn't Madden. More "talent" doesn't always mean better production immeadiately. It takes time to gel. There are a lot of new faces and a whole new offensive scheme. Everyone needs to pump the brakes and relax.

I think last year had MORE new faces, rookies STARTING at key positions, a new coaching staff, new offensive and defensive schemes with less talent all the while flipping a 2-14 season into an 11-5 playoff berth team. Did I mention they also released a guy by the name of Peyton Manning. I know the schedule will play a part into this season but I see concerns about the staff. By the way it wasn't Madden last year either. The Dallas Cowboys make excuses the Colts win ball games! :number1:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this isn't Madden. More "talent" doesn't always mean better production immeadiately. It takes time to gel. There are a lot of new faces and a whole new offensive scheme. Everyone needs to pump the brakes and relax.

^ This. Every team has growing pains. Especially with a rookie OC and a HC with less HC experience than our interim HC last year. Like it or not, the team is in rebuilding mode. They are still learning to work together and trying to find their identity.

I have faith in this team. I expect great things from them. I just don't expect it this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ This. Every team has growing pains. Especially with a rookie OC and a HC with less HC experience than our interim HC last year. Like it or not, the team is in rebuilding mode. They are still learning to work together and trying to find their identity.

I have faith in this team. I expect great things from them. I just don't expect it this year.

I have bad feeling you might be right. I woefully underestimated how a new OC can change things, better or worse. Hopefully he finds a scheme that works well for the Colts. i hoping he's not on auto pilot, just waiting for his way to work.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think last year had MORE new faces, rookies STARTING at key positions, a new coaching staff, new offensive and defensive schemes with less talent all the while flipping a 2-14 season into an 11-5 playoff berth team. Did I mention they also released a guy by the name of Peyton Manning. I know the schedule will play a part into this season but I see concerns about the staff. By the way it wasn't Madden last year either. The Dallas Cowboys make excuses the Colts win ball games! :number1:

That's a neat little motto. It doesn't change the fact that the team is still rebuilding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a neat little motto. It doesn't change the fact that the team is still rebuilding.

:clap: Thanks jvan on the motto and yes they are still rebuilding but coaches play a part in that process too. I'm not saying we have bad coaches and that they can't get the job done I'm just a little leery at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's early but i have concerns.  I did not care for the offense when i seen it at camp and then during preseason.   I don't think we play to our strengths enough.  I hate the 1 WR formations, and we are averaging over 2 yards less a play out of that formation compared to ALL other sets.  We rank 5th in rushing but 19th in passing.  Last year it was reversed.  19th is too low for a player like Luck.  For comparison sakes, the Vikes under Ponder rank 20th.   Brady and the Pats are in there too, but he's throwing to a pretty awful WR unit right now who can't catch. The difference in offensive production in the first half compared to the 2nd is huge. Defenses are adjusting, and it would appear that for whatever reason, the Colt's simply aren't adjusting at all.  If they were, we wouldn't see such a huge difference in the numbers between halves.  I think the coaches have problems at times putting the best players on the field.  Havili overr Hilton in game 1.   Brown in on 4th down over Bradshaw.  Sorry, but that is dumb coaching anyway you slice it.  There is no excuse for it. You can't blame Brown for missing the block, he isn't a great blocker.   Blame the coaches for putting him in that position.

 

I don't have an opinion yet on Pagano.  Still too early.  But early signs are concerning there too.  He said he didn't even consider going for it on 4th and 1 Sunday in the first qtr because it was too early in the game.  Really coach?  Come on. I "think" he may be too conservative.  But need more evidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Manusky worries me and hes been fired twice already.

That's kind of misleading. The Niners were a train wreck under Singletary and Norv Turner made him the scapegoat in SD. I don't know how good he is, but I would let his past firings cloud the picture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know as fans you have the right to be critical of management and coaching but i still think it's rather early to have this thread imo. Maybe if we're midway through and we're under .500 this thread would be an appropriate thread, but still then it is limited.

 

I hope even if we don't make the playoffs we should stick with pagano for a few years. Give him time, it's really his 1st season tbh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly all the hate pep is done lol. But you guys think Luck is gonna just go through a sophomore slump? We made the playoffs last year and now everybody mostly me think we can do way way better. I'm starting to think that Luck making the playoff last year is not a good thing because now he has to worry about big expectations. I know Luck will be a great QB but he is in his second year regardless of all the FO FA we brought in to help protect him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Most of us are underpaid, difference is we move on and deal with it and barely can enjoy life. Imagine if Pat Mahome's and his wife and kids had to live paycheck to paycheck, that would be funny to see, even for 3 months 
    • You have a good heart because unfortunately money rules the world. Without it, you can't do anything or live nice. I am just talking live halfway nice, nothing mind popping like buying 3 cars and a half million-dollar house. Just live in a 200,000 house (good neighborhood) and have a nice car and be able to take a Vacation once a year type of money is what I mean. To your point, being a good person with good morals is super important though . I try to treat people well and help people as much as I can.
    • Fun fact: Smith took Mike Tyson the distance, only 1 of 2 fighters to do that when Mike was Champ from 1986-1989. Tony Tucker was the other.
    • I have seen a few clips of Creed 2 on Youtube but never have watched the whole movie. I seen where Drago is in it. I thought Creed 1 was kind of average but I grew up with the Rocky movies with Rocky fighting. As far as the fights between Rocky and Clubber being short, that was fine because there were 2 of them. The way I would rank the Rocky movies would be: 1. Rocky 3 - had more action than any of them and the Creed twist was shocking. Back then there was no internet or teasers, so nobody had no idea that Creed would train Rocky. Mr T was by far the baddest villain of them all. He made people want to hate him. Hulk Hogan was even it who Rocky fought for charity  . Mick even passed away, it all kinds of twists and turns.   2. Rocky 1 - the 1st one because of the storyline. He also went the distance with GOAT = Apollo, nobody ever done that.   3. Rocky 2 - had the best fight, so I can see how that would be #1 in many eyes. That was my mom's favorite because of Adrian coming out of the coma and telling Rocky to win and the fight was the best of the whole series.   4. Rocky 4 - This one was good but not great. They could have made this much better to where it could of been the best of the series. It was kind of unrealistic because no way in real life would Apollo get killed in 2 rounds. The fight between Apollo and Drago should have at least gone 7 or 8 rounds and just show Apollo taking a beating. 2 Rounds = no way. #2, they made Drago out to be like a superhero, Rocky already beat Clubber who was just as strong, so I didn't care for the storyline. The training scenes by Rocky and Drago and the music is what saved that one from being average.
    • I hope we keep Toppin, I didn't think we would. Paul George went to Philly for 4 years/212 Mill, so now we have them to deal with as well besides Boston, NY, and Milwaukee. I thought we were better than Philly before the George deal, not sure now. 
  • Members

    • 2006Coltsbestever

      2006Coltsbestever 42,008

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • lincolndefan

      lincolndefan 92

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtStrong2013

      ColtStrong2013 3,572

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NFLfan

      NFLfan 17,555

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 8,441

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TheNewGuy

      TheNewGuy 128

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Kirie89

      Kirie89 6

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nadine

      Nadine 8,163

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...