Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

How to fix the colts


CR91

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, NewColtsFan said:


Huh? 
 

Paye

Dayo

Stewart

Franklin

Okereke

Speed

Brents

Blackman

 

And added players like Buckner and Moore  through trade and waiver claims.  

 

Yep a list of C- players he drafted. Buckner and Moore don’t count.
Grover hasn’t been the same since no more PED’s. 

Brent’s… Are you kidding me? Made of glass.

Paye and Dayo have show to only be single sack season players.

Blackmon a C- Safety and we all know the whole secondary is a need 🤣

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ImissPeyton18 said:

not at all. Peyton threw a lot of interceptions but he threw a lot of touchdowns also. He was not a project. 

 

 

Ok. AR has 11 tds in the equivalent of 5 games. Is that not a lot?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, a06cc said:

Yep a list of C- players he drafted. Buckner and Moore don’t count.
Grover hasn’t been the same since no more PED’s. 

Brent’s… Are you kidding me? Made of glass.

Paye and Dayo have show to only be single sack season players.

Blackmon a C- Safety and we all know the whole secondary is a need 🤣

 

2 hours ago, a06cc said:

Yep a list of C- players he drafted. Buckner and Moore don’t count.
Grover hasn’t been the same since no more PED’s. 

Brent’s… Are you kidding me? Made of glass.

Paye and Dayo have show to only be single sack season players.

Blackmon a C- Safety and we all know the whole secondary is a need 🤣


The difference is you see all those guys as C- players.    That’s your opinion.  
 

I don’t believe there are grades or other facts to back that up.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/18/2024 at 8:52 PM, CR91 said:

So this is based on what I've seen from the colts the pass two weeks and what I feel they can do to fix some of the problems their dealing with

 

1.Stop forcing AR to make passes in the pocket 

 

I'm sorry, but AR imo just doesn't have the accuracy to sit in the pocket and make throws. Get him outside where teams are forced to come at him because of the fear of him running which then opens up the coverage. It shrinks the field sure, but it also puts the defense in a bind because they have to respect AR's legs.

 

I disagree to a degree. AR is much more of a pocket passer than a lot of people would like to consider him. He needs MORE reps ... in and out of the pocket. He just needs reps and experience. Agree with one thing though... he might benefit from changing his platform once in a while and giving the defense some deferent looks that they cannot key in on. 

On 9/18/2024 at 8:52 PM, CR91 said:

2.Taylor needs to touch the ball 20-25 times a game 

 

2 games and Taylor has not touched the ball more then 16 times which is absolutely insane to me given he's your best player. You need to take as much pressure off AR as possible and JT can do that.

Somewhat agree... but game script dictates some of this. We've just not been playing with the lead a lot and we've been in position to need to throw a lot. I still don't think him sitting the last drive last week was that huge of a problem, especially after he actually dropped an easy pass earlier in the game. He's never been known to be a great pass-catching back and I have no idea why people are pretending like he is one here. :dunno:

 

On 9/18/2024 at 8:52 PM, CR91 said:

3.Give AR easy throws to the TEs

 

I don't know why the hell the TEs are not getting more involved in the passing game. We need drive starting plays. Not everything needs to be a deep or intermediate play.

We need better TEs, AR doesn't need to force throws to mediocre TEs who slip or run the wrong routes or can't catch the ball. 

On 9/18/2024 at 8:52 PM, CR91 said:

4.Defense needs more lane discipline 

 

I can't count how many times I've seen teams easily move our guys out of the way. No one is holding their ground and on certain cases their just over pursuiting and the RB is already 5 yards down the field.

 

Yep... lots of things need cleaning up in our defense. Some seem like coaching points, some are personnel based. I think our LBs have been big culprits in our porous run defense. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/18/2024 at 3:34 PM, Thunderbolt said:

Why don't we trade for Mac Jones who's the back-up for Jacksonville. I realized he's a pocket passer, but he's still young, accurate passer, and can run if need be. Use him as a stop gap right now, while AR can sit and watch and develop.  Just a thought.

Sorry, but that's a terrible idea. A player who's played just 19 games since high school and who more than anything needs real game experience doesn't magically become a better, more experienced passer by watching from the sideline. You don't get better at sports by watching sports.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

 


The difference is you see all those guys as C- players.    That’s your opinion.  
 

I don’t believe there are grades or other facts to back that up.  

C is being very nice.  C- to D is what they are.  Mediocre talent at best.  Just watch other teams.  They have real talent.  We have Ballard talent.  That is talent only Ballard sees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/18/2024 at 5:49 PM, a06cc said:

Here’s the thing though. You aren’t an NFL Coach and your suggest is pretty stupid 🤣 It’s either he learns how to throw from a pocket or he’ll be out of the league. My suggestion is he learns how to be an NFL Quarterback. 

I have a better suggestion.  Don't draft an experiment.  It will makes things much better.  And AR is an experiment so Ballard can say look what I did.  I got news for all of you.  AR will get Ballard fired.  AR is not good.  Never has been.  Its the reason he has not played very many games in High School and College.  He is not good.  Period.  he is an athlete that can throw the ball a mile but nothing else.  Nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Hooksalot said:

I have a better suggestion.  Don't draft an experiment.  It will makes things much better.  And AR is an experiment so Ballard can say look what I did.  I got news for all of you.  AR will get Ballard fired.  AR is not good.  Never has been.  Its the reason he has not played very many games in High School and College.  He is not good.  Period.  he is an athlete that can throw the ball a mile but nothing else.  Nothing.

 

thank you for your in depth opinion that I have no doubt comes from years of experience grading and evaluating QB talent for the NFL.

 

I got news for you.  Ballard did not make that decision on his own.  

 

Quote

he is an athlete that can throw the ball a mile but nothing else.  Nothing.

 

I got more news for you.  You are wrong.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, BeanDiasucci said:

For all the talk about how great Ballard is at the draft. Who are the great draft picks on this defense? There may be A- or B+ picks (and an INC in Latu), but are there any As? 

 

image.png.ef48f80acbe8a2fc07865aab0dd4ae66.png

 

There also seem to be this idea that Ballard has been mining late round defensive gems in the draft for years. Like who? The guy who got suspended for gambling?

 

I think Ballard's drafting prowess has always been a bity overstated, at least since that 2018 draft class (which seems to be an outlier).

 

And nearly half of the full starting roster is comprised of aging players...all acquired 6+ years ago. Between injuries and poor performance, we might be seeing the downside of this. 

 

There are some pieces, but a rebuild (regardless of AR) seems inevitable. That could be the light at the end of a tunnel of a lost season. Get a top 5 pick and then parlay it into a monster trade-back ala 2018. That would be a great start and a wonderful housewarming present for the new GM.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Hooksalot said:

C is being very nice.  C- to D is what they are.  Mediocre talent at best.  Just watch other teams.  They have real talent.  We have Ballard talent.  That is talent only Ballard sees.


Again…. You’re entitled to any opinion you like.   But I don’t agree, nor do I think the facts would support your opinion.   

Hey, I just double checked..   you’re new to the website.   Welcome to the community.   Sorry you’ve joined at a time the Colts have started so poorly.  

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NewColtsFan said:


Again…. You’re entitled to any opinion you like.   But I don’t agree, nor do I think the facts would support your opinion.   

Hey, I just double checked..   you’re new to the website.   Welcome to the community.   Sorry you’ve joined at a time the Colts have started so poorly.  

 

They aren’t new… they joined in 2016. They just show randomly to trash the team and then leave.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Hooksalot said:

I have a better suggestion.  Don't draft an experiment.  It will makes things much better.  And AR is an experiment so Ballard can say look what I did.  I got news for all of you.  AR will get Ballard fired.  AR is not good.  Never has been.  Its the reason he has not played very many games in High School and College.  He is not good.  Period.  he is an athlete that can throw the ball a mile but nothing else.  Nothing.

It is so obvious you don’t look at his tape. 
 

And I have news for you. Pretty much every QB in the 2023 draft was a project. Even Stroud had some questions around him. Who was the real CJ? The one who couldn’t get it done against Michigan two years in a row? Or the one we saw against Georgia? 
 

You’re lying if you knew.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean the comparison being made in the article/thread. And that's probably not the right word, it's just an example to illustrate the point that you're making -- it takes more than six games for a QB to figure out how to do their job.
    • I agree that any realisitic playoff hopes are likely done if we go 0-3. But I don't think anything drastic has to happen mid season. At worse, fire Gus Bradley. Ballard's job can be determined in the off-season.
    • Specifically regarding the run defense, the players obviously need to play better. And while it's trite and annoying to hear, it really is little things that lead to bad defensive performances in the run game. That's illustrated by how the run defense appeared to correct itself halfway through the Packers game.    For example, the Packers ran a similar run play at least three times in this game. It stood out to me because it had some misdirection and a reverse side handoff. The first time they ran it, it was a big gain. The second time, more moderate gain. By the third time, in the second half, the Colts defense was ready for it, and I think they stopped it for a loss. Same defensive personnel, much different results. My point is that the Colts have sufficient personnel to be better against the run (setting aside questions about Buckner's absence). We can definitely point to assignment failures, poor tackling, and lack of physicality, which are personnel issues. But those issues should be addressed by the current players performing better, which we have evidence of them doing already this season. I'm not saying the run defense is "fixed" because they did better in the second half vs the Packers, only saying that's evidence that they can play much better than they have so far.   The scheme issues are many and varied. This latest decision to put Bryan at NT is mind boggling, not just because I don't think Bryan is a good player. Mostly, it's because we have a proven NT in Stewart, and secondly because we signed a mountainous backup to Stewart in Davis. So why are we using the undersized 3T who underperforms, we presumably have two better options ahead of him? It's like we're making a personnel issue a scheme issue.   Which gets back to coaching in general. I have a lot of questions about coaching right now. Some are pretty obvious, and they're on both sides of the ball (like JT's usage). Even STs, like why Matt Gay is kicking when he just had a hernia "procedure." I think we have coaching and personnel issues, but the coaching issues seem self-inflicted and mostly correctable.    And just to go back to defense, again, I agree that there are personnel issues. But I don't think it matters what personnel we have, Gus Bradley is not going to adjust his scheme, and that limits the defensive output. 
    • "See where we are midway through the season. If we’re 0-8 then your hopes will be more realized."  
    • Bryan is subpar regardless of where they try to hide him on the d-line so it wasn't going to look good anyway...
  • Members

    • DynaMike

      DynaMike 171

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JediXMan

      JediXMan 4,995

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • richard pallo

      richard pallo 9,418

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • lukec1995

      lukec1995 22

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • colts89

      colts89 1,077

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • tdblue17

      tdblue17 6

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dingus McGirt

      Dingus McGirt 3,902

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • hambone35

      hambone35 54

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Superman

      Superman 22,019

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • throwing BBZ

      throwing BBZ 3,989

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...