Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Exciting times ahead. Key dates to know for Colts fans (MERGE)


csmopar

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

Zach hicks has a story and from what he heard at the combine he expects colts to go after a safety or two in FA. Mentioned it’s a good class there.

Let’s hope it’s guys worth a darn and not Dunn Bupkis and Ha Ha No-sho. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

Zach hicks has a story and from what he heard at the combine he expects colts to go after a safety or two in FA. Mentioned it’s a good class there.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

Zach hicks has a story and from what he heard at the combine he expects colts to go after a safety or two in FA. Mentioned it’s a good class there.

I have always thought safety was going to be a major target.  Xavier McKinney would be my first choice but I could easily see Jordan Fuller or Jeremy Chinn signing with the Colts.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

Zach hicks has a story and from what he heard at the combine he expects colts to go after a safety or two in FA. Mentioned it’s a good class there.

Dan Patrick was talking this morning about buyer beware of what you hear at the combine. A LOT gets said at the combine and it turns into a giant game of telephone where a lot doesn’t end up being close to what is really going on.

 

Not saying the Colts won’t go after a safety or two just be cautious with taking it as absolute fact not that you are saying it is absolute fact.  

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, GoColts8818 said:

Dan Patrick was talking this morning about buyer beware of what you hear at the combine. A LOT gets said at the combine and it turns into a giant game of telephone where a lot doesn’t end up being close to what is really going on.

 

Not saying the Colts won’t go after a safety or two just be cautious with taking it as absolute fact not that you are saying it is absolute fact.  

Except colts are weak there so there is a very good chance they do. Especially after Ballard said it needs upgraded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

Except colts are weak there so there is a very good chance they do. Especially after Ballard said it needs upgraded.

Which is why I said I am not saying they won’t.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The draft is not good at safety, but there are some talented guys in FA.

 

But, I expect we'll pick up a guy like Rayshawn Jenkins. Average as can be, but he'll be cheap and he has experience with Bradley. Incidentally he also had a RAS of 9.42.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Solid84 said:

The draft is not good at safety, but there are some talented guys in FA.

 

But, I expect we'll pick up a guy like Rayshawn Jenkins. Average as can be, but he'll be cheap and he has experience with Bradley. Incidentally he also had a RAS of 9.42.

I think Jeremy Chinn had a RAS score of 10.0.  He would also be a great addition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we give up Pitt, AR won't have a reliable, consistent target to throw to. We can't bank on drafting a #1 WR at 15. The Atlanta game last season told us everything we needed to know about this offense without him.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, richard pallo said:

I think Jeremy Chinn had a RAS score of 10.0.  He would also be a great addition.

It may not have come across clearly, but I don't think Rayshawn Jenkins is a good get for the Colts. I think he's a JAG. A RAS-y JAG, but Ballard will pick-up on the Bradley connection. 

 

Don't know Chinn. Just looking at his stats though he seems to have had one good season in 4. Don't know if that's someone to get excited about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This seems to be taking this a step further.

 

Edit:

Quote

A source also shared that the Colts have had their eyes on Sneed for a while now, and they shared the following.

"If he (Sneed) hit free agency, he would have been our top priority at CB and free agent altogether to pursue." 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Solid84 said:

This seems to be taking this a step further.

 

Edit:

 

Wow this could happen. I don’t like the draft compensation it might take but having a bet QB who is still pretty young to go with Brents would have me very excited. Hopefully it wouldn’t cost us our second round pick.

That speed trade could even happen before next week too. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

Wow this could happen. I don’t like the draft compensation it might take but having a bet QB who is still pretty young to go with Brents would have me very excited. Hopefully it wouldn’t cost us our second round pick.

That speed trade could even happen before next week too. 

I read multiple times a 2nd is what it would take, but I not sure if that's just the Chiefs' way of opening trade discussions.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Solid84 said:

I read multiple times a 2nd is what it would take, but I not sure if that's just the Chiefs' way of opening trade discussions.

Guess it would depend if Sneed  wants out and he forces his hand. If he wants to leave and forces it probably won’t cost as much. If we go pass catcher at 15 I am perfectly fine giving up the second.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Solid84 said:

This is not the original tweet I was thinking of, but this mentions a price:

 

 

That’s not the only time I’ve seen the day 2 pick being sought. NFL dot com had it a day or so ago at that as well

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Solid84 said:

This is not the original tweet I was thinking of, but this mentions a price:

 

 


I would give up a second round pick for him. And I would look to bring a free safety in to pair. We would be flexible to do whatever at 15, including trading down to make up for the pick given. Sneed and an upgrade at free safety gives versatility on the back end of the defense, and would be major upgrades. It gives the option of drafting d-line early, and using a strong receiver pool to round out the roster. If they are committed to Pittman, then drafting a receiver at 15 is probably not in the cards. Bringing in Sneed cans the idea of a corner as well. A Brock Bowers or Jared Verse? Possible. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Solid84 said:

This is not the original tweet I was thinking of, but this mentions a price:

 

 

A day two pick could also be a 3rd pick and maybe another later pick.  I have read where that also could get it done.  I can’t remember who but an elite corner was traded for that price a couple of years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ColtStrong2013 said:


I would give up a second round pick for him. And I would look to bring a free safety in to pair. We would be flexible to do whatever at 15, including trading down to make up for the pick given. Sneed and an upgrade at free safety gives versatility on the back end of the defense, and would be major upgrades. It gives the option of drafting d-line early, and using a strong receiver pool to round out the roster. If they are committed to Pittman, then drafting a receiver at 15 is probably not in the cards. Bringing in Sneed cans the idea of a corner as well. A Brock Bowers or Jared Verse? Possible. 

I'd pay a 2nd for him too. My worry is a team like the Patriots with their 34th or the Titans with their 38th would come along waving those picks. Then we're looking at throwing more picks at it or swapping 1sts with the Chiefs and I'm not sure I'd be ready to do that, when we also have to pay him close to $20m.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Solid84 said:

I'd pay a 2nd for him too. My worry is a team like the Patriots with their 34th or the Titans with their 38th would come along waving those picks. Then we're looking at throwing more picks at it or swapping 1sts with the Chiefs and I'm not sure I'd be ready to do that, when we also have to pay him close to $20m.

 

 


you don’t think he is going to have influence? Whatever team is trading for him would have to work out a signing agreement too. So it’s not as simple as the chiefs just taking the highest bidder. It has to work out for all parties. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ColtStrong2013 said:


you don’t think he is going to have influence? Whatever team is trading for him would have to work out a signing agreement too. So it’s not as simple as the chiefs just taking the highest bidder. It has to work out for all parties. 

True, but I guess that depends on how flexible the Chiefs want to be for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Solid84 said:

I'd pay a 2nd for him too. My worry is a team like the Patriots with their 34th or the Titans with their 38th would come along waving those picks. Then we're looking at throwing more picks at it or swapping 1sts with the Chiefs and I'm not sure I'd be ready to do that, when we also have to pay him close to $20m.

 

 

Patriots are going to have a rookie QB and are rebuilding. I doubt that would happen. Vikings unless they bring back cousins are in the same situation. Lions defiantly could land him as they are ready to contend. Jags could be too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Solid84 said:

True, but I guess that depends on how flexible the Chiefs want to be for him.


I would say they’ll have to be flexible to an extent for it to work best. I don’t see it being a win-win for all parties if he isn’t involved to an extent and satisfied with the end result. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

A day two pick could also be a 3rd pick and maybe another later pick.  I have read where that also could get it done.  I can’t remember who but an elite corner was traded for that price a couple of years ago.

You don’t see corners being traded for much higher than a 3rd. So I doubt it will be higher than that. The fact a team has to also sign him to an extension could lesson the compensation too.  Chiefs would probably like to have a higher round pick in the 2nd or 3rd. It’s a win win if colts draft a pass catcher at 15 and then trade for sneed giving up their second. Get 2 game changers there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

You don’t see corners being traded for much higher than a 3rd. So I doubt it will be higher than that. The fact a team has to also sign him to an extension could lesson the compensation too.  Chiefs would probably like to have a higher round pick in the 2nd or 3rd. It’s a win win if colts draft a pass catcher at 15 and then trade for sneed giving up their second. Get 2 game changers there.

I’m finding it hard to believe we would be interested in Snead after investing and playing all of the young corners last year.  Flowers will be coming back too.  Now if we lose Kenny that would change my view.  If Kenny returns I would think we would sign a FA safety which wouldn’t cost as much as Snead.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

I’m finding it hard to believe we would be interested in Snead after investing and playing all of the young corners last year.  Flowers will be coming back too.  Now if we lose Kenny that would change my view.  If Kenny returns I would think we would sign a FA safety which wouldn’t cost as much as Snead.  


I think it’s pretty telling on Kenny Moore that there are reports of serious interest for the Colts. He would not be back with Sneed brought on the roster… 

 

I don’t think it’s hard to believe. He’s a legit player. I think they realize they need to upgrade the secondary both at corner and safety to be competitive with Houston, who is no doubt going to make some moves this offseason. There are some that think Houston can be the biggest threat to KC this year with the right moves. We have to play this offseason right. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You are missing out a rather LARGE piece of the puzzle in your factoring here. We had last season's win numbers with GARDNER FREAKING MINSHEW at QB practically the whole season. Love the guy and what he did for us last season, but he isn't exactly a world beater at the QB position. AR brings such a different dynamic to this offense and teamm, Shane is going to be chomping at the bit to get started this season. The sample size we saw from AR last season was small, but it was definitely encouraging - especially considering we were all expecting him to be much more raw and inaccuarte. He basically red-shirted last year, learning the NFL game and in Steichen's ear the whole time, while learning the playbook inside out.  Our team has fundamentally stayed the same as last season, which damn near won the AFC South with Gardner at QB for the love of god. Now we add AR to that mix, as well as some very interesting additions in Mitchell and Latu who could have very meaningful impacts. The fact that we are so under the radar is almost laughable - AFC South isnt going to know what hit it. 
    • Great points!  I would assume the Irsay’s would conduct the interviews. If Steichen is given more control he would as well or the new GM could decide his fate like Ballard did with Pagano. Several ways it can go and we are a few years away from it even happening so who really knows. I’m hoping none of it matters and the team becomes a true contender and this discussion is merely killing time. 
    • I would say "hire the best who's available for the job". If all the good / great GM candidates are gone, you're stuck hiring someone like Grigson (or maybe someone from this forum).   I often wonder, who's the best candidate to hire for an impossible job? Someone who can make the impossible, possible?
    • I agree.  Hire who’s best for the job.  But that doesn’t mean the guy who is easiest is automatically the wrong choice.  Easiest can also mean best.   It depends on your perspective.  
    • I’m in, can’t believe how fast this year is going. 
  • Members

    • lollygagger8

      lollygagger8 5,473

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Coltsfan1953

      Coltsfan1953 201

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • K-148

      K-148 90

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • lincolndefan

      lincolndefan 92

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jason_

      Jason_ 2,312

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 8,436

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Aaron86

      Aaron86 440

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Virtuoso80

      Virtuoso80 437

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 14,540

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dingus McGirt

      Dingus McGirt 3,690

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...