Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Conversations are moderated for civility. We ask that you please stay on topic. For more info, see our Community Guidelines ×
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum
Enter To Win 2 Tickets to Steelers @ Colts Sun 09/29 | 1:00 PM EDT

How Th CBS Hosts Predicted The Game

King Colt

By King Colt
in NFL General

Recommended Posts

chad72 Ring of Honor

chad72

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, IcEWoLF said:

Yep, KC might have been the winner if they would have done a better job at protecting Mahomes and if his receivers if they would have at least catched the balls.

 

Both Reid and Mahomes did not adjust to their OL being overwhelmed plus Hill AND Kelce covered well. Typically back up OL players are better at run blocking than pass blocking, IMO.

 

It looked like the early  Manning days where they refused to run the ball even with 2 safeties deep. You can at least keep the D honest by doing that, with draw plays, off the tackle runs and occasional screens. Sometimes, just giving opposing DCs something to think about affects their play calling instead of just chucking it 45-50 times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NewColtsFan Ring of Honor

NewColtsFan

Posted
Posted
On 2/8/2021 at 5:04 AM, King Colt said:

The predicted scores by the pros goes to show how & why opinions are useless and should be acknowledged by posters here.

Phil        KC 30 TB 24

Coach    KC 20 TB 24

Nate      KC 38 TB 35

Boomer KC 34 TB 30 


I always love when posters attempt to show experts are wrong in a transparent attempt to claim that it shows that their opinion is just as good, just as valid as the opinions of the experts.

 

Yeah....   that’s a big no for me.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
King Colt Hall of Famer

King Colt

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:


I always love when posters attempt to show experts are wrong in a transparent attempt to claim that it shows that their opinion is just as good, just as valid as the opinions of the experts.

 

Yeah....   that’s a big no for me.....

On the contrary no such comparison was made. Was it? Can you show it to everyone? I love when posters make claims they pull out of the butts. Quit while you're behind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
2006Coltsbestever Ring of Honor

2006Coltsbestever

Posted
Posted
On 2/8/2021 at 8:04 AM, King Colt said:

The predicted scores by the pros goes to show how & why opinions are useless and should be acknowledged by posters here.

Phil        KC 30 TB 24

Coach    KC 20 TB 24

Nate      KC 38 TB 35

Boomer KC 34 TB 30 

Problem with this is, most people picked the Chiefs. I had them winning 30-27 as well. Most on ESPN and the NFL Network had them winning. The game stunned a majority of people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
aaron11 Practice Squad

aaron11

Posted
Posted
17 hours ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

A lot of people don't like Romo but I think He and Nantz are the best in the business. I like them a lot better than Buck and Aikman.

I like Romo, and Aikman.  Nance is ok, Buck gets tiresome pretty fast though for me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • John Waylon
      Matt Gay has a new injury lmao

      By John Waylon · Posted

      You know who is also kicking better?   Chase McLaughlin.   
    • DavePSL
      Taking Taylor off the field

      By DavePSL · Posted

      Not trying to over simplify but it is pretty simple. SS calls plays that he believes will work against a certain defense and he has confidence his players will execute that play. The results right now are that his players are NOT capable of executing those plays on a consistent basis enough to win games. The only question moving forward is, do we have good enough players to start to execute more consistently or not and is SS making it as easy as possible for players to be consistent. It's not just a talent thing. It's a attitude and smart thing and then the level of talent. Most of the time, the best players are the smartest players with the right attitude. How talented they are is a bonus. My point, i question our teams attitude and football intelligence as much as I question their talent. Ex.....Stopping the run is as much attitude as it is talent. A big part of why JT is JT, is because of his intellegence.
    • John Hammonds
      The Good, Bad, Ugly after 2 NFL Weeks - College Draft Board Update Analysis

      By John Hammonds · Posted

      Thanks for the updates.  I made my "first pass" projected picks based on where the players are ranked on tankathon right now.  Obviously, subject to change!
    • Stephen
      Matt Gay has a new injury lmao

      By Stephen · Posted

      He hasn't  been that good other than the 1 game he won last year.
    • lollygagger8
      Too Soon to Panic

      By lollygagger8 · Posted

      The biggest problem is that the rest of the team is playing like trash around the rookie QB.    Of course the essentially rookie QB that has played 6 NFL games is going to be a rollercoaster.  He's known to have accuracy issues, and is for some reason being forced to be a pocket passer.    When the highest paid O-line in the league can't block, that's problem.  When the WR's can't catch passes that bounce off their hands, that's a problem.  When the highly invested in $$ D-Line (like 5 1st or 2nd rd players) can't block and LB's get consistenly washed, that's a problem.  When the highest paid kicker in the league can't kick and gets hurt constantly, that's a problem.  When the defensive scheme is to "bend not break" but the bends are to the tune of 100 yards a series, that's a problem.   Now's the time to strike in other areas while you have a QB on a rookie contract. Actually, this all should've been figured out already by the GM and all positions should've been rock solid by now. 

  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...