Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Would it be time to change rules if NFC East winner is 6-10?


Recommended Posts

Just wondering if it would be worth changing rules for hosting a home game if you win a division with a sub .500 record.

 

I can see the NFC East winner at 6-10, they’d be a potential Top 10 pick if they didn’t win the division.

 

A .500 record at minimum is not an unrealistic requirement for a home game in the playoffs, IMO.

 

Thoughts???

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, chad72 said:

Just wondering if it would be worth changing rules for hosting a home game if you win a division with a sub .500 record.

 

I can see the NFC East winner at 6-10, they’d be a potential Top 10 pick if they didn’t win the division.

 

A .500 record at minimum is not an unrealistic requirement for a home game in the playoffs, IMO.

 

Thoughts???

 

1 hour ago, crazycolt1 said:

I have been an advocate of changing the playoffs to seeding the conference for a long time. 

 

I agree.....seed all teams after the regular season. 

 

And if that means a 12-4 "Wild Card" team gets a bye week then so be it.... they will have earned it in the win column.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's my suggestion:

Keep the AFC and NFC but remove divisions

 

The top 8 seeds from each make playoffs

1 vs 8

2 vs 7

3 vs 6

4 vs 5

 

Top seed plays lowest remaining seed next 

 

The following year the 8 playoff teams from each conference all play each other once so the same teams don't make it every year.

 

The other 8 games are 4 from separate conference and 4 of teams that didn't make it.

 

My only concern is how the schedule would be chosen. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd like to leave it as it is.  I like the divisions.   Maybe every few years a division winner has a .500 record, oh well, no big deal.

I also like to see how divisions rotate as far as which divisions are good and which are not.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I would just make it so that the better record always hosts the game. Divison winner should just get you in the playoffs. Keep everything else the same. I would also go back to the way it was last year and before. Im pretty annoyed they added another team from each conference, but wild card weekend will be fun 3 games a day.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Myles said:

I'd like to leave it as it is.  I like the divisions.   Maybe every few years a division winner has a .500 record, oh well, no big deal.

I also like to see how divisions rotate as far as which divisions are good and which are not.  

Same here.  I like division battles meaning something.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

If I was an owner I wouldn't hang division banners. People mock us for hanging a Final 4 banner in 2014 but yet think hanging a division banner (hypothetically for going 8-8) is ok? Think about how silly that sounds. I would rather be in the AFC Title Game than win my division, that is common sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don’t think I buy the QB whisperer thing either. At the very least...I need to see proof of concept on a draft pick or a really young QB before I would entertain it, instead of going back to the well (twice now). 
    • In all seriousness I kind of like this idea.  Colts trade away one of the NFL's current top centers with Kelly and replace him with another stud coming out of Alabama, a much younger version.  Obviously a risk here with Dickerson and his late season injury so why am doubling down on drafting another center for a short-term stop gap but also feel Pinter can step in right away as needed.  Other key factor is as others have pointed out going low cost draftee to fill our void at LT.  Now the Colts if they could pull this trade off might even be able to consider trading up again with say the Jets and take a QB.  Honestly still have reservations about Wentz and if he is the true long-term answer the Colts are searching for.  If not groom the young QB under Wentz for a year and cut Wentz free.   The Colts do have a lot of pending FAs to make decisions about.  With the trade scenario the Colts still have ~$9-10 million in cap space left over.  The only thing with that in mind is changing being honest and losing our 2nd draft pick and having an additional 5th round back and select a depth WR since wouldn't be getting a good WR early in Round 2.  Round 6 much rather with the extra projected cap savings on hand sign Texans LT Roderick Johnson.  At least he has experience in this Division then target LCB Tay Gowan (UCF) whom opted out this past season but is considered a sleeper this draft.   When your done being narrow-minded look the rest over and be honest see if this is doable and fills our major voids.  
    • I dont want Watt here. His health is too much of a concern. 
    • Agree probably an overreach Colts giving away our 5th Round pick.  Realistically would be more along the lines of trading Kelly and our Round 2 pick.  
  • Members

    • Roosarioo

      Roosarioo 1

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DaColts85

      DaColts85 391

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CoachLite

      CoachLite 406

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DoubleE Colt

      DoubleE Colt 47

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • BeanDiasucci

      BeanDiasucci 184

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Colt Overseas

      Colt Overseas 554

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Solid84

      Solid84 9

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Coltpwr

      Coltpwr 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NannyMcafee

      NannyMcafee 1,662

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 7,986

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...