Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Trade #1 Pick For #2?


BProland85

Recommended Posts

Sponsors...... that sounds a lot like what I said here;

He looked ridiculous whatever the reason.

RG3 drives a Chrysler Pacifica. His parents told him they were gonna buy him a brand new car for his first car and he asked them not to waste the money that a used car is fine. Dan Snyder made a joke that players drive Bentley's in the parking lots in the NFL and Griff said he didnt care that he loves the Pacifica and wouldnt buy a new car because of it. He said he doesnt care if he looks silly in it because he likes it that much....

Money is the LAST thing on this kids mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 107
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

RG3 drives a Chrysler Pacifica.

That will last about 15 minutes until he drives past his first dealership with $5 million in his bank account. Then his pacifica will be parked in one of his three houses 5-car garages. Not that I'd blame him for that.

As to the shirt; He's entering the NFL and could have understood the message looked facetious.

Wow, I took a beating here and many great arguments against me. I even got us a new member with my outrageous comments on his attire, that's a first for me. BTW, welcome to the forum, RIggo.

Anyway, the kid is living a dream that none of us could even understand the pressures of. I hope he does well and I don't hope for him to fail just to prove me right. I'm sure he doesn't deserve failure as some notable busts have in the NFL's past.

Comparing him to Luck on the field, off the field, by outward appearances, attitude and mannerisms, I'd take Luck all day on all accounts. He is the proverbial winner winner of the delicious chicken dinner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That will last about 15 minutes until he drives past his first dealership with $5 million in his bank account. Then his pacifica will be parked in one of his three houses 5-car garages. Not that I'd blame him for that.

As to the shirt; He's entering the NFL and could have understood the message looked facetious.

Wow, I took a beating here and many great arguments against me. I even got us a new member with my outrageous comments on his attire, that's a first for me. BTW, welcome to the forum, RIggo.

Anyway, the kid is living a dream that none of us could even understand the pressures of. I hope he does well and I don't hope for him to fail just to prove me right. I'm sure he doesn't deserve failure as some notable busts have in the NFL's past.

Comparing him to Luck on the field, off the field, by outward appearances, attitude and mannerisms, I'd take Luck all day on all accounts. He is the proverbial winner winner of the delicious chicken dinner.

After thinking about this some more I think it is just that both QBs fit their potential teams perfectly and wouldn't work as well the other way around. Luck is pretty much Peyton Jr., all the right answers, keeps a low profile and just throws the football. So basically Peyton before he realized how awesome he is in commercials.

RG3 kind of fits the bigger city of DC which means more media. He just kind of shows that little bit more of personality that fans will love here in DC. With you guys being so used to Peyton, Luck seems like That Dude. With the Skins, we've had mediocre bland guys like Rex and Jason Campbell so getting a guy like RG3 who can throw and has that superstar personality that the media will eat up gets us all excited.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watching the Baylor Basketball game tonight, their Basketball team was wearing Adidas.

If memory serves me correctly he wasn't the only player wearing that same shirt.

Could have been team issued.

Apparently it is. I was set straight by a few passionate fans in this thread. I still don't like the kids swagger. I'll take our guy all day, every day, over Griff. Not even a question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After thinking about this some more I think it is just that both QBs fit their potential teams perfectly and wouldn't work as well the other way around. Luck is pretty much Peyton Jr., all the right answers, keeps a low profile and just throws the football. So basically Peyton before he realized how awesome he is in commercials.

RG3 kind of fits the bigger city of DC which means more media. He just kind of shows that little bit more of personality that fans will love here in DC. With you guys being so used to Peyton, Luck seems like That Dude. With the Skins, we've had mediocre bland guys like Rex and Jason Campbell so getting a guy like RG3 who can throw and has that superstar personality that the media will eat up gets us all excited.

Well said, very well said.

BTW; Is your screen-name derived from Riggins?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well said, very well said.

BTW; Is your screen-name derived from Riggins?

Thanks. Glad we've come to some understanding.

And of course, had to think of a username real fast so I could rage all over my keyboard at you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently it is. I was set straight by a few passionate fans in this thread. I still don't like the kids swagger. I'll take our guy all day, every day, over Griff. Not even a question.

I didn't read through the whole thread..

I knew they wore nike last year, and I thought I read that RGIII had signed with Adidas, then I saw the bb team wearing, so that is why I made the post..

He doesn't come off as nearly as cocky or flamboyant as Cam Netwon did to me last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks. Glad we've come to some understanding.

And of course, had to think of a username real fast so I could rage all over my keyboard at you.

lol.....Riggins is my all time favorite back. I like him over all, even Sanders, hands down the most brutal north-south runner. I was a stout Redskins fans back in the day. After Theisman went down I just kinda went away from them but have always rooted for them in the annual Cowboys vs Redskins games.

Your rage was well directed. Here's to hoping both our franchises can bust out of their current funk with their new leaders!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't read through the whole thread..

I knew they wore nike last year, and I thought I read that RGIII had signed with Adidas, then I saw the bb team wearing, so that is why I made the post..

He doesn't come off as nearly as cocky or flamboyant as Cam Netwon did to me last year.

Cam went full out number #1 pick swag on maximum mode. Kid better be glad he played so well, he would have looked like an *.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol.....Riggins is my all time favorite back. I like him over all, even Sanders, hands down the most brutal north-south runner. I was a stout Redskins fans back in the day. After Theisman went down I just kinda went away from them but have always rooted for them in the annual Cowboys vs Redskins games.

Your rage was well directed. Here's to hoping both our franchises can bust out of their current funk with their new leaders!

I'm more of an Earl Campbell kind of guy, but yeah hope the Colts and Luck can do some great stuff. That first RG3 vs Luck game is gonna be HUGE, haha.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm more of an Earl Campbell kind of guy, but yeah hope the Colts and Luck can do some great stuff. That first RG3 vs Luck game is gonna be HUGE, haha.

Campbell was a truck with shoes, wasn't he? That was a different era. The NFL needs more backs like that in this era.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You consider that treasure chest of draft picks they gave up to draft Griffin shrewd?

I consider the moves we made last offseason in both free agency (acquiring several underrated talents who were tremendously productive) and the draft (amassing 12 draft picks all of whom eventually wound up on the active roster) to be extremely shrewd. I consider this move up to be a necessary gamble on a very good QB prospect for a team that has rarely finished so poorly as to actually have a shot at that level of talent.

They outbid a Cleveland team armed with a lot of picks and paid thru the nose. It also means that Browns Pres. Mike Holmgren, who has coached the likes of Montana, Young and Favre..... for all practical purposes said "too rich for me" at the pricetag for Griffin.

Cleveland supposedly matched our offer but it came in too late. The Rams and Redskins had agreed in principle to the deal and the Rams upheld the agreement despite the Browns' better draft position. Part of that likely has to do with the fact that our front office has ties to theirs and Shanahan and Fisher are friends.

The move might pay off.... and it might not.... but the price was steep either way. And I'm guessing Dan Snyder was involved front and center as well.

For the record.... I wouldn't trade with the Skins and flip-flop the top two picks.

The price was steep but the interesting part of all of this is that the media overwhelmingly agrees that it was a good move. That never happens with the Redskins, so you have to assume that it wasn't so outrageous as it might be were it for any player other than Griffin (or Luck). Besides, we'll still have a full draft's worth of picks in each of the next three drafts, if I remember right. This move will really come down to developing our QB and hitting on some mid-round prospects.

I'm sure Snyder has followed the process closely but the trade was not his call to make. That was basically the stipulation of the fan revolt of sorts at the end of 2009 that led to use bringing on a real GM and coach. Shanahan has final say on all roster moves, so this was his decision to make with input from the rest of the organization.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the opportunity were presented, would you trade the #1 overall pick to the Redskins for their #2 and say DE/OLB Brian Orakpo or Ryan Kerrigan?

Personally, its still pretty close for me deciding between Luck and RG3. Both I think will be great QBs. If we can make our decison easier and still land a top flight starting defensive player in the deal, I wouldnt mind it.

I've read that comparing them is like comparing Marino and Elway. Both great but which one best fits your team?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Naw Luck > RGiii. I wouldn't make that move if the world depended on it. I don't know where the comparisons come from. RGiii is good yeah but Luck is so much more NFL ready.

Sides the Heisman winning QBs since 1984 have been as follows:

Flutie, Testaverde, Ware, Detmer, Toretta, Ward, Wuerffel, Weinke, Crouch, Palmer, White, Leinart, Smith, Tebow, Bradford, Newton.

I'll take a pass on RGiii though I think he will be a solid QB if he can stay healthy. I just don't see anything that makes me believe RGiii will be better, especially in the long run. Regardless what people say he still is a run style QB. I have a bad feeling the guy is going to get injured.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This forum gives me a headache. The title and description alone is enough to make me reach for a handgun.

P.S. Don't worry about the 'Skins; their cap hit alone is going to make sure that team will live in mediocrity for 4-6 years.

P.P.S. Andrew Luck is clearly the #1 QB. Andrew Luck is the best college QB I HAVE EVER SEEN. EVER SEEN. RG3 is a darned good player and I wish him well but teams didn't "Suck for Luck" to end up taking Robert Griffin. Case closed. Go Cardinal, Go Colts, Go Andrew.

P.P.P.S. Sorry about all the post-scripts but here is a nice little joke to end on. RG3 wears socks with Superman on them. Superman wears socks with Andrew Luck on them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This forum gives me a headache. The title and description alone is enough to make me reach for a handgun.

P.S. Don't worry about the 'Skins; their cap hit alone is going to make sure that team will live in mediocrity for 4-6 years.

P.P.S. Andrew Luck is clearly the #1 QB. Andrew Luck is the best college QB I HAVE EVER SEEN. EVER SEEN. RG3 is a darned good player and I wish him well but teams didn't "Suck for Luck" to end up taking Robert Griffin. Case closed. Go Cardinal, Go Colts, Go Andrew.

P.P.P.S. Sorry about all the post-scripts but here is a nice little joke to end on. RG3 wears socks with Superman on them. Superman wears socks with Andrew Luck on them.

Nice little joke? But you know what they say: what makes a good comedian timing?.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bahhh and me sitting here with no likes. Sorry, I owe ya one.

Griff came off as immature and showy at his pro-day, especially in compare to the demeanor and presentation of Luck. I discussed this in another thread earlier. Griff was strutting himself in his cute little Under Armor outfit with the "cool" looking yet entirely aesthetic left arm sleeve thingy. He also had some stupid message written on his chest in neon letters, and later appeared at the presser with yet another neon message to convey his attitude.

09000d5d827c31b9_video_rhr_280_210.jpg

Grow up kid. Words are worth about as much as that penny-T.

Luck impressed me by not trying to impress me with slick outfits and clever sayings prominently displayed on his chest. He looked like he grabbed whatever was laying on the floor when he woke up, he went out there and chucked the ball into the wind and I freakin love that about him.

When speaking, Luck was very sure and nonchalant. I hate fake and Griff reeks of fake. Luck is the real. I'm really getting fired up about him now that my divorce with Manning has been finalized.

I agree.

I don’t know what it is but I just have this feeling that RG3 is going to develop a HUGE ego attitude before the year is over.

Don’t need it

Don’t want it

Don’t even let it in the building

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I consider the moves we made last offseason in both free agency (acquiring several underrated talents who were tremendously productive) and the draft (amassing 12 draft picks all of whom eventually wound up on the active roster) to be extremely shrewd. I consider this move up to be a necessary gamble on a very good QB prospect for a team that has rarely finished so poorly as to actually have a shot at that level of talent.

Compared to the Redskins history of often sidestepping the draft and stocking their roster largely thru free agency, I suppose you can call it shrewd. It's actually fairly normal.

Cleveland supposedly matched our offer but it came in too late. The Rams and Redskins had agreed in principle to the deal and the Rams upheld the agreement despite the Browns' better draft position. Part of that likely has to do with the fact that our front office has ties to theirs and Shanahan and Fisher are friends.

Your team gets credit for scooping the #2 pick despite the Browns equal offer, if that was in fact the case, and a personal friendship between Fisher and Shanahan may well have been a factor.... which is fine..... thats often how the NFL world turns 'round. But RGIII is now being touted as at least the equal of Andrew Luck and a perfect fit for a WC system.... so we'll see if Holmgren or the Skins, or both, are the eventual winner by the outcome of RGIII's career and whatever players the Browns draft.

The price was steep but the interesting part of all of this is that the media overwhelmingly agrees that it was a good move. That never happens with the Redskins, so you have to assume that it wasn't so outrageous as it might be were it for any player other than Griffin (or Luck). Besides, we'll still have a full draft's worth of picks in each of the next three drafts, if I remember right. This move will really come down to developing our QB and hitting on some mid-round prospects.

Yes... the media loved the move and the RGIII hype has elevated to AT LEAST the hype level of Andrew Luck. Hardly a barometer of their eventual success and there's the small matter of performance on the field.... its all about the W's. Now.... your statement about their next 3 drafts.... there's a big difference between that and having a 1st rounder in each draft.... so I agree that hitting your mid-rounders will absolutely be a key factor.

]I'm sure Snyder has followed the process closely but the trade was not his call to make. That was basically the stipulation of the fan revolt of sorts at the end of 2009 that led to use bringing on a real GM and coach. Shanahan has final say on all roster moves, so this was his decision to make with input from the rest of the organization.

Okay.... IMO, this is where you're REALLY getting carried away.

The past and present reality with Dan Snyder is that Mike Shanahan's "final say" could become his "famous last words" in the blink of an eye. We needn't look any further than guys like Marty Schottenheimer and Skins icon Joe Gibbs to figure that out. Dan Snyder.... perhaps more than any other NFL owner.... has proven to be short on patience and capable of taking the nuclear option without notice.

IMO, another 2 seasons of playoff misses is the max amount of rope he'll give Shanahan... whose own megalomania lurks and which finally did him in with Denver after milking the Elway/Davis SB's for all they were worth..... and could easily do the same in DC where he'll get no such time allotment without fairly immediate results. This arrangement is no less volatile than Bill Parcells and Jerry Jones was in Dallas.

Make no mistake.... Daniel Snyder is the ultimate Redskins shot-caller.... and the warm-and-fuzzies surrounding RGIII these days better translate into wins and playoff appearances sooner rather than later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree.

I don’t know what it is but I just have this feeling that RG3 is going to develop a HUGE ego attitude before the year is over.

Don’t need it

Don’t want it

Don’t even let it in the building

I get the exact same feeling and have(like I said earlier in the thread) since he was pimping himself to win the heisman. A humble guy just don't do that no matter whether he feels he deserves it or not. Just keep your mouth shut and prove it on the field. Not saying he didn't prove it, just that I don't like the fact that he felt the need to say it. I just get the feeling that midway through the season he'll be referring to himself in the 3rd person and that kind of crap irratates me to no end. Hopefully this kid proves me wrong but I'll have to see it to believe it. He has future egotistical jerkbag written all over him IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get the exact same feeling and have(like I said earlier in the thread) since he was pimping himself to win the heisman. A humble guy just don't do that no matter whether he feels he deserves it or not. Just keep your mouth shut and prove it on the field. Not saying he didn't prove it, just that I don't like the fact that he felt the need to say it. I just get the feeling that midway through the season he'll be referring to himself in the 3rd person and that kind of crap irratates me to no end. Hopefully this kid proves me wrong but I'll have to see it to believe it. He has future egotistical jerkbag written all over him IMO.

Maybe it’s the fact that the media hypes him enough that he doesn’t need to hype himself. It reminds me of the fast food franchises that hype up movies. The more the hype, the worse the movie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No.

Griff is going to fall well short of the #2 pick value, let alone the ancillary picks given as compensation for the trade-up. Red flags aplenty indicating issues with injury potential, maturity, leadership and attitude with that kid.

I haven't seen anything blatant to believe this, yet gut instinct says this my be a possibility. Maybe it's just me, but I see exceptionally talented players living off their talent and not putting the ancillary work in. Eventually, their talents falls with mounting injury and the savvy to overcome it went to the guys in the film and weight rooms. We'll see.

BTW, I found my lava lamp and saw a VW microbus. Where is the entry to the Hippie Peace movement Club? Sign me up. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. That would be doing what San Diego did with the Giants where a trade was initiated that sent Eli Manning to the Giants for Philip Rivers; and Drew Breez to the Saints. The Giants and Saints got the better end of that trade off.The top QB honors of the NFL is going to be between Andrew Luck & Matthew Stafford IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. That would be doing what San Diego did with the Giants where a trade was initiated that sent Eli Manning to the Giants for Philip Rivers; and Drew Breez to the Saints. The Giants and Saints got the better end of that trade off.The top QB honors of the NFL is going to be between Andrew Luck & Matthew Stafford IMO.

Brees wasn't traded. That bum was allowed to hit free agency

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok guys didnt see this thread being this talked about but Im actually completely fine with taking Luck 1st overall just so you know. All in all, he is the best QB in this draft who posseses the best QB skills. He should be the pick.

Now I just hope we can somehow acquire more draft picks by trading an aging player like Freeney.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the opportunity were presented, would you trade the #1 overall pick to the Redskins for their #2 and say DE/OLB Brian Orakpo or Ryan Kerrigan?

Personally, its still pretty close for me deciding between Luck and RG3. Both I think will be great QBs. If we can make our decison easier and still land a top flight starting defensive player in the deal, I wouldnt mind it.

They will not both be good QB's. RG3 is the better athlete, Luck is far superior as a QB. Or should I say FAR SUPERIOR.

so says BIGugly.....so it is.....

Oh, and the best one of the bunch won't be out 'til next year. Barkley at USC. Take it to the bank.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I predict all of the players listed as questionable will play.  The Steelers offense is meh.
    • The problem with hiring a defensive guy and tasking him with building that offensive support system is that most of them just don’t have it, and they’re not really capable of building it. There aren’t enough Tom Moore types out there to help institute that long-term knowledgeable stability.    We got lucky with Pagano and Luck having Arians in the building, and largely being the head coach for the majority of Luck’s rookie season. But watching Pagano flail to fill an offensive staff post-Arians was painful, and most of the defensive head coaches struggle in the exact same way. It’s out of their specialty and out of their comfort zone and it just makes it harder than it needs to be on everyone involved.    The most advantageous way to hire a defensive HC is with an already established QB and system that he can just come in and not have to build from the ground up. 
    • You should double check. I just did. Womack started both games, with Jaylon Johnson on the other side, and Kenny Moore at nickel.    Against the Packers, Womack got 20 snaps, Flowers got 19. Against the Bears, Womack got 28 snaps, Flowers got 41 (and he left before the game ended, so maybe he would have gotten more). Maybe Flowers was on his way to taking Womack's spot in the lineup, but Womack was on the field as a starter in both games.
    • Game on the line, inconsistent passer at QB, and the OL is the strength of the team. Everyone in the world knew that the first priority was to stop JT. And they couldn't.    I don't know what's with this myth that there's something deficient about JT as a RB. It's nonsense.
    • I think he's probably only using 25% of his playbook so far, for various reasons. Some of that is intentional, as they work in some concepts with a young QB and a young-ish supporting cast.   Another part of it is that the Colts game script has been heavily skewed, especially in the first two games, so the gameplan had to be reduced as the game went along. The offense couldn't stay on the field, and the defense couldn't get off of it. It was better against the Bears, but their offense still ran 30 more plays than ours. Total, our offense has run 87 fewer plays than our opponents. Teams usually script their first 15 offensive plays, and I wonder if the Colts have gotten through that opening script in any of the first three games. So I think there are some things that they'd like to have run, but so far they have not been able to get to them.   I don't think it's a binary 'do we call winning plays, or do we call plays to develop the QB' consideration. I don't necessarily agree that those priorities have to compete with one another, but it does require a balance to do them both justice. I don't think it does this team any good, short term or long term, to restrict Richardson to 15 passing attempts/game, or to use him as an option QB like this is the Navy team, even if they felt like that could be a way to win some games. I also don't think they should coach him as if every game is "winner take all," and have him lay his body on the line or try to drop back 50 times a game.    And we have to blame Richardson and the WRs to a certain extent. There have been a lot of missed throws, drops, and turnovers. Those plays have stalled or ended several possessions, and that's not on the play calling.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...