Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

How would you feel drafting Forrest Lamp 15th overall?


How would you feel if we drafted Forrest Lamp 15th overall?  

88 members have voted

  1. 1. How would you feel if we drafted Forrest Lamp 15th overall?



Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Tmoney said:

They both looked a lot better towards the end of the year and I'd hope they're working hard this off season. I just think adding a stud RG, kicking out Haeg to where he's more natural, and creating a great battle at RT makes this O-line possibly top 10 in the league. I'm 100% with you our D needs a lot of help and I've been preaching D round 1 for a while, but the more I think about it Andrew's health is seriously at risk and its not worth taking the gamble on trying to develop guys that aren't ready yet but have potential. I would not reach on a OL prospect, but Lamp is no reach IMO he'd actually be a steal. 

I think Haeg can be a solid starting guard though. I'm gonna post some vids in this thread in a couple minutes of LeRaven. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 201
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

7 minutes ago, Tmoney said:

If we hypothetically draft Lamp tho, Clark competes with Haeg for RT and I have my money on Haeg. When exactly did we resign AC until 2019? Either way that gives another year for Clark to develop. He was decent in 3 games last year but he wasn't anything special and he definitely didn't lockdown any position. He has LT traits, but technique is still so raw. Philbin can develop him I'm confident in his coaching ability but not even he could have Clark ready by next year.

 

Clark is not going to be given the LT spot until he shows he can be very successful at the RT spot on the NFL level.     AC got his deal extended a year or two ago. 

 

My money is on Clark for RT.    Haeg is ahead of him now,  but Clark's ceiling is dramatically higher, so he should pass him soon enough.....    I think Haeg has a future at RG in the short-term,  and when AC is done,  then Clark will move to LT to replace AC, and Haeg will move to RT.    And, at that point we'll need to figure out the RG spot, but I don't see that as a problem.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/22/2017 at 9:51 AM, polk_high_allstar said:

Lamp may be the only legit 1st round talent for the o-line this year and feel if we were to draft him this year we can really focus on fixing all the problems on the D in the future. Defensive depth in this draft is deep.  Feel we can get a borderline stud CB in the 2nd and possible the 3rd if you want to wait on Sidney Jones.

 

Castonzo/Mewhort/Kelly/Lamp/Haeg

 

That is a might fine line and feel we can put the protect Luck thing to bed for a while.

If the colts insist on having a vertical offense that isn't committed to the running game Luck is going to take too many shots regardless.

i actually think the Oline would look fine if the colts committed to a quick rhythm passing game......like the most of the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

Clark is not going to be given the LT spot until he shows he can be very successful at the RT spot on the NFL level.     AC got his deal extended a year or two ago. 

 

My money is on Clark for RT.    Haeg is ahead of him now,  but Clark's ceiling is dramatically higher, so he should pass him soon enough.....    I think Haeg has a future at RG in the short-term,  and when AC is done,  then Clark will move to LT to replace AC, and Haeg will move to RT.    And, at that point we'll need to figure out the RG spot, but I don't see that as a problem.

 

Clark has the sky he has no ceiling, but he's still not ready to play full time RT at the level we need him to rn. Haeg was solid at RG, but he was much better at RT because he pass blocks so well and he's pretty weak inside at the POA. We could roll with them into 2017 and hope they've improved enough through the off season or we could upgrade one spot and let them make each other better for the other spot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Majin Vegeta said:

 

^Quick pass, but LeRaven would have won. 

 

^ He gets bullrushed but he's able to latch on and maintain balance despite being put on his heels. In the end he disposes of Hunter 8 yards deep which allows Luck to climb the pocket and make a play.

 

 

 

 

 

Such a smooth athlete. Shows why he could really Play LT someday. This was his best game by far against good competition. I think one video in particular shows why hes a year maybe two away. When he gets bull rushed by Hunter, he never re anchors and just gets walked back to the QB. He never shoots his hands back inside to regain leverage. I really like Clark and maybe he beats out Haeg this year at RT, but it wouldnt discourage me from taking Lamp. Where did you find these videos? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Tmoney said:

Clark has the sky he has no ceiling, but he's still not ready to play full time RT at the level we need him to rn. Haeg was solid at RG, but he was much better at RT because he pass blocks so well and he's pretty weak inside at the POA. We could roll with them into 2017 and hope they've improved enough through the off season or we could upgrade one spot and let them make each other better for the other spot. 

 

If Clark isn't ready to play RT at the level that we want next year,  then the Colts are going to have a problem.       And that may mean a commitment to taking Lamp if he's still there....

 

But,  I don't get the feeling that the Colts share that viewpoint.      

 

In Philbin we trust.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, ClaytonColt said:

I don't think I am looking at it wrong and I'm not suggesting an imaginary cap on the number drafted. I'm just saying that I believe that if you spend too much resource on one area the other places on the team suffer and you don't succeed. 

 

It's not a slam dunk by any means but successful teams don't get built by continually drafting offensive line guys in the early rounds. That's just a simple fact.

It doesn't matter how many draft resources you spend on a position if it works. If we have a top flight OL will it matter that we spent 5 high picks on it? The best player at 15 may be Lamp at OG. But the best players in the rest of the rounds could be defense.

 

To the bolded, you don't know that if you yourself said you've never seen a team with all highly drafted OL guys starting. So that is not a fact. The Colts O-line showed signs of being decent last season. You add Lamp and it would probably be great. Why wouldn't you want that? Regardless of where they're drafted, great teams are built in the trenches. If Lamp is BPA at 15 you take him without question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

If Clark isn't ready to play RT at the level that we want next year,  then the Colts are going to have a problem.       And that may mean a commitment to taking Lamp if he's still there....

 

But,  I don't get the feeling that the Colts share that viewpoint.      

 

In Philbin we trust.

 

No they won't. They have Haeg. Haeg's best position is RT. If you draft Lamp you have either Clark or Haeg at RT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Defjamz26 said:

It doesn't matter how many draft resources you spend on a position if it works. If we have a top flight OL will it matter that we spent 5 high picks on it? The best player at 15 may be Lamp at OG. But the best players in the rest of the rounds could be defense.

 

To the bolded, you don't know that if you yourself said you've never seen a team with all highly drafted OL guys starting. So that is not a fact. The Colts O-line showed signs of being decent last season. You add Lamp and it would probably be great. Why wouldn't you want that? Regardless of where they're drafted, great teams are built in the trenches. If Lamp is BPA at 15 you take him without question.

It's not that I don't want the line to be great. Of course I want to do that. 

 

I just look at great lines and they've pretty much always got one or two players who are sourced from a low starting point but fit into the unit. There's no point saying "I want a line like Dallas" (or any other team) and then ignoring how Dallas built the line.

 

Every high draft pick has am "opportunity cost" therefore wherever you choose to strengthen you have foregone on opportunity to strengthen elsewhere.

 

There's no guarantee that picking Lamp would make the whole team better. The same argument was put forward for picking Kelly last year and although he's a fine player we still ended up 8-8 so the team was no better off.

 

At the moment the line has enough good players where we should be able to creatively fill in the gaps. The defense as a whole is lacking those players and is basically just full of role players.

 

The unit to strengthen and the unit to ignore in terms of resource is therefore clear to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Defjamz26 said:

 

To the bolded, you don't know that if you yourself said you've never seen a team with all highly drafted OL guys starting. So that is not a fact. 

And just specifically about this it's not quite what I said. I said I'd never seen a successful team built that way.

 

I believe the Brown's had an o-line built on three 1st round picks and two 2nd's.

 

Thomas, Bitonio, Mack, Erving and Schwartz. 

 

I wouldn't say that they were successful though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Defjamz26 said:

No they won't. They have Haeg. Haeg's best position is RT. If you draft Lamp you have either Clark or Haeg at RT.

 

Well.....

 

That wasn't my meaning....   yes,  Haeg plays RT....    and he'd be....   OK?    Serviceable?    Pretty good?

 

My point is the team has invested in Clark.    He is supposed to be the team's RT in 2017,  not Haeg.    That's been the plan all along.     Clark's ceiling is much, much higher than Haeg's.     I'm more confident in Clark at RT than I am with Haeg at RT.

 

It would be a bad sign for Clark's future if he's not ready to start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

Well.....

 

That wasn't my meaning....   yes,  Haeg plays RT....    and he'd be....   OK?    Serviceable?    Pretty good?

 

My point is the team has invested in Clark.    He is supposed to be the team's RT in 2017,  not Haeg.    That's been the plan all along.     Clark's ceiling is much, much higher than Haeg's.     I'm more confident in Clark at RT than I am with Haeg at RT.

 

It would be a bad sign for Clark's future if he's not ready to start.

Long term I agree with you. Clark has the higher ceiling. But Haeg was more ready at RT than Clark was in 2016 due to the offenses they played in during college. You say Haeg would be ok/serviceable at RT but I felt that's what he was at RG. Clark should be the future at RT but if not you at least have Haeg. 

 

18 minutes ago, ClaytonColt said:

And just specifically about this it's not quite what I said. I said I'd never seen a successful team built that way.

 

I believe the Brown's had an o-line built on three 1st round picks and two 2nd's.

 

Thomas, Bitonio, Mack, Erving and Schwartz. 

 

I wouldn't say that they were successful though.

Again every situation is different. Who's to say if the Colts draft Lamp that it doesn't work out like it didn't work out for the Browns? You've never seen a successful team built that way but the Colts could be the team that breaks the trend. Would you rather have Haeg at RG or a guy many believe is the next Zack Martin? And his tape backs it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Defjamz26 said:

Again every situation is different. Who's to say if the Colts draft Lamp that it doesn't work out like it didn't work out for the Browns? You've never seen a successful team built that way but the Colts could be the team that breaks the trend. Would you rather have Haeg at RG or a guy many believe is the next Zack Martin? And his tape backs it up.

I haven't said it definitely wouldn't work. I'm just showing how others build good teams (not just good lines) and saying I would rather follow that rough blueprint. 

 

I'd rather develop Haeg (Good and Blythe aswell) and have a top defensive player than pick Lamp. I believe that would make a much bigger impact on the overall results of the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, ClaytonColt said:

I haven't said it definitely wouldn't work. I'm just showing how others build good teams (not just good lines) and saying I would rather follow that rough blueprint. 

 

I'd rather develop Haeg (Good and Blythe aswell) and have a top defensive player than pick Lamp. I believe that would make a much bigger impact on the overall results of the team.

Lamp right now is better than Haeg and has a higher ceiling. Also curious, let's say the following players are picked before our picks:

 

-Garrett

-Thomas

-Adams

-Hooker

-Fournette

-Cook

-A QB

-Lattimore

-Mike Williams

-Foster

-Barnett

-Reddick

-Taco

-Humphrey

-Conley

 

Who are you taking instead of Lamp? The top defender you're talking about might not be there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, BOTT said:

If the colts insist on having a vertical offense that isn't committed to the running game Luck is going to take too many shots regardless.

i actually think the Oline would look fine if the colts committed to a quick rhythm passing game......like the most of the NFL.

I'm with you.  I would prefer a more efficient offense, but every analysis and adavanced metric seems to say this O-line is terrible, irrespective of offensive style.

 

People hang their hat on the stat which showed they were 5th in the league in sacks allowed over the last seven games.  As I said in another thread, over the last seven games, the Colt defense was 7th in the league in points allowed, yet no one is looking at this defense and thinking, no problem, everything is fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Defjamz26 said:

Lamp right now is better than Haeg and has a higher ceiling. Also curious, let's say the following players are picked before our picks:

 

-Garrett

-Thomas

-Adams

-Hooker

-Fournette

-Cook

-A QB

-Lattimore

-Mike Williams

-Foster

-Barnett

-Reddick

-Taco

-Humphrey

-Conley

 

Who are you taking instead of Lamp? The top defender you're talking about might not be there.

I have no doubt that Lamp is better than Haeg but I'm doubtful that making that upgrade makes a difference to the major deficiencies of the team and therefore the results.

 

As for the second question I have no idea. I'd have to have a look into it but I'd worry about it if that specific scenario came about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, ClaytonColt said:

I have no doubt that Lamp is better than Haeg but I'm doubtful that making that upgrade makes a difference to the major deficiencies of the team and therefore the results.

 

As for the second question I have no idea. I'd have to have a look into it but I'd worry about it if that specific scenario came about.

Lamp wouldn't help our inability to rush the passer, our thin secondary, or need for athletic LBs but he helps the team greatly. He keeps Luck healthy, gives him more time to throw, and improves the run blocking. Luck with more time, keeps more drives alive and scores more points as the opposing defense gets gassed. Better run blocking means the RBs can sustain drives as well, plus take pressure off of Luck. Sustaining drives is a major deficiency on this time that is a result of the QB always being pressure and subpar run blocking. Lamp would help to fix all of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

THe Steelers are comparable to us because Big Ben and Luck both hold on to the ball longer waiting for something to develop.  They eventually took care of their Oline  with some high picks and we are on that road too. We may already have the pieces but if Lamp is the missing piece I think we have to do it.  Their defense has suffered some too just like ours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Defjamz26 said:

Lamp wouldn't help our inability to rush the passer, our thin secondary, or need for athletic LBs but he helps the team greatly. He keeps Luck healthy, gives him more time to throw, and improves the run blocking. Luck with more time, keeps more drives alive and scores more points as the opposing defense gets gassed. Better run blocking means the RBs can sustain drives as well, plus take pressure off of Luck. Sustaining drives is a major deficiency on this time that is a result of the QB always being pressure and subpar run blocking. Lamp would help to fix all of that.

He won't keep Luck healthy. Luck will still get hit and he could therefore get hurt. Romo got hurt 2 years running behind the Dallas line.

 

I don't see sustaining drives as a line problem. I see it as a scheme problem.

 

On offense we have 8 players who were chosen in the top 100 including 4 first round picks. On defense we only have 2 in the top 100 and no first rounders. When you consider that we're 25-0 with Luck when we hold teams to under 19 points we have to start addressing that balance and fix the gaping holes on that side of the ball rather than plugging the minor deficiencies on the O.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎3‎/‎21‎/‎2017 at 4:31 PM, Jared Cisneros said:

I've seen a lot of mocks saying we may take him at 15 overall. With Ballard also being set on improving the trenches, I'm realizing this could be a possibility come draft time. So I was wondering, how would you guys feel if he was our pick at 15?

no no no !   Defense............. Need To Pick Defense First ......... and Keep on Doing it Till We Get It Right

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LockeDown said:

THe Steelers are comparable to us because Big Ben and Luck both hold on to the ball longer waiting for something to develop.  They eventually took care of their Oline  with some high picks and we are on that road too. We may already have the pieces but if Lamp is the missing piece I think we have to do it.  Their defense has suffered some too just like ours.

Thanks. Another good example.

 

A line made up of 2 firsts, a second and then 2 undrafted guys filling the gaps.

 

Interestingly in the last three years the Steelers have spent 7 out of 9 high round picks on defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, ClaytonColt said:

He won't keep Luck healthy. Luck will still get hit and he could therefore get hurt. Romo got hurt 2 years running behind the Dallas line.

 

I don't see sustaining drives as a line problem. I see it as a scheme problem.

 

On offense we have 8 players who were chosen in the top 100 including 4 first round picks. On defense we only have 2 in the top 100 and no first rounders. When you consider that we're 25-0 with Luck when we hold teams to under 19 points we have to start addressing that balance and fix the gaping holes on that side of the ball rather than plugging the minor deficiencies on the O.

I hear you about defense. But top 100 extends to the 2nd and 3rd rounds as well. It's not like we can't get defensive players in rounds 2-3. Plus, you may have forgotten that there is a draft next year as well. And the year after that.

 

 I know no one on this forum likes to look at the roster being built over time. Everyone wants us to fix all the holes in one offseason. But the reality is that it WILL take time. The best approach in that regard is to do what Ballard is doing. Low value FAs who are low risk-high reward and draft BPA (with need in mind). Defense is where this team lacks the most  so that should be the focus, but it doesn't mean you have to ONLY draft defense high. You should avoid RBs and WRs in the 1st but we should be looking at an OG.

 

Plus what's the difference between taking Lamp at 15, or Dorian Johnson at our 2nd round pick? Based on what you're saying couldn't we be passing up defensive difference makers in the 2nd if we took a guard there? All the blue chip defenders will probably be gone by 15. But Lamp is a blue chip guard who will be there. I think it's an easy decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Tmoney said:

Such a smooth athlete. Shows why he could really Play LT someday. This was his best game by far against good competition. I think one video in particular shows why hes a year maybe two away. When he gets bull rushed by Hunter, he never re anchors and just gets walked back to the QB. He never shoots his hands back inside to regain leverage. I really like Clark and maybe he beats out Haeg this year at RT, but it wouldnt discourage me from taking Lamp. Where did you find these videos? 

Fanragsports.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Defjamz26 said:

I hear you about defense. But top 100 extends to the 2nd and 3rd rounds as well. It's not like we can't get defensive players in rounds 2-3. Plus, you may have forgotten that there is a draft next year as well. And the year after that.

 

 I know no one on this forum likes to look at the roster being built over time. Everyone wants us to fix all the holes in one offseason. But the reality is that it WILL take time. The best approach in that regard is to do what Ballard is doing. Low value FAs who are low risk-high reward and draft BPA (with need in mind). Defense is where this team lacks the most  so that should be the focus, but it doesn't mean you have to ONLY draft defense high. You should avoid RBs and WRs in the 1st but we should be looking at an OG.

 

Plus what's the difference between taking Lamp at 15, or Dorian Johnson at our 2nd round pick? Based on what you're saying couldn't we be passing up defensive difference makers in the 2nd if we took a guard there? All the blue chip defenders will probably be gone by 15. But Lamp is a blue chip guard who will be there. I think it's an easy decision.

I'd advocate picking defense in the first three rounds anyway so I'd be equally against picking a guard in the 2nd aswell. However just to play along if we selected Lamp and the went D in the 2nd and 3rd we'd have;

 

9 top 100 picks on offense (five 1st's)

4 top 100 picks on defense (zero 1st's)

 

That's still massively unbalanced to me and won't get us closer to where we want to be.

 

I agree with you about building through more than 1 draft but the defense has been neglected for long enough now. There will always be a road grading lineman or a sexy running back available where we pick but at some point we have to invest on the other side of the ball. To me that time is now (technically it was last season so I don't want to wait for 1 more).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ClaytonColt said:

I'd advocate picking defense in the first three rounds anyway so I'd be equally against picking a guard in the 2nd aswell. However just to play along if we selected Lamp and the went D in the 2nd and 3rd we'd have;

 

9 top 100 picks on offense (five 1st's)

4 top 100 picks on defense (zero 1st's)

 

That's still massively unbalanced to me and won't get us closer to where we want to be.

 

I agree with you about building through more than 1 draft but the defense has been neglected for long enough now. There will always be a road grading lineman or a sexy running back available where we pick but at some point we have to invest on the other side of the ball. To me that time is now (technically it was last season so I don't want to wait for 1 more).

Here's the thing, though.  We have a new GM.  Grigson, Ballard - two different people.  New era.  I doubt Ballard is thinking about the past or worrying about what Grigson  might have done.  If he feels Lamp is the most sure thing at #15, he won't instead go defense because Grigson went primarily offense.  I doubt he cares what Grigson did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

If Clark isn't ready to play RT at the level that we want next year,  then the Colts are going to have a problem.       And that may mean a commitment to taking Lamp if he's still there....

 

But,  I don't get the feeling that the Colts share that viewpoint.      

 

In Philbin we trust.

 

100% what Philbin says goes. I do hope I'm wrong your right so we can go D round 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ClaytonColt said:

I'd advocate picking defense in the first three rounds anyway so I'd be equally against picking a guard in the 2nd aswell. However just to play along if we selected Lamp and the went D in the 2nd and 3rd we'd have;

 

9 top 100 picks on offense (five 1st's)

4 top 100 picks on defense (zero 1st's)

 

That's still massively unbalanced to me and won't get us closer to where we want to be.

 

I agree with you about building through more than 1 draft but the defense has been neglected for long enough now. There will always be a road grading lineman or a sexy running back available where we pick but at some point we have to invest on the other side of the ball. To me that time is now (technically it was last season so I don't want to wait for 1 more).

Good stat! I love Lamp but I'd obviously rather go D. Either way I won't be mad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Defjamz26 said:

Lamp right now is better than Haeg and has a higher ceiling. Also curious, let's say the following players are picked before our picks:

 

-Garrett

-Thomas

-Adams

-Hooker

-Fournette

-Cook

-A QB

-Lattimore

-Mike Williams

-Foster

-Barnett

-Reddick

-Taco

-Humphrey

-Conley

 

Who are you taking instead of Lamp? The top defender you're talking about might not be there.

I would take Charles Harris over Forrest Lamp. Starting to like him a lot and Ballard has shown interest in him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, ClaytonColt said:

Another post that has difficulty counting. I said 4 or 5 and you've shown me 3?

Okay this is seriously irritating because you're trying to be insulting but still missing the point. And oh yeah... We only have 2 first rounders on our O line currently, not 3. Hows that for counting?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Jared Cisneros said:

I would take Charles Harris over Forrest Lamp. Starting to like him a lot and Ballard has shown interest in him.

 

I'd take Harris in the second round, especially after a good pro day where he showed his horrible combine numbers were a fluke. The new numbers jive more with what everyone would've expected out of him. He's got a terrific spin move, and has some potential to be good at the next level. But I'm still not convinced he's a top 15 pick caliber guy. Production wise he looks solid on paper, but then you look at his game by game splits you see he basically wrecked a few games against mediocre teams and was kind of held in check by the good ones. Where as some other prospects like Lamp (and I'd say this about Derek Barnett too) you can turn on the tape and see how they really shined against the toughest opponents. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Track Guy said:

Okay this is seriously irritating because you're trying to be insulting but still missing the point. And oh yeah... We only have 2 first rounders on our O line currently, not 3. Hows that for counting?

It's not insulting at all and nor did I miss the point. 

 

I specifically said high draft picks rather than first rounders. We also have a 2nd (and a 3rd) on the line which would definitely come under that category in my eyes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Track Guy said:

 

Last season, the top O-lines were the Titans, Cowboys, and Raiders. Titans had 3 first round picks starting on their line. 

I've only just looked into this. 

 

Apart from Conklin and Lewan who was the third 1st round pick who helped the Titans become one of the best lines last year?

 

it wasn't Kline (UDFA claimed off waivers), Jones (4th rd signed as a FA) or Spain (UDFA)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ClaytonColt said:

I've only just looked into this. 

 

Apart from Conklin and Lewan who was the third 1st round pick who helped the Titans become one of the best lines last year?

 

it wasn't Kline (UDFA claimed off waivers), Jones (4th rd signed as a FA) or Spain (UDFA)

 

Chance Warmack was their starter at RG - although he did miss a lot of the season which is a fair point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, ClaytonColt said:

I'd advocate picking defense in the first three rounds anyway so I'd be equally against picking a guard in the 2nd aswell. However just to play along if we selected Lamp and the went D in the 2nd and 3rd we'd have;

 

9 top 100 picks on offense (five 1st's)

4 top 100 picks on defense (zero 1st's)

 

That's still massively unbalanced to me and won't get us closer to where we want to be.

 

I agree with you about building through more than 1 draft but the defense has been neglected for long enough now. There will always be a road grading lineman or a sexy running back available where we pick but at some point we have to invest on the other side of the ball. To me that time is now (technically it was last season so I don't want to wait for 1 more).

Speaking of last season though, that's a perfect example to illustrate my point. Everyone was screaming for defense in the 1st but we needed O-line help and all the elite blue chip defenders were gone (unless you were high on Shaq Lawson or Darron Lee) and we took a blue chip interior O-lineman. Saying we must go defense the first 3 rounds is incredibly short sighted IMO. You're basically saying the Colts should reach and take defense even if there's a higher rated player on offense available. I don't think we need a RB in the first or a receiver at all, you shouldn't rule out an offensive lineman. Ballard may not like Good or Haeg at RG.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Defjamz26 said:

Speaking of last season though, that's a perfect example to illustrate my point. Everyone was screaming for defense in the 1st but we needed O-line help and all the elite blue chip defenders were gone (unless you were high on Shaq Lawson or Darron Lee) and we took a blue chip interior O-lineman. Saying we must go defense the first 3 rounds is incredibly short sighted IMO. You're basically saying the Colts should reach and take defense even if there's a higher rated player on offense available. I don't think we need a RB in the first or a receiver at all, you shouldn't rule out an offensive lineman. Ballard may not like Good or Haeg at RG.

No that's not a good point. 

Last years situation and draft class was much different than this year. Our line is in much better shape going into this draft opposed to last year. Our line is undoubtedly trending up. The defense is so obviously not.  We pick at 15. There are a ton of great prospects. We won't have to "reach" on a defender.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Defjamz26 said:

Speaking of last season though, that's a perfect example to illustrate my point. Everyone was screaming for defense in the 1st but we needed O-line help and all the elite blue chip defenders were gone (unless you were high on Shaq Lawson or Darron Lee) and we took a blue chip interior O-lineman. Saying we must go defense the first 3 rounds is incredibly short sighted IMO. You're basically saying the Colts should reach and take defense even if there's a higher rated player on offense available. I don't think we need a RB in the first or a receiver at all, you shouldn't rule out an offensive lineman. Ballard may not like Good or Haeg at RG.

I'm not saying reach at all. If I was advocating picking one particular position then that would cause a reach but saying we need to focus on one side of the ball won't. There will be good defenders available at 15 no matter how it falls. I've seen Lamp picked in the late 20s in most mocks, perhaps he'd be the reach?

 

You're right about last year. We picked offensive lineman with 2 of our top 3 picks and Kelly played pretty well. Did it help the team as a whole? 

 

Our defense was still trash, our QB still got hit and hurt and we fell further behind in the division.

 

Kelly played well and I'm sure he's a fine player but the team who won our division and the team who won the superbowl both did so with undrafted guys in that position so who are distributing their resources better and focusing their team building in the right areas?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dane Brugler's scouting report on Jason Bean:   23. JASON BEAN | Kansas 6016 | 196 lbs. | 6SR Mansfield, Texas (Lake Ridge) 6/9/1999 (age 24.88) #9   SUMMARY: Jason Bean was an All-District passer at Lake Ridge High in Mansfield (south of DFW) and threw for 1,682 yards and 20 touchdowns as a senior. A threestar recruit, he stayed close to home and signed with North Texas. He showed promise as a first-year starter in 2020 and entered the transfer portal. He signed with Kansas, where he shared starting duties with Jalon Daniels. With Daniels injured in 2023, Bean became the full-time starter and set career bests in yards and touchdowns. With his skinny, lean-muscled frame, Bean doesn’t have desired size, and his arm strength is average. He can layer throws as a passer, but his decisionmaking and timing are inconsistent and lead to mistakes. He trusts his “fight or flight” instincts as a runner and has the qu ick feet to evade and pull away from pursuit. Overall, Bean has above-average straight-line speed and shows flashes as a passer, but his accuracy and pocket presence aren’t currently on an NFL level.   GRADE: Priority Free Agent  
    • Dane Brugler's scouting report on Kedon Slovis :   14. KEDON SLOVIS | BYU 6024 | 223 lbs. | 5SR Scottsdale, Ariz. (Desert Mountain) 4/11/2001 (age 23.04) #10   BACKGROUND: Kedon Slovis, who has two older brothers, grew up in Scottsdale with his father (Max) and mother (Lisa LaPedes-Slovis), who were both middle school teachers. He started playing flag football in third grade. Against the wishes of his mother, who worried about him getting hurt, Slovis started playing tackle football in sixth grade. He also played basketball throughout childhood and often was coached by his father. Slovis attended Desert Mountain High School in Scottsdale and played primarily on the JV squad and as a backup for the varsity. With NFL Hall of Famer Kurt Warner as his offensive coordinator, he became the starting quarterback as a junior and completed 64.0 percent of his passes for 2,987 yards, 32 touchdowns and five interceptions. As a senior, Slovis earned honorable mention All-State honors with 62.2 percent completions for 2,542 yards, 18 touchdowns and six interceptions in 2018. He also had five rushing t ouchdowns as a starter. Over Slovis’ junior and senior seasons, Desert Mountain had a 9-12 record. Slovis played basketball as a freshman before deciding to focus on football, including working with his quarterback coach Shawn Seaman.   A three-star recruit, Slovis was the No. 26 pro-style quarterback in the 2019 class and the No. 12 recruit in Arizona (QB Spencer Rattler was the No. 1 player and quarterback in the state). Playing at a high school program not known for producing Division I football players, he didn’t start to receive legitimate recruiting attention until a few schools came through the area the spring after his junior season. USC was one of those and offered Slovis in May 2018. Less than a week later, he officially committed to the Trojans (NC State and Oregon State were his other Power 5 offers). Slovis was the No. 21 recruit (out of 24) in former head coach Clay Helton’s 2019 class. After enrolling early in January 2019, he moved up the depth chart in his first spring and became the backup as a true freshman. When J.T. Daniels was sidelined with a knee injury in 2019, Slovis became the Trojans’ starter and became Pac-12 Offensive Freshman of the Year, setting the conference singleseason record with his 71.9 completion percentage (previous record was 71.3 percent by Andrew Luck). Entrenched as the Trojan s’ starter moving forward, he led USC to a 5-1 record in the pandemic-shortened 2020 season but struggled throughout the 2021 campaign, opening the door for Jaxson Dart to earn playing time.   After Helton was fired and replaced by Lincoln Riley, Slovis entered the transfer portal in December 2021. He heard from seve ral schools but was intrigued by the chance to follow Kenny Pickett and throw to Jordan Addison at Pittsburgh, although Addison transferred to USC shortly after Slovis announced. After starting the 2022 season at Pittsburgh, Slovis wanted to play in a more pass-first attack and transferred to BYU for his final season in 2023, taking advantage of the extra year of eligibility granted because of the pandemic. Several Pitt players publicly criticized Slovis for “quitting” without talking to the team. Slovis graduated with his degree in communication from USC (May 2022) and is pursuing his master’s degree in biology. He accepted his invitation to the 2024 East-West Shrine Bowl.   STRENGTHS: Functional size and athleticism for the position … adequate arm strength when delivering from a wide base … when he has time, he is highly accurate in the short-to-intermediate part of the field … one of the better quarterbacks in the class at using his eyes to disguise his intentions and manipulate the coverage … bravely tests small windows downfield… uses tight footwork to navigate muddy pockets … routinely hangs tough while under fire and bounces back from hits … very even-keeled with his play personality … was voted a team captain at all three programs where he played college football … ranks top five in USC history in touchdown passes (58), despite an abbreviated stay.   WEAKNESSES: His process quickly unravels under pressure, forcing him to rush and make mistakes … uses his eyes well on some plays, then stares down targets the next … inconsistent decision-making process … fastball loses life when he can’t step in the bucket and fire … will occasionally make plays with his legs but doesn’t have the escapability or mobility to be a true threat … accounted for 31 fumbles in his career … suffered a concussion as a senior in high school and another during his freshman year at USC (September 2019), which sidelined him for one game; missed the final three games of the 2021 season with a left leg injury (November 2021); suffered another concussion at Pitt (September 2022) and missed one game; missed the final four games of his super senior season after battling several injuries, including a right shoulder issue (October 2023).   SUMMARY: A one-year starter at BYU, Slovis spent his final season in offensive coordinator Aaron Roderick’s RPO-heavy balanced scheme. He was a freshman AllAmerican at USC in 2019 (throwing to Michael Pittman Jr., Amon-Ra St. Brown and Drake London), but injuries and inconsistent play followed in two more seasons with the Trojans and one season at Pittsburgh before his final year with the Cougars (his completion percentage declined each of his five seasons). Slovis has adequate size and arm strength with toughness in the pocket and consistent ball placement when he stays in rhythm. However, h e isn’t a creator (with his arm or legs) and frequently makes stubborn decisions, despite coverage telling him to go in a different direction. Overall, Slovis has the functional skills to be a productive passer when everything around him is going right, but he didn’t put enough on tape to suggest he can elevate an offense when things fall apart around him. He is practice squad candidate who will have a chance to grow into a backup role in the NFL.   GRADE: 7th Round-Priority Free Agent
    • BTW not sure if this means much of anything but Spencer Shrader of Notre Dame is the 6th ranked kicker out of this draft in Dane Brugler's rankings. We paid big money to Matt Gay so maybe it doesn't mean much, but still notable IMO. 
    • UDFA: QB - Kedon Slovis, BYU QB - Jason Bean, Kansas K - Spencer Shrader, Notre Dame WR - Xavier White, Texas Tech  RB - Trent Pennix, North Carolina State  OG - Dalton Tucker, Marshall  DT - Isaiah Coe, Oklahoma LB - Craig Young, Kansas   Tryout: DT - Jeblonski Green, South Carolina State  TE - Malcolm Epps, Pittsburgh OT - Jake Hornirook, Duke RB - Justin Strong, Southern Illinois  LS - Michael Vinson, Notre Dame  OC - Jake Kradel, Pittsburgh  OL - Aidan Hemphill, Texas Southern  DB - Brandon Bishop, Liberty  OT - Daniel Johnson, Purdue 
    • Oh no doubt about that. I absolutely value the fact that people like Brugler, Cosell, Jeremiah, etc. actually do the work and take their job seriously. And I also agree that others do very surface level stuff(more akin to what most of us here are doing here as a hoby. Except... they get paid for it).    My angle is not exactly "everyone is the same", they are not. That's why I value extremely highly the work some do and not so much others. And I agree that just because a player doesn't hit, it doesn't mean the evaluation was faulty... or just because a player hits unexpectedly, I don't think the evaluation was necessarily faulty either. It's important to see the reasoning behind the projections and it is important to recognize the uncertainty in any projection really. IMO the uncertainty covers for a lot of shoddy "work" and rankings because a lot of talking heads can just parrot hits and omit misses. So they are not all the same, but their results might be very close to each other. Just like in the NFL - the difference between good and bad GMs in hit rate is in single digit number over the long term. You won't get one GM that hits 80% and another that hits 20%(Although... Grigson probably was close to that one).   Part of it is because the ones that don't do the work, actually copy and plagiarize the work that the great ones do... example, they will take the Jeremiah and Brugler's big boards and will mash them together and just switch a few names around, or if they have a favorite they will bump him up while dropping a specific one they don't like, but in the grand scheme of things the results wouldn't be dramatically different. So the value for me is from the actual verifiable work those people do and the way they present information. WIth people like Brugler or Cosell you can actually tell that it's them that are doing the work. They give you detailed reports on why they think what they think about those prospects. And they are almost never extreme in their opinions - i.e. "this player is trash, he would never succeed in the league". You know they actually sit down and watch those guys play and actually do scouting reports from what they see on tape, rather than from what they've heard someone else say about those players. And with Brugler, even furthermore, you see a ton of background information about those players. He's pretty much doing what scouts for the teams are doing. He's digging about the childhood and adolescence of those players, he's digging up red flags, medical information(whatever is available), etc. And he's just one person. And he's doing it for 400+ players every year. You can only respect that. And I derive a ton of more value out of it than I do out of a random pundit's QB ranking for which I probably have watched more tape than he has. 
  • Members

    • Patrick Miller

      Patrick Miller 2,028

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • BProland85

      BProland85 2,809

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • cjwhiskers

      cjwhiskers 847

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Kc77

      Kc77 3

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Tsarquise

      Tsarquise 1,236

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • r a y s k i

      r a y s k i 410

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • atapcl

      atapcl 83

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NFLfan

      NFLfan 17,441

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • runthepost

      runthepost 2,014

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • holeymoley99

      holeymoley99 2,642

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...