Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Does Luck's contract happen before the season starts?


AmberDerrow

Recommended Posts

It's a question a lot of fans are wondering... Mainly for the interest in cap space.

 

We've heard Jim Irsay talk about the potential of Luck's contract: “It’s going to be a big number. It’s going to be a shocking number, nine figures and probably a 20 (million) starting point per year, but again we will find the right number to get to.”

 

Should there be a concern for cap space? Irsay has also stated the need to make the contract "as cap friendly as it can be" but will there be enough to make a championship team?

 

 

Read more on Luck's future contract in colts.com beat writer, Kevin Bowen's, latest article: Colts Preparing For Andrew Luck's Next Contract

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Irsay needs to find a new approach to discussing the contracts of his franchise QB's.  He used to make these claims about how much he's gonna pay them, like it's something to be proud of.  Pay the least you can in a way that's cap friendly so you can build a team around him. 

 

This feels like the Manning Era 2.0 in nearly every way. 

 

Hopefully Luck looks at the last two QB's to win Super Bowls and how they approached their contracts and how it relates to team-building.  Both Manning and Brady took substantial pay cuts to allow other top players to be paid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, General_Hux said:

Irsay needs to find a new approach to discussing the contracts of his franchise QB's.  He used to make these claims about how much he's gonna pay them, like it's something to be proud of.  Pay the least you can in a way that's cap friendly so you can build a team around him. 

 

This feels like the Manning Era 2.0 in nearly every way. 

 

Hopefully Luck looks at the last two QB's to win Super Bowls and how they approached their contracts and how it relates to team-building.  Both Manning and Brady took substantial pay cuts to allow other top players to be paid. 

This is not like most of private industry where salaries are hush-hush. Luck and his agent know what others are getting paid. Low-balling would not be an effective tactic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, General_Hux said:

Irsay needs to find a new approach to discussing the contracts of his franchise QB's.  He used to make these claims about how much he's gonna pay them, like it's something to be proud of.  Pay the least you can in a way that's cap friendly so you can build a team around him. 

 

This feels like the Manning Era 2.0 in nearly every way. 

 

Hopefully Luck looks at the last two QB's to win Super Bowls and how they approached their contracts and how it relates to team-building.  Both Manning and Brady took substantial pay cuts to allow other top players to be paid. 

Restructure is not substantial pay cut.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Carlos Danger said:

I think so. It should be priority #1. Somehow failing to lock him up in the long term would be a top 5 epic sports failure of all time. 

If Luck is not signed kind of dramatic to put it in the top fails in sports history. Just saying. Maybe in Colts history but in all of sports? :dunno:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, General_Hux said:

Irsay needs to find a new approach to discussing the contracts of his franchise QB's.  He used to make these claims about how much he's gonna pay them, like it's something to be proud of.  Pay the least you can in a way that's cap friendly so you can build a team around him. 

 

This feels like the Manning Era 2.0 in nearly every way. 

 

Hopefully Luck looks at the last two QB's to win Super Bowls and how they approached their contracts and how it relates to team-building.  Both Manning and Brady took substantial pay cuts to allow other top players to be paid. 

The last two QBs that you mentioned are also towards the end of their careers, and have had many many many years of cashing very very very large paychecks.  That's a huge difference compared to a guy just starting his career and getting ready to get his first very substantial paycheck.  It's a lot easier to restructure your contract for less money when you already have $100+ mil in the bank.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ranked on their draft boards or ranked in terms of being an NFL prospect?  Yes, those aren't the same things.   In terms of NFL prospects, yes, I think all teams have pretty much the same 250 players ranked in pretty much the same order.  That's what the "Top 100 prospects means".  Its prospects.  Of course, they are more certain about the players they have ranked highly than the players they have ranked lower.  The margin of error for the lower players is higher than it is for the higher players, so there is a chance that a player with a 7th round grade by one team gets selected in the 5th round by another, over a 5th round ranking guy getting selected in the 3rd round by another.  I'd wager that teams have their top 25 ranked pretty much the same.   I'm speaking in terms of understanding the players' attributes, talents, Character risks, and abilities to play in the NFL...which is NOT the same as their draft boards...meaning who they might want to actually draft.   Draft boards would be based upon those attributes combined with the uniqueness of the teams,  So even though a team may think Marvin Harrison is the number 1 prospect, they may choose to pick their number 12 ranked prospect guy JJ McCarthy.  Knowing talent and needs, they probably have JJ higher on their Draft board than MHJ.    But no, I do not think that each team knows how the other 31 teams have their draft boards ranked, with any degree of certainty.   I think every GM had ADM ranked as a prospect the same as every other, in terms of risks, talents, etc.  The team that actually picked him has unique reasons for picking him.  And if you put almost ay other GM in the place of Ballard at the time, who understands the Colts, he would have picked ADM for the Colts too.  And they too would have felt lucky that their, say, 35th ranked prospect was still available at pick 52.  Ballard said that "nobody has any idea how this stuff plays out"  Its not my opinion to argue with.  I'm trying to help those on the forum understand what he's saying, even if it conflicts with the opinions they've held for years.       So you judge the validity of a post based upon consensus?  That's all you got?  Yeah, ok, the consensus apparently does not agree with me.  Big deal.
    • Looking forward to watching it later.  Love when the colts do this.  
    • This is going to be a fun episode!
  • Members

    • rob220

      rob220 1

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 8,352

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 19,724

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Colt Overseas

      Colt Overseas 1,332

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • legend300

      legend300 137

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtsGermany

      ColtsGermany 1,009

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CardiacColts

      CardiacColts 340

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IinD

      IinD 4,480

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Mr. Irrelevant

      Mr. Irrelevant 952

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • richard pallo

      richard pallo 9,076

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...