Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Ware and Miller


RockThatBlue

Recommended Posts

The slight difference is that this tandem plays screens, draws and the run better than the Freeney/Mathis tandem.

 

The Freeney/Mathis tandem would have been even better if we had ANY kind of push in the interior but we chose to go with small NTs/UTs and paid the price with no doubling needed in the middle and the coaches did not favors with the big whoopy cushion defense played by DBs allowing 3 step drops to flourish besides draw plays. Either provide push in the middle or play close coverage which will give time for your pass rushers to get there. I could never fathom why Dungy and Meeks wasted all those years playing passive defense that woke up thankfully for one stretch of 4 games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The slight difference is that this tandem plays screens, draws and the run better than the Freeney/Mathis tandem.

 

The Freeney/Mathis tandem would have been even better if we had ANY kind of push in the interior but we chose to go with small NTs/UTs and paid the price with no doubling needed in the middle and the coaches did not favors with the big whoopy cushion defense played by DBs allowing 3 step drops to flourish besides draw plays. Either provide push in the middle or play close coverage which will give time for your pass rushers to get there. I could never fathom why Dungy and Meeks wasted all those years playing passive defense that woke up thankfully for one stretch of 4 games.

 

Because his defense won a Superbowl without him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because his defense won a Superbowl without him.

 

My point is we would have won more SBs if we had such level of high play in the front 7 and secondary like that 4 game stretch. To me, our D never matched up well against balanced teams like the Chargers and Patriots, period, and that is why the one playoff run that Peyton and the Colts got past one, just one of them (Patriots), we won the SB. Heck, a running team like the Steelers in 2005 chose to pass on us to go up 14-0 and our D was caught like deer in the headlights before they woke up for the rest of the game. Chiefs and Ravens in 2006 were one dimensional teams too, Patriots were the only balanced team we beat.

 

Our next SB, we faced running teams in 2009 vs the Ravens and Jets, we fared well as a D against one dimensional teams. Then we went against the Saints, a balanced offense, and lost. Just goes to show you time and time again how we came up short vs balanced offensive teams, even when our team was good. The theme is striking and I feel Dungy and Meeks' schemes had as much to do as our finesse offense that suddenly became a running juggernaut when we won the SB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The slight difference is that this tandem plays screens, draws and the run better than the Freeney/Mathis tandem.

The Freeney/Mathis tandem would have been even better if we had ANY kind of push in the interior but we chose to go with small NTs/UTs and paid the price with no doubling needed in the middle and the coaches did not favors with the big whoopy cushion defense played by DBs allowing 3 step drops to flourish besides draw plays. Either provide push in the middle or play close coverage which will give time for your pass rushers to get there. I could never fathom why Dungy and Meeks wasted all those years playing passive defense that woke up thankfully for one stretch of 4 games.

True but I'm talking about their pass rush ability is similar. Ware and Millers ability to collapse the pocket reminded me of how freeney and Mathis would do the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My point is we would have won more SBs if we had such level of high play in the front 7 and secondary like that 4 game stretch. To me, our D never matched up well against balanced teams like the Chargers and Patriots, period, and that is why the one playoff run that Peyton and the Colts got past one, just one of them (Patriots), we won the SB. Heck, a running team like the Steelers in 2005 chose to pass on us to go up 14-0 and our D was caught like deer in the headlights before they woke up for the rest of the game. Chiefs and Ravens in 2006 were one dimensional teams too, Patriots were the only balanced team we beat.

Our next SB, we faced running teams in 2009 vs the Ravens and Jets, we fared well as a D against one dimensional teams. Then we went against the Saints, a balanced offense, and lost. Just goes to show you time and time again how we came up short vs balanced offensive teams, even when our team was good. The theme is striking and I feel Dungy and Meeks' schemes had as much to do as our finesse offense that suddenly became a running juggernaut when we won the SB.

Ya I just meant that Dungys' Tampa team won a SB without him and it worked. Gruden didn't do anything different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ya I just meant that Dungys' Tampa team won a SB without him and it worked. Gruden didn't do anything different.

 

Gruden opened up the offense a little more and the D had interior personnel that Dungy did not have in Indy consistently, that was the main difference for them getting over the hump. It was not a co-incidence that we won the SB once we got Booger (from Tampa) for the interior. We did not have a Derrick Brooks but we did have a Bob Sanders ala Lynch for them that got healthy at the right time and Bethea drafted at the same time to make a great safety tandem. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah the Colts didn't have a dominant D back in the days but it was good at applying pressure, forcing turnovers, and bending but not breaking.  I would take that D back in a heart beat over the one they've had in the last 3 years.  I remember there were years where they were bottom in the league at run stopping but a very good scoring D.  That being said, I do feel somewhat optimistic that this D could be ok in the future.  I really like some of the young and new talent on the DL. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which makes me wonder if our D (and O-line) issues are coaching issues....oops....just opened up a can of worms.

When Robert Mathis gets back, I hope we do him and Phillips does Ware..dont worry about pass coverage

..Penetrate on every play....disrupt...pass blitz or run blitz..just blitz..different angles

.and we'll take you out on first down...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It just seems like people have sold themselves the idea he was going to come out great this season which I think is and was completely unreasonable.   I hope to see some improvement by the end of the season, but I really don't expect a whole lot until sometime next season. AR has got so much catching up to do.   I mean, there's no doubt AR's struggles are affecting MPJ, but MPJ has never been a great separater and seeing a defender right besides MPJ is probably stopping AR from throwing his way at this point.   Also, to be clear, I'm not saying AR will DEFINITELY be great, but I do think we DEFINITELY don't know yet and people need to be a lot more patient with him.
    • They both couldn’t throw or work on footwork. To ignore this could be a possibility with AR is naive. Let’s see where he is by game 7. Especially when it looks like he went backwards  from last season.
    • Other than the fact that Luck was a proven NFL QB in his prime and that his shoulder rehab lasted 3x as long.   
    • His lack of experience was a well-known risk in drafting him and it's a big reason why some were skeptical (including me). On the flip side, it sort of seemed like people disregarded his lack of experience then in favor of things like potential and upside. But now he's struggling and it's showing. If anything, it's validated those initial concerns.   I tend to think WR drops following a QB from college to the NFL says as much about the QB as it does the pass catchers. But they need to do better. I think it will take a combination of improvements from both AR and the pass catchers.   Not sure if something is up with MPJ, but some "regression" this year was very predictable. At one point, I actually thought he might leave in FA when faced with prospect of re-signing with a run-first team and a young QB who is still learning how to throw short and intermediate passes (the area he operates). But he stayed...and I am glad he did. But if it continues, there are going to be a lot of people blaming MPJ, which is pretty ridiculous, when you think about just 6 months ago, people were talking about how great of a contract it was and that MPJ was a legit WR1 with AR.  
    • Last week,Rams home game, Sofi looked like a 49ers home game. Dallas and Vegas are that way too.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...