Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Enough of draft Luck, need to draft CB and a saftey


Recommended Posts

I'm not one to complain and I usually look at the cup half full but the Colts secondary is sub par at best. Really...

These guys are not good, miss INT's, can't tackle at all. If the Colts are going to play cover 2 or Tampa 2 and let the QB complete passes for 3-5 yards then the DB's need to tackle at the spot of completion. Too many times last night the Bucs WR made the catch and broke tackles for a bigger gain.

I don't want Luck, too much hype and too much hype means bust. (ie: Leaf and Russell come to mind)

What ever draft spot we get I would first address the secondary because right now that is the weekest part of the team. I'll give the O-line a pass since two guys went down last night but its been the same DBs for 4 weeks now and they are bad.

thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 93
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Funky is all over this..

We better forget about luck and try to get good...

We're picking up guys off the street to play in the secondary and that's why we have them 20 yards off the line of scrimmage.

Poor Jacob Lacey is overmatched against everybody

We look like Purdue in the secondary...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Totally agreed. a good CB (I've been preaching Dre Kirkpatrick for a week or so now) would move powers to the #2 CB and Lacey in the Nickel. That could actually pan out to be a formidable secondary. I hope Polian and Polian Jr. agree we need to address our secondary next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not one to complain and I usually look at the cup half full but the Colts secondary is sub par at best. Really...

These guys are not good, miss INT's, can't tackle at all. If the Colts are going to play cover 2 or Tampa 2 and let the QB complete passes for 3-5 yards then the DB's need to tackle at the spot of completion. Too many times last night the Bucs WR made the catch and broke tackles for a bigger gain.

I don't want Luck, too much hype and too much hype means bust. (ie: Leaf and Russell come to mind)

What ever draft spot we get I would first address the secondary because right now that is the weekest part of the team. I'll give the O-line a pass since two guys went down last night but its been the same DBs for 4 weeks now and they are bad.

thoughts?

If you want a DB first then we'd have to trade down out of the #1 spot....if in fact we wind up at #1. I'm assuming you meant for us to trade down because there is no way Bill Polian will spend the 1st overall pick on a CB or S.....nor does any of this year's DB crop warrant it.

It is a legitimate need and for once....I'd like to see something resembling a stellar pair of CBs in our secondary.

Side note: Comparing Luck to Leaf and Russell is way off base....he has 10X the work ethic of those two slugs combined. We may or may not select him....but I highly doubt he'll bust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you want a DB first then we'd have to trade down out of the #1 spot....if in fact we wind up at #1. I'm assuming you meant for us to trade down because there is no way Bill Polian will spend the 1st overall pick on a CB or S.....nor does any of this year's DB crop warrant it.

It is a legitimate need and for once....I'd like to see something resembling a stellar pair of CBs in our secondary.

Side note: Comparing Luck to Leaf and Russell is way off base....he has 10X the work ethic of those two slugs combined. We may or may not select him....but I highly doubt he'll bust.

'56'...we just dont know...

You can say you knew the truth..

but I was SURE Jemarcus Russell would be a star ..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you want a DB first then we'd have to trade down out of the #1 spot....if in fact we wind up at #1. I'm assuming you meant for us to trade down because there is no way Bill Polian will spend the 1st overall pick on a CB or S.....nor does any of this year's DB crop warrant it.

It is a legitimate need and for once....I'd like to see something resembling a stellar pair of CBs in our secondary.

Side note: Comparing Luck to Leaf and Russell is way off base....he has 10X the work ethic of those two slugs combined. We may or may not select him....but I highly doubt he'll bust.

I was compareing this "hype" Luck is getting to all the "hype" Leaf and Russell got when they entern the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

'56'...we just dont know...

You can say you knew the truth..

but I was SURE Jemarcus Russell would be a star ..

That means there were 2 people that thought that, you and Al Davis. Everybody else knew this guy was nothing but a heaping pile of crap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For this team, CB and safeties are second round picks and beyond. Picking as high as we are, we can get a good corner in the second round. You don't draft a safety in the first round unless he is Ed Reed or Troy Polumolu.

That first pick needs to go to a QB, DT, and then CB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For this team, CB and safeties are second round picks and beyond. Picking as high as we are, we can get a good corner in the second round. You don't draft a safety in the first round unless he is Ed Reed or Troy Polumolu.

That first pick needs to go to a QB, DT, and then CB.

This is what I keep saying. We play a zone coverage most of the time. A top CB will not make much of a difference (if any) at all. To waste a high 1st rd. pick on one would be ludicrous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree we need some better CB's. I am confused why we do not improve this position year after year. With our pass rushers, we should have some solid CB's and then it would make it so much harder for teams to pass against us. Freeney and Mathis can only do so much, put some solid CB's on the field to help these guys out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

'56'...we just dont know...

You can say you knew the truth..

but I was SURE Jemarcus Russell would be a star ..

Oh....I'm no Draft Day sage.....no one is. I was a Jarron Gilbert fan, for anyone who remembers him. He fell to the 3rd round....and apparently for good reason. No one is a draft "guru"....including the people who get paid to do the real thing.

My take on Russell at the time was....the guy could rifle the ball with the best of them, but there were fairly well-known warning signs that he was very lax on the work habits. He showed up at the combine at 270lbs.... and the red flags were there.

The last thing I'm gonna say about Andrew Luck is the 1st thing I said....if Peyton is down to 2 seasons or less, take him.....if not, then trade the pick. And among other needs....try and get an impact DB, it is said to be a pretty deep class.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What if Manning isn't the same next year and we didn't draft a QB, then we are left with Painter and who knows who else. IMO, we draft either Luck or Kellen Moore with our first pick and then in the second round we go defense. We need a QB for the future, he will need to learn the system before stepping out there on week 1 and have no clue like Collins this year. The defense can wait until the 2nd round. IMO, there won't be that many good defensive players in this draft anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What if Manning isn't the same next year and we didn't draft a QB, then we are left with Painter and who knows who else. IMO, we draft either Luck or Kellen Moore with our first pick and then in the second round we go defense. We need a QB for the future, he will need to learn the system before stepping out there on week 1 and have no clue like Collins this year. The defense can wait until the 2nd round. IMO, there won't be that many good defensive players in this draft anyway.

I know you're on the Kellen Moore guy but he will be available in the 4th or 5th rd.. The guy simply does not have good arm strength and is too short.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What if Manning isn't the same next year and we didn't draft a QB, then we are left with Painter and who knows who else. IMO, we draft either Luck or Kellen Moore with our first pick and then in the second round we go defense. We need a QB for the future, he will need to learn the system before stepping out there on week 1 and have no clue like Collins this year. The defense can wait until the 2nd round. IMO, there won't be that many good defensive players in this draft anyway.

We don't have to draft a QB in the top 5 to get someone that Peyton can groom to become an excellent QB. And I'll predict now there is NO WAY Kellen Moore goes in the first round. I think he'll fall to the 3rd round at best. He doesn't have the arm strength to make a majority of NFL type throws and he's 5'11..too many hurdles to overcome to be considered a first round pick imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is what I keep saying. We play a zone coverage most of the time. A top CB will not make much of a difference (if any) at all. To waste a high 1st rd. pick on one would be ludicrous.

I think we've seen enough of the cover 2.

We need to trend toward a base 4-3 look and get away from the same philosophy we installed when we led the league in points scored and were shattering passing records.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we've seen enough of the cover 2.

We need to trend toward a base 4-3 look and get away from the same philosophy we installed when we led the league in points scored and were shattering passing records.

I agree 100%, but until Polian is gone I don't think were going to see any scheme change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was compareing this "hype" Luck is getting to all the "hype" Leaf and Russell got when they entern the draft.

That's fair....I compared apples and oranges to what you said, my bad.

But some times the hype is actually fulfilled too. Stafford, Suh and Jake Long look like hyped up Draft Day winners.

There are good arguments on both sides....but Peyton's status and our W-L record will dictate the outcome.

For now....I'm gonna hold off on any further Luck debates until we know more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree 100%, but until Polian is gone I don't think were going to see any scheme change.

Polian is gone soon, on his own volition. I wonder if Chris Polian would be more capable in drafting and signing a different prototype?

I think there is a fear of going down that road until Manning is gone. I firmly believe that Manning's absence is a ready excuse for all shortcomings this year, and the FO will not even think to enter into drastic change until Manning is gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Manning can work with players like Collie, Garcon, White etc. if he has to he is a great QB. I would rather see all the picks used on our defense, drafting offense in the 1st round has only produced us 1 super bowl. We need more players like Freeney, Sanders (When healthy), Mathis, Bethea. I am tired of seeing us bust on picks like Brown, Gonzalez etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we've seen enough of the cover 2.

We need to trend toward a base 4-3 look and get away from the same philosophy we installed when we led the league in points scored and were shattering passing records.

I disagree...I'd prefer to see more cover 2 but less tampa 2. people say that a different scheme requires different players but the players we have now would play well in cover 2 because the colts do run some cover 2. It's the tampa 2 that's leading to all the easy over the middle completions and the lack of getting off the field on 3rd downs. When they don't drop angry pat back into deep coverage they do actually mix up the coverage between man and zone and drafting an elite CB would allow them to run man even more often.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not one to complain and I usually look at the cup half full but the Colts secondary is sub par at best. Really...

These guys are not good, miss INT's, can't tackle at all. If the Colts are going to play cover 2 or Tampa 2 and let the QB complete passes for 3-5 yards then the DB's need to tackle at the spot of completion. Too many times last night the Bucs WR made the catch and broke tackles for a bigger gain.

I don't want Luck, too much hype and too much hype means bust. (ie: Leaf and Russell come to mind)

What ever draft spot we get I would first address the secondary because right now that is the weekest part of the team. I'll give the O-line a pass since two guys went down last night but its been the same DBs for 4 weeks now and they are bad.

thoughts?

What good will it do to draft help in the secondary, when our coaches are just going to instruct them to play 10-15 yards off the ball? It's the overall scheme that sucks more so than the players playing in it in my opinion. Our secondary has gotten progressively worse each year under Coyer. This should not be surprising to anyone because that is exactly what happened to Denver while he was there. Colts need to purge themselves of this guy ASAP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don't have to draft a QB in the top 5 to get someone that Peyton can groom to become an excellent QB. And I'll predict now there is NO WAY Kellen Moore goes in the first round. I think he'll fall to the 3rd round at best. He doesn't have the arm strength to make a majority of NFL type throws and he's 5'11..too many hurdles to overcome to be considered a first round pick imo.

Jason..

There's no way Kellen Moore is not picked in the first round.

He holds every college passing record west of the Mississippi...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh....I'm no Draft Day sage.....no one is. I was a Jarron Gilbert fan, for anyone who remembers him. He fell to the 3rd round....and apparently for good reason. No one is a draft "guru"....including the people who get paid to do the real thing.

My take on Russell at the time was....the guy could rifle the ball with the best of them, but there were fairly well-known warning signs that he was very lax on the work habits. He showed up at the combine at 270lbs.... and the red flags were there.

The last thing I'm gonna say about Andrew Luck is the 1st thing I said....if Peyton is down to 2 seasons or less, take him.....if not, then trade the pick. And among other needs....try and get an impact DB, it is said to be a pretty deep class.

Sounds like the draft reports on Russell were similar to Cam Newton..right??

Egomaniac.....doesnt want to work hard. see?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not one to complain and I usually look at the cup half full but the Colts secondary is sub par at best. Really...

These guys are not good, miss INT's, can't tackle at all. If the Colts are going to play cover 2 or Tampa 2 and let the QB complete passes for 3-5 yards then the DB's need to tackle at the spot of completion. Too many times last night the Bucs WR made the catch and broke tackles for a bigger gain.

I don't want Luck, too much hype and too much hype means bust. (ie: Leaf and Russell come to mind)

What ever draft spot we get I would first address the secondary because right now that is the weekest part of the team. I'll give the O-line a pass since two guys went down last night but its been the same DBs for 4 weeks now and they are bad.

thoughts?

This is what I keep saying. We play a zone coverage most of the time. A top CB will not make much of a difference (if any) at all. To waste a high 1st rd. pick on one would be ludicrous.

Gus you draft what you need when you can....

This positional drafting is crazy...

If you need a corner (and we do).take the best on available...

Dont take a lineman when you need a corner just because you're too proud to take a corner in the first round...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have to draft Luck if we get the first pick. If he pans out to have great potential after playing under Manning for two years you then could trade Manning to another team for some good picks or trades. Its a business, don't forget that. The 49ners and Green Bay both axed their franchise quarterbacks and they still had excellent teams. But if Luck turns out to be mediocre than of course you trade him away or keep him as a backup with a lower salary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jason..

There's no way Kellen Moore is not picked in the first round.

He holds every college passing record west of the Mississippi...

lol...we'll see. ;) college passing records mean very little, especially when you're constantly playing the poor quality opponent that Boise State plays year in and year out. I have nothing personal against the guy and in fact he seems like the kind of guy you want to root for...but imo he's nothing more than a decent backup in the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless Mannings career is over we would be dumb to spend a #1 overall on a QB - so I agree enough of the Luck talk! If he can come back he still has 4-5 years left in him!

We need to improve on D and on the Oline!

I am truelly baffled how anyone can think that in year 4 or 5 Peyton would be a better option over a younger better QB in Luck? Green Bay showed how to handle it, and if the Colts are smart they follow their pattern. You draft Luck, he takes the 2012, 2013 and maybe 2014, but the Peyton era is coming to a close and people need to wake up to that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Does anybody know what happened to or became of Princeton? I used to enjoy his "everything will be alright" comment.
    • Wilt dominated Bill Russell when they played, what Boston fans don't comprehend for some reason is, the Celtics had all the best players on their team other than players like West, Baylor, and Robertson. Outside of that the league had a bunch of MEH players back then except on Boston. Boston had Cousy, Havlicek, Sam Jones, Tom Heinsohn, and KC Jones besides Russell. Russell could get away with playing a bad game on occasion because Havlicek or Sam Jones or even Heinsohn could go for 25 and they would still win. Cousy wasn't a great shooter but was a great Assist guy and would just run that team like a great QB does.   Bill Simmons has Bill Russell as the 2nd greatest player ever, that is what ruins his list and I agree with a lot of his rankings. Loved his book and love his knowledge on ranking players but his Russell ranking is simply because he is from Boston. No way in hell is Bill Russell the 2nd greatest player of all-time. He had too many offensive deficiencies to be that. To me Larry Bird was the better player compared to Bill Russell.    Simmons top 10 updated: 1. Michael Jordan 2. Bill Russell 3. LeBron James 4. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar 5. Magic Johnson 6. Larry Bird 7. Wilt Chamberlain  8. Tim Duncan 9. Kobe Bryant  10. Jerry West   Mine is: 1. Michael Jordan (we agree)   2. Magic Johnson   3. LeBron James (we agree)   4. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar (we agree)   5. Kobe Bryant   6. Larry Bird (we agree)   7. Wilt Chamberlain (we agree)   8. Steph Curry - Bill has Curry 15th.   9. Shaq O'Neal - Bill has Shaq 13th.   10. Bill Russell - yes, he makes my top 10, great defensive player, great rebounder, a good scorer but not a dominant scorer and a winner. His 11 championships can be viewed in a lot of different ways compared to how players won theirs in the 80's-up until now. 11 is 11 though so a top 10 list without him would not like right.   He had West and Duncan in his top 10 - I don't. I have Shaq and Curry instead. To me Shaq was more dominant at his peak than Duncan was, and Curry changed the game with his 3-point shooting. Shaq is the only player in NBA history other than Michael Jordan to win 3 straight Finals MVP's (2000-2002), he has to be top 10. I never thought I would see a better shooter than Reggie Miller, then Steph entered the building. Steph also does have 4 championships, a Finals MVP, and 2 League MVP's + he has the most 3 pointers made in NBA history.
    • Caitlin Clark 1 Angel Reese 0. Fever beat Sky 71-70. You lose Angel Reese. 
    • I'm all for doubling down and going EDGE in the 1st again. Just got to make sure we get the right one. Depending on where we draft, I'm okay with trading up a couple of picks to snatch the better pass rusher of the bunch. Since there will be a good amount of rushers, I hear, let's go get the better one. I can also see the draft being the opposite as this years. Most teams will go defense now in this draft, and very good offensive players fall. I think we are perfect on offense, that's why I'm okay with trading up to get the guy we need on defense.
  • Members

    • RollerColt

      RollerColt 12,588

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • twfish

      twfish 1,945

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DEColtsLover36

      DEColtsLover36 2,111

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Hooch

      Hooch 3

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TheNewGuy

      TheNewGuy 52

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Knuckles79

      Knuckles79 244

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Shepman

      Shepman 401

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • HoosierHero

      HoosierHero 199

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • cdgacoltsfan

      cdgacoltsfan 4,312

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 19,915

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...