-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
-
Thread of the Week
-
Topics
-
Posts
-
I think the whole issue is providing a bit of cover for ARs performance, or at least the passing games' performance. An assumption that JT busts off a 20 yard chunk play that the passing game can't produce (or GB having to account for that possibility), and its somehow Shane's fault for seeing that opportunity and not having JT in there. IMO, when a team is not getting chunk plays it needs, its not a RB issue, its a QB issue. That's why some of the intensity of this argument is really just to deflect blame away from AR and try and place it one step higher. JMO.
-
I don't know what being on board with the extension means, its not very revealing. I'm not commenting on Shane's like for JT, I think he's just fine with JT as his RB. I just mean that from a team politics point of view, the new HC can't make his first major decision saying he doesn't want to extend the team's only star. So I'm not surprised he said that he was on board with it. Again, no sarcasm in that from me because he probably is fine with JT, I'm just looking at it from how it would look if the coach said anything else other than being on board.
-
By OLD FAN MAN · Posted
imo shane tends to over manage at times, just let them play basic football
-
-
Members
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now