Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Should we go RB in the 4th ??


Recommended Posts

Just now, LJpalmbeacher2 said:

Are there any above average ones left? I would have loved Harris from Bama but the cheater nabbed him before our pick. :yuk:

I hate when teams you hate draft guys you want.

yeah that was a strange move on there part. i mean they have Sony why get another RB so high up

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dexter Williams from Notre Dame would fit the team nicely. 

 

I think the best running backs on the board are Ryquell Armstead, Justice Hill, and Rodney Anderson, but they are kind of redundant when we already have Marlon Mack. Plus Rodney Anderson's injury history is concerning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Bluefire4 said:

Dexter Williams from Notre Dame would fit the team nicely. 

 

I think the best running backs on the board are Ryquell Armstead, Justice Hill, and Rodney Anderson, but they are kind of redundant when we already have Marlon Mack. Plus Rodney Anderson's injury history is concerning.

I’d hoped for Montgomery but would really like to add Williams to the backfield.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bennie Snell at RB ?

 

I also think we need to get some developmental OL going with a few of these picks

 

I dont think Gardner or Hooker will make it to our picks, but I think both could contribute right away.

 

I really thought Butler WR would be picked by now...... I bet he goes in next 10 picks

 

Wren may be a possibility

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Like i said, theres no purpose to a 84, 95, etc cuz you are looking at that uni every week. The Colts, thankfully, havent ruined the logo by updating (dolphins, jets, ) or change color schemes every other year, or doing the predictable black uni thing.  You actually have to go back to a 1956 year to actually get a “throwback”, or significant difference. And acknowledge Baltimore?  Why?  Because they treat the team so well now?  To heck with Baltimore.  They werent interested in this one once, and now They have a new team.   The Colts are in Indy.  They dont “belong” to Indy.... merely based there.  Like basically every team except the Packers i guess.   Im in Pa, a couple hours from Baltimore.  I could have got a divorce, and switched to the ravens and been at every home game , but ............. NAH..... i have too much history and, well, just no.  Never even a debate of Ravens, steelers, or eagles. I’m a Colt till death.  Maybe beyond if Shirley McClaine knows anything.      
    • Pascal has not exactly played well as the number 3 receiver.  It would be great if Campbell could make it back. 
    • Color Rush jerseys are absolutely fabulous.  Need to be worn multiple times a season and definitely in the Super Bowl when we go back.  We’ve never won the big game in our blue jerseys.  The Color Rush will be the ones to finally get it done.
    • No problem, my alma mater is an FCS school that made the playoffs the last 2 playoffs for the first times in 30 years.    And with regards to final point. The first round, is based on teams that are close to each other. Like for example. My school, Missouri State faced Tennessee-Martin as they were close to each other. They look at all the playoff teams that are not seeded and assign two teams that are one different conferences (unless they didn't play that year, then they can be assigned) and two close to the other team. They will not have a CA team play a SC team for example. Then the second round they assign the games before round 1. They do this to save the money. 
    • It just seems kind of clumsy and orchestrated. If you are going to do a 1956 throwback, actually do it with the players that were on the team. Acknowledge they were the Baltimore Colts at that time, not the generic “ Colts .”  Don’t put modern day players into old throwback films that were doctored. It’s not about splitting team history, it’s about getting NFL history correct.  I can’t certainly speak for Indy, but I think most fans would rather have an 84 ,95 , or 06 throwback , rather than a 1956 one they know nothing of. I’m not counting some of you guys because I know you know Colts history, but probably most fans.   
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...