BlueShoe Posted December 30, 2017 Share Posted December 30, 2017 Having a great quarterback (and protecting him) is the most important ingredient to being successful. The next best ingredient is to apply pressure on the opposing quarterback. The tables below really puts things into perspective. Inside linebackers the Colts have drafted over the past 7 years: http://footballdungeon.com/indianapolis-colts/ Year OVR RD Player Position College Rank 2017 161 5 Anthony Walker Jr. ILB Northwestern 141 2016 125 4 Antonio Morrison ILB Florida 129 2015 207 6 Amarlo Herrera ILB Georgia 260 2014 203 6 Andrew Jackson ILB Western Kentucky 194 2010 63 2 Pat Angerer ILB Iowa 101 Edge rushers the Colts have drafted over the past 7 years: Year OVR RD Player Position College Rank 2017 80 3 Tarell Basham EDGE Ohio 76 2016 239 7 Trevor Bates EDGE Maine 298 2014 166 5 Jonathan Newsome EDGE Ball State 170 2013 24 1 Bjoern Werner EDGE Florida State 25 2012 214 7 Tim Fugger EDGE Vanderbilt 255 2010 31 1 Jerry Hughes EDGE TCU 35 We traded away the only player we actually hit on (Jerry Hughes). It's too soon to know much about Anthony Walker or Tarell Basham, but our last 7 years of drafting linebackers is absolutely horrid! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DougDew Posted December 30, 2017 Share Posted December 30, 2017 We had Mathis at EDGE for a lot of those years so the need for a high draft pick wasn't there, and recent drafts really haven't aligned talent with our draft position. But as far as ILB, I don't think we know what we're doing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueShoe Posted December 30, 2017 Author Share Posted December 30, 2017 36 minutes ago, DougDew said: We had Mathis at EDGE for a lot of those years so the need for a high draft pick wasn't there, and recent drafts really haven't aligned talent with our draft position. But as far as ILB, I don't think we know what we're doing. I cannot give the Colts a pass because of Robert Mathis. He was getting old in 2010, and we needed to replace both him and Freeney. Mathis had a couple of good years left, but we needed to find replacements. Everybody on the boards knew it. We have failed to replace either of them, and we have had 7 years to accomplish the task. I don't think the Colts have had any idea what to do at linebacker, ever since Clay Matthews was taken out from underneath us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DougDew Posted December 30, 2017 Share Posted December 30, 2017 1 minute ago, BlueShoe said: I cannot give the Colts a pass because of Robert Mathis. He was getting old in 2010, and we knew we needed to replace both him and Freeney. Everybody on the boards knew it. We have failed to replace either of them, and we have had 7 years to accomplish the task. I don't think the Colts have had any idea what to do at linebacker, ever since Clay Matthews was taking out from underneath us. I guess the draft after Werner I see as the need to give Werner a chance. If you draft another EDGE high after you drafted Werner, then you're giving up on Werner. Maybe we should have, but I can see the logic in not investing back to back high draft picks, especially when the other OLB is more of a SAM and not a rusher. ILB we have never drafted very highly, and Angerer was a Tampa 2 guy to begin with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueShoe Posted December 30, 2017 Author Share Posted December 30, 2017 8 minutes ago, DougDew said: I guess the draft after Werner I see as the need to give Werner a chance. If you draft another EDGE high after you drafted Werner, then you're giving up on Werner. Maybe we should have, but I can see the logic in not investing back to back high draft picks, especially when the other OLB is more of a SAM and not a rusher. ILB we have never drafted very highly, and Angerer was a Tampa 2 guy to begin with. I liked Angerer, and even met him once. He was excited about playing in the 3-4, and I think he would have played inside well (a lot better than others following him). I don't believe you ever stop looking for EDGE rushers. Look at Denver. They have Von Miller, and they're still drafting pass rushers. That's why they play great defense. I am not going to give the Colts front office(s) any passes on this. They have failed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DougDew Posted December 30, 2017 Share Posted December 30, 2017 Just now, BlueShoe said: I liked Angerer, and even met him once. He was excited about playing in the 3-4, and I think he would have played inside well (a lot better than others following him). I don't think you ever stop looking for EDGE rushers. Look at Denver. They have Von Miller, and they're still drafting pass rushers. That's why they play great defense. I am not going to give the Colts front office(s) any passes on this. They have failed. No passes either, but others will put up the same investment in OL. I'd put up the same problem with our drafting of WRs, nobody to complement TY. Me thinks we will be drafting LBs this spring. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueShoe Posted December 30, 2017 Author Share Posted December 30, 2017 2 minutes ago, DougDew said: No passes either, but others will put up the same investment in OL. I'd put up the same problem with our drafting of WRs, nobody to complement TY. Me thinks we will be drafting LBs this spring. I agree. In my mind, a GM must put the majority of his resources into protecting the quarterback and hitting the opposing quarterback. I wouldn't blame Ballard if he spent every pick for the next 3 seasons on drafting nothing but offensive linemen and pass rushers. If we can block for Andrew and frustrate the opposing quarterback then we will win a lot of games. That might seem a little extreme, but it is true, nonetheless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nesjan3 Posted December 31, 2017 Share Posted December 31, 2017 43 minutes ago, BlueShoe said: Having a great quarterback (and protecting him) is the most important ingredient to being successful. The next best ingredient is to apply pressure on the opposing quarterback. The tables below really puts things into perspective. Inside linebackers the Colts have drafted over the past 7 years: http://footballdungeon.com/indianapolis-colts/ Year OVR RD Player Position College Rank 2017 161 5 Anthony Walker Jr. ILB Northwestern 141 2016 125 4 Antonio Morrison ILB Florida 129 2015 207 6 Amarlo Herrera ILB Georgia 260 2014 203 6 Andrew Jackson ILB Western Kentucky 194 2010 63 2 Pat Angerer ILB Iowa 101 Edge rushers the Colts have drafted over the past 7 years: Year OVR RD Player Position College Rank 2017 80 3 Tarell Basham EDGE Ohio 76 2016 239 7 Trevor Bates EDGE Maine 298 2014 166 5 Jonathan Newsome EDGE Ball State 170 2013 24 1 Bjoern Werner EDGE Florida State 25 2012 214 7 Tim Fugger EDGE Vanderbilt 255 2010 31 1 Jerry Hughes EDGE TCU 35 We traded away the only player we actually hit on (Jerry Hughes). It's too soon to know much about Anthony Walker or Tarell Basham, but our last 7 years of drafting linebackers is absolutely horrid! Ugh yeah looking at these charts we have not had much success drafting linebackers at all. Hopefully Ballard can turn this pattern around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
superrep1967 Posted December 31, 2017 Share Posted December 31, 2017 1 hour ago, DougDew said: We had Mathis at EDGE for a lot of those years so the need for a high draft pick wasn't there, and recent drafts really haven't aligned talent with our draft position. But as far as ILB, I don't think we know what we're doing. We drafted Werner in the 1st round Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smonroe Posted December 31, 2017 Share Posted December 31, 2017 56 minutes ago, BlueShoe said: I agree. In my mind, a GM must put the majority of his resources into protecting the quarterback and hitting the opposing quarterback. I wouldn't blame Ballard if he spent every pick for the next 3 seasons on drafting nothing but offensive linemen and pass rushers. If we can block for Andrew and frustrate the opposing quarterback then we will win a lot of games. That might seem a little extreme, but it is true, nonetheless. Thats not extreme, that’s common football sense. Not saying it’s easy to find those guys, but a smart GM wouldn’t stop trying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Four2itus Posted December 31, 2017 Share Posted December 31, 2017 We really have not valued the LB position in Indy for decades. The Steelers, Pats, and Ravens have taken a different tack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Two_pound Posted December 31, 2017 Share Posted December 31, 2017 Exactly, Four2itus, and why is that, we have been drafting db's instead of front 7 players four years. And I will repeat it again, it doesn't matter who is in your secondary if your front 7 can't stop the run or get to the passer. Now we did a lot better job stopping the run this year than recent years. And that was mostly because of Hankins, Woods, Anderson, Ridgeway, even Hunt played half decent this year. Just no pressure on the qb. Does anyone realize Walden had 11.5 sacks last year and Sheard only managed 4.5 this year. Time to cut him, he go back to where he came from. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OLD FAN MAN Posted December 31, 2017 Share Posted December 31, 2017 2 hours ago, BlueShoe said: I agree. In my mind, a GM must put the majority of his resources into protecting the quarterback and hitting the opposing quarterback. I wouldn't blame Ballard if he spent every pick for the next 3 seasons on drafting nothing but offensive linemen and pass rushers. If we can block for Andrew and frustrate the opposing quarterback then we will win a lot of games. That might seem a little extreme, but it is true, nonetheless. i concur Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LockeDown Posted December 31, 2017 Share Posted December 31, 2017 With the 3rd pick, if Ballard truly grabs best available, it will be hard not to pick Barkley after what I just saw in their bowl game. I am all in on Chub or Key, but that RB is everything they say. You felt like he could win the game anytime he wanted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OLD FAN MAN Posted December 31, 2017 Share Posted December 31, 2017 1 hour ago, Smonroe said: Thats not extreme, that’s common football sense. Not saying it’s easy to find those guys, but a smart GM wouldn’t stop trying. hard to find 3-4 linebackers i agree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#12. Posted December 31, 2017 Share Posted December 31, 2017 57 minutes ago, LockeDown said: With the 3rd pick, if Ballard truly grabs best available, it will be hard not to pick Barkley after what I just saw in their bowl game. I am all in on Chub or Key, but that RB is everything they say. You felt like he could win the game anytime he wanted. Imagine what a good OC like McDaniels could do with Barkley(and Mack). You want to talk about having to defend every blade of grass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaredfor3 Posted December 31, 2017 Share Posted December 31, 2017 If we keep the third pick, I am fine with DE/LB Bradley Chubb or RB Saquon Barkley. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jdubu Posted December 31, 2017 Share Posted December 31, 2017 11 hours ago, LockeDown said: With the 3rd pick, if Ballard truly grabs best available, it will be hard not to pick Barkley after what I just saw in their bowl game. I am all in on Chub or Key, but that RB is everything they say. You felt like he could win the game anytime he wanted. The one standout thing I can say about Barkley is he didn’t have to play in this game but he wanted to play in this game and help his team. He risked injury and draft position (money) to play the game and play hard. That’s a trait that gets overlooked these days with athletes playing it safe in their last year and especially in the last game knowing he is a top draft pick already. It’s just hard to justify picking a RB at #3 when there is equal talent at the other positions we really need as well. DE/LB, OT, G. Let’s hope some WR’s come into the combine and a few more QB’s make a push towards the top of the draft and maybe we can move back 2-5 spots and still get a huge difference maker plus more picks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LockeDown Posted December 31, 2017 Share Posted December 31, 2017 2 hours ago, Jdubu said: The one standout thing I can say about Barkley is he didn’t have to play in this game but he wanted to play in this game and help his team. He risked injury and draft position (money) to play the game and play hard. That’s a trait that gets overlooked these days with athletes playing it safe in their last year and especially in the last game knowing he is a top draft pick already. It’s just hard to justify picking a RB at #3 when there is equal talent at the other positions we really need as well. DE/LB, OT, G. Let’s hope some WR’s come into the combine and a few more QB’s make a push towards the top of the draft and maybe we can move back 2-5 spots and still get a huge difference maker plus more picks. Totally agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now