Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Players Ruled Out for Preseason Opener


Bluefire4

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Coltsman1788 said:

Don't put words in my mouth about Luck.  I didn't say anything about Andrew Luck did I?  Now if this season and in subsequent seasons he shows a propensity to be unable to stay on the field then the question will likely arise as to his durability and whether or not it has anything to do with what happened to last him last year.  But we certainly aren't there yet and hopefully won't have to engage in that conversation if all goes well. 

 

Dorsett's situation is distinguishable from Luck's as I'm using Dorsett's last three years because they show a recent trend since his injury which includes the two seasons immediately following.  He got hurt during his junior year so I'm interested in his reliability from that point onward. Since that time he has missed at least 33% of his team's games in 2 out of the past 3 seasons which is at least cause for some concern.  Dorsett has the burden of proof to show that he can stay on the field over the course of a NFL season.  Until he shows otherwise...his reliability is suspect in my opinion. 

Did I say you said andrew luck? Was there any mention that you said that in my post? I made a comparison. You can't cherry pick things to your liking because it confirms what you beleive especially when the facts disprove you. @BCoop is right on in his post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't been able to figure out how to start my own thread yet as a new member, so I decided to ask on this thread. Does anyone know if the Colts app will have a radio feed for the game? I see it has the game center with a play-by-play and chat, but I'll be working and can't get the game on the radio due to freakn PowerLines lines over the building. I have tried tunein radio before but that sucks, so any help where I can listen on my android would be appreciated!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Coltsman1788 said:

 

 

So in other words, in 2 out of his last 3 seasons starting with his junior year at the U, Dorsett has missed at least a third of his team's games. He missed 42% of his team's games in his junior season at Miami and then roughly 33% of his rookie NFL season.   I'd say that is justifiable reason for me to have some trepidation in regards to his durability/availability particularly when Grigson invested a first rounder on the guy.  Then he injured himself again earlier in this off season.  Fortunately, he seems to have bounced back from that.  But yeah...based on the above I'm surprised and pleased that he wasn't on the no play list for today.  Hopefully, it's just that he hit a rough stretch over the last three years but I have concerns about his durability until he shows me he can keep himself healthy and available for 16 games. 

 He broke his leg last year. Not like it was a soft tissue injury that was reoccurring. Perhaps we have a different definition of injury prone and that's fine. He's played in 84% of his games over the last 5 years. He missed games with a MCL and broken leg, not ongoing year after year nagging injuries. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, NaptownClown said:

I haven't been able to figure out how to start my own thread yet as a new member, so I decided to ask on this thread. Does anyone know if the Colts app will have a radio feed for the game? I see it has the game center with a play-by-play and chat, but I'll be working and can't get the game on the radio due to freakn PowerLines lines over the building. I have tried tunein radio before but that sucks, so any help where I can listen on my android would be appreciated!

I do not believe there is an option on the app, I heart radio might be a good option?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, twfish said:

Did I say you said andrew luck? Was there any mention that you said that in my post? I made a comparison. You can't cherry pick things to your liking because it confirms what you beleive especially when the facts disprove you. @BCoop is right on in his post.

 

The problem with the cherry picking argument is that it can make you blind to identifying potential negative trends.  At some point, negative trends must have a starting point.  Why would I be concerned with any of Dorsett's pre-injury years?  If Dorsett was healthy there is no issue or concern about his durability.  The question only arises after he has had a significant injury.  In Dorsett's case that was during his junior year.  We only have three years to go on since that time.  The thing with statistics is that they can be used to say what you want.   @BCoop used  the overall percentage of total games played over that  3 year period to make his argument stronger.  I choose to break it down by year to support mine and found that in 2 of those 3 years Dorsett did not suit up for at least 33% of the season.    In essence, we both presented the statistics in the light which  best supported the points we wanted to make. 

 

Your attempted Luck comparison could have been worded better to show that you were offering it as your own comparison and not making it seem as if I called Luck's durability into question.  That aside...your comparison wasn't relevant as Luck was only injured last season and has not played any subsequent seasons.  Unlike Dorsett, who has had two additional seasons since his initial injury during his junior year.  I think you brought up Luck's name and tried to associate my criticism of Dorsett to him  because you know that any perceived criticism of Luck around here usually generates a negative response.  But that comparison wasn't warranted.  Hence my need to post what I did on that.

 

Listen, at the end of the day...I want the Dorsett on the field and am hoping that he is a valued contributor for years to come. I just have my concerns. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Larry Horseman said:

 He broke his leg last year. Not like it was a soft tissue injury that was reoccurring. Perhaps we have a different definition of injury prone and that's fine. He's played in 84% of his games over the last 5 years. He missed games with a MCL and broken leg, not ongoing year after year nagging injuries. 

 

Ok I  give you that his injuries have not been of the re-occuring nagging variety...thank God for that at least.  But yet it still seems to be something going wrong with this guy.  MCL, broken leg; and whatever else it was that had him missing time at the beginning of the off-season...I'm beginning to lose track. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Coltsman1788 said:

 

Ok I  give you that his injuries have not been of the re-occuring nagging variety...thank God for that at least.  But yet it still seems to be something going wrong with this guy.  MCL, broken leg; and whatever else it was that had him missing time at the beginning of the off-season...I'm beginning to lose track. 

 

He tweaked his hamstring in OTAs but didn't miss any time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Smonroe said:

Luck, Gore and Mathis out.  Going to be a very ugly game.  

Not really.  Pretty suRe they will all make the team.  No need to play them 

 

Tolzien  is better than you think.  The RB 2-4 is still up for grabs.   Very smart IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Smonroe said:

Luck, Gore and Mathis out.  Going to be a very ugly game.  

Wouldn't hurt to get in a little work.  Coaches complain about the lack of physical practices but turn around and sit guys in preseason.  Like a couple series is too much work?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Coltfreak said:

Not really.  Pretty suRe they will all make the team.  No need to play them 

 

Tolzien  is better than you think.  The RB 2-4 is still up for grabs.   Very smart IMO

 

Yeah, they all have fair shots to make the team.  Kind of glad Luck isn't playing, Rex is crazy.

 

Anxious to see Rogers and the new LBs.  Oline too, of course.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Wow!    You're on fire today.   Post after post that are classically you.  Only you have these views.   That’s why these posts are so easy to remember for years.   I’m struggling to find anything to agree with.   Not that you’d care what my opinion is.  I just couldn’t help but finally respond today.   Sorry. 
    • Great interview!!   Both the Colts 1st round and 2nd round picks fell right in to their laps!!   Preparation + luck are equal parts of the equation!!
    • 84th percentile against man, 83d percentile against press... 
    • I think you're working from some assumptions that I don't agree with. First, it seems like you believe "the system" produces 32 relatively equal draft boards, and it's pretty obvious that's not the case. Second, it seems like you believe that if a team picks a player in the 4th round, that means they must have had a 4th round grade on him, otherwise they would have drafted him earlier.   It's possible that a team feels more strongly about a player than other teams. They could have Player X as their 30th player, and Player Y as their 35th player. The team is on the clock at #40, both players are still on the board, the team takes Player X. A few picks go by, Player Y is still on the board, they start trying to move up from wherever they sit in the next round, but a trade isn't coming together. They wind up staying put, and are able to draft Player Y -- their 35th ranked prospect -- at #75 or whatever. They had a high 2nd round grade on him, and got him in the middle of the third. Maybe they'd felt like they got lucky because things went their way. But drafting him in the third round doesn't mean they only viewed him as a third round prospect; what would make that scenario possible is the fact that every team works from their own board, and there are major variances from team to team. 
    • I doubt that. The reason is because not a single WR was selected the rest of the 2nd round, as borne out by how that 2nd round went. So any other GM still chose not to draft a single WR in round 2after the AD pick (either felt they didn't need one or had already gotten one), so your statement is not supported by how things played out. Whether it was Ballard at 52 or Ballard at 56 that he traded down to, he would have still found AD as value and pulled the trigger, is my contention. All GM boards are not created equal, so you can't broad brush there.
  • Members

    • Catloaf

      Catloaf 408

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 21,256

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ShuteAt168

      ShuteAt168 973

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • chad72

      chad72 18,306

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CR91

      CR91 12,716

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • SOMDColtsfan

      SOMDColtsfan 417

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Clem-Dog

      Clem-Dog 155

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndyD4U

      IndyD4U 1,434

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Mikemccoy84

      Mikemccoy84 95

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Chucklez

      Chucklez 1,046

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...